Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm

Safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with 365 μm fibers of Ho: YAG laser: a short-term follow-up

Our previous study first reported the efficacy of FURL using 365 μm fibers with holmium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Ho: YAG) laser lithotripsy. This study evaluates the 16-week safety of this procedure. A prospective cohort study was conducted, and the clinical characteristics of patients who underwent FURL using 365 μm fibers with Ho: YAG laser were retrospectively collected. Descriptive statistics were reported, and logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors influencing the stone-free rate (SFR). Infection-related laboratory parameters, including white blood cell count (WBC), procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP), were collected. Regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for the development of urosepsis post-surgery. Additionally, a 16-week follow-up was conducted in outpatient clinics, and kidney function was assessed. A total of 274 patients participated in this study. The 4-week stone-free rate (SFR) following FURL with 365 μm fibers of Ho: YAG laser was significantly associated with stone size and composition. No severe complications were observed following FURL procedures. There were no significant differences in white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) in peripheral blood before and after FURL procedures. Urosepsis was diagnosed in 1.82% of patients. Preoperative white blood cell count (WBC) in urine and preoperative urine culture results were identified as significant risk factors. Kidney function remained stable at 4 and 16 weeks following FURL. This prospective cohort study demonstrated the high safety of FURL with 365 μm fibers of Ho: YAG laser, as infection-related parameters during the perioperative period showed no significant differences, and kidney function remained stable throughout the 16-week follow-up.

Does prior PCNL affect RIRS? A retrospective analysis of a single center data

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate the results and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients who have previously undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis included patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones between August 2018 and April 2023. Group 1 comprised 396 patients who underwent primary RIRS, while Group 2 included 231 individuals who had RIRS after previous PCNL. Evaluation parameters included preoperative characteristics, stone attributes, operative details, treatment outcomes, stone-free status, and complications. Statistical analysis utilized Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Pearson Chi-square test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean age, body mass index, stone number, mean stone burden, and SFS were not statistically different between the groups. Lower pole stones were identified in 144 patients in Group 1 and 88 patients in Group 2 (p = 0.315). In Group 1 and Group 2, the mean operation time and fluoroscopy time were 65.23 ± 18.1 min, 81.32 ± 14.3 min, 26.34 ± 8.31 s, 46.61 ± 7.6 s, respectively, showing statistically significant differences between the groups (p = 0.013, p < 0.001, respectively). Infundibulum stenosis was identified and treated with a laser in 12% of Group 2 cases. Complications occurred in 12 patients in Group 1 and 14 patients in Group 2 (p = 0.136).

CONCLUSION

A history of PCNL may contribute to extended operation times and increased fluoroscopy exposure in subsequent RIRS without significantly affecting postoperative SFS or complication rates.

Pelvicalyceal anatomy and stone related factors as predictors of stone free rate in retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stone

INTRODUCTION

The objective of the present study is to evaluate the various pelvi-calyceal anatomy related and stone related parameters and their influence on stone free rate in retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones.

METHODS

The retrospective analysis of records of 206 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones from December 2021 and November 2023.The patients were divided into two groups: stone free group and residual stone group. Various factors like patients' characteristics, stone size, volume, numbers, density, infundibular width, infundibulopelvic angle, operative time, lasing time, type of laser, and retreatment rate were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

The mean stone size in stone free group was 1.1 ± 0.7 cm whereas in residual stones group was 1.7 ± 0.4 cm (p = 0.03). Overall stone free rate was 62.1% (128/206) whereas residual stone rate was 37.9% (78/206). In stone-free group only 2.3% (3/128) of the patients had an acute infundibulopelvic angle ⩽ 30° whereas in the residual stones group an acute infundibulopelvic angle ⩽ 30° was found in 58.9% (46/78) of the patients (p < 0.001). Patients with an infundibulopelvic angle ⩽ 30°, 93.8% (46/49) had residual stones, whereas infundibulopelvic angle > 30° only 20.1% (32/157) had residual stones (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis has demonstrated that Infundibulopelvic angle and stone size were the only significant factors in predicting stone free rate for lower calyceal stone.

CONCLUSION

Infundibulopelvic angle and stone size have significant impact on the stone free rates in retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones.

Prospective Evaluation of Risk Factors Responsible for Infection Following Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to identify the various risk factors for infective complications following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted over one year, and the incidence of infectious complications after RIRS was calculated. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence and absence of infective complications and were compared in terms of preoperative and operative characteristics. The complications were assessed and graded according to the Modified Clavien classification system (MCCS). The Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI).

