The Clinical Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes: Focus on the Long-Acting Analogs

Tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg versus injectable semaglutide 0.5 mg for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg with subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 mg as second-line treatment for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, after metformin monotherapy, using adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (aITCs).

METHODS

The aITCs were performed using the Bucher method to compare the relative efficacy and safety of tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg versus semaglutide 0.5 mg via a common comparator (subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg) based on trial results from SURPASS-2 (NCT03987919) and SUSTAIN7 (NCT02648204).

RESULTS

All tirzepatide doses showed statistically significantly greater reductions in glycated haemoglobin, body weight and body mass index from baseline to week 40, with a comparable adverse event (AE) profile and no statistically significant differences in the odds of gastrointestinal AEs versus semaglutide 0.5 mg. Furthermore, all tirzepatide doses showed greater odds of patients achieving HbA1c targets of ≤ 6.5 % (≤48 mmol/mol) and < 7.0 % (<53 mmol/mol) and weight loss targets of ≥ 5 % and ≥ 10 %, versus semaglutide 0.5 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

In these aITCs, glycated haemoglobin and weight reductions were significantly greater for all tirzepatide doses versus semaglutide 0.5 mg with a comparable AE profile. These findings provide comparative effectiveness insights in the absence of a head-to-head clinical trial.

Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide 7 and 14 mg, the only orally delivered glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist tablet approved for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

METHODS

Search several databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of oral semaglutide in patients with T2DM from inception through May 31, 2021. The primary outcomes included change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body weight. Risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the outcomes.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 11 RCTs with a total of 9821 patients. Compared with placebo, semaglutide 7 and 14 mg reduced HbA1c by 1.06% (95% CI, 0.81-1.30) and 1.10% (95% CI, 0.88-1.31), respectively. While in comparison with other antidiabetic agents, semaglutide 7 and 14 mg reduced HbA1c by 0.26% (95% CI, 0.15-0.38) and 0.38% (95%CI, 0.31-0.45). Both doses of semaglutide could significantly reduce body weight. Semaglutide 14 mg did increase the incidence of medication discontinuation and gastrointestinal events (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea).

CONCLUSION

Once-daily semaglutide 7 and 14 mg can significantly lowered HbA1c and body weight in patients with T2DM, and this effect increases with dose. Significantly, more gastrointestinal events occurred with semaglutide 14 mg.

Gastrointestinal disorders potentially associated with Semaglutide: an analysis from the Eudravigilance Database

BACKGROUND

Semaglutide is a Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist used in the second-line treatment of poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and can be used in monotherapy or associated with other oral antidiabetics or even insulin, increasing the effectiveness of the treatment. This work aims to analyze the profile of adverse drug reactions reported for semaglutide in Eudravigilance.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data on Individual Cases Safety Reports were obtained from the database of the centralized European spontaneous reporting system Eudravigilance by accessing www.adrreports.eu. (1 December 2021).

RESULTS

It is possible to observe a high prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders (N = 3502, 53.2%). The most severe reported cases were primarily gastrointestinal disorders, metabolic, and nutritional disorders, eye disorders, renal and urinary disorders and cardiac disorders, with an evident higher prevalence of adverse gastrointestinal events both in oral and injectable dosage form (N = 133, 50.0% vs N = 588, 47.2%, respectively). Through a comparative analysis, semaglutide had a greater number of reported gastrointestinal adverse events compared to sitagliptin and empaglifozin (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Semaglutide has a good safety profile, however the definition of subgroups within the type 2 diabetes population who are particularly prone to develop serious adverse event when treated with GLP-1 RAs is crucial.

