Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: an outpatient procedure

Initial results of endourological treatment of renoureteral lithiasis by means of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous surgery in an outpatient procedure in a tertiary care center

OBJECTIVE

Urinary lithiasis is a prevalent disease with a high socioeconomic impact, where endourological surgery has shown excellent results with minimal complications. For its part, outpatient surgery is an efficient, safe and quality care model. We present our experience in the outpatient endourological treatment of lithiasis and a review of the main series.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective analysis of 85 flexible or percutaneous procedures for the treatment of lithiasis, carried out in our center between January 2021 and April 2022. The main objective was to analyze the rate of unplanned admission and the success and incidence of complications as secondary objectives. The patients were selected following the inclusion criteria of the care process.

RESULTS

The mean age was 56 ± 14 years. Urine culture was positive in 13.9% of the patients, 38% had a pre-surgical double-J catheter. Median stone surface was 55 mm 2 (961 ± 323 Hounsfield Units). 73 flexible and 12 percutaneous procedures were performed. 8 patients required immediate unplanned admission and another 2 during the first month. 94% were stone-free at the third month. No intraoperative complications were detected, although 16.5% of the patients presented some type of postoperative complication.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, with a strict selection of patients and following a care process with multidisciplinary participation, endourological procedures are feasible and safe in the outpatient setting. Periodic monitoring of the results is essential for the sake of a constant improvement of the process.

The Feasibility of Pop-Dusting Using High-Power Laser (2 J × 50 Hz) in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones: Retrospective Single-Center Experience

Objective: Recently, retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using laser lithotripsy has become popular. However, the optimal laser energy setting for pop-dusting has not been established. In this study, we report our experiences of RIRS using the high-power (up to 100 W) pop-dusting (HPPD) technique. Methods: This study retrospectively assessed 82 cases with RIRS using HPPD. Patients who underwent abdominal CT or mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) diuretic renal scan at 3 months postoperatively were included in this study. Patient and stone characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Results: The average number of renal stones was 3.67 ± 4.11, and the average length of the largest stones was 13.30 ± 6.41 mm. The mean Hounsfield units was 959.99 ± 384.73. The operation time was 58.10 ± 26.67 minutes. The mean HPPD time was 11.93 ± 9.48 minutes, with settings of 1.97 ± 0.25 J and 48.78 ± 3.29 Hz. The stone-free rate was 89%. The mean hospital stay was 1.68 ± 1.29 days. Pelvicaliceal and ureter injuries were observed in 9.8% and 32.9% of the study population, respectively. However, there was no transfusion, subcapsular hematoma, persistent urinary leakage, ureteral or infundibular stricture, or renal functional deterioration. There was transient postoperative fever in 12.2% of the study population. Conclusions: HPPD could be performed safely during RIRS for renal stones without significant complications such as collecting system injury or bleeding. High-power laser mode (up to 100 W) can be a safe and effective choice for pop-dusting during RIRS, especially for large and hard stones.

Pneumatic Lithotripsy Versus Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones

Introduction: Several different modalities are available for ureteral stone fragmentation. From them pneumatic and holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) lithotripsy have supportive outcomes. In this study we studied 250 subjects who had ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) or laser lithotripsy (LL). Methods: Two-hundred fifty patients with ureteral stones underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy (115 subjects in the PL group, 135 subjects in the LL group) from August 2010 to April 2016. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate stone-free rate (SFR), mean operation time (MOT), mean hospital stay (MHS), stone migration and complications. Results: Two groups were similar in age, gender, mean size of stones, side of stone, and complications. There was a statistical difference in terms of SFR, stone migration and MHS in favor of the LL group (P ≤ 0.05, P ≤ 0.05 respectively), and MOT in favor of the PL group (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: Both the PL and LL techniques were effective and safe for ureteral stones, however a slightly higher SFR was found in the LL group.

