An endourologic approach to complete ureteropelvic junction and ureteral strictures

Combined antegrade and retrograde access to difficult ureters: revisiting the rendezvous technique

INTRODUCTION

Complex ureteric strictures present a significant challenge to the endourologist and uro-radiologist. Multiple separate interventions to try to cross the stricture are often attempted. We describe our experience managing a heterogenous patient group using the 'rendezvous' procedure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

16 patients and 18 ureters (one bilateral procedure, and two separate procedures in one patient) underwent rendezvous procedures. Seven patients had coexisting ureteric calculi treated. Each case was followed up for between 3 months and 5 years.

RESULTS

In 16/18 ureters there was technical success at time of surgery; successfully crossing the stricture, allowing ureteroscopic access to the ureter, dilating and/or stenting the ureter. 2/18 were unsuccessful; one secondary to advanced malignancy resulting in a uretero-vaginal fistula and the second a failure to remove a retained, displaced ureteric stent. Of the 18 ureteric procedures; 7/18 were stent free at 3 months, improving to 8/18 stent free at 6 months. 4/18 remained nephrostomy dependent (failure of drainage despite stent or failure to stent) at 3 months, increasing to 6/18 being nephrostomy dependent at 6 months. 1/16 remained dialysis dependent with a nephrostomy tube. For those procedures involving ureteric calculi, 6/7 were stone free and 1/5 had a persistent stone fragment requiring further intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined approach may decrease the number of separate interventions required, with the aim of removing the need for a long-term nephrostomy, as well as providing opportunity to treat ureteric calculi in the context of stricture disease. Our experience has been that where the rendezvous has been required to treat strictures caused by malignant extrinsic compression, stenting has not been successful; this information is key to informed consent in a group of patients who may have a limited life expectancy.

Successful transureteropyelostomy after heminephrectomy of a bilateral hydronephrotic horseshoe kidney: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Horseshoe kidney is a rare congenital malformation that is found in approximately 0.25% of the general population and usually remains asymptomatic.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a successful transureteropyelostomy after heminephrectomy of the non-functional right moiety in a 25-year-old man with horseshoe kidney who had a combined 50% functional loss and hydronephrosis due to multiple distal ureteral strictures on the functionally remaining left side. Continuous ureteral stenting of the remaining part of the former horseshoe kidney was avoided during a follow-up of 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Urologists are often faced with technically difficult cases that are not responsive to standard operative procedures, and this case illustrates an individual surgical approach in a clinical situation.

Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparison between laser and Acucise balloon cutting catheter

Endopyelotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty are the preferred modalities for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction because of their minimally invasive nature. There are continuous efforts for improving endopyelotomy techniques and outcome. Retrograde access represents the natural evolution of endopyelotomy. The Acucise cutting balloon catheter (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Laguna Hills, CA) and ureteroscopic endopyelotomy using holmium laser are the most widely accepted techniques. The Acucise catheter was developed to simplify retrograde endopyelotomy and made it possible for all urologists, regardless of their endourologic skills. The Acucise catheter depends on incision and dilatation of the ureteropelvic junction under fluoroscopic guidance, whereas ureteroscopy allows visual control of the site, depth, and extent of the incision; the holmium laser is a perfect method for a clean precise incision. Review of the English literature showed that the Acucise technique was more widely performed, though laser had better (but not statistically significant) safety and efficacy profiles.

Endoscopic Treatment of Ureteric Strictures: Acucise, Cold-Knife Endoureterotomy and Wall Stents as a Salvage Approach

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the factors influencing the results of endoureterotomy using cold-knife and cutting balloon dilatation, and permanent ureteral wall stents in patients with benign ureteral strictures after different operations affecting the ureter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 4-year period, in 18 patients, endoscopic cold-knife and Acucise endoureterotomies were performed in 13 and 7 renal units, respectively. Eight Memoterm permanent ureteral wall stents were inserted into 7 patients when endoureterotomy failed. Successful outcome was defined by the absence of re-stricture assessed both clinically and radiologically.