RESULTS

Out of 165 patients in the study, 27 (16.7%) patients developed UTI within one month of undergoing RIRS. The most frequent complication was fever, which occurred in 13 (7.8%) patients. When stratified by MCCS, 13 were grade I, nine were grade II, four were grade III, and one was a grade IV complication. High stone burden, concomitant diabetes mellitus, and multiple renal stones were identified as substantial risk factors for postoperative UTI in univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, preoperative UTI and prolonged operative time were found to have a significant association with postoperative UTI.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that preoperative UTI and prolonged operative time are independent factors responsible for postoperative UTI. Large stone burden, stone multiplicity, and diabetes mellitus contribute to a higher risk for UTI following RIRS.

Safety and Efficacy of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Solitary Kidney: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the RIRSearch Study Groups' Results

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients with renal calculi with solitary kidneys (SKs). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, a matched case-control study was carried out using the data from 522 RIRS patients treated between 2014 and 2021. Patients' demographic data, stone characteristics, operative outcomes, perioperative and postoperative complications, and surgical success were analyzed. All patients were evaluated with noncontrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) preoperatively and 1 month after the surgery. Surgical success was defined as no evidence of remaining residual fragments of <3 mm in the first-month postoperative NCCT images. The case group of 29 patients with SKs (Group 1) treated with RIRS were matched with 76 control patients (Group 2) with bilateral kidneys, who underwent unilateral RIRS by propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Results: After PSM analysis, the demographic and clinical data did not differ significantly between the groups. The stone burden was similar between the groups: 733.6 mm3 (range: 50.4-7565.9) versus 991.1 mm3 (range: 201.2-4380.6) (P = .09), respectively. The perioperative complication rates were 13.8% (n = 4) in Group 1 and 11.8% (n = 9) in Group 2 (P = .78). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for postoperative complication rates (minor complications, classified as Clavien 1 or 2), (6.9% [n = 2] versus 13.2% [n = 10; P = .34]), respectively. Surgical success was 82.8% (n = 24) in Group 1 and 83.6% in Group 2 (P = .92). There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative glomerular filtration rate and creatinine values (P = .005). Conclusions: Our results support that RIRS is a safe and effective treatment method in SK patients with similar complication and stone-free rates compared to patients who had bilateral functional kidneys and underwent unilateral RIRS.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery

OBJECTIVES

To set out the second in a series of guidelines on the treatment of urolithiasis by the International Alliance of Urolithiasis that concerns retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), with the aim of providing a clinical framework for urologists performing RIRS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After a comprehensive search of RIRS-related literature published between 1 January 1964 and 1 October 2021 from the PubMed database, systematic review and assessment were performed to inform a series of recommendations, which were graded using modified GRADE methodology. Additionally, quality of evidence was classified using a modification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence system. Finally, related comments were provided.

RESULTS

A total of 36 recommendations were developed and graded that covered the following topics: indications and contraindications; preoperative imaging; preoperative ureteric stenting; preoperative medications; peri-operative antibiotics; management of antithrombotic therapy; anaesthesia; patient positioning; equipment; lithotripsy; exit strategy; and complications.

CONCLUSION

The series of recommendations regarding RIRS, along with the related commentary and supporting documentation, offered here should help provide safe and effective performance of RIRS.

The learning curve for retrograde intrarenal surgery: A prospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

retrograde intrarenal surgery (CRIR) is an evolving tool. Its learning curve is not well established, despite the common use of flexible ureteroscopes today. Our aim is to estimate the number of procedures needed for one to perform RIRS consistently.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

a urology resident had his first 80 RIRS for nephrolithiasis analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The procedures were divided into 4 groups containing 20 surgeries each (I to IV), according to their order, for comparison.

RESULTS

there was no difference in stone sizes between groups. All qualitative variables varied significantly between groups (p<0.001), except between III and IV. In the quantitative analysis, there was a difference between groups I and IV in time for double-J catheter placement (p=0.012). There was an increasing difference in sheath placement time (p<0.001) and in total operative time (p=0.004). The time fot stone treatment (p=0.011) was significant only between groups I, II and III. There was difference in total sheath time only between groups I and III (p=0.023). Stone free status did not change between groups.

DISCUSSION

the differences between the qualitative and quantitative variables show the relation between number of surgeries performed and proficiency in the procedure. Intergroup comparisons show sequential optimization of parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

we found that 60 is a reasonable number of surgeries to be performed in order to reach the plateau of RIRSs learning curve.

Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Dual Lumen Versus Single Lumen Flexible Ureteroscopes in Proximal Ureteral and Renal Stone Management

INTRODUCTION

We sought to compare the safety, efficacy, efficiency and surgeon experience during upper urinary tract stone management with single-lumen versus dual-lumen flexible ureteroscopes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine patients with proximal ureteral or renal stone burden < 2 cm were randomized to a single-lumen or dual-lumen flexible ureteroscopy. We recorded times for ureteroscopy, laser lithotripsy, stone basketing, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications. The rate of stone clearance and stone free status were calculated using computed tomography imaging. Surgeons completed a survey after each procedure rating various metrics regarding ureteroscope performance.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients from the single-lumen group and forty-four patients from the dual-lumen group had comparable median ureteroscopy time (37 vs 35 minutes, p=0.984) and basketing time (12 vs 19 min; p=0.584). Median lithotripsy time was decreased in the dual-lumen group (single: 6 vs dual: 2 min, p=0.017). The stone clearance rate was superior in the dual-lumen group (single: 3.7 vs dual: 7.1 mm3/min, p=0.025). The absolute stone-free rate was superior for the dual-lumen group (single: 26% vs dual: 48%, p=0.045). No differences in intraoperative (single: 0% vs dual: 2%; p=0.375) and postoperative complications (single: 7% vs dual: 11%, p=0.474) were observed. Surgeons' ratings of the dual-lumen ureteroscope was superior for visibility, comfort, ease of use, and overall performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the dual-lumen ureteroscope in patients with renal and proximal ureteral stones < 2 cm provided shorter lithotripsy time, higher stone clearance rates, improved stone free rate and superior surgeon ratings when compared to single-lumen flexible ureteroscopes.

Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of renal calculi ≤ 2 cm: a propensity matched study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of Super-Mini PCNL (SMP) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) in the management of renal calculi ≤ 2 cm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, inter-institutional, observational study of patients presenting with renal calculi ≤ 2 cm. Patients underwent either SMP (Group 1) or RIRS (Group 2) and were performed by 2 experienced high-volume surgeons.

RESULTS

Between September 2018 and April 2019, 593 patients underwent PCNL and 239 patients had RIRS in two tertiary centers. Among them, 149 patients were included for the final analysis after propensity-score matching out of which 75 patients underwent SMP in one center and 74 patients underwent RIRS in the other. The stone-free rate (SFR) was statistically significantly higher in Group 1 on POD-1 (98.66% vs. 89.19%; p = 0.015), and was still higher in Group 1 on POD-30 (98.66% vs. 93.24%, p = 0.092) SFR on both POD-1 and POD-30 for lower pole calculi was higher in Group 1 (100 vs. 82.61%, p = 0.047 and 100 vs 92.61% p = 0.171). The mean (SD) operative time was significantly shorter in Group 1 at 36.43 min (14.07) vs 51.15 (17.95) mins (p < 0.0001). The mean hemoglobin drop was significantly less in Group 1 (0.31 vs 0.53 gm%; p = 0.020). There were more Clavien-Dindo complications in Group 2 (p = 0.021). The mean VAS pain score was significantly less in Group 2 at 6 and 12 h postoperatively (2.52 vs 3.67, 1.85 vs 2.40, respectively: p < 0.0001), whereas the mean VAS pain score was significantly less in Group 1 at 24 h postoperatively (0.31 vs 1.01, p < 0.0001). The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group 1 (28.37 vs 45.70 h; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

SMP has significantly lower operative times, complication rates, shorter hospital stay, with higher stone-free rates compared to RIRS. SMP is associated with more early post-operative pain though.

