Barbed Suture for Renorrhaphy During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Efficacy and safety of self-retaining double-needle barb suture in transabdominal path robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of self-retaining barbed double-layer sutures (SRBDS) used for wound sutures in stage T1 renal cancer undergoing peritoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic partial renal resection.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for localized renal tumors (< 7 cm) in Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from January 2021 to January 2022 were selected. The experimental-group and the control-group randomly included 25 patients, respectively. SRBDS was intended to be used for kidney wound repair in the experimental group, and single-needle Vicryl was applied in the control group.

RESULTS

Patients in both the experimental group and the control group completed RAPN without conversion to open surgery. The operative time (80.20 ± 18.39 min) and warm ischemia time (11.76 ± 1.16 min) of the experimental group were both reduced compared to the control group (86.00 ± 15.94 min, 14.56 ± 1.04 min). The increased changes in blood creativity at one week and three months postoperatively in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the decreased changes in GFR level at three months postoperatively in the experimental group were significantly lower than that in the control group (5.21 ± 2.14 vs 7.81 ± 2.28, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For localized T1 renal carcinoma, SRBDS is a safe and efficient endoscopic suture technique, which may be considered as an alternative to other suturing techniques, tissue sealants, and glues for RAPN in the future.

Robotic partial nephrectomy: Techniques for complex tumors

Robotic assisted partial nephrectomy is an effective and minimally invasive approach that has gained significant popularity in the past 20 years. Guidelines support prioritizing partial nephrectomy in small renal masses when technically feasible, given improvement in long term renal function and cardiovascular risk. Increasing surgeon comfort with the robotic platform has allowed for the removal of larger and more complex tumors. There are a vast number of surgical techniques described in the literature for dissection, hilum clamping, tumor resection and renorrhaphy. We aim to describe and summarize different considerations and techniques to utilize when performing robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in complex renal masses. In this review, we specifically focus on masses with higher tumor complexity (RENAL score ≥10, those that involve or about the hilum or are invasive into the renal sinus).

A randomized trial of MONOFIX® vs. V-loc™ for resection bed suture during robotic partial nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Monofix®-PDO compared to V-Loc™ for tumor bed suturing during robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

METHODS

A randomized, controlled, multicenter, single-blinded trial was conducted across four tertiary institutions. Patients with T1-2 stage renal masses scheduled for RAPN were enrolled. The exclusion criteria included patients not deemed in need of bed suturing, those with a history of prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy, and those with severe systemic diseases or high bleeding tendencies. A total of 174 patients participated and were subjected to permuted block randomization (T1a vs. others), resulting in 88 patients in the V-Loc™ group and 86 in the Monofix®-PDO group. The primary outcome was the resection bed suture time. The secondary outcomes were total suture use time, warm ischemia time, console time (for efficacy), estimated blood loss, hemoglobin change, and 90-day treatment-related adverse events (for safety). All patients were scheduled for follow-up visits for up to three months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The primary outcome, resection bed suture time, did not significantly differ between the V-Loc™ and Monofix®-PDO groups (4.8 ± 2.6 vs. 4.5 ± 2.6 min, p = 0.531). Secondary outcomes, including total suture used time (5.3 ± 2.8 vs. 4.8 ± 2.6 min, p = 0.289) and warm ischemic time (15.6 ± 5.5 vs. 15.4 ± 5.4 min, p = 0.834), were comparable between the two groups. In terms of safety outcomes, changes in serum hemoglobin levels did not show significant differences on postoperative days 1, 3, and 14 (P = 0.537, 0.353, and 0.840, respectively). No device-related adverse events were observed during the 90-day follow-up period in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Monofix®-PDO demonstrated non-inferior to V-Loc in terms of both safety and efficacy in patients undergoing RAPN. This trial is registered on cris.nih.go.kr as KCT0006809 (Registration date: 02/19/2021).

A randomized trial to compare smooth monofilament suture vs. barbed suture using the three-layer continuous closure technique in canine ovariohysterectomy in a high-quality high-volume spay/neuter clinic

The primary objective of this study was to compare time efficiency and complication rates between smooth monofilament suture (SMS) and barbed suture (BS) using the three-layer continuous incisional closure pattern after ovariohysterectomy in a high-quality high-volume spay/neuter clinic. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial enrolling 71 adult female dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned to SMS or BS treatments. The effect of closure with BS or SMS on closure time was tested through multilevel, multivariable linear regression in a generalized linear mixed model. Body condition score, weight, and pre-closure incision length were tested as covariates. Surgeon was included in the model as a random effect. Pre-closure incision length (p = 0.01) and method (p ≤ 0.0001) were associated with closure time. Adjusting for pre-closure incision length, the average time for closure with SMS was 6.5 min (range 3.70-10.31 min), and the average time for closure with BS was 4.91 min (range 3.05-8.05 min). Accounting for the closure method, the closure time increased by 39 s for each additional centimeter of incision length. BS was more efficient than SMS when performing the three-layer continuous suture pattern. No short-term telemedicine-assessed complications were noted with either treatment method. BS can improve efficiency in surgical closures, especially considering large volumes of animals, and appears to have a similar short-term, telemedicine-assessed complication rate when compared to SMS.

Impact of Inner Layer Renorrhaphy Suture on Renal Artery Pseudoaneurysm Formation Following Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To report the impact of resection base inner layer renorrhaphy suture type on renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) rate following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

METHODS

Five hundred and sixty-three consecutive RAPNs performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into 3 categories: (1) No base suture, (2) monofilament barbed suture (2-0 V-Loc 180 absorbable suture, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), (3) polyglactin 910 (2-0 Vicryl coated suture, Ethicon Inc, Cincinnati, OH). In a secondary analysis, we evaluated suturing (Vicryl and V-Loc) vs no base suture. All patients had outer cortical renorrhaphy performed with 0-Vicryl suture utilizing the standard sliding clip technique.