The Roles of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) Inhibitors in Decreasing the Occurrence of Adverse Cardiorenal Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder characterized by increased serum glucose due to errors in insulin production or response. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus has continued to rise globally over the years, with roughly 7079 persons per 100,000 expected to be impacted by 2030. A vast number of patients with diabetes mellitus experience unfavorable side effects such as weight gain, hypoglycemia, and hepatorenal toxicity from the several diabetic medications available. These adverse effects may result in life-threatening consequences with a high likelihood of occurrence; therefore, ongoing efforts continue to develop medications with improved tolerability and better glycemic control. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are examples of new innovative targeted therapies to manage diabetes mellitus and potentially improve cardiorenal conditions. This review article details the specific mechanisms of action, potential side effects, and cardiorenal benefits of GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i therapies to fully understand their roles in combating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).

Anti-inflammatory effect of glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonist on the neurosensory retina in an acute optic nerve injury rat model

PURPOSE

To explore the possibility of using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) as a new treatment for neuroinflammation, by analyzing retinal pathological changes in an optic nerve crush rat model.

METHODS

Eight-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into lixisenatide (LIX, n = 10), traumatic control (T-CON, n = 10), and normal control (n = 5) groups. The optic nerves of left eyes in the LIX and T-CON groups were crushed in a standardized manner. The LIX group was treated with subcutaneous injections of lixisenatide (200 μg/kg/day) for 5 days. One week after initiating treatment, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry analyses were performed on the retinal tissues of each group to identify inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

The LIX group showed significantly lower mRNA levels of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), thioredoxin interacting protein (TXNIP), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) than the T-CON group. Also, the LIX group exhibited decreased TXNIP and GFAP expression compared with the T-CON group, and similar expression to the normal control group, according to Western blot analysis. Significantly increased immunohistochemistry staining of Brn3a and decreased TUNEL staining were seen in the LIX group compared with the T-CON group, indicating that lixisenatide contributes to retinal ganglion cell survival in cases of acute optic nerve injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuroinflammation was significantly reduced in lixisenatide-treated retinas compared with untreated retinas in our acute optic nerve injury rat model. The neuroprotective effect of lixisenatide indicates that it can serve a new treatment option against clinically intractable traumatic optic neuropathy.

Effect of once-weekly semaglutide versus thrice-daily insulin aspart, both as add-on to metformin and optimized insulin glargine treatment in participants with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 11): A randomized, open-label, multinational, phase 3b trial

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide versus thrice-daily (TID) insulin aspart (IAsp) in participants with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with insulin glargine (IGlar) and metformin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SUSTAIN 11 (NCT03689374) was a randomized (1:1), parallel, open-label, multinational, phase 3b trial. After a 12-week run-in to optimize once-daily IGlar U100, 1748 adults with T2D (HbA1c >7.5% to ≤10.0%) were randomized to OW semaglutide or TID IAsp as add-on to optimized IGlar and metformin for 52 weeks. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from randomization to week 52. Confirmatory secondary endpoints included the occurrence of severe hypoglycaemic episodes and change in body weight (BW). Safety was assessed.

RESULTS

HbA1c (randomization: 8.6% [70.0 mmol/mol]) decreased by 1.5% points (16.6 mmol/mol) and 1.2% points (13.4 mmol/mol) with semaglutide (n = 874) and IAsp (n = 874), respectively (estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0.29% points [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.38; -0.20]; P < .0001 for non-inferiority). Few severe hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded in either group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. Change in BW from randomization (87.9 kg) to week 52 was in favour of semaglutide (-4.1 kg) versus IAsp (+2.8 kg) (ETD -6.99 kg [95% CI -7.41; -6.57]). A higher proportion of participants experienced adverse events with semaglutide (58.5%) versus IAsp (52.1%); most were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

In this basal insulin-treated population, OW semaglutide improved glycaemic control to a greater extent than TID IAsp and provided numerically greater weight loss.