Ningmitai capsule promotes calculi expulsion after RIRS for 10-20-mm upper urinary stones: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of Ningmitai capsule as an adjunctive stone expulsion therapy after RIRS. All patients were diagnosed with upper urinary tract calculi measuring 10–20 mm. The patients who successfully underwent RIRS were randomly assigned to the NMT capsule group (Ningmitai capsule, 1.52 g, three times daily) or the control group for 4 weeks based on the random number table method. The primary endpoints were the stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone-free rate (SFR). The average stone expulsion time (SET), average stone-free time (SFT) and complications were recorded. Between July 2, 2019, and December 17, 2020, 220 participants successfully underwent RIRS across 6 centers; 123 of them were randomized according to the exclusion criteria, and 102 (83%) were included in the primary analysis. The SERs on the 3rd, 7th, 14th and 28th days were significantly increased in the NMT capsule group compared with the control group (78.95% vs. 31.11%, 92.98% vs. 55.56%, 94.74% vs. 64.44%, 100% vs. 82.22%, respectively, p < 0.05). The SFRs on the 3rd and 7th days were not different (p > 0.05), while those on the 14th and 28th days were higher in the NMT capsule group (63.16% vs. 24.44% and 92.98% vs. 68.89%, p < 0.05). The average SET and average SFT of the NMT capsule group were remarkably shorter than those of the control group (p < 0.001). During the follow-up period, there were no significant differences in urine RBC counts between the two groups (p > 0.05). The urine WBC counts of the NMT capsule group were significantly lower than those of the control group on the 14^th day (p = 0.011), but there was no difference on the 3rd, 7th or 28th day (p > 0.05). The analgesic aggregate of the NMT capsule group was also much lower (p = 0.037). There were no significant differences in adverse events (p > 0.05), and they improved significantly without sequelae. This study indicated that NMT capsules can significantly promote stone clearance and are more effective and safer for upper urinary calculi after RIRS.

Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registration No. ChiCTR1900024151.

Date of registration June 28, 2019.

A curva de aprendizado em cirurgia retrógrada intrarrenal: Uma análise prospectiva

RESUMO Introdução: a cirurgia retrógrada intrarrenal (CRIR) é ferramenta em evolução. Sua curva de aprendizado não está bem estabelecida, apesar do uso comum dos ureteroscópios flexíveis atualmente. O objetivo é estimar o número de procedimentos necessários para se realizar CRIR consistentemente. Material e Métodos: Um residente de urologia teve suas primeiras 80 CRIR para tratamento de nefrolitíase analisadas quantitativa e qualitativamente. Os procedimentos foram divididos em 4 grupos contendo 20 cirurgias cada (I a IV), de acordo com sua ordem, para comparação. Resultados: Não houve diferença nos tamanhos dos cálculos entre grupos. Todas as variáveis qualitativas apresentaram variação significativa entre os grupos (p<0,001), exceto entre III e IV. Na análise quantitativa houve diferença entre os grupos I e IV no tempo de colocação do cateter duplo J (p=0,012). Houve uma diferença crescente no tempo de colocação da bainha (p<0,001) e no tempo operatório total (p=0,004). O tempo para o tratamento do cálculo (p=0,011) foi significativo apenas entre os grupos I, II e III. Houve diferença no tempo total de bainha apenas entre os grupos I e III (p=0,023). Taxa livre de cálculos não se alterou entre os grupos. Discussão: as diferenças observadas entres as variáveis qualitativas e quantitativas evidenciam a relação entre o número de cirurgias realizadas e a proficiência no procedimento. As comparações intergrupo mostram otimização sequencial dos parâmetros. Conclusões: estima-se que 60 é um número razoável de cirurgias para que se atinja o platô da curva de aprendizado.

Use of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in pediatric kidney stones

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) for pediatric kidney stones management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety pediatric patients with single or multiple renal stones 1-3 cm in diameter were collected prospectively and equally divided into two groups to undergo RIRS or mini-PCNL. The groups were compared for fluoroscopy and operative time, postoperative hospital stay time, stone-free rate (SFR), need for auxiliary procedures, and cost as well as complications.

RESULTS

There were no differences found between RIRS and mini-PCNL groups with regard to operative time and postoperative DJ stent application, while the mean of fluoroscopy time and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RIRS than in the mini-PCNL group. The SFR, auxiliary treatment on residual stones, and complications were comparable. In both groups, no major (Clavien IV-V) complications were observed. The mean cost of RIRS was $1210 and $733 for the mini-PCNL.

CONCLUSIONS

Both RIRS and mini-PCNL are effective and safe treatment modalities for pediatric renal stones 10-30 mm in size. However, mini-PCNL is more cost-effective making it a viable alternative to RIRS.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery for a staghorn renal calculus in a patient with solitary kidney and urinary tract deformity: a case report

Staghorn renal calculi are large, branched stones in the kidney that partially or completely fill the renal pelvis and renal calyces. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard treatment for staghorn calculi. However, we report a retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) performed to treat a staghorn calculus in a patient with a solitary kidney and a deformed urinary tract. The 37-year-old male patient presented with right-sided lumbar pain. The computed tomography (CT) scan found a solitary kidney on the right side with an opaque 4.5 cm × 2.4 cm renal stone and grade I hydronephrosis. Additionally, a urinary tract deformity was observed, and it was secondary to the deformity of the pelvis caused by a previous pubis fracture, which significantly increased the risk and the difficulty of intrarenal surgery. A total number of 3 sessions of RIRS were conducted, and the patient was discharged 3 days after each session on average. The postoperative X-ray exam of the third session revealed that the renal stone was completely removed. The patient recovered well without any complications. This case demonstrates that RIRS is a safe and effective treatment of staghorn calculi with the presence of urinary tract deformation. This suggests RIRS may be of particular interest in minimizing the procedure-related damage of a solitary kidney.