Results of day-case ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease: prospective outcomes over 4.5 years

PURPOSE

To investigate the prospective outcomes of day-case ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease. With the rising prevalence of stone disease in the face of finite resources, there is increasing pressure to undertake procedures as a day case avoiding in-patient stay. There are a limited number of studies reporting on the feasibility of ureteroscopy as a day-case procedure. This study aimed to investigate the prospective outcomes and predictors precluding to DC-URS for stone disease in patients treated in our university teaching hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2012 and July 2016, consecutive cases of adult stone ureteroscopy performed or supervised by a single surgeon were recorded in a prospective database. Patients underwent pre-operative counselling in a specialist stone clinic and were admitted to a dedicated 'Surgical day unit' on the day of surgery. A standardised anaesthetic protocol was adhered to in all cases. Data on patient demographics, stone parameters, pre-operative assessment, operative details, length of stay, stone-free rate and complication rates were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 544 consecutive adult ureteroscopy for stone disease were conducted over the study period with a day-case rate of 77.7%. Thirty-nine percent of failed day-case ureteroscopy were due to late completion of ureteroscopy and due to associated social circumstances of patients. The mean stone size, operating time duration and post-operative stent insertion rates for DC-URS patients were 14 mm, 46 min and 96.5%, respectively. Post-operatively, the mean stone-free rate (SFR), unplanned re-admissions and complications for DC-URS patients were 95, 4 and 4%, respectively. A higher failure of DC-URS was related to patient's age (p = 0.003), positive pre-operative urine culture (p < 0.001), elevated pre-operative serum creatinine (p < 0.001) and higher mean operating time (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, a day-case ureteroscopy rate of nearly 78% can be achieved. With its acceptable complication rate, and low re-admission rates, DC-URS is a safe and feasible option in a majority of patients with stone disease.

[Safety and feasibility of outpatient flexible ureteroscopy for urinary stones: A retrospective single-center study]

AIM

Management of urolithiasis has changed over the past decades. Outpatient surgery has become a major issue for healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of outpatient flexible ureteroscopy.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study has been conducted including all patients who underwent an outpatient flexible ureteroscopy between January 2012 and December 2013. Failure of outpatient management was defined as length of hospital stay>12 hours or readmission within 48 hours after discharge. Univariate analysis was performed to seek for predictors of failure of outpatient management.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-seven patients who underwent a total of 174 procedures were included. They were mostly men (57.5 %), with a mean body mass index of 25.2kg/m² (±4.3). The stones were mostly unique (64.3 %), with a mean size of 14.2mm (±11.2). Eighty patients had a double J stent preoperatively (46.5 %), and mean operative time was 64.2 minutes (±34.1). An ureteral access sheath was used in 39 procedures (22.4 %). A double J stent was left postoperatively in 103 patients (59.1 %). In total, 165 procedures (94.8 %) were performed successfully as outpatient surgery. On postoperative imaging, the stone-free rate was 69.5 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 3.4 % of cases and were mostly minor (i.e. Clavien 1-2; 83.3 %). Predictive factors of failed outpatient management were male gender (P=0.04), BMI (P=0.03), and anticoagulants intake (P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Outpatient flexible ureteroscopy for urinary stones is feasible and its low failure and complications rate may allow a wider spread of its use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Holmium Intraductal Laser Lithotripsy of Biliary Stones in Liver Grafts

BACKGROUND

Biliary stones after liver transplantation (LT) rarely occur but a focus on those complications and their treatment is needed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 390 adult patients who underwent an LT from July 2004 to July 2014 entered the study. Biliary complications and notably biliary stones after LT were identified.

RESULTS

In total, 365 LT were analyzed. Biliary stones were identified in 14 patients (3.8%). Predictive factors for the onset of biliary stones after LT were hepatocellular diseases (P = .038; OR = 9.7) and biliary stenosis (P = .000; OR = 11.9). Treatments consisted of percutaneous transhepatic procedures (4 patients), endoscopic retrograde procedures (9 patients), and in open surgery (1 case); in 2 cases, due to a failure of previous treatments, holmium intraductal laser lithotripsy (HILL) was used: the first patient, a 35-year-old woman developed multiple intrahepatic biliary stones after LT. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) was ineffective and a HILL was performed, clearing the right common bile duct but leaving residual stones in the left duct. The patient underwent a retransplantation due to recurrent hepatitis C virus infection but died 3 months later because of graft failure. The second patient, a 42-year-old 14 years after retransplantation, developed biliary sludge and stones; after several attempts with PTC and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, a HILL was performed. All stones except one big one were treated. The patient is alive and well.