Novel glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue exhibits potency-driven G-protein biased agonism with promising effects on diabetes and diabetic dry eye syndrome

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are considered as effective treatments for type 2 diabetes. Here, we describe the in vitro characteristics and in vivo anti-diabetic efficacies of a novel GLP-1RA, termed SM102. The in vitro functions of SM102, including GLP-1R kinetic binding parameter, cAMP activation, endocytosis and recycling, were all evaluated using the INS-1 832/13 cells expressing human GLP-1R. Chronic efficacies study was performed to evaluate the effects of SM102 on the glycemic benefits, body weight loss and other diabetic complications in db/db mice. As a result, SM102 exhibited enhanced binding affinity and potency-driven bias in favor of cAMP over GLP-1R endocytosis and β-Arrestin 2 recruitment, as well as comparable insulin secretory response compared with Semaglutide. In addition, chronic treatment of SM102 led to more promising therapeutical effects on hyperglycemia, weight control and insulin resistance as well as dry eye syndrome (DES) than Semaglutide. Furthermore, SM102 could ameliorate diabetic DES via improving antioxidant properties, inflammatory factors and inhibiting MAPKs pathway in diabetic mice. In conclusion, SM102 is a G protein-biased agonist serving as a promising new GLP-1RA for treating diabetes and diabetic complications.

Therapeutic peptides: current applications and future directions

Peptide drug development has made great progress in the last decade thanks to new production, modification, and analytic technologies. Peptides have been produced and modified using both chemical and biological methods, together with novel design and delivery strategies, which have helped to overcome the inherent drawbacks of peptides and have allowed the continued advancement of this field. A wide variety of natural and modified peptides have been obtained and studied, covering multiple therapeutic areas. This review summarizes the efforts and achievements in peptide drug discovery, production, and modification, and their current applications. We also discuss the value and challenges associated with future developments in therapeutic peptides.

Beneficial effects of liraglutide on peripheral blood vessels

Background/Aim. Macroangiopathy is the major cause of death and disability in type 2 diabetic patients. Studies have shown that liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, can protect cardiovascular system by inhibiting chronic inflammation of diabetes. However, a study about the effects of liraglutide on peripheral blood vessels and peripheral blood leukocytes has not been reported yet. The aim of this study was to determine vasculoprotective effect, vascular protection and mechanism of action of liraglutide in addition to its hypoglycemic effect. Methods. A total of 60 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited from December 2013 to December 2014 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, PR China. Before the treatment with liraglutide, height and weight were measured to calculate body mass index (BMI). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and so on were detected. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and islet ? cell function (HOMA-?) were computed. After applying liraglutide for three months, all indexes were measured again. The effects of liraglutide on these indexes were analyzed by paired sample t-test. Results. After the treatment with liraglutide, values of glycosylated hemoglobin ? HbA1c (8.46 ? 1.62 vs. 7.26 ? 1.40%) and 2h postprandial blood glucose ? 2hPBG (11.95 vs. 9.6 mmol/L) decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Body weight (87.3 vs. 82.5 kg) and BMI (30.37 vs. 28.63 kg/m2) decreased by 5.5% and 5.7%, respectively (p < 0.05). Also, levels of triglycerides (TG) (2.57 ? 1.54 vs. 1.81 ? 0.70 mmol/L) and LDL-cholesterol (2.92 ? 0.78 vs. 1.89 ? 0.66 mmol/L) reduced significantly (p < 0.05). Ankle-brachial index (ABI) decreased from 1.24 ? 0.10 to 1.14 ? 0.06 cm/s by 8%, while brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (ba-PWV) decreased from 1,442.15 ? 196.26 to 1,316.85 ? 146.63 cm/s by 8.7%, and both differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Liraglutide, with a good hypoglycemic effect, can significantly reduce postprandial blood glucose and HbA1c, but cannot significantly improve fasting plasma glucose, insulin resistance and islet ? cell function. It also considerably decreased body weight, BMI and TG. Liraglutide can significantly lower ba-PWV and ABI to protect peripheral blood vessels.