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and retrograde flexible ureteroscopy-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy for a huge ureteropelvic junction stone and multiple small renal stones: A CARE-compliant case report

RATIONALE

Concurrent kidney and ureteral stones are always complicated and a clinical challenge. Improvements in endoscopic equipment have led to the widespread adoption of retrograde intrarenal surgery, which has a good stone clearance rate. On the other hand, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LUL) has been reported to be non-inferior to retrograde flexible ureteroscopy in stone-free rate and the need for axillary procedures, and to have a significantly lower rate of post-operative sepsis compared to retrograde flexible ureteroscopy. We describe a case managed with LUL followed by laparoscope-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (LA-RIRS) in a single operation for a large upper ureteral stone and small renal stones, which is usually challenging and requires axillary procedures.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient was a 66-year-old male with underlying hypertension and diabetes mellitus. He reported severe flank pain after receiving endoscopic management of concurrent right ureteropelvic junction stone and multiple renal stones about 1 month previously.

DIAGNOSIS

The residual stones were reassessed using non-contrast computed tomography before surgery. A 2.8-cm residual ureteropelvic junction stone and multiple renal stones with a maximum length of 1 cm were found. A second operation was considered to be necessary due to the deterioration of his renal function and refractory flank pain.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed LUL followed by LA-RIRS. Two surgeries were completed in a single operation. The Jackson-Pratt drain was removed 3 days after the operation.

OUTCOMES

After the surgery, no high-grade complications were recorded according to the Clavien Dindo classification. A follow-up kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph performed 2 months after the operation revealed no residual stones. Renal echo revealed no obstructive nephropathy 1 month after double-J catheter removal.

CONCLUSION

LUL with LA-RIRS with a stone basket for renal stone extraction is a safe and feasible technique, and no step surgery or axillary procedures were needed in our case. If clinical cases with a huge stone burden over the ureter are indicated for LUL with concurrent small renal stones, LUL with LA-RIRS can be an alternative option.

Impact of differential ureteral stent diameters on clinical outcomes after ureteroscopy intracorporeal lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In this meta-analysis we assessed whether the diameter of ureteral stents (4.7-5-Fr, 6-Fr) has an impact on the rate of occurrence of urinary tract symptoms and complications after successful URS and intracorporeal lithotripsy. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A rigorous search for relevant studies published in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was conducted to find informative randomized controlled trials. The reference lists of relevant articles were also manually searched and reviewed. The protocol was prospectively registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020202164). All statistical evaluations were performed using RevMan software version 5.3.0. Seven articles comprising 547 patients were included in the meta-analysis. After placement of ureteral stents with different diameters for approximately 1 week, we found that ureteral stents with smaller diameters (4.7-5-Fr) were associated with significant improvements in the main domain scores on the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire, such as urinary symptoms (mean difference -4.47, 95% confidence interval -5.87 to -3.08; P < 0.00001) and body pain (mean difference -2.48, 95% confidence interval -4.37 to -0.59; P = 0.01), but poor outcomes in stent migration compared to ureteral stents with a 6-Fr diameter (odds ratio 3.00, 95% confidence interval 1.06-8.51; P = 0.04). However, there were no significant differences in Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire scores with regard to work performance (mean difference -0.56, 95% confidence interval -2.52 to 1.40; P = 0.58), general health (mean difference -2.29, 95% confidence interval -4.95 to 0.37; P = 0.09), additional problems (mean difference -0.43, 95% confidence interval -1.02 to 0.15; P = 0.15), and complications such as fever (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.24-2.39; P = 0.63). Ureteral stents with a diameter of 4.7-5-Fr have better outcomes than those with a diameter of 6-Fr, based on the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire pain and urinary tract symptoms scores. However, they are more prone to migration compared to those with a larger diameter.

