Laparoscopic adrenalectomy via the retroperitoneal approach: first five cases

Clinical outcomes and learning curve of a laparoscopic adrenalectomy in 103 consecutive cases at a single institute

OBJECTIVE

We examined the clinical outcomes and the learning curve for a laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in 103 consecutive cases performed by three surgeons at our institute, according to the type of adrenal disorder.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and three patients with adrenal tumors, including 38 cases of primary aldosteronism, 33 cases of Cushing syndrome (including preclinical Cushing syndrome), 15 cases of pheochromocytoma, and nine cases of non-functioning adenoma were evaluated, while focusing on the approaches, intraoperative and postoperative data, and the learning curve of LA, according the type of adrenal disorder.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the operation time, estimated blood loss, incidence of conversion to open surgery and blood transfusion, or postoperative recovery among the patients treated by LA for aldosteronoma, Cushing adenoma, pheochromocytoma, and non-functioning adenoma. In the cases of aldosteronoma and Cushing adenoma, the learning curve for the operation time and blood loss in each operator tended to decrease as the number of operations increased. On the other hand, in the cases treated by LA for pheochromocytoma, no trends in either the operation time or blood loss were observed. However, there has been neither any conversion to open surgery nor blood transfusion in cases treated by LA since 1998 (our 42nd case), even after the changes in the operators.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results clearly indicate that LA is becoming safer than before, probably due to improvements in the technique, education, and training of surgeons, in addition to the increased number of cases now treated by LA.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: morbidity compared with adrenalectomy for tumors of other pathology

PURPOSE

We report our experience with laparoscopic adrenalectomy in nine patients with pheochromocytoma and compare the morbidity with that of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for tumors of other pathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1997 and November 1999, nine patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for pheochromocytoma via a transperitoneal approach. Of the patients, eight had solitary tumors, and one presented with bilateral pheochromocytomas. The mean size of the tumors was 5.4 cm. The surgical outcomes of the 9 patients were compared with those of 28 patients with adrenal tumors of other pathology (primary aldosteronism in 15 patients, Cushing syndrome in 6, and nonfunctioning adenoma in 7) who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy during the same period. The mean size of the adrenal tumors of other pathology was 2.4 cm.

RESULTS

In eight of the nine patients with pheochromocytoma, laparoscopic adrenalectomy was successful. The procedure was converted to open surgery in the patient with bilateral tumors because of uncontrollable hemorrhage. A hypertensive crisis with the systolic blood pressure >200 mm Hg occurred in 6 patients (67%), but the episode could be controlled by temporary discontinuation of tumor manipulation, administration of drugs, or both. In adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma, the mean operative time was longer (199 v 177 minutes) and the mean estimated blood loss was greater (360 v 54 mL) than for tumors of other pathology. Blood transfusion was given to two patients with pheochromocytoma but to no patient with tumors of other pathology. The patients with adrenal tumors of other pathology could resume normal activity earlier (mean 18 v 26 days) than those with pheochromocytoma.

CONCLUSION

The operation is more difficult and the morbidity is higher in laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma than that for tumors of other pathology. An experienced team of surgeons with advanced laparoscopic skills and anesthesiologists is mandatory. In large tumors, great caution should be taken for intraoperative complications. Nevertheless, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is not contraindicated for pheochromocytoma and can be performed safely.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: comparison with open adrenalectomy and comparison of laparoscopic surgery for pheochromocytoma versus other adrenal tumors

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma with that of conventional open adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma and laparoscopic surgery for other adrenal tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with adrenal tumors, including 10 cases of pheochromocytoma, 18 cases of Cushing's syndrome, 20 cases of primary aldosteronism, and 6 cases of nonfunctioning tumors, were evaluated. A historical group of 7 consecutive patients who underwent conventional open adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma was also studied.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma was successful in 9 of the 10 patients. There was no difference in tumor size, operation time, estimated blood loss, or occurrence of hypertensive episodes during surgery between patients treated with laparoscopic procedures and those treated with open surgery. However, the number of days to first postoperative oral feeding and first ambulation, length of hospitalization, and number of patients requiring parenteral analgesics were significantly smaller after laparoscopic surgery than after open surgery. There was no significant difference in operation time, estimated blood loss, incidence of intraoperative complications, or postoperative recovery between patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma and those who underwent laparoscopic surgery for other adrenal lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy does not increase the specific risks associated with surgery for pheochromocytoma. It is a minimally invasive alternative to conventional open adrenalectomy.