RESULTS

One hundred ten patients (19.5%) had V-Loc suturing, 255 patients (45.3%) had Vicryl suturing, and 198 patients (35.2%) had no base suture. Patients had a median age of 62.8years (interquartile range: 53.5-69.7) and median RENAL score was 8 (6-9). Median mass size from preoperative imaging was 3.0 cm (2.5-4.0) for V-Loc, 3.3 cm (2.5-4.2) for Vicryl, and 2.0 cm (1.8-3.0) for no base suture (P < .001). Overall, 21 patients (3.7%) developed a symptomatic postoperative RAP. The rate of RAP was 3.6% (4/110) for V-Loc, 3.9% (10/255) for 2-0 Vicryl, and 3.5% (7/198) for no base suture (P = 1.00). Similarly, the rate of RAP was 3.5% (7/198) for no base suture and 3.8% (14/365) for base suture (P = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Utilization of base suture and type of base suture used during RAPN was not predictive of postoperative RAP development.

Renorrhaphy techniques in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

In the absence of consensus on the optimal approach to renorrhaphy in partial nephrectomy, this systematic review aims to assess the various renorrhaphy techniques and their impact on surgical outcomes.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the literature was performed in March 2022, using PubMed and Scopus, without time restrictions and research filters for studies investigating renorrhaphy techniques in partial nephrectomy. Studies providing sufficient details on renorrhaphy techniques and their outcomes during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN) were included in this analysis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thirty-one studies with 5720 patients were included in the analysis. In most studies, tumor diameter was <4 cm. RENAL and PADUA scores as well as tumor locations were heterogeneous between the studies. The results of the use of hemostatic agents were conflicting among different studies with limited evidence regarding the benefits of its routine use in partial nephrectomy. The use of barbed and running sutures was associated with a reduced warm ischemia time. While some studies showed a decreased warm ischemia time when omitting cortical renorrhaphy, others found that it may lead to higher incidence of minor complications without any significant improvement in other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is ongoing research to determine the optimal approach to renorrhaphy. The current evidence on the routine use of hemostatic agents is limited. The use of certain techniques such as barbed sutures, sliding clips and running sutures reduced the warm ischemia time. The omission of cortical renorrhaphy is still controversial.

Prognostic value of tumour contour irregularity on surgical strategies for T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional study

PURPOSE

To determine the prognostic value of tumour contour irregularity degree (CID) in surgical strategy options for T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective multi-institutional review of 489 patients with T1bN0M0 RCC treated between January 2009 and June 2019. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to analyse the impact of CID on disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 55 months (interquartile range, 40-81 months) for 55 (11.2 %) patients with metastasis or recurrence. Logistic analysis indicated that CID was associated with World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grades III-IV (odds ratio, 1.015; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.008-1.023; p < 0.001). After being classified into high CID (≥50 %) and low CID (<50 %) groups, those with a high CID showed a significantly higher ratio of WHO/IUSP grades III-IV (74/277 [26.7 %] vs 25/212 [11.8 %]) and shorter DFS than the low CID group (p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression showed that partial nephrectomy (PN; hazard ratio [HR], 1.889; 95 % CI, 1.020-3.499; p = 0.043), high CID (HR, 6.685; 95 % CI, 2.776-16.100; p < 0.001), and WHO/ISUP grade III-IV (HR, 1.950; 95 % CI, 1.100-3.458; p = 0.022) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. The Kaplan-Meier plot showed that PN had a DFS rate comparable to that of radical nephrectomy (RN; p = 0.994). In the low CID group, patients who underwent PN showed comparable DFS to those who underwent RN (p = 0.903). Furthermore, patients with a high CID tended to have worse DFS in the PN versus RN group (p = 0.044). Multivariable Cox regression showed that PN (HR, 2.049; 95 % CI, 1.065-3.942; p = 0.032) and WHO/ISUP grade III-IV (HR, 2.148; 95 % CI, 1.189-3.881; p = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors of DFS in the high CID group.

CONCLUSIONS

CID is a reliable preoperative parameter which is positively correlated with WHO/ISUP grade and can help with surgical decision-making in patients with T1bN0M0 RCC.

The efficacy of modified binding technique for renorrhaphy during robotic partial nephrectomy: surgical and functional outcomes from single-center experience

BACKGROUND

To compare the traditional single-layer and double-layer suture renorrhaphy with modified "Binding" suture renorrhaphy (whole rim of the wound was closed by the all-layer flow suture starting from the parenchyma cut edges to hilum, followed by the final defect closure) in robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for treating localized renal cell carcinoma in our large institutional experience.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 406 consecutive patients who underwent RPN from May 2018 and December 2020 in our center. The demographic and oncologic outcome variables were compared between different renal reconstruction groups and the effect of these suture techniques on renal function outcomes was also evaluated.

RESULTS

For the single-layer group, median operative time and warm ischemic time were significantly less than that of the double-layer and "Binding" groups (p < 0.001), while the significantly lower eGFR drop (p = 0.014) was also detected within postoperative 3 months from baseline, but this difference lost its statistical significance from 3th month to the last follow-up. The changes in postoperative creatinine values were clinically insignificant among the three groups. In a sub-analysis over 258 patients with moderate/high nephrometry score, those patients who underwent "Binding" suture had an undifferentiated warm ischemic time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospitalization stay with a decreased risk of Grade III complications (postoperative hemorrhage requiring intervention) and improved renal function recovery during the whole follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Single-layer suture renorrhaphy may be associated with better renal functional preservation and could prove to be reliable in patients with low-complexity tumor (RENAL score ≤ 6). Patients with moderate/high-complexity tumor (RENAL score ≥ 7) might represent a subgroup of patients having a functional benefit after "Binding" suture renorrhaphy even in the long-term period.

Hernia Defect Closure With Barbed Suture: An Assessment of Patient-reported Outcomes in Extraperitoneal Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair

BACKGROUND

Primary closure of a fascial defect during ventral hernia repair is associated with lower rates of recurrence and better patient satisfaction compared with bridging repairs. Robotic surgery offers enhanced ability to close these defects and this has likely been aided by the use of barbed suture. The goal of this study was to evaluate the perioperative safety and the long-term outcomes for the use of barbed suture for the primary closure of hernia defects during robotic ventral hernia repair (rVHR) with mesh.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent rVHR with the use of a barbed suture for fascial defect closure from August 2018 to August 2020 in an academic center. All the patients included were queried by phone to complete a quality of life assessment to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Subjective sense of a bulge and pain at the previous hernia site has been shown to correlate with hernia recurrence. These questions were used in conjunction with a Hernia-related Quality of Life Survey (HerQles) score to assess a patient's quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients with 102 hernias were analyzed. Sixty patients (74%) were successfully reached and completed the PRO form at median postoperative day 356 (range: 43 to 818). Eight patients (13% of patients with PRO data) claimed to have both a bulge and pain at their previous hernia site, concerning for possible recurrence. Median overall HerQLes score was 82 [Interquartile Range (IQR): 54 to 99]. Patients with a single hernia defect, when compared with those with multiple defects, had a lower rate of both a bulge (15% vs. 30%) and symptoms (33% vs. 48%), as well as a higher median HerQLes score (85 vs. 62) at the time of PRO follow-up. Patients with previous hernia repair had a lower median HerQLes score of 65 (IQR: 43 to 90) versus 88 (IQR: 62-100). These patients also had a higher rate of sensing a bulge (29% vs. 18%), whereas a sense of symptoms at the site was less (33% vs. 44%).