CONCLUSIONS

When usual treatments are unsuccessful and biliary stones are large, their fragmentation and treatment could be done with HILL, a promising procedure after LT.

Flexible and rigid ureteroscopy in outpatient surgery

BACKGROUND

Outpatient surgery is critical to improve health care costs. The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the results of outpatient treatment of upper tract urinary stones by rigid or flexible ureteroscopy in a routine care setting.

METHODS

A database was created at the creation of the outpatient surgery department. 87 patients underwent 100 ureteroscopic procedures for urinary lithiasis from June 2013 to March 2015.

RESULTS

Most of our patients were male with 53 men (sex ratio M/F 1.13), with a mean age of 52.9 ± 15 years old (23.4-82.4). 44 % of ureteroscopies performed were flexible ureteroscopies, 31 % rigid ureteroscopies and 25 % associated rigid and flexible ureteroscopies. The average stone load was 10.1 ± 5.7 mm (2-30) The mean operating time was 58.3 ± 21.1 min (20-150). 82.9 % of patients had a single urinary stone and 17.1 % (n = 14) had 2 or more. 114 stones were treated, 57,1 % intrarenal. There were 6 (6 %) postoperative complications: three Clavien stage 2 infections; three Clavien stage 3b complications (two renal colics requiring ureteral stenting 48 h after discharge and 1 symptomatic perirenal urinoma 48 h after discharge). There was one intraoperative complication (1 %): a ureteral wound with contrast leakage. The rate of transfer to conventional hospitalization was 2.2 %. Stone size influenced the stone-free status (p < 0.0001) and the need for more than one session. There was a significant correlation between operative time and stone size above 10 mm (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Flexible and rigid ureteroscopy are safe and efficient procedures for upper urinary tract stones and can be carried out in an outpatient department. Stone size had an impact on postoperative stone-free status and operative time.

Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The use of flexible ureteroscopy (URS) for nephrolithiasis has been rapidly expanding. Initially, safety guidewires were maintained alongside the ureteroscope during stone manipulation to prevent loss of access and allow stent insertion in the event of perforation. We intend to determine the safety of flexible URS without a separate safety guidewire in a large series of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all cases of flexible URS with laser lithotripsy performed by a single surgeon from August 2003 to May 2008. Preoperative patient characteristics, radiographic stone sizes, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Patients with renal or ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stones were isolated for a qualitative data analysis.

RESULTS

Flexible URS was performed on 305 kidneys in 246 consecutive patients, of which 59 cases were bilateral. Cases were subdivided into complicated and uncomplicated. Two hundred seventy cases were uncomplicated and performed without a safety guidewire. No intraoperative complications resulted from the lack of a safety guidewire, including no cases of lost access, ureteral perforation/avulsion, or need for percutaneous nephrostomy tube. Thirty-five cases were complicated, necessitating a safety guidewire. Of these, 16 had concomitant obstructing ureteral stones, 5 had encrusted ureteral stents, and 14 had difficult access because of large stone burden or aberrant anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that, in a large series of patients, a safety guidewire was not necessary for routine cases of flexible URS with laser lithotripsy on renal or UPJ stones. Particular cases with complicated anatomy, difficult access, concomitant ureteral stones, simultaneous stone basketing, or bulky stone burden still necessitate use of a safety guidewire because of increased risk of adverse outcomes.

A Review of Studies Reporting on Complications of Upper Urinary Tract Stone Ablation Using the Holmium:YAG Laser

Purpose:

A review of the literature of studies reporting complications of ureteroscopic urinary tract stone ablation using the holmium:YAG laser was performed.

Patients and methods:

Electronic databases were searched using specific keywords to identify relevant studies. Reference lists of identified articles were scrutinised for other studies and searches were conducted using the names of authors known to have published widely in this field. Two reviewers assessed retrieved articles for inclusion criteria. Patients <16 years old were excluded.

Results:

Overall, 48 studies published between 1994 and 2007 were included. Half were published since 2000. In total, 4454 patients were identified. Around half of studies were performed in North America (25). The number of patients per study varied from 8 to 598. The study populations were very heterogeneous in terms of stone position and size, and ureteroscope size and rigidity. Overall, 303 (6.8%) complications were identified. Post-operative ureteric stricture and perforation rates were both 1.0%. There were only six major complications identified (0.1%). The post-operative sepsis rate was 2% and one death was reported.