Evaluation of the anatomical factors affecting the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for isolated lower pole kidney stones

Studies which examine the factors affecting success rate in kidney stones located in the lower pole as well as the effects of infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) and infundibular length (IL) have been conducted with a small number of patients. We aimed to evaluate the cut-off points of IPA and IL parameters that effect the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for isolated lower pole kidney stones. This retrospective study includes 168 patients who underwent primary RIRS due to isolated lower pole kidney stones in our clinic between January 2013 and May 2020. Pre-operative demographic data, medical history, physical examination, surgery duration as well as the post-operative hospitalization time of patients specifics were obtained. According to pre-operative computed tomography (CT), stone size, stone burden, stone density, number of stones (single and multiple), stone laterality, congenital kidney abnormality, the presence of solitary kidney, parameters of IPA and IL were measured and both included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups as the successful group and the unsuccessful group according to their post-operative success. These two groups were compared in terms of pre and post-operative data. Stone burden, IPA < 42.65°, and IL > 27.5 mm were specified as the independent risk factors for success of RIRS procedure. The patients for whom RIRS procedure is planned for lower pole kidney stones, stone burden, IPA, and IL should be taken into consideration to be able to predict success and it should be kept in mind that additional treatment may be required.

Does ureteral access sheath affect the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether or not using a ureteral access sheath (UAS) affects the perioperative outcomes after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) performed in patients with renal stones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An observational study was carried out using data of 60 patients who underwent RIRS with the diagnosis of renal stones <2 cm between February 2017 and November 2017 at our institution. The data of the 60 patients were registered prospectively during the study period. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether a UAS was used (Group 1-30 patients) or not (Group 2-30 patients) during RIRS. Perioperative outcomes and complications were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The stone burdens of the patients in Group 1 and in Group 2 were 76.59 mm² and 62.19 mm², respectively (p = .160). There was no statistically significant difference in SFR (p = 1.000), complication rates (p = .418), and operation time (p = .411) between both groups, except for the fact that postoperative pain intensity levels using the VAS were slightly higher in Group 2 (4.13 ± 2.37 vs. 5.33 ± 1.89, p = .064).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, we showed that similar success and acceptable complication rates can be achieved without using UAS compared to using UAS during RIRS. However, using UAS may provide an advantage in reducing postoperative pain after RIRS.

Evaluation of Patient Treatment Preferences for 15 to 20 mm Kidney Stones: A Conjoint Analysis

Introduction and Objective: Ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are standard treatments for intermediate-size (15-20 mm) kidney stones but differ in their postoperative recovery, stone-free rates, and complication risks. We aimed to evaluate what affects patient treatment preferences. Methods: Patients with urinary stone disease completed a choice-based conjoint analysis exercise assessing four treatment attributes associated with URS and PCNL. A sensitivity analysis using a market simulator was performed, and the relative importance of each attribute was calculated. Differences in treatment preferences by demographic subgroup were assessed. Results: A total of 58 patients completed the conjoint analysis exercise. Stone-free rate was the most important treatment attribute, while the length of hospital stay and cosmesis were less important. Overall, sensitivity analysis based on market simulation scenarios predicted an almost equal preference for URS (52.4%) compared with PCNL (47.6%) for treatment of an intermediate-size stone. Older patients (>65 years old) expressed their stronger preferences for lower infection rates and shorter hospital stays, and were more likely to prefer URS (67.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 52% to 82.5%) compared with younger patients (20-34 years old) (20.3%, 95% CI: 0% to 41.5%) who preferred higher procedure success rates and fewer repeat procedures. Conclusion: Conjoint analysis predicts nearly equal patient preference for URS or PCNL for the treatment of intermediate-size kidney stones. Older patients prefer the lower urinary tract infection risk and shorter hospital stay associated with URS, while younger patients prefer higher stone-free rates associated with PCNL. These results can help guide urologists in counseling patients and improve the shared decision-making process.

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and objectives: To perform a updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stones (RS). Materials and Methods: A total of 37 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis about effectiveness to treat RS. Endpoints were stone-free rates (SFR), incidence of auxiliary procedure, retreatment, and complications. We also conducted a sub-analysis of ≥2 cm stones. Results: First, PCNL had the highest SFR than others regardless of stone sizes and RIRS showed a higher SFR than ESWL in <2 cm stones. Second, auxiliary procedures were higher in ESWL than others, and it did not differ between PCNL and RIRS. Finally, in <2 cm stones, the retreatment rate of ESWL was higher than others. RIRS required significantly more retreatment procedures than PCNL in ≥2 cm stones. Complication was higher in PCNL than others, but there was no statistically significant difference in complications between RIRS and PCNL in ≥2 cm stones. For ≥2 cm stones, PCNL had the highest SFR, and auxiliary procedures and retreatment rates were significantly lower than others. Conclusions: We suggest that PCNL is a safe and effective treatment, especially for large RS.

