Asystolic Cardiac Arrest during Balloon Insufflation for Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy

Dysautonomia following breast surgery: Disproportionate response to post-operative hematoma

Background

Up to 10% of patients undergoing breast surgery suffer from bleeding complications. Some experience severe hypotension and bradycardia of unclear etiology. Similar to the vasovagal hyperstimulation provoked by abdominal insufflation during laparoscopic surgery, we hypothesize that chest wall stretch from postoperative breast hematoma may mechanically stretch the vagus nerve, triggering dysautonomia disproportionate to the degree of blood loss.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective review of patients requiring reoperation for hematoma evacuation following breast surgery between 2011 and 2021 was performed. The relationship between hematoma volume and hemodynamic instability, as well as hematoma volume and vasovagal symptoms, was measured.

Results

Sixteen patients were identified. Average hematoma volume was 353 mL, and average minimum mean arterial pressure was 64 mm Hg (range: 34–102 mm Hg). Fifty-six percent of patients reported symptoms including dizziness, somnolence, and/or syncope. Accounting for body surface area, patients with larger hematomas had similar minimum mean arterial pressures compared to those with smaller hematomas, 55 and 73 mm Hg, respectively (P = .0943). However, patients in the large hematoma group experienced over 3 times as many vasovagal symptoms, 88% and 25%, respectively (P = .0095).

Conclusion

Patients with large hematomas reported significantly more vagal symptoms compared to those with small hematomas despite similar mean arterial pressures. In addition, the trend of lower mean arterial pressures and heart rates more closely resembles vagal hyperstimulation than hypovolemic shock. Early hematoma evacuation to relieve vagal nerve stretch and parasympatholytics to reverse dysautonomia are targeted interventions to consider in this patient population rather than fluids, vasopressors, and blood products that are used in cases of hemodynamic instability due to hypovolemia alone.

Bladder rupture - a rare complication of extraperitoneal balloon dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Balloon dissection to create the extraperitoneal space to facilitate laparoscopic procedures is generally a safe step. However, complications can include vascular and visceral injuries. Bladder injury during balloon dilation of extraperitoneal space has previously been described during herniorraphy. This is the first reported case of bladder injury during balloon dilation of the extraperitoneal space during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

We report transection of bladder at the prostato-vesical junction, during balloon dilation of extraperitoneal space, in a 66-year-old man undergoing extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

The patient had an uneventful procedure due to immediate recognition of this intra-operative complication. At 6-month follow-up, he reports complete return of urinary continence and is free from biochemical recurrence from prostate cancer.

DISCUSSION

Albeit uncommon, balloon-related complications can occur. Surgeons performing extraperitoneal laparoscopic procedures should be aware of the range of potential complications specifically related to balloon dilation of extraperitoneal space. With experience, these complications can be mitigated.

Simulated life-threatening emergency during robot-assisted surgery

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of robot-assisted techniques for urologic and gynecologic surgery in patients with severe comorbidities, the risk of a critical incidence during surgery increases. Due to limited access to the patient the start of effective measures to treat a life-threatening emergency could be delayed. Therefore, we tested the management of an acute emergency in an operating room setting with a full-size simulator in six complete teams.

METHODS

A full-size simulator (ISTAN, Meti, CA), modified to hold five trocars, was placed in a regular operating room and connected to a robotic system. Six teams (each with three nurses, one anesthesiologist, two urologists or gynecologists) were introduced to the scenario. Subsequently, myocardial fibrillation occurred. Time to first chest compression, removal of the robot, first defibrillation, and stabilization of circulation were obtained. After 7 weeks the simulation was repeated.

RESULTS

The time to the start of chest compressions, removal of the robotic system, and first defibrillation were significantly improved at the second simulation. Time for restoration of stable circulation was improved from 417 ± 125 seconds to 224 ± 37 seconds (P=0.0054). Unexpected delays occurred during the first simulation because trocars had been removed from the patient but not from the robot, thus preventing the robot to be moved.

CONCLUSION

Following proper training, resuscitation can be started within seconds. A repetition of the simulation significantly improved time for all steps of resuscitation. An emergency simulation of a multidisciplinary team in a real operating room setting can be strongly recommended.