Conclusions:

Upper urinary tract stone ablation using the holmium:YAG laser is both safe and reliable. Follow-up imaging to detect procedure-specific complications would not appear to be routinely indicated given this low complication rate.

How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?

PURPOSE

To analyze results of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treatment of ureteral stones with two modern lithotripters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 598 patients with ureteral stones was treated with the Modulith SLX Classic and Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripters. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 54 (17) years, and the mean (SD) stone surface area was 42 (34) mm2. Results were available for 580 patients.

RESULTS

Stone-free ureters were recorded in 563 (97.1%) patients. Stone-free rates were 96.1%, 97.8%, and 97.9%, for the proximal, middle, and distal ureter, respectively. The average number of SWL sessions needed was 1.31. For the proximal, middle, and distal ureter, one SWL session was sufficient in 73.1%, 66.7%, and 83.2% of patients, respectively. Assisting auxiliary procedures were used in 102 patients (18%). The total mean (SD) treatment time was 48 (26) minutes and the mean (SD) number of shockwaves was 3266 (2258). SWL for stones located in the proximal, middle, and distal ureter was carried out in the prone position in 38%, 88%, and 9%, respectively. For 90 patients primarily treated with a large focus, the re-treatment rate was the same as for patients treated with a standard focus. A stone treatment index used to assess the efforts, results, and complications was similar for the two lithotripters and for all stone locations. Thus both lithotripters had similar efficacy.

CONCLUSION

With consistent use of SWL, a stone-free rate of more than 97% can be attained, with a reasonable re-treatment rate and only modest use of assisting auxiliary procedures.

Is the holmium:YAG laser the best intracorporeal lithotripter for the ureter? A 3-year retrospective study

PURPOSE

To study the efficiency and safety of holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 188 patients with 208 ureteral stones were treated with semirigid ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy from January 2003 to December 2005. Of the stones, 116 were lower ureteral, 37 middle ureteral, and 55 upper ureteral.

RESULTS

The success rate was 92.7% at the time of ureteroscopy and 96.7% at 3 months. The failures were secondary to retropulsion of the stones (3.3%). There were no perforations and one stricture. Stenting was done in 90% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Holmium:YAG laser is an ideal intracorporeal lithotripter for ureteral calculi, with a high success rate and low morbidity.

[Ureteroscopy under intravenous analgesia with remifentanil]

In a prospective study, from September 2000 to September 2001, all ureteroscopies ( n=140) were performed under local and intravenous patient controlled analgesia using continuous infusion of remifentanil (Ultiva). The dosage of 0.15 micro g/kg/min was adapted to changing intraoperative pain (range 0.08-0.30 micro g/kg/min). Preoperative sedation with midazolam 2 mg was given 5 min prior to ureteroscopy. The efficacy of monitored anesthesia care ("Big MAC") was quantified by the patient using a visual analogue pain scale. A total of 97.1% (136/140) of the procedures were performed and finished under remifentanil. Only four male patients underwent conversion to general anesthesia due to insufficient analgesia. All but one patient would choose remifentanil again for first line anesthesia. Significant differences in pain scale values were noticed for male/female patients and ureteroscopies above/below the iliac vessel crossing. Side effects were rare being mainly hypoxic events (pO(2)<90% in 5.1%). Indication, intraoperative procedure, average surgery time (24 min), complications and primary success rate (96.6/90/63.3% stone free for distal/mid/proximal ureter, respectively) did not differ from the control group under general anesthesia. Ureteroscopies with remifentanil are safe, universally applicable because of refifentanil's organ independent esterase metabolism and as effective as general anesthesia. There is no need for PACU stay for patients due to the ultra-short drug half-life, and therefore remifentanil is cost effective and perfect in an outpatient setting.