Effects of efpeglenatide versus liraglutide on gastric emptying, glucose metabolism and beta-cell function in people with type 2 diabetes: an exploratory, randomized phase Ib study

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the effects of efpeglenatide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), on gastric emptying, glucose metabolism, and islet beta-cell function versus liraglutide and placebo in people with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This phase Ib study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02059564) randomized participants (n=47) to three cohorts. Within the first two cohorts, participants were randomized to placebo, efpeglenatide 6 mg weekly (QW; first cohort), or efpeglenatide 16 mg monthly (QM; second cohort). The third cohort received liraglutide 1.8 mg daily (QD). Gastric emptying was assessed through the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of acetaminophen at baseline and steady state. Glucose metabolism and beta-cell function were assessed based on mixed-meal tolerance testing and a graded glucose infusion procedure.

RESULTS

Treatment duration was approximately 3 months for efpeglenatide 16 mg QM and 1 month for efpeglenatide 6 mg QW and liraglutide. At peak drug concentrations, efpeglenatide 6 mg QW was non-inferior to liraglutide 1.8 mg QD in delaying gastric emptying, as assessed by acetaminophen PK (lower bound of 90% CI for the efpeglenatide:liraglutide ratio >0.8 for area under the curve (AUC)_0-120, AUC_0-180, AUC_0-360 and maximum concentration (C_max)). Efpeglenatide 16 mg QM did not decrease the rate of gastric emptying to as great an extent as liraglutide (ie, non-inferiority was not shown). Compared with liraglutide, both efpeglenatide dosing regimens demonstrated comparable or more favorable glucometabolic effects and improved beta-cell function. All gastrointestinal adverse events reported with efpeglenatide were mild or moderate in severity and transient over treatment and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The glucometabolic effects of efpeglenatide 6 mg QW and 16 mg QM were comparable to liraglutide. Additional studies are necessary to further examine these benefits of efpeglenatide.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02059564.

Management of type 2 diabetes with oral semaglutide: Practical guidance for pharmacists

PURPOSE

To provide pharmacists with information on counseling patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving oral semaglutide.

SUMMARY

Oral semaglutide, the first oral glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), was approved for the treatment of adults with T2D by the US Food and Drug Administration in September 2019. Semaglutide has been coformulated with the absorption enhancer sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate to improve bioavailability of semaglutide following oral administration. Oral semaglutide has been shown to have efficacy and safety profiles similar to those of other GLP-1RAs. Many patients with T2D have a complex oral medication regimen to manage their T2D and concomitant chronic comorbid conditions. Therefore, it is important that patients follow the dose administration instructions closely: oral semaglutide should be taken on an empty stomach upon waking with a sip (≤120 mL) of plain water and at least 30 minutes before the first food, beverage, or other oral medications of the day. The most common adverse effects of oral semaglutide are gastrointestinal (typically nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting). It is important for pharmacists to counsel patients prescribed oral semaglutide about optimal oral dosing, why correct dosing conditions are necessary, expected therapeutic response, and effective strategies to mitigate potential gastrointestinal adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Information and practical strategies provided by pharmacists may facilitate initiation and maintenance of oral semaglutide therapy and ensure that each patient achieves an optimal therapeutic response.

Optimizing Therapeutic Outcomes With Oral Semaglutide: A Patient-Centered Approach

In September 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved oral semaglutide as the first orally administered glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist for treating people with type 2 diabetes. Although injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists are well-established treatment options for people with type 2 diabetes, clinical experience with an oral formulation in this class is limited. This article provides practical guidance for diabetes care and education specialists on how to effectively counsel patients initiating therapy with oral semaglutide on appropriate administration of the treatment and its possible effects on glycemic control, body weight, and quality of life. Strategies for mitigating potential side effects typical of the GLP-1 receptor agonist class, namely nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, are also provided. Involving patients in treatment decisions and educating them about available and prescribed medications are key strategies for encouraging treatment adherence and ensuring optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Cardiovascular safety outcomes of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which in turn is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes has been investigated in CV outcomes trials (CVOTs). This review aims to help pharmacists and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) gain a better understanding of such CVOTs in T2D with a primary focus on the once-weekly (QW) GLP-1 RAs.