RESULTS

The strictures were secondary to ureterolithotomy in 6, ureteroscopy in 3, gynecological procedures in 4, abdominal surgeries in 2, transplantation in 2 and continent urinary diversion in 1. The right and left ureters were unilaterally affected in 5 and 11 patients, respectively (5 of them had a solitary kidney), while the remaining 2 patients had bilateral ureteral strictures. We achieved total ureteral patency of 3 (43%) and 7 (54%) renal units with Acucise and cold-knife incision, respectively. Obstructive uropathy was resolved in 6 renal units (75%) of 8 using ureteral wall stents.

CONCLUSION

Endoureterotomy with cold-knife or Acucise cutting balloon dilatation is effective in the treatment of iatrogenic ureteral strictures, but only in a selected group. Based on our results, the favorable prognostic criteria for endoureterotomy are the length (< or =1.5 cm), the nonischemic nature of the stricture and adequate renal function. As a salvage approach, permanent self-expanding ureteral wall stents with a 75% success rate may provide a satisfactory outcome for decompression of an obstructed system.

Ureteroscopic endoureterotomy

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the current status of ureteroscopic endoureterotomy (UE) by reporting extensive experience with the endoscopic management of ureteric strictures, with special emphasis on factors determining success, and by reviewing publications on the minimally invasive management of ureteric strictures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 50 patients (mean age 53 years, range 18-85, equal sex distribution) with ureteric strictures of varying causes; all had their stricture treated endoscopically. The follow-up was 0.5-9 years; 10 patients with recurrent strictures had two ipsilateral stents placed to try to improve the outcome, and eight patients with completely obliterating strictures were treated by ureteroscopic re-canalization.

RESULTS

The site of stricture had no bearing on the eventual outcome. Patients with uretero-enteric and malignant strictures did not fare so well. The most important predictor of failure was the length of the stricture, with failure in all seven patients with strictures of > 2 cm. In the 10 patients treated with two ipsilateral stents, eight were successful, which was very promising considering that these patients had recalcitrant strictures and placing one stent had previously failed. The overall success rate was 74%.

CONCLUSION

UE has become the procedure of choice for the initial management of ureteric strictures. Simple balloon dilatation is also effective in certain situations. The characteristics of the stricture often govern the eventual outcome. In properly selected cases success rates of approximately 75% can be expected.

Update On Minimally Invasive Management of Ureteral Strictures

PURPOSE

To review the role of minimally invasive management in ureteral stricture disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed on the MEDLINE database through 2002 concerning endoscopic treatment of patients with ureteral strictures.

RESULTS

Many endourologic methods are available for ureteral strictures. Ureteral dilation may be accomplished in most cases, with various rates of success depending on stricture etiology, location, and length. Endoureterotomy also leads to long-term patency in properly selected cases and appears to be superior to dilation alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant advances in technique and technology have improved our ability to treat ureteral strictures without the need for open surgery in most patients.

Ureteral stents and their use in endourology

Ureteral stents have assisted urologists in the performance of surgery of the urinary tract for many years. They can have both diagnostic and therapeutic value, but are used most frequently as adjuncts to endoscopic or minimally invasive procedures. This review provides an update of the current uses for ureteral stents, technology of biomaterials, complications associated with indwelling ureteral stents and the future of stents in urology.

Endoscopic and surgical repair of the ureter

Endoscopy has justified its leading position in ureteral surgery. Recent advances in this field have pushed forward the frontiers and enabled the treatment of difficult ureteral strictures and congenital abnormalities such as megaureter and ureteroceles. The use of the ileum is, however, still the reference for ureteral replacement. An ileal ureter may be performed laparoscopically, but it remains an invasive procedure. In the near future the development of ureteral prostheses could simplify the management of ureteral replacement. For that purpose, and in selected cases, alloplastic ureteral prostheses may already have clinical applications. Bioengineered ureteral prostheses are still at an experimental stage.