Clinical experience and results of ESWL treatment for 3,093 urinary calculi with the Storz Modulith SL 20 lithotripter at the Singapore general hospital

We study the outcome of 2,700 patients treated for 3,093 urinary calculi over a period of 60 months. All patients underwent Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment using the Storz Modulith SL20, predominantly on an outpatient basis (99.9% using intravenous pethidine for analgesia). The treatment outcome of 1,666 renal calculi and 1,427 ureteric calculi were analysed and stratified according to size and site. Follow-up status at 3 months was available for 91.8% of patients. For renal calculi, the overall success rate was 81% (re-treatment rate 29.7%). The majority of failures were stones larger than 2 cm and those situated in the lower pole of the renal calyces. The overall success rate for ureteric calculi is 85% with similar clearance rates throughout the ureter (re-treatment rate 22.8%). Failures were predominantly with stones larger than 2 cm. For the entire series, the morbidity rate requiring hospital admission was 2.9%, there was no mortality. The commonest cause for admission was for pain control (1.8%). To our knowledge, our experience with this lithotriptor is the largest to date. We have demonstrated that ESWL with Storz Modulith SL20 is safe, well tolerated and highly effective for the treatment of urolithiasis.

Transurethral ureterorenolithotripsy using new automated irrigation/suction system controlling pressure and flow compared with standard irrigation: a randomized pilot study

PURPOSE

To compare in a random fashion an automated irrigation/suction pump system with the standard pressurized technique during transurethral ureterorenolithotripsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 2001 and December 2001, 47 patients were prospectively included. Prior to randomization, rigid instruments were allocated to 25 patients (group R) and flexible instruments to 22 patients (group F) according to stone location. The groups R and F were then randomized separately, and the pressurized technique was employed in groups R1 and F1, while the automated system was employed in groups R2 and F2. Operative time, amount of liquid consumed, and stone-free rate at the end of the procedure were analyzed.

RESULTS

For the entire series, ureteroscopy time using the automated system (mean 42 +/- 17[SD] minutes; range 15-90 minutes) was 35% less than with the pressurized technique (mean 65 +/- 25 minutes; range 20-135 minutes) (P = 0.04 Wilcoxon score). The stone-free rate was significantly higher in groups R2 + F2 (92%) than in groups R1 + F1 (69%) (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

With the ENDO FMS UROLOGY system, there was a significant reduction in the mean ureteroscopy time: 32% less with the rigid instrument and 53% less with the flexible instrument. This seems to be attributable to a wider working space and highly improved visibility. The integrated suction at constant flow allows efficient evacuation of stone fragments while limiting cavity pressure. These results, obtained on 47 patients, should be confirmed by larger randomized studies.

Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary after ureteroscopy and ureteropyeloscopy: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Retrospective studies have suggested that routine stenting can be avoided following ureteroscopy. We prospectively analyzed the need for routine ureteral stent placement in patients undergoing ureteroscopic procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive patients (60 renal units) were randomized into either a stent or a no-stent group following ureteroscopy with either a 7.5F semirigid or a 7.5F flexible ureteroscope for treatment of calculi (holmium laser or pneumatic lithotripsy) or transitional-cell carcinoma (holmium laser). Intraoperative variables assessed included total stone burden, the need for ureteral dilation, and overall operative times. All patients were evaluated by questionnaire on postoperative days 0, 1, and 6 with regard to pain, frequency, urgency, dysuria, and hematuria.

RESULTS

Of the 60 renal units treated, 38 received ureteral stents (mean 5.2 days), and 22 were treated without a stent. All 10 patients requiring ureteral balloon dilation had stents placed and were removed from the analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to age, sex, or stone burden. Operative time was decreased in the no-stent group (43 minutes v 55 minutes; P = 0.013). Flank discomfort was significantly less common in the no-stent group on days 0, 1, and 6 (P = 0.004, P = 0.003, P < 0.001, respectively), as was the incidence of suprapubic pain on day 6 (P = 0.002). There was no difference in urinary frequency, urgency, or dysuria between the groups on postoperative day 1, but all these symptoms were significantly reduced in the no-stent group on day 6 (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). There was no significant difference in patient-reported postoperative hematuria in either group. One patient in each group developed a urinary tract infection. One patient in the no-stent group developed ureteral obstruction in the postoperative period that necessitated stenting, and one patient in the stent group experienced stent migration necessitating removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine ureteral stenting does not appear to be warranted in those patients who do not require ureteral dilation during ureteroscopic procedures. Ureteral stent placement following ureteroscopy may be avoided, thereby reducing operative time, surgical costs, and patient morbidity.