METHODS

This narrative review mainly focuses on the evaluation of the similarities and differences in the design and results of CVOTs involving currently approved and marketed QW GLP-1 RAs-semaglutide subcutaneous, exenatide extended-release (ER) and dulaglutide. Results from CVOTs of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are also included.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Three CVOTs of QW GLP-1 RAs were identified for inclusion in this review: SUSTAIN 6 (semaglutide), EXSCEL (exenatide ER) and REWIND (dulaglutide), all of which varied in terms of trial design, patient demographics and other baseline characteristics. Results from these CVOTs demonstrated the CV safety of QW GLP-1 RAs compared with standard of care. Additionally, CV and renal benefits were demonstrated for semaglutide and dulaglutide, but not for exenatide ER. The CV safety of four DPP4is and three SGLT2is was demonstrated. None of the DPP4is had a CV or renal benefit, whereas all three SGLT2is were associated with CV and renal benefits.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This article provides an overview of the results from QW GLP-1 RA CVOTs, including the recently published results for dulaglutide, and places them within the broader T2D treatment landscape to help HCPs make informed decisions in daily practice. The QW GLP-1 RAs with benefits reaching beyond glycaemic control can provide a comprehensive treatment option for people with T2D at high risk of CVD, with CVD or chronic kidney disease.

Rapid selection of a novel GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonist with prolonged glycemic control and weight loss in rodent animals

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) co-agonists have emerged as treatment options for reversing diabetes and obesity. Here, we screened the high potency receptor-biased GLP-1R agonists via a newly designed high-throughput GLP-1R extracellular domain (ECD)-based system and demonstrated its in vitro and in vivo therapeutic characters.

METHODS

Twelve 9-mer peptides (named XEL1-XEL12) which were screened from a large phage-displayed peptide library were fused to the N-terminus of GIP (3-30) to generate another twelve fusion peptides, termed XEL13-24. Using the six lysine-altered XEL17 as leading sequences, eighteen fatty chain modified fusion peptides were further assessed via in vitro GLP-1R/GIPR-based cell assay. Moreover, the acute and long-acting in vivo effects of selected candidate on diabetic db/db mice and diet-induced obesity (DIO) rats were both carefully evaluated.

RESULTS

XEL17 exhibited balanced activation potency on GLP-1R/GIPR in stable cell lines, and further assessment was performed to evaluate the XEL32, a fatty chain modified XEL17 derivative. Preclinical pharmacodynamic results in diabetic db/db mice demonstrated that XEL32 held outstanding insulinotropic and glucose-lowering activities. In addition, protracted antidiabetic effects of XEL32 were also proved by the hypoglycemic test and multiple oral glucose tolerance test. Furthermore, chronic treatment of XEL32 in DIO rats exhibited outstanding beneficial effects on body weight control, fat loss, food intake control, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) reduction as well as the glucose tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

XEL32, as a novel GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonist, may supply efficient glycemic control and weight loss.

Semaglutide attenuates excessive exercise-induced myocardial injury through inhibiting oxidative stress and inflammation in rats

AIMS

To investigate the protective effects and mechanism of semaglutide on exercise-induced myocardial injury.

MAIN METHODS

Effects of semaglutide on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced oxidative stress injuries and inflammatory response were assessed in H9c2 cell via MTT assay and Western blot. Quiet control group, over training group and three doses of semaglutide treated overtraining groups were subjected to the swimming training with increasing load for consecutive 10 weeks. Immediately after the last training, the body weight, myocardial morphological changes, injury markers and inflammatory response related proteins of the model rats were analyzed.