CONCLUSIONS

Barbed suture for fascial defect closure in rVHR was found to be safe with an acceptable rate of possible recurrence by the use of PRO data. Patients with multiple hernias and previous repairs had a higher likelihood of recurrence and a lower quality of life after rVHR.

Comparison of survival and renal function between partial and radical laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Partial nephrectomy has been persuaded as a widely accepted surgical procedure for T1a (≤ 4 cm) renal tumors. However, when treating T1b (4-7 cm) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the "optimal" method of surgery is still debatable. The aim of the research is to evaluate the long-term oncological and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for patients with T1b RCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 1, 2003 to July 1, 2016, 331 patients were included in the current study. Patients presented with unilateral T1b RCC and underwent either LPN (n = 177) or LRN (n = 154). Relevant clinical data including follow-ups were acquired from patients.

RESULTS

The operation time of the LPN group patients was longer than that of LRN group (94.3 min vs 88.3 min, p = 0.021) and LPN group patients required shorter stays in hospital (11.5 days vs. 13.4 days, p = 0.009). Contrast to LRN, level of eGFR was superior in LPN at the postoperative time of 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months (all p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests showed that patients undergoing LPN had a much higher overall survival (OS) (p = 0.007), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.006) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p = 0.008) than those receiving LRN. In comparison with the LRN group, multivariable Cox analysis indicated that patients of the LPN group had a 1.9-fold OS, 2.9-fold CSS and 2.3-fold MFS.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with T1b RCC, our findings revealed that OS, CSS and MFS are superior in patients receiving LPN than those treated with LRN. With the benefit of preserving renal function of LPN, which leads a less incidence risk of other systematic diseases, LPN may be the preferred option when condition permits for cases involving T1b RCC.

Tensile force exerted by suture during renorrhaphy using current techniques

Partial nephrectomy has become the preferred treatment option for small renal masses. In particular, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) using laparoscopic or robotic approaches has shown decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and faster return to normal activity compared to open surgery. However, MIPN still carries risk of postoperative complications including hemorrhage and urine leakage. Closure of the renal remnant, often called renorrhaphy, is a critical step to avoid these complications. The purpose of the study was to provide quantitative data on suture properties during partial nephrectomy. Multiple suture techniques have been proposed for renal closure during robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. There is no consensus for preferred closure technique and this decision is at the discretion of the surgeon. Simulated partial nephrectomies were performed on porcine kidneys. Renorrhaphy was completed with barbed suture using a simple running, interrupted sliding-clip, or horizontal mattress technique. Suture tension was obtained prior to tissue failure with force sensors measuring in newtons (N). The interrupted sliding-clip and horizontal mattress techniques performed similarly with median force values of 11.06 N and 12.20 N, respectively. The simple running technique performed with a median force of 3.62 N. ANOVA proved statistical significance. Interrupted sliding-clip and horizontal mattress sutures exert similar forces prior to tissue failure during renorrhaphy. Both techniques were able to achieve forces great enough to overcome the hydrostatic pressure of perfused renal tissue. Simple running sutures failed at significantly lower forces. When closing renal defects after partial nephrectomy, sliding-clip and horizontal mattress should be utilized over simple running sutures.

Suture techniques during laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis of peri-operative outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the available evidence on renorrhaphy techniques and to assess their impact on peri-operative outcomes after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed in January 2018 without time restrictions, using MEDLINE, Cochrane and Web of Science databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement recommendations. Studies providing sufficient details on renorrhaphy techniques during laparoscopic or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and comparative studies focused on peri-operative outcomes were included in qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 67 and 19 studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively. The overall quality of evidence was low. Specific tumour features (i.e. size, hilar location, anatomical complexity, nearness to renal sinus and/or urinary collecting system), surgeon's experience, robot-assisted technology, as well as the aim of reducing warm ischaemia time and the amount of devascularized renal parenchyma preserved represented the key factors driving the evolution of the renorrhaphy techniques during MIPN over the past decade. Quantitative synthesis showed that running suture was associated with shorter operating and ischaemia time, and lower postoperative complication and transfusion rates than interrupted suture. Barbed suture had lower operating and ischaemia time and less blood loss than non-barbed suture. The single-layer suture technique was associated with shorter operating and ischaemia time than the double-layer technique. No comparisons were possible concerning renal functional outcomes because of non-homogeneous data reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

Renorrhaphy techniques significantly evolved over the years, improving outcomes. Running suture, particularly using barbed wires, shortened the operating and ischaemia times. A further advantage could derive from avoiding a double-layer suture.

The application of barbed suture during the partial nephrectomy may modify perioperative results: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Barbed sutures can avoid knot tying and speed the suture placement in the PN(partial nephrectomy). On account of the impact on clinical outcomes are ambiguous, this study is determined to identify the application of barbed suture during PN.

Methods

ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Register of Clinical Studies, PubMed and EMBASE were searched for RCTs(randomized controlled trials) and cohort studies focusing on the comparison of barbed and traditional sutures in PN(last updated on Feb in 2015). According to Cochrane Library’s suggestion, quality assessment was performed. Review Manager was applied to analyze all the data and sensitivity analyses were performed through omitting each study sequentially.