Outpatient ureteroscopy: predictive factors for postoperative events

OBJECTIVES

To identify risk factors that can predict the postoperative events of outpatient ureteroscopy.

METHODS

The data of 329 consecutive patients who underwent outpatient ureteroscopy from January 1996 to July 2000 were analyzed. Patient selection for outpatient surgery was based solely on their general medical status and social factors. Eighty-three percent of the procedures were therapeutic ureteroscopy. The reported postoperative events included sleep disturbances, postoperative pain score, emesis, unplanned admission, and other complications. These were compared with the various patient and operative factors. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the predictive factors for different postoperative events.

RESULTS

The overall success rate of ureteroscopic access to the pathologic site was 99.7%. Most of the therapeutic ureteroscopy performed was ureteroscopic lithotripsy (93%), with a stone-free rate of 91%. Ninety-seven percent of the operations were completed within 90 minutes, and 98% of patients were fit for discharge within 5 hours. Female patients reported more symptoms on the way home (25.8% versus 16%, P = 0.047) and more postoperative emesis (14.4% versus 2.1%, P <0.001). The postoperative pain score on day 1 was higher if the operation had lasted more than 60 minutes (2.4 versus 1.5, P = 0.002). Patients who received postoperative stenting had a higher postoperative pain score on day 3 (1.1 versus 0.4, P <0.001) and a higher complication rate compared with those who required no postoperative stenting (16.8% versus 4%, P <0.001). No predictive factors for unplanned admission were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy can be successfully performed in an outpatient setting. Although the early postoperative pain was associated with nature of the operation (which could not be changed), the subsequent postoperative pain and complications were associated with ureteral stenting, which could be reduced by selective stenting. Unplanned admissions could not be predicted.

Pneumatic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, safety, and features of pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) with those of laser lithotripsy (LL) and present our clinical experience in the endoscopic management of ureteral calculi.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From August 1994 to February 2000, 285 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic lithotripsy with either the Swiss Lithoclast pneumatic lithotripter (145 patients) or the Ho:YAG laser lithotripter (140 patients) for the treatment of ureteral calculi.

RESULTS

In one single session, the overall successful stone fragmentation rate of LL was higher than that of PL (95.7% v 69.7%; P < 0.01). The average time to stone-free status was shorter for LL than for PL (18 days v 31 days; P < 0.01). No major complications were observed in LL, while five ureteral perforations were encountered in PL.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser lithotripsy has advantages over PL in high efficiency of stone fragmentation and a low complication rate. Laser lithotripsy is a powerful, effective, and safe treatment modality for ureteral calculi.

Percutaneous ureterolithotomy: direct method for removal of impacted ureteral stones

PURPOSE

We report 52 percutaneous urterolithotomies in 51 patients having large, impacted middle ureteral stones. Direct percutaneous stone removal can be performed as successfully as in cases of renal stones treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

METHODS

The operation is performed under local anesthesia; therefore, the procedure is quicker and simpler than the laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic intervention. All patients became stone free. In two patients (4%), ultrasound disintegration was necessary; in the remaining cases, there was no need for any fragmentation: the stone was removed intact. A retroperitoneal drain was always left at the end of the procedure. With the exception of two cases, the ureter was always stented without closure of the ureteral incision.

RESULTS

Fever (> or = 38 degrees C) was observed in 15 patients (29%) for 2 days. Retroperitoneal hematoma 5 cm in diameter was seen in one patient. One patient had urine leakage through the retroperitoneal drain in the postoperative period for 18 days. Also, one patient came back 3 days after discharge with urine leakage through the percutaneous retroperitoneal tract.

CONCLUSION

Direct percutaneous ureterolithotomy is an effective way to remove impacted middle ureteral stones but is advisable only for endourologists with considerable experience.

