2
|
Beato-Víbora PI, Chico A, Moreno-Fernandez J, Bellido-Castañeda V, Nattero-Chávez L, Picón-César MJ, Martínez-Brocca MA, Giménez-Álvarez M, Aguilera-Hurtado E, Climent-Biescas E, Azriel-Mir S, Rebollo-Román Á, Yoldi-Vergara C, Pazos-Couselo M, Alonso-Carril N, Quirós C. A Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of the Benefits of Two Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems in Glucose Control and Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Real-world Setting. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:216-224. [PMID: 37948469 DOI: 10.2337/dc23-1355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Advanced hybrid closed-loop systems (AHCL) have been shown to improve glycemic control and patient-reported outcomes in type 1 diabetes. The aim was to analyze the outcomes of two commercially available AHCL in real life. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A prospective study was performed, including adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes, AHCL naïve, from 14 centers, who initiated the use of MM780G with SmartGuard or Tandem t:slimX2 with Control-IQ. Baseline and 3-month evaluations were performed, assessing HbA1c, time in different glycemic ranges, and patient-reported outcomes. The primary outcome was the between-group time in range 70-180 mg/dL difference from beginning to end of follow-up. RESULTS One hundred fifty participants were included, with 75 initiating each system (age: 39.9 ± 11.4 years [16-72]; 64% female; diabetes duration: 21.6 ± 11.9 years). Time in range increased from 61.53 ± 14.01% to 76.17 ± 9.48% (P < 0.001), with no between-group differences (P = 0.591). HbA1c decreased by 0.56% (95% CI 0.44%, 0.68%) (6 mmol/mol, 95% CI 5, 7) (P < 0.001), from 7.43 ± 1.07% to 6.88 ± 0.60% (58 ± 12 to 52 ± 7 mmol/mol) in the MM780G group, and from 7.14 ± 0.70% to 6.56 ± 0.53% (55 ± 8 to 48 ± 6 mmol/mol) in the Control-IQ group (both P < 0.001 to baseline, P = 0.819 between groups). No superiority of one AHCL over the other regarding fear of hypoglycemia or quality of life was found. Improvement in diabetes-related distress was higher in Control-IQ users (P = 0.012). Sleep quality was improved (PSQI: from 6.94 ± 4.06 to 6.06 ± 4.05, P = 0.004), without differences between systems. Experience with AHCL, evaluated by the INSPIRE measures, exceeded the expectations. CONCLUSIONS The two AHCL provide significant improvement in glucose control and satisfaction, with no superiority of one AHCL over the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Chico
- Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Carmen Quirós
- Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Bannuru RR, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Ekhlaspour L, Hilliard ME, Johnson EL, Khunti K, Lingvay I, Matfin G, McCoy RG, Perry ML, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:S126-S144. [PMID: 38078575 PMCID: PMC10725813 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-s007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
4
|
Benhamou PY, Adenis A, Lablanche S, Franc S, Amadou C, Penfornis A, Kariyawasam D, Beltrand J, Charpentier G. First Generation of a Modular Interoperable Closed-Loop System for Automated Insulin Delivery in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Lessons From Trials and Real-Life Data. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:1433-1439. [PMID: 37449762 PMCID: PMC10658690 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231186976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND DBLG1 (Diabeloop Generation 1) stands as one of the five commercially available closed-loop solution worldwide for patients with type 1 diabetes as of 2023. Our aim was to provide an overview of all data obtained with this system regarding outcomes and populations, with an emphasis on interoperability. METHODS This report includes all available sources of data (three randomized control trials and five surveys on real-life data). Collection ran from March 3, 2017 to April 30, 2022. RESULTS We gathered data from 6859 adult patients treated with closed-loop from three to 12 months. Overall, all sources of data showed that time in range (TIR) 70 to 180 mg/dL, starting from 47.4% to 56.6%, improved from 12.2 to 17.3 percentage points. Time in hypoglycemia was reduced by 48% in average (range: 26%-70%) and reached a level of 1.3% in the largest and most recent cohort. In patients with excessive time in hypoglycemia at baseline (≥5%), closed-loop allowed a reduction in time below range (TBR) by 59%. The comparison of days with declared physical activity versus days without physical activity did not show differences in TBR. The improvement in TIR observed with three different pump systems (Vicentra Kaleido, n = 117; Sooil Dana-I, n = 84; and Roche Insight, n = 6684) ranged from 15.4 to 17.3 percentage points. DISCUSSION These data obtained in different European countries were consistent throughout all reports, showing that this closed-loop system is efficient (high improvement in TIR), safe (remarkably low level of TBR), and interoperable (three pump settings so far).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Yves Benhamou
- Department of Endocrinology, Grenoble
University Hospital, Grenoble Alpes University, INSERM U1055, Laboratory of
Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics, Grenoble, France
- Endocrinology, Centre Hospitalier
Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Sandrine Lablanche
- Department of Endocrinology, Grenoble
University Hospital, Grenoble Alpes University, INSERM U1055, Laboratory of
Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics, Grenoble, France
| | - Sylvia Franc
- Center for Study and Research for
Improvement of the Treatment of Diabetes, Bioparc-Genopole Evry-Corbeil, Evry,
France
- Department of Diabetes and
Endocrinology, Sud-Francilien Hospital, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
- Department of Endocrinology,
Diabetology & Metabolic Diseases, Sud-Francilien Hospital, Paris-Saclay
University, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - Coralie Amadou
- Department of Endocrinology,
Diabetology & Metabolic Diseases, Sud-Francilien Hospital, Paris-Saclay
University, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - Alfred Penfornis
- Department of Endocrinology,
Diabetology & Metabolic Diseases, Sud-Francilien Hospital, Paris-Saclay
University, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - Dulanjalee Kariyawasam
- Paediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology,
Gynaecology Department, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, Assistance
Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris-Centre, Paris, France
- Paris Cite University, Paris,
France
| | - Jacques Beltrand
- Paediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology,
Gynaecology Department, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, Assistance
Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris-Centre, Paris, France
- Paris Cite University, Paris,
France
| | - Guillaume Charpentier
- Center for Study and Research for
Improvement of the Treatment of Diabetes, Bioparc-Genopole Evry-Corbeil, Evry,
France
- Department of Diabetes and
Endocrinology, Sud-Francilien Hospital, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| |
Collapse
|