KEY FINDINGS

Semaglutide at three concentrations in LPS treated H9c2 cells significantly increased the survival rate and inhibited the apoptosis of cardiomyocytes. Moreover, semaglutide activated AMPK pathway, improve autophagy and inhibited reactive oxygen species production in LPS treated H9C2 cells. In vivo results further revealed that chronic treatment of semaglutide induced significant increase in myocardial injury markers. The pathological histology analysis results showed that semaglutide ameliorated myocardial morphological changes, reduced area of lipid accumulation and significantly decreased the expression levels of NF-κB, TNF-α and IL-1β.

SIGNIFICANCE

Semaglutide exert the protective effects on exercise-induced cardiomyopathy by activating AMPK pathway, increasing autophagy, reducing the production of ROS and inflammation-related proteins.

Once-Weekly Efpeglenatide Dose-Range Effects on Glycemic Control and Body Weight in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin or Drug Naive, Referenced to Liraglutide

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-weekly efpeglenatide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), in early type 2 diabetes (T2D) (drug naive or on metformin monotherapy).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

EXCEED 203 was a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-ranging study of efpeglenatide once weekly referenced to open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg (exploratory analysis). Participants, ∼90% on metformin monotherapy, were randomized to one of five efpeglenatide doses (0.3, 1, 2, 3, or 4 mg q.w.; n = 181), placebo (n = 37), or liraglutide (≤1.8 mg daily; n = 36). The primary efficacy end point was change in HbA_1c from baseline to week 13.

RESULTS

From a baseline HbA_1c of 7.7-8.0% (61.0-63.9 mmol/mol), all efpeglenatide doses ≥1 mg significantly reduced HbA_1c versus placebo (placebo-adjusted least squares [LS] mean changes 0.6-1.2%, P < 0.05 for all) to a final HbA_1c of 6.3-6.8% (45.4-50.6 mmol/mol); masked efpeglenatide 4 mg was noninferior to open-label liraglutide. Greater proportions treated with efpeglenatide ≥1 mg than placebo achieved HbA_1c <7% (61-72% vs. 24%, P < 0.05 for all), and greater reductions in body weight were observed with efpeglenatide 3 and 4 mg versus placebo (placebo-adjusted LS mean differences -1.4 and -2.0 kg, respectively, P < 0.05 for both). Rates of nausea and vomiting were consistent with other GLP-1 RAs and rapidly subsided after the initial 2 weeks. No neutralizing antibodies were detected with efpeglenatide.

CONCLUSIONS

Efpeglenatide once weekly led to significant reductions in HbA_1c and weight, with a safety profile consistent with the GLP-1 RA class in patients with early T2D mostly on metformin monotherapy.

Rationale for a titratable fixed-ratio co-formulation of a basal insulin analog and a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Achieving and maintaining recommended glycemic targets, including those for glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1C), is key to improving outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). As fasting plasma glucose and postprandial glucose contribute to overall A1C, targeting both is essential for sustaining glycemic control.

METHODS

This review examines the complementary mechanisms of action of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and basal insulin; they both enhance glucose-stimulated insulin release and suppress glucagon secretion. GLP-1 receptor agonists also slow gastric emptying and increase satiety.

RESULTS

Adding a GLP-1 receptor agonist to therapy with a basal insulin analog has been associated with improved overall glycemic control, with comparable risk of hypoglycemia and no weight gain. Titratable fixed-ratio co-formulations of basal insulin and a GLP-1 receptor agonist have been shown to improve glycemic control, with less complex dosing schedules, possibly increasing treatment adherence. The slow titration of fixed-ratio co-formulations has been shown to reduce the occurrence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse events associated with the use of a separate GLP-1 receptor agonist. Titratable fixed-ratio co-formulations also mitigate insulin-associated weight gain, and show a comparable risk of hypoglycemia to basal insulin use alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of titratable fixed-ratio co-formulations have been demonstrated for insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine/lixisenatide in the DUAL and LixiLan trials, respectively, in both insulin-naive and -experienced patients. Titratable fixed-ratio co-formulations represent an attractive treatment option for many patients with T2D.