Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: early experience

Kidney morcellation in laparoscopic nephrectomy for tumor: recommendations for specimen sampling and pathologic tumor staging

Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a novel approach for small renal tumors in selected patients; however, removal of the kidney through the small laparoscopic abdominal wall incision site requires the kidney to be morcellated into small fragments while still in situ. Morcellation presents two problems for the pathologist. First, guidelines for optimal sampling of morcellated fragments have not been described. Second, morcellation precludes complete pTNM tumor staging, in particular, tumor size, margins, and renal vein involvement. Based on our initial experience with 23 laparoscopic nephrectomies/nephroureterectomies (13 clinically suspected neoplasms, confirmed pathologically as renal cell carcinoma [RCC, n = 7], urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis [n = 3], angiomyolipoma [n = 1], and cystic nephroma [n = 1], and 10 clinically benign entities) and a conservative statistical model, we present a decision analysis model of various specimen sampling protocols that optimize cost, labor, or time to diagnosis (single vs sequential sampling). Using the tumor-to-kidney volume ratio (TKR), calculated from preoperative radiologic imaging and specimen gross weight, several specimen sampling algorithms were compared. For the average situation in which TKR is > or =0.15, the algorithm that most significantly optimizes cost and labor is one that initially samples 5% of the morcellated specimen. However, additional sampling may be required in one fourth of the cases. The optimal amount of sampled tissue may indeed be less than 5% because this assumes no suspicious tissue is grossly visible and in all our cases of RCC grossly visible tumor was identified. Additional nomograms for a spectrum of TKR, sampling success, and cost are presented to allow pathologists their own discretion in determining optimal sampling of the morcellated kidney. Tumor staging is severely limited by morcellation. Tumor size, renal capsule involvement, and renal vein involvement cannot be fully pathologically evaluated for RCC, whereas invasion cannot be definitively assessed for urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. Knowledge of the radiologic features (lesion size, capsule, and vein involvement) is important in sampling and staging morcellated kidneys removed laparoscopically.

Management of small renal tumors: an overview

The incidental finding of a small renal mass poses a therapeutic dilemma. The traditional treatment of clinically important masses has been radical nephrectomy. Recently, nephron-sparing surgery has emerged as a viable alternative; and experimental minimally invasive percutaneous tissue ablation techniques, including cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation, are being evaluated. In this review, we discuss the dilemma posed by frequent renal imaging and the increased proportion of incidental tumors being detected, the limitations of needle biopsies for histologic diagnosis, nephron-conserving and minimally invasive surgery, and the possible merits of radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy. We envision a defined role for minimally invasive percutaneous or extracorporeal ablation of small renal tumors.

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a five-year experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with small renal cell carcinoma by comparing the clinical results of patients treated laparoscopically with those of patients treated with traditional open radical nephrectomy.

METHODS

Of 100 patients with localized, small (less than 5 cm in diameter) renal cell carcinoma treated by the same surgical team between 1992 and 1998, 60 patients underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and 40 underwent open radical nephrectomy. Of the 60 laparoscopically treated patients, the first 11 and the most recent 34 patients were operated on transperitoneally and the other 15 retroperitoneally.

RESULTS

The mean operative time of the laparoscopically treated patients was longer than that of the open nephrectomy patients (5.2 versus 3.3 hours, P<0.001). The mean blood loss of the laparoscopically treated patients was less than that of the open nephrectomy patients (255 versus 512 mL, P<0.001). One laparoscopically treated patient needed conversion to open surgery. The time to full convalescence of the laparoscopically treated patients was shorter than that of the open nephrectomy patients (23 versus 57 days, P<0.001). Two of the 59 laparoscopically treated patients and 1 of the 40 open nephrectomy patients had metastatic disease. The former 2 are alive with stable disease and the latter died of progressive disease 11 months after surgery. The 5-year disease-free rate was 95.5% in laparoscopy patients and 97.5% in open nephrectomy patients (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a less invasive alternative to open surgery for patients with localized small renal cell carcinoma.

Laparoscopic evaluation of indeterminate renal cysts

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic evaluation of indeterminate renal cysts.

METHODS

Ten patients with indeterminate renal cysts (5 Bosniak type II and 5 Bosniak type III) underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic aspiration of cyst fluid for cytologic analysis with examination, biopsy, and excision of the cyst wall and base.

RESULTS

All procedures were successful and without complications. All the lesions were benign.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic evaluation of indeterminate renal cysts is safe and effective. The procedure alleviates patient anxiety about the nature of the lesion and obviates years of radiologic surveillance, thus reducing costs.