Results

Eight cohort studies and none of RCTs proved eligible (risk of bias: moderate to low,431 patients). Warm ischemia time(MD = − 6.55,95% CI -8.86 to − 4.24, P < 0.05) decreased statistically in the barbed suture group, as well as operative time(MD = − 11.29,95% CI -17.87 to-4.71, P < 0.05). Postoperative complications also reduced significantly(OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to0.80, P < 0.05). Unidirectional barbed suture resulted in fewer postoperative complications based on the subgroup analysis(OR = 0.48,95% CI 0.24 to 0.94, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The barbed suture may be a useful surgical innovation which can modify perioperative results for surgeons and patients. Randomly-designed studies with longer follow up and larger sample sizes are in the need of to explore the applicability.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-018-0435-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ischemia Techniques in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes

CONTEXT

The optimal ischemia technique at partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal masses is yet to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and analyze the current evidence about surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes after different ischemia techniques (cold, warm, and zero ischemia) at PN.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A computerized systematic literature search was performed by using PubMed (MEDLINE) and Science Direct. Identification and selection of the studies were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria. Outcomes of interest were estimated blood loss (EBL), overall complications, positive surgical margins, local tumor recurrence, and renal function preservation. Meta-analysis and forest-plot diagrams were performed. Overall pooled estimates, together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), of the incidence of all parameters were obtained using a random effect model (RE-Model) on the log transformed means (MLN), proportion, or standardized mean change, as deemed appropriate.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

One hundred and fifty-six studies were included. No clinically meaningful differences were found in terms of EBL after cold (mean: 215.5; 95% CI: 154.2-276.8m), warm (mean: 201.8; 95% CI: 175.0-228.7ml), or zero (mean: 261.2; 95% CI: 171.0-351.3ml) ischemia technique. Overall, postoperative complications were recorded in 14.1% (95% CI: 6.7-27.4), 11.1% (95% CI: 10.0-12.3), and 9.7% (95% CI: 7.7-12.2) of patients after cold, warm, and zero ischemia (p<0.01), respectively. Positive surgical margins were recorded in 4.8% (95% CI: 1.9-10.9), 4.0% (95% CI: 3.4-4.8), and 5.6% (95% CI: 3.1-9.8) of patients after cold, warm, and zero ischemia (p<0.01), respectively. Local recurrence was recorded in 3.2% (95% CI: 1.9-5.2) and 3.1% (95% CI: 0.7-11.5) of patients after warm and zero ischemia (p<0.01), respectively. The log₂ of estimated glomerular filtration ratio mean changes were-1.37 (95% CI:-3.42 to 0.68),-1.00 (-2.04 to 0.03), and-0.71 (-1.15 to-0.27) ml/min after cold, warm, and zero ischemia, respectively. Low level of evidence, retrospective nature of most of included studies, a high risk of selection bias, and heterogeneity within included studies limited the overall quality of the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of ischemia technique at PN is still debatable and subject to confounding by several factors, namely, patients' selection criteria, surgical technique used, and percentage of functional parenchyma spared during surgery. These confounders bias available evidence and were addressed by only a small part of available studies. Unfortunately, the overall quality of literature evidences and the high risk of selection bias limit the possibility of any causal interpretation about the relationship between the ischemia technique used and surgical, oncological, or functional outcomes. Thus, none of the available ischemia technique could be recommended over the other.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The present analysis shows that none of the available ischemia techniques, namely, cold, warm, or zero ischemia, is universally superior to the others, and other factors play a role in the surgical outcome.

Self-retaining barbed suture reduces warm ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of self-retaining barbed suture in renorrhaphy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by comparing surgical outcomes in a prospective randomized manner.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From July 2014 to July 2015, a total of 60 patients with T1 renal tumor were randomized into two equal groups: self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) and conventional absorbable polyglactin suture (non-SRBS group). All patients were treated by retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. One surgeon with high volume experience performed all procedures. The patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The patient demographics and tumor characteristics were comparable. The mean tumor size and R.E.N.A.L. scores were comparable between the two groups. LPN was successfully accomplished in all patients without open conversion. The warm ischemia and renorrhaphy times were significantly shorter in the SRBS group (18.8 ± 8.2 vs. 22.9 ± 7.3 min, P = .04; 10.4 ± 3.7 vs. 13.8 ± 5.6 min, P = .01). The minor complication rate was 13.3% vs. 10.0%, which was comparable. No major complication occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The randomized controlled trial demonstrates that SRBS for renorrhaphy during retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is safe and efficient. Application of barbed suture simplifies the parenchymal repair procedure and reduces warm ischemia time in comparison with conventional suture.

Development and Validity of a Silicone Renal Tumor Model for Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Training

OBJECTIVE

To provide a training tool to address the technical challenges of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, we created silicone renal tumor models using 3-dimensional printed molds of a patient's kidney with a mass. In this study, we assessed the face, content, and construct validity of these models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgeons of different training levels completed 4 simulations on silicone renal tumor models. Participants were surveyed on the usefulness and realism of the model as a training tool. Performance was measured using operation-specific metrics, self-reported operative demands (NASA Task Load Index [NASA TLX]), and blinded expert assessment (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Surgeons [GEARS]).

RESULTS

Twenty-four participants included attending urologists, endourology fellows, urology residents, and medical students. Post-training surveys of expert participants yielded mean results of 79.2 on the realism of the model's overall feel and 90.2 on the model's overall usefulness for training. Renal artery clamp times and GEARS scores were significantly better in surgeons further in training (P ≤.005 and P ≤.025). Renal artery clamp times, preserved renal parenchyma, positive margins, NASA TLX, and GEARS scores were all found to improve across trials (P <.001, P = .025, P = .024, P ≤.020, and P ≤.006, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Face, content, and construct validity were demonstrated in the use of a silicone renal tumor model in a cohort of surgeons of different training levels. Expert participants deemed the model useful and realistic. Surgeons of higher training levels performed better than less experienced surgeons in various study metrics, and improvements within individuals were observed over sequential trials. Future studies should aim to assess model predictive validity, namely, the association between model performance improvements and improvements in live surgery.

Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Objective:

To comparatively evaluate the traditional interrupted knot-tying and running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl^® in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive patients undergoing LPN using traditional interrupted knot-tying suture renorrhaphy (Group 1; n=31) or running suture technique renorrhaphy with 2-0 monofilament polyglecaprone (Monocryl^®, Ethicon) (Group 2; n=31) from December 2011 to October 2015 at the University. All patients underwent LPN performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The demographic, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups, and the effect of both suture techniques on the warm ischemic time (WIT) and trifecta were evaluated.