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and objectives: To perform a updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stones (RS). Materials and Methods: A total of 37 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis about effectiveness to treat RS. Endpoints were stone-free rates (SFR), incidence of auxiliary procedure, retreatment, and complications. We also conducted a sub-analysis of ≥2 cm stones. Results: First, PCNL had the highest SFR than others regardless of stone sizes and RIRS showed a higher SFR than ESWL in <2 cm stones. Second, auxiliary procedures were higher in ESWL than others, and it did not differ between PCNL and RIRS. Finally, in <2 cm stones, the retreatment rate of ESWL was higher than others. RIRS required significantly more retreatment procedures than PCNL in ≥2 cm stones. Complication was higher in PCNL than others, but there was no statistically significant difference in complications between RIRS and PCNL in ≥2 cm stones. For ≥2 cm stones, PCNL had the highest SFR, and auxiliary procedures and retreatment rates were significantly lower than others. Conclusions: We suggest that PCNL is a safe and effective treatment, especially for large RS.

A Novel Surgical Technique for Treatment of Renal Stones in Preschool-aged Patients: Initial Experience With Needle-perc

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate our newly developed minimal instrumentation technique, needle-perc, for treatment of preschool-aged patients with renal stones. To the best of our knowledge, this is the smallest endoscopic equipment for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reported thus far.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Needle-perc was performed in 8 patients using a 4.2-Fr needle to achieve access to the collecting system under ultrasonic guidance alone. The mean patient age was 2.4 years (range, 0-5 years). Five of the 8 patients were boys, while 3 were girls. Six patients had unilateral stones and 2 patients had bilateral stones. Six renal units exhibited single calculus, 2 exhibited staghorn stones, and 2 exhibited multiple stones. The mean calculus size was 1.6 cm (range, 0.8-4.5 cm). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed prospectively.

RESULTS

Access was successfully achieved in all patients. Puncturing was fully guided by ultrasound. Five patients underwent needle-perc alone. Two patients were transferred to 16-Fr access because of intrarenal infection and large stone burden. One patient underwent reduction of tract number. The mean operative time was 49.2 minutes (range, 22-75 minutes); mean hemoglobin loss was 5.2 g/L (range, 0-13.8 g/L). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (range, 3-7 days). Preplaced catheters were kept for 2-3 days to facilitate fragment discharge. Complications occurred in 2 patients: fever >38.5°C. The stone-free rate was 100% at 1 month postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Our initial data indicate that needle-perc is feasible and safe for preschool-aged renal patients. Further studies are required to define its usefulness in treatment of larger stones.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND

Upper urinary tract stones is the most common diseases in urology. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURL) are common treatment, but both their efficacy and safety are controversial. Thus we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCNL and fURL in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones, providing a reference for clinical work.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and CNKI were searched through Apr. 1, 2019 to identify eligible studies. Data were analyzed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. Pooled relative risks (RRs) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed or random effects methods. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), fifteen cohort studies involving 1822 patients were included. Stone-free rate of PCNL was significantly high than that of fURL (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.12; P = 0.0004). The decline of hemoglobin in PCNL was significantly high than that of fURL (WMD: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.54, 1.61; P < 0.0001). The number of blood transfusion was significantly greater in the PCNL compared to the fURL (RR: 5.04; 95% CI: 1.78, 14.24; P = 0.002). The incidence of postoperative bleeding or hematuria showed greater significantly difference in the PCNL compared to the fURL (RR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.55, 4.75; P = 0.0005). Operation time, fever, infection, perforation, requiring drug analgesia was not significantly different between two surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of upper urinary tract stones, the stones clearance rate of PCNL is higher than fURL, and the safety of fURL is higher than PCNL.

When is the best time to perform external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a multi-center study based on randomized controlled trials

