Potential Underdetection of pT3a Renal-Cell Carcinoma with Laparoscopic Morcellation

Preclinical safety testing and initial experience of a morcellation bag with four sealable ports

Electromechanical morcellation-so called power morcellation-is a minimally invasive approach to remove bulky lesions such as uterine fibroids. The spread of benign and malignant tissue due to morcellation is a major concern that might limit the use of laparoscopic interventions. We present an in vitro evaluation of the safety characteristics of a four-port endobag with closable trocar sleeves, and describe physical properties of the bag that may or may not allow passage through the hole. In addition, we report our preliminary experience of this tool when used for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies. The behavior of the endobag during the extraction process was analyzed by extracting opened and re-sealed bags filled with 20 ml blue dye solution through a wooden template, with incisions measuring 10 to 24 mm. The endobag was used in 50 subtotal hysterectomies during the morcellation procedure. In the in vitro test, no dye loss was recorded for incisions measuring 11-24 mm. The mean force required to pull the bag through the template was inversely proportional to incision size. No bag rupture occurred during the surgical procedures. The mean time taken to prepare the bag for morcellation was 7.1 min (range, 4-14 min), the mean duration of subtotal hysterectomy was 53.4 min (range, 20-194 min). The mean weight of the removed body of the uterus was 113.8 g (range, 13-896 g), the mean weight of tissue and fluid remaining in the bag after morcellation 7.9 g (range, 0-39 g). In the in vitro setting, the improved endobag signifies greater patient safety during bag extraction, along with less tissue traumatization due to a smaller incision in the abdominal wall. The improved ergonomic features of the bag permit the insertion of three trocars in the lower abdomen and avoid closure of unused access ports. Our preliminary experience has shown that the device can be used under routine conditions. Failure rates will be evaluated in future studies.

Reduction in Renal Specimen After Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: A Histopathologic Analysis

Abstract Background and Purpose: There is no consensus on the most appropriate way to extract the kidney after laparoscopy. A previous study evaluated the reduction in total kidney volume and incision size (40%) after perfusion with a 5% hypertonic solution in a porcine model. The purpose of the current study was to compare the histopathologic renal tumor diagnosis before and after this perfusion. Furthermore, fluid drained from the renal vein was analyzed for the presence of neoplastic cells. Materials and Methods: After radical nephrectomy, specimens of 21 cases of renal tumors were studied. A small piece of the tumor was removed and fixed in formaldehyde. After that, 500 mL of a 5% NaCL solution was infused through the renal artery. The first 10 mL drained from the vein was collected and sent for cytologic study. The specimens and the fragment were analyzed. The parameters studied were histologic subtypes, Fuhrman grade, necrosis, and microvascular invasion. Results: Clear-cell renal carcinoma was found in 81% of the cases. Two cases of chromophobic renal carcinoma, one case of papillary tumor, and one case of oncocytoma were found. There were no differences in histologic subtypes, Fuhrman grade, necrosis, and microvascular invasion before and after perfusion in most of the cases. All cytologic analysis of drained liquid from the renal vein was negative for neoplastic cells. Conclusions: Renal perfusion with 5% NaCL solution after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy did not interfere with the histopathologic and cytologic characteristics of the kidney. In addition, all samples from the liquid drained from the renal vein were negative for neoplastic cells. These findings suggest that renal shrinkage with hypertonic saline after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is feasible and might be useful for patients with kidney cancer. Validation of our results as well as their impact on clinical outcomes is warranted.

Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site and multiport laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: a prospective, nonrandomized study

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site and multiport laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy, focusing on postoperative pain and analgesic requirement.

METHODS

Nonrandomized, prospective comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site and multiport laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy. Thirty-four patients underwent laparoendoscopic single-site (17 radical nephrectomy/17 partial nephrectomy); 42 underwent multiport laparoscopy (28 radical nephrectomy/14 partial nephrectomy) from February 2009 to February 2010. Laparoendoscopic single-site transperitoneal access was obtained by periumbilical incision through which all trocars were inserted. Laparoendoscopic radical nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy recapitulated steps of multiport laparoscopic radical nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy. Demographics/tumor characteristics, outcomes, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-two of 42 multiport laparoscopic and 32/34 laparoendoscopic single-site cases were successfully performed. Mean follow-up was 16.2 months. For laparoendoscopic single-site and multiport laparoscopy groups mean operating room time (min) was 159.3 vs 158.9 (P = .952); mean estimated blood loss (mL) was 175.7 vs 156.1 (P = .553); percent transfused was 2.9% vs 0% (P = .925). No significant differences in complications were noted (P = .745). Significant decrease in analgesic use (6 morphine equivalents vs 11.6, P < .001) and discharge pain score (1.7 vs 2.7, P < .01) were noted in laparoendoscopic single-site vs multiport laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. For laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy and multiport laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, no significant differences were noted for tumor diameter (1.8 vs 2.0 cm, P = .57), RENAL score (0.962), ischemia time (28.6 vs 27.5 minutes, P = .70), and preoperative (P = .78)/postoperative creatinine (P = .32). For laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy and multiport laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, no significant differences were noted for mean tumor diameter (5.6 vs 5.3 cm, P = .63), RENAL score (P = .815), and mean operative time (142.3 vs 155.4 minutes P = .13).

CONCLUSION

In this well-matched, prospective comparison, laparoendoscopic single-site is comparable with multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of perioperative parameters and may confer benefit with respect to analgesic requirement. Randomized evaluation and longer-term follow-up are necessary.

Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for radical and cytoreductive nephrectomy, renal vein thrombectomy, and partial nephrectomy: a prospective pilot evaluation

Introduction. Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) may diminish morbidity of laparoscopic surgery. We prospectively evaluated feasibility and outcomes of LESS-Radical Nephrectomy (LESS-RN) and Partial Nephrectomy (LESS-PN). Methods. 10 patients underwent LESS-RN (6) and LESS-PN (4) between 2/2009-5/2009. LESS-RN included 2 with renal vein thrombectomy, one of which was also cytoreductive. Transperitoneal LESS access was obtained by periumbilical incision. Patient/tumor characteristics, oncologic, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were analyzed. Results. 3 Men/7 Women (mean age 58.7 years, median follow-up 9.8 months) underwent LESS. 9/10 cases were completed successfully. All had negative margins. Mean operative time was 161 minutes, estimated blood loss was 125 mL, and incision size was 4.4 cm. Median tumor size for LESS-RN and -PN was 5.0 and 1.7 cm (P = .045). Median LESS-PN ischemia time was 24 minutes; mean preoperative/postoperative creatinine were 0.7/0.8 mg/dL (P = .19). Mean pain score at discharge was 1.3. Mean preoperative, 3-, and 6-month postoperative SF-36 QoL Score was 73.8, 74.4 and 77.1 (P = .222). All patients are currently alive. Conclusions. LESS-RN, renal vein thrombectomy, and PN are technically feasible and safe while maintaining adherence to oncologic principles, with excellent QoL preservation and low discharge pain scores. Further study is requisite.