Results:

The running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl^® reduced WIT, estimated blood lost and length of hospitalization stay significantly without increasing postoperative complication rate during LPN in comparison with interrupted knot-tying suture.

Conclusion:

The renorrhaphy using the running suture with Monocryl^® is an effective and safe technique with the advantage of shortening WIT even in more challenging and larger tumors during LPN.

Effects of barbed suture during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on postoperative tissue damage and longitudinal changes in lower urinary tract outcome

OBJECTIVE

To compare the postoperative tissue damage and longitudinal changes in functional and patient-reported outcomes after vesicourethral anastomosis with barbed suture and nonbarbed suture in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study involving 88 consecutive patients who underwent RARP. These patients were categorized into the barbed suture group (n = 50) and the nonbarbed suture group (n = 38). Urethral and periurethral damages determined by magnetic resonance imaging at nine months after RARP were compared using generalized linear models. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) index, uroflowmetry, and the 1-h pad test were measured at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after RARP. The findings were analyzed using mixed-effects models. Confounding was adjusted for using propensity score covariate adjustment.

RESULTS

The likelihood of having Grade 2/3 urethral and periurethral damages was greater in the barbed suture group than in the nonbarbed suture group (adjusted risk ratios: 2.98 and 3.85, respectively). IPSS, QOL index, and urinary leakage transiently increased at one month after RARP in both groups. QOL index was higher in the barbed suture group than in the nonbarbed suture group at 1, 9, and 12 months (P = 0.023, P = 0.025, and P = 0.011, respectively). The barbed suture group had significantly more cases of urinary incontinence than the nonbarbed suture group at 3 months (P = 0.041). Other outcomes were comparable between the two groups at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort study showed that, after RARP, barbed sutures during VUA induced more severe tissue damage as determined by MRI and greater transient aggravation of QOL and continence function than nonbarbed sutures. The present findings suggest that using nonbarbed sutures during VUA may facilitate earlier acquisition of urinary QOL and urinary continence.

Barbed suture tissue closure device in urological surgery – a comprehensive review

The development and implementation of barbed sutures has transformed the technique of tissue closure with increasing application across multiple surgical disciplines. Changes in design and handling such as the introduction of absorbable and non-absorbable bidirectional barbed sutures reflect an increasing applicability in tissues of varying qualities. We undertook a comprehensive review of available literature to provide an evidence-based rationale for the clinical use of barbed suture tissue closure devices. We summarise uses along with advantages and disadvantages reported across a number of surgical specialties such as urology, orthopaedics, gynaecology and plastic surgery. Tangible benefits noted were faster closure speed, maintenance of suture integrity, improved efficiency in closure, avoidance of knots and possibly a cost-benefit effect. In terms of complications, the barbed sutures compared equally with standard sutures with no significant differences. In conclusion, barbed sutures have demonstrated versatility and safety across surgical specialties and compares favourably with standard sutures. There appears to be an increasing popularity in the use of barbed sutures with clear advantages to both surgeon and patient.

Laparoscopic Technique and Initial Experiences of Choledocholithotomy Closure With Knotless Unidirectional Barbed Sutures After Surgery for Biliary Stone Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Between January 2012 and June 2013, we performed laparoscopic choledocholithotomy on 10 cases of common bile duct stone disease. Laparoscopic surgery for common duct stone disease is technically demanding. Particularly, laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot tying for repair of choledochotomy are the most difficult skills in this operative procedures. Barbed sutures has recently been proposed to facilitate laparoscopic suturing. This is the first report demonstrating that the barbed suture could potentially improve the efficacy of the intracorporeal repair of choledochotomy following extirpation of biliary tract stones with less time needed to suture.

METHODS

Consecutive 10 patients with common bile duct stones who underwent laparoscopic choledocholithotomy were enrolled in this study. Choledochotomy was closed with V-Loc sutures (15 cm V-Loc 180 sutures) for 7 patients, and a V-20 needle (26 mm, tapered) for 3 patients.

RESULTS

The mean choledochotomy closure time was significantly shorter in the V-Loc group (15.2 ± 1.6 min) than in the Vicryl group (23.5 ± 1.5 min). The unidirectional barbed sutures allowed surgeons to use both their hands effectively and to focus exclusively on the placement of the subsequent stitches, without the need to maintain tension on preceding stitches to prevent slippage. And also the unidirectional barbed sutures were able to distribute tension evenly along the suture line, allowing good tissue apposition.

CONCLUSION

The knotless unidirectional barbed sutures are a safe and effective tool for choledochotomy repair during surgery for common bile duct stones.

The role of the assistant during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: does experience matter?

The objective of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes with respect to the experience level of the bedside assistant during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively maintained database of 414 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomies performed by experienced robotic surgeons at our institution from April 2011 to September 2014. A senior-level assistant was defined as a resident in his or her post-graduate year (PGY) 4 or 5, or a fellow. Junior-level assistants were considered to be PGY-2, PGY-3, or a nurse first assistant. Multivariate analyses were performed using linear, Poisson, and logistic regression models. There were 115 junior-level cases and 299 senior-level cases. On univariate analysis, the experience level of the assistant had no impact on operative time (168 for junior level vs. 163 min for senior level, p = 0.656). Likewise, there were no differences between the junior- and senior-level groups with regard to warm ischemia time (21.3 vs. 20.9 min, p = 0.843), negative margin status (111/115 (96.5 %) vs. 280/299 (93.6 %), p = 0.340), or postoperative complications (17/115 (14.8 %) vs. 35/299 (11.7 %), p = 0.408). After multivariate analysis, operative time was associated with increased body mass index and tumor size (both p < 0.001), but not with resident experience level (p = 0.051). Estimated blood loss and postoperative complications were also not associated with the PGY of the assistant (p = 0.488 and p = 0.916, respectively). Despite common concern, the PGY status of a physician trainee serving as the bedside assistant does not appear to influence the outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at a high-volume center.

Past, present and future of urological robotic surgery

The first urologic robotic program in the world was built at the Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital Detroit, Michigan, in 2000 under the vision of surgical innovator, Dr. Mani Menon for the radical prostatectomy. The robot-assisted radical prostatectomy continues being modified with techniques to improve perioperative and surgical outcomes. The application of robotic surgical technique has since been expanded to the bladder and upper urinary tract surgery. The evolution of surgical technique and its expansion of application will continue to improve quality, outcome parameters and experience for the patients.

Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed absorbable sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 242 patients

OBJECTIVE

Intracorporeal reconstruction of the digestive tract is technically challenging. The V-Loc 180 wound closure device (Covidien) is a self-anchoring unidirectional barbed suture that obviates the need for knot tying. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate the use of the novel suture in gastrointestinal enterotomy closure.

METHODS

The subjects comprised patients with malignant disease who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gastrectomy with curative intent. The barbed suture was used to close the entry hole for the linear stapler during intracorporeal reconstruction following laparoscopic gastric resection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who developed anastomotic leakage at the site where the barbed suture was applied.

RESULTS

Between July 2012 and March 2015, 242 patients were enrolled. Of 362 anastomoses, the enterotomy hole at 256 sites was closed using the barbed suture. These 256 sites consisted of 95 gastroduodenostomies, 25 gastrogastrostomies, 13 gastrojejunostomies, 90 jejunojejunostomies, 17 esophagojejunostomies and 16 primary closures of the stomach following local gastric resection. There were no anastomosis-related complications, conversion to usual sutures, mechanical closure of the entry hole and reoperation due to adhesive obstructions or mortality over a median follow-up period of 17.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the unidirectional barbed absorbable suture for gastrointestinal closure is safe and effective in laparoscopic gastrectomy.

The clinical application of the sliding loop technique for renorrhaphy during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Surgical technique and outcomes

Purpose

To report the initial clinical outcomes of the newly devised sliding loop technique (SLT) used for renorrhaphy in patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) for small renal mass.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed the surgical videos and medical charts of 31 patients who had undergone RALPN with the SLT renorrhaphy performed by two surgeons (CWJ and CK) between January 2014 and October 2014. SLT renorrhaphy was performed after tumor excision and renal parenchymal defect repair. Assessed outcomes included renorrhaphy time (RT), warm ischemic time, perioperative complications, and perioperative renal function change. RT was defined as interval from the end of bed suture to the renal artery declamping.

Results

In all patients, sliding loop renorrhaphy was successfully conducted without conversions to radical nephrectomy or open approaches. Mean renorrhaphy and warm ischemic time were 9.0 and 22.6 minutes, respectively. After completing renorrhaphy, there were no adverse events such as dehiscence of approximated renal parenchyma, renal parenchymal tearing, or significant bleeding. Furthermore, no postoperative complications or significant renal function decline were observed as of the last follow-up for all patients. The limitations of this study include the small volume case series, the retrospective nature of the study, and the heterogeneity of surgeons.

Conclusions

From our initial clinical experience, SLT may be an efficient and safe renorrhaphy method in real clinical practice. Further large scale, prospective, long-term follow-up, and direct comparative studies with other techniques are required to confirm the clinical applicability of SLT.

Urinary fistula after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre analysis of 1 791 patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for a urine leak in a large multicentre, prospective database of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A database of 1 791 RPN from five USA centres was reviewed for urine leak as a complication of RPN. Patient and tumour characteristics were compared between patients with and those without postoperative urine leaks. Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables and Wilcoxon sum-rank tests were used for quantitative variables. A review of the literature on PN and urine leak was conducted.

RESULTS

Urine leak was noted in 14/1 791 (0.78%) patients who underwent RPN. The mean (sd) nephrometry score of the entire cohort was 7.2 (1.9), and 8.0 (1.9) in patients who developed urine leak. The median (range) postoperative day of presentation was 13 (3-32) days. Patients with urine leak presented in delayed fashion with fever (two of the 14 patients, 14%), gastrointestinal complaints (four patients, 29%), and pain (five patients, 36%). Eight of the 14 patients (57%) required admission, while eight (57%) and nine (64%) had a drain or stent placed, respectively. Drains and stents were removed after a median (range) of 8 (4-13) days and 21 (8-83) days, respectively. Variables associated with urine leak included tumour size (P = 0.021), hilar location (P = 0.025), operative time (P = 0.006), warm ischaemia time (P = 0.005), and pelvicalyceal repair (P = 0.018). Upon literature review, the historical incidence of urine leak ranged from 1.0% to 17.4% for open PN and 1.6-16.5% for laparoscopic PN.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of urine leak after RPN is very low and may be predicted by some preoperative factors, affording better patient counselling of risks. The low urinary leak rate may be attributed to the enhanced visualisation and suturing technique that accompanies the robotic approach.

The learning curve and factors affecting warm ischemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Introduction:

The learning curve for robotic partial nephrectomy was investigated for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon and factors associated with warm ischemia time (WIT) were assessed.

Materials and Methods:

Between 2007 and 2014, one surgeon completed 171 procedures. Operative time, blood loss, complications and ischemia time were examined to determine the learning curve. The learning curve was defined as the number of procedures needed to reach the targeted goal for WIT, which most recently was 20 min. Statistical analyses including multivariable regression analysis and matching were performed.

Results:

Comparing the first 30 to the last 30 patients, mean ischemia time (23.0–15.2 min, P < 0.01) decreased while tumor size (2.4–3.4 cm, P = 0.02) and nephrometry score (5.9–7.0, P = 0.02) increased. Body mass index (P = 0.87), age (P = 0.38), complication rate (P = 0.16), operating time (P = 0.78) and estimated blood loss (P = 0.98) did not change. Decreases in ischemia time corresponded with revised goals in 2011 and early vascular unclamping with the omission of cortical renorrhaphy in selected patients. A multivariable analysis found nephrometry score, tumor diameter, cortical renorrhaphy and year of surgery to be significant predictors of WIT.

Conclusions:

Adoption of robotic assistance for a surgeon experienced with laparoscopic surgery was associated with low complication rates even during the initial cases of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Ischemia time decreased while no significant changes in blood loss, operating time or complications were seen. The largest decrease in ischemia time was associated with adopting evidence-based goals and new techniques, and was not felt to be related to a learning curve.

A New Sliding-Loop Technique in Renorrhaphy for Partial Nephrectomy: A Feasibility Study in a Porcine Model

BACKGROUND

We developed a sliding-loop technique that narrowed both sides of the parenchyma in a porcine model and compared it with the conventional sliding-clip technique.