Update on contact lithotripsy

Despite the development of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, endoscopic stone removal, with or without intracorporeal lithotripsy, is still an effective minimally invasive alternative for special indications. There is no defined all-purpose lithotripsy procedure for contact lithotripsy. The choice of the lithotripsy procedure for endoscopic stone disintegration depends on a number of different factors, the main one being stone localization. Small calibre, flexible probes (electrohydraulic, pneumatic, laser) are especially appropriate for ureterorenoscopy, but the speed of stone disintegration is a limiting factor. In contrast, large calibre rigid probes (ultrasound) are clearly more effective, but are unsuitable in size for flexible ureterorenoscopy. This indicates that the type and size of the endoscope decisively influences the choice of devices for endoscopic stone disintegration. Additional inhibiting factors are the flexibility or the rigidity of the instrument and the diameter of the working channel. It must be noted that total costs are not only calculated on the purchase of the equipment, but must also cover disposable materials.

Outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy: selective internal stenting and factors enhancing success

PURPOSE

To evaluate a policy of selective, short-duration internal stenting after outpatient ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1997 to April 1998, 62 patients (34 male, 28 female) with a mean age of 50 (range 21-80) years underwent outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy using a holmium laser (365 microm; 0.5-1.4J/5-10 Hz) and 6F/7.5F semirigid ureteroscope. Internal stents were inserted selectively in patients with severe preoperative obstruction (intravenous urogram finding), tight stone impaction (endoscopic finding), or significant residual obstruction (on-table retrograde pyelogram finding) despite stone clearance. Patient demographics, stone measures, stone clearance rates, complications, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirement, and follow-up imaging were compared for the stented and unstented patients.

RESULTS

With the present criteria of selective internal stenting, stents were inserted in 56% of the patients for a mean duration of 3.6 weeks. Excluding those patients with residual stones requiring further interventions, the stenting rate was 39% with a mean duration of 1.9 weeks. There was no difference in patient characteristics, stone burden, and stone levels between the stented and unstented group. The mean operating time for the unstented group was shorter than for the stented group (45.6 minutes v 56.6 minutes; P = 0.03). The stone clearance rates were similar for the two groups (96% v 97%), but the complication rate of the stented group was higher (8.6% v 3.7%). The mean postoperative pain score and analgesic requirement were similar in the two groups on postoperative day 1 but significantly less in the unstented group on day 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria for selective internal stenting are useful in determining when a stent should be used. By omitting the stent insertion in the absence of these criteria, operating time, postoperative pain, and analgesic requirement were reduced without increasing the complication rate. Ureteral stricturing was absent despite the low stenting rate.

Endoscopic management of urologic disease with the holmium laser

The efficiency and safety profile of the holmium laser have made this tool a versatile multipurpose instrument for use in the endoscopic treatment of a wide variety of urologic disorders. Herein are reviewed holmium laser physics and current endourologic applications, as well as the performance of new low-power holmium lasers.

Intracorporeal lithotripsy. Update on technology

The number and variety of devices currently available for endoscopic lithotripsy reflect the reality that no single device is ideal in all situations. Although the search for the universal lithotriptor continues, the urologist must consider several factors if faced with the decision of which device to purchase. Perhaps foremost among these factors is the clinical situation with which one commonly deals. For example, although the smaller, flexible probes such as EHL or laser demonstrate considerable utility if used ureteroscopically, the larger stone burden associated with today's percutaneous nephrolithotripsy population often is treated more efficiently with one of the mechanical devices employing a larger, rigid probe, such as ultrasound or the Lithoclast. Similarly, the type and size of endoscopic equipment at one's disposal have a significant impact on which device to purchase or use. There are physical constraints affecting which device may or may not be used, rigid versus flexible endoscope, working channel caliber, and offset versus end-on-port. The skill and experience of the surgeon is also a factor of obvious importance, particularly if one is using a modality with a relatively narrow margin of safety such as EHL. Likewise, the training and experience of nursing personnel is a factor, especially regarding the use of lasers, which require certified personnel who are well versed in laser safety. Finally, in today's environment one must carefully evaluate cost in terms of not only initial capital outlay but also ongoing charges for disposable and maintenance items. Thus, the decision of which device to purchase is complex and requires careful evaluation of all of the previously noted variables. Likewise, if one is fortunate enough to have more than one device available, the decision of which lithotriptor to employ requires a similar decision based on sound surgical judgment.