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a five-year experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with small renal cell carcinoma by comparing the clinical results of patients treated laparoscopically with those of patients treated with traditional open radical nephrectomy.

METHODS

Of 100 patients with localized, small (less than 5 cm in diameter) renal cell carcinoma treated by the same surgical team between 1992 and 1998, 60 patients underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and 40 underwent open radical nephrectomy. Of the 60 laparoscopically treated patients, the first 11 and the most recent 34 patients were operated on transperitoneally and the other 15 retroperitoneally.

RESULTS

The mean operative time of the laparoscopically treated patients was longer than that of the open nephrectomy patients (5.2 versus 3.3 hours, P<0.001). The mean blood loss of the laparoscopically treated patients was less than that of the open nephrectomy patients (255 versus 512 mL, P<0.001). One laparoscopically treated patient needed conversion to open surgery. The time to full convalescence of the laparoscopically treated patients was shorter than that of the open nephrectomy patients (23 versus 57 days, P<0.001). Two of the 59 laparoscopically treated patients and 1 of the 40 open nephrectomy patients had metastatic disease. The former 2 are alive with stable disease and the latter died of progressive disease 11 months after surgery. The 5-year disease-free rate was 95.5% in laparoscopy patients and 97.5% in open nephrectomy patients (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a less invasive alternative to open surgery for patients with localized small renal cell carcinoma.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the preferred choice? A comparison to open adrenalectomy

PURPOSE

We compare the effectiveness and efficiency of laparoscopic adrenalectomy to open surgical management of adrenal disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective comparison was undertaken of 21 patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy between April 1996 and May 1997 with 17 patients who underwent open adrenalectomy between October 1994 and January 1996. Any patient suspected of having primary adrenal carcinoma and/or an adrenal lesion larger than 6 cm. was excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Patient demographics were matched well. Mean laparoscopic surgical time was 79 minutes longer than for open surgery. After overcoming the learning curve, the surgical time decreased by 59 minutes in the last 10 laparoscopic adrenalectomies. All laparoscopic intraoperative complications were managed without the need for open surgical conversion. Postoperative characteristics demonstrated significant benefits in the laparoscopic group (p=0.001) with respect to days to return to full diet (1.7 versus 4.6), analgesic pain requirements and days of hospitalization (2.7 versus 6.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy offers significant postoperative benefits to patients with benign adrenal disease requiring surgical intervention. The surgical time is longer than that for open adrenalectomy but there was an encouraging reduction in time after overcoming the laparoscopic learning curve. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is an excellent choice for tumors smaller than 6 cm. Its role for larger lesions and/or primary adrenal carcinoma is currently under investigation.

Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: experience in 100 patients

Between July 1992 and October 1996, 100 transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomies were performed on 99 patients at our hospital and affiliated hospitals. The clinical diagnoses were primary aldosteronism (41 patients), Cushing's syndrome (15), pre-Cushing's syndrome (6), pheochromocytoma (7; 8 adrenal glands), adrenal cancer (2), nonfunctioning adenoma (22), myelolipoma (3), and complicated adrenal cyst (3). Ninety-seven glands were removed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 240 +/- 76 (SD) minutes and the mean blood loss 68 +/- 80 mL for the series. The mean blood was 77 +/- 113 mL when the three operations that were converted to open surgery are included. The mean times for the return to a normal diet and unassisted ambulation were 1.3 +/- 0.6 and 1.4 +/- 0.8 days, respectively. The mean duration of the use of analgesics was 1.5 +/- 1.3 days, including the day of surgery. In contrast, in the latest 10 open adrenalectomies done at Kyoto University Hospital, the mean operative time was 186 +/- 53 minutes and the mean blood loss 220 +/- 170 mL. The mean times for return to a normal diet and for unassisted ambulation and the mean duration of the use of analgesics were 1.9 +/- 0.3, 2.9 +/- 1.1, and 2.9 +/- 1.7 days, respectively. Thirty-six operations, excluding one converted to open surgery, performed at Kyoto University Hospital were selected to look at the learning curve for transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy and evaluated for operative time and blood loss. The mean operative time and mean blood loss in the first 10 procedures performed at Kyoto University Hospital were 256 +/- 63 minutes and 89 +/- 57 mL; however, these values were reduced to 177 +/- 39 minutes and 48 +/- 32 mL in the next 10 procedures at the same hospital. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy via the transperitoneal anterior approach can be equivalent to open adrenalectomy in efficiency with a shorter convalescence.