METHODS

Three pigs (30-40 kg) were reused following another experiment conducted by the same researchers. Bilateral kidneys were harvested within 30 minutes after euthanasia. Two partial nephrectomies per kidney were performed on opposite surfaces. All kidney defects were of the same size (diameter of 2.5-3 cm with a depth of 1.0-1.5 cm). The sliding-clip technique and sliding-loop technique were performed separately. In the sliding-loop technique, we created a 1-cm loop at the end of a Vicryl and placed a tetrafluoroethylene polymer pledget in front of the knots passing through the needle. The needle then crossed the loop after passing through the renal parenchyma. A Weck clip was placed and slid on one side to tighten the suture. Tightening was controlled with an equivalent force using a digital push-pull gauge. Three stitches were placed at each renorrhaphy site. The distance between repaired renal surfaces was measured at 5 different points (3 suture sites and 2 middle sites between sutures).

RESULTS

The results of the 2 techniques were compared by using the independent t test. The mean distance between renal surfaces was significantly narrower in the sliding-loop technique than in the conventional technique (1.80 ± 1.08 mm vs 5.28 ± 2.46 mm, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In the porcine model, the sliding-loop technique more effectively closed the partial nephrectomy defects compared with the conventional sliding-clip technique.

The growth of computer-assisted (robotic) surgery in urology 2000-2014: The role of Asian surgeons

Objective

A major role in the establishment of computer-assisted robotic surgery (CARS) can be traced to the work of Mani Menon at Vattikuti Urology Institute (VUI), and of many surgeons of Asian origin. The success of robotic surgery in urology has spurred its acceptance in other surgical disciplines, improving patient comfort and disease outcomes and helping the industrial growth. The present paper gives an overview of the progress and development of robotic surgery, especially in the field of Urology; and to underscore some of the seminal work done by the VUI and Asian surgeons in the development of robotic surgery in urology in the US and around the world.

Methods

PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases were searched for publications from 2000 through June 2014, using algorithms based on keywords “robotic surgery”, ”prostate”, “kidney”, “adrenal”, “bladder”, “reconstruction”, and “kidney transplant”. Inclusion criteria used were published full articles, book chapters, clinical trials, prospective and retrospective series, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses written in English language. Studies from Asian institutions or with the first/senior author of Asian origin were included for discussion, and focused on techniques of robotic surgery, relevant patient outcomes and associated demographic trends.

Results

A total of 58 articles selected for final review highlight the important strides made by robots in urology, from robotic radical prostatectomy in 2000 to robotic kidney transplant in 2014. In the hands of an experienced robotic surgeon, it has been demonstrated to improve functional patient outcomes and minimize perioperative complications compared to open surgery, especially in urologic oncology and reconstructive urology. With increasing surgeon proficiency, the benefits of robotic surgery were consistently seen across different surgical disciplines, patient populations, and strata.

Conclusion

The addition of robot to the surgical armamentarium has allowed better patient care and improved disease outcomes. VUI and surgeons of Asian origin have played a pioneering role in dissemination of computer-assisted surgery.

Application of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable suture in retroperito- neoscopic partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and feasibility of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable suture application in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From Sep 2011 and Aug 2012, 76 cases of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy were performed at our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) group (n = 36) and non-SRBS group (n = 40). There was no significant difference in age, sex, tumor size and location between the two groups. Clinical data and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

All 76 cases of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy were successfully performed, without conversion to open surgery or serious intraoperative complications. In the SRBS group, the suture time, warm ischemia time and operation blood loss were significantly shorter than that of non-SRBS group (p < 0.01), and operation time and hospital stay were shorter than that of non-SRBS group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable suture in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy could shorten suture time and warm ischemia time, with good safety and feasibility, worthy of being used in clinic.

Current Status of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

<p>Recently, nephron-sparing, minimally invasive surgery of small renal masses has become popular. The most typical surgery is laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). However, due to technical difficulties, the indications for LPN had been limited to small, exophytic, and peripheral tumors. This paper introduces current status of oncological outcomes and technical considerations.</p>

New and emerging uses of barbed suture technology in plastic surgery

Barbed sutures first received US Food and Drug Administration approval for soft tissue approximation in 2005 and early adopters readily embraced this device to develop new techniques. It has become apparent that the advantages are more than just "skin deep." Superficial and deep fascia, cartilage, tendon, joint capsule, and fibrous periprosthetic capsules can also be manipulated. Barbed sutures have revolutionized our approach to facial rejuvenation and body contouring by enhancing our ability to quilt and powerfully lift tissue. The elimination of surgical drains and shorter surgical times has made this a true boon for plastic surgeons as well as many other surgical specialists. This article summarizes some of the current and evolving applications of this exciting new tool.

[Suture materials in urology]

Since ancient times, sutures have been a fundamental part of the surgeon's practice. Beside the vegetable and animal origin materials, in the last decades different refined synthetic materials have been introduced in the clinical practice. More recently, different devices, such as staplers and tissue sealers have been developed. Thus, more than ever, urologists are faced with a multitude of suture materials, and research of safe, effective materials and devices seems to be continuously growing. The introduction and widespread diffusion of laparoscopic and robotic surgery has further boosted this research. Given there is no single material that is ideal for all situations, the surgeon must choose the best material for each particular case.
The aim of this non-systematic review is to summarize the more innovative suture materials and devices and to describe the different surgical methods to utilize them both in general and in urologic surgery.

Utilization of a novel unidirectional knotless suture during minimal access procedures in pediatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The application of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for advanced procedures in children is logical. However, the intracorporeal placement and tying of suture can be challenging, leading to prolonged anesthesia and morbidity. We describe our initial experience with the use of a novel unidirectional barbed knotless suture (V-LOC, Covidien, Mansfield, MA) that permits a safe and efficient advanced MIS reconstruction in infants and children.

METHODS

From August 2010 to February 2012, 11 infants and children underwent diaphragmatic reconstruction utilizing either the absorbable or the permanent V-LOC suture. Data retrieval included gender, weight, diagnosis, operative time, complications and follow up.

RESULTS

Thoracoscopic or laparoscopic repairs were carried out in all children. Two of the infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia of Bochdalek (CDH) developed a recurrence at 4 and 6 months of age and required reoperation. There were no other complications or recurrence in the remaining 9 children, and there were no mortalities in the group.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate the use of the unidirectional barbed knotless suture in pediatric surgery. We demonstrate that the use of the V-LOC barbed suture is an innovative, safe and time saving option for pediatric MIS. Prospective analysis with long-term follow-up is required to confirm these initial results and to ascertain if this novel approach can be utilized in other pediatric surgical conditions.

Laparoscopic technique and safety experience with barbed suture closure for pelvic cavity after abdominoperineal resection

BACKGROUND

Between April 2005 and December 2012, we performed laparoscopic colorectal resection with regional lymph node dissection on 273 cases of colorectal cancer patients. However, Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery requires a high degree of skill. Any surgeon who is going to embark on these difficult resections should have at a minimum laparoscopic suturing skills in order to be able to close the peritoneal defect.

METHODS

In laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, the intracorporeal suture technique required to close the pelvic cavity is very difficult. Barbed sutures have recently been proposed to facilitate laparoscopic suturing. Two patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) with intracorporeal closure of the pelvic cavity from September to October 2012 were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

We present our initial experience of two consecutive cases of intracorporeal closure of the pelvic cavity by totally laparoscopic APR. After clinical follow-up, the two patients have no complaints and have shown no signs of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

We hypothesized that barbed sutures could potentially improve the efficiency of intracorporeal closure of the pelvic cavity after laparoscopic APR. Further, we expect that use of the V-Loc™ will reduce intra-operative stress on the endoscopic surgeon.

The unidirectional barbed suture for renorrhaphy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Stanford experience

PURPOSE

Using barbed suture represents a novel technical modification in the performance of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Our purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this suture for renorrhaphy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients underwent LPN using V-Loc™ 180 (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland) suture, and a nonconsecutive control group of 24 patients, matched according to tumor size and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, underwent LPN using absorbable polyglactin suture. All 37 patients underwent LPN performed by a single surgeon. Perioperative and postoperative indicators of morbidity, estimated blood loss, and warm ischemia time (WIT) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor size, laterality, and R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score were identical between the groups. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, rates of surgical complications, and length of hospital stay. However, mean WIT was significantly shorter in the V-Loc group compared with the control group (24.5±5.3 minutes versus 31.9±8.9 minutes, P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of V-Loc sutures for renorrhaphy during LPN is safe and feasible and, in our series, significantly reduces WIT. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings, but these results indicate a promising development in reducing WIT during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

The use of self-retaining barbed suture for inner layer renorrhaphy significantly reduces warm ischemia time in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: outcomes of a matched-pair analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) on reducing renorrhaphy time and warm ischemia time (WIT) during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), in comparison with conventional polyglactin suture.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2008 and June 2012, 115 patients underwent LPN for renal tumors at our institution. Among them, the patients whose inner layer renorrhaphy was performed using SRBS (group 1, n=33) or polyglactin suture (group 2, n=33) were retrospectively identified from prospectively collected institutional laparoscopic database (unmatched comparison). Furthermore, 17 patients from each group were matched at a 1:1 ratio in terms of sex, age, body mass index, preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomic (PADUA) classification scoring system, and operative approach (transperitoneoscopic/retroperitoneoscopic) to eliminate the effects of these variables on WIT (matched-pair comparison). Demographic, perioperative, and pathologic parameters were evaluated between groups in both unmatched and matched-pair comparison.

RESULTS

The perioperative parameters including inner layer renorrhaphy time, WIT, estimated blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, and complication rate were not statistically different between the two groups in the unmatched comparison. Median PADUA score (9 vs 8, P=0.006), median preoperative (4 cm vs 3.6 cm, P=0.049), and pathologic (4.5 cm vs 3.5 cm, P=0.009) tumor size, however, were significantly higher in group 1. In the matched-pair analysis, inner layer renorrhaphy time (350 sec vs 505 sec, P=0.004) and WIT (19 min vs 28 min, P=0.037) were significantly reduced with the use of SRBS in group 1 without a difference of median PADUA score (8 vs 8, P=1), median preoperative (3.8 cm vs 4 cm, P=0.959), and pathologic (4.2 cm vs 4 cm, P=0.284) tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

The SRBS significantly reduced inner layer renorrhaphy time and WIT during LPN and may enable urologists to perform LPN in more challenging and larger tumors, in comparison with conventional polyglactin suture.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in contemporary practice

Laparoscopic renal surgery is associated with reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stay, enhanced cosmesis, and more rapid convalescence relative to open renal surgery. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a minimally invasive, nephron-sparing alternative to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN) for the management of small renal masses. While offering similar oncological outcomes to laparoscopic RN, the technical challenges and prolonged learning curve associated with LPN limit its wider dissemination. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), although still an evolving procedure with no long-term data, has emerged as a viable alternative to LPN, with favorable preliminary outcomes. This article provides an overview of the role of RAPN in the management of renal cell carcinoma. The clinical indications and principles of surgical technique for this procedure are discussed. The oncological, renal functional, and perioperative outcomes of RAPN are also evaluated, as are complication rates.

Partial nephrectomy: is there an advantage of the self-retaining barbed suture in the perioperative period? A matched case-control comparison

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) in renal defect repair during partial nephrectomy (PN), by assessing perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

From June 2010 on we have been using the SRBS for superficial layer closure during open and laparoscopic PN in two European centers. These data were collected prospectively and matched with historical PN cases performed with conventional suture. Cases were matched for PADUA score, surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) and the center where surgery was performed. Comparisons were made in patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes including warm ischemia time (WIT), changes in hemoglobin (Hb), changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and perioperative complications between the SRBS and non-SRBS groups. Statistical tests of significance were performed using Student's t test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-one consecutive cases of PN under WIT were performed with SRBS. These cases were matched with cases from the historical database of PN performed with conventional suture. The rate of perioperative complications was statistically significantly lower in the SRBS cohort (6.5 vs. 22.6 %, p = 0.038). Mean ischemia time was 19.6 min (SD, 7.5) in the SRBS group versus 21.8 min (SD, 9.5) in the conventional suture group (p = 0.312). There were no significant differences between groups for postoperative changes in creatinine, eGFR and Hb. Limitations of this study include the absence of randomization and the relative small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

SRBS can be safely used during partial nephrectomy. SRBS reduces significantly the number of perioperative complications.