To determine the best time to perform EPVL treatment by evaluating the efficacy and safety of active stone extraction in treating residual fragments at different time points after RIRS. All participants had renal or upper ureteral stones preoperatively and still had residual stones after receiving RIRS. They were prospectively randomized into four groups: patients in group A received EPVL 3 days after RIRS; patients in group B received EPVL 7 days after RIRS; patients in group C received EPVL 14 days after RIRS; patients in group D did not receive EPVL after RIRS. Follow-up examinations were performed on all participants. The results, including stone size and location, stone-free rate (SFR) and complications, were compared among the groups. There were 176 patients in total. The SFR in groups A, B, C and D were 62.22%, 40.91%, 14.28% and 11.11%, respectively, 7 days after RIRS. At 14 days after RIRS, the SFR was 80%, 59.09%, 42.86% and 26.67% in groups A, B, C and D, respectively. At 28 days after RIRS, the SFR was 91.11%, 84.09%, 76.19% and 51.11% in groups A, B, C and D, respectively. Group A had the highest SFR from 7 to 28 days, and group C had a higher SFR at 28 days after RIRS than group D (P < 0.05). The side effects were less in groups A and B than in group D 28 days after RIRS (P < 0.05). We recommended that the best time to perform EPVL is 3 days after RIRS, because it could achieve a high SFR at any point in time and reduced complications.

Is it safe to use a ureteral access sheath in an unstented ureter?

Background

The aim of this study was to examine ureteral stricture rate after the use of UAS in an unstented ureter and compare complications of smaller vs. larger-caliber UAS.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive RIRS for renal stones, with the use of UAS in unstented ureters. We excluded cases with previous ureteroscopies, who carried ureteral stent or nephrostomy, had impacted stones, underwent radiation treatment, or had urinary tract malignancies. The primary outcome was formation of ureteral strictures diagnosed by hydronephrosis in ultrasound test and late secretion in dynamic renal scan. Secondary outcome was stone-free-rate (SFR) and complications. In addition, we compared safety and efficacy of smaller (9.5/11.5Fr) vs. larger-caliber (12/14Fr) UAS.

Results

The cohort included 165 patients with a median follow-up time of 115 days. There was no case of ureteral stricture formation after the use us UAS, despite using a larger-caliber UAS in nearly half the cases. Larger-caliber UAS was not associated with more complications compared to the smaller-caliber one (p = 0.780). SFR was non-significantly higher in the larger-caliber UAS group (p = 0.056), despite having a larger stone burden, and only stone number was associated with SFR (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

These data suggest that the use of UAS during RIRS in an unstented ureter is safe and does not involve ureteral stricture formation after one procedure. Furthermore, the use of wider sheaths was not found to be associated with higher complications rate.

Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the management of renal stones: A meta-analysis

Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is recommended as the first-line treatment for the management of kidney stones that are ≥2 cm in diameter. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has become increasingly preferred due to its high level of safety and repeatability, particularly in small stones. However, whether PCNL has superior efficacy and lower complication rates when compared with RIRS remains controversial. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with PCNL and RIRS as therapy for renal stones. Clinical trials published in PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) were systematically reviewed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of patients with renal stones who were treated with PCNL or RIRS. Main outcomes measures included stone-free rate, operative time, hospital stay, and complication rate. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR), or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pooled estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model according to the heterogeneity among the studies. In total, 17 studies [4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 cohort studies] involving 1,717 patients met the inclusion criteria, and were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that PCNL exhibited a significantly higher stone-free rate (RR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.95; P<0.001) but was associated with a longer hospital stay, when compared with RIRS (WMD=-2.72, 95% CI: -3.9 to -1.54; P<0.001). Operative time (WMD=7.86, 95% CI: -0.89 to 16.61; P=0.078) and complication rate (RR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.05; P=0.083) did not significantly differ between the groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that PCNL had a shorter operation time than RIRS in patients with stone sizes ≥2 cm (WMD=12.88, 95% CI: 4.77 to 20.99; P=0.002), and PCNL had a similar stone-free rate as RIRS when the estimates were pooled from RCTs (RR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.01; P=0.078). Compared with PCNL, RIRS had a significantly lower stone-free rate, shorter hospital stay, but a similar operation time and complication rate. Therefore, we propose that RIRS may be an alternative therapy to PCNL, with acceptable efficacy and complication rates for renal stones. Further large-scale, well-conducted RCTs are required to verify our findings.

Sheathless and fluoroscopy-free retrograde intrarenal surgery: An attractive way of renal stone management in high-volume stone centers

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sheathless and fluoroscopy-free flexible ureterorenoscopic laser lithotripsy (FURSL) for treating renal stones.

Methods

Between May 2015 and May 2017, 135 patients with renal stones treated with sheathless and fluoroscopy-free FURSL were prospectively evaluated. Our technique involved a semi-rigid ureteroscopic assessment of the ureter, and the guidewire was left in situ to railroad the flexible ureteroscope. A holmium laser was used to fragment and dust the stones; fragments were neither grasped nor collected.

Results

The study population consisted of 135 patients including 85 males (62.96%) and 50 females (37.04%) with a mean age of 40.65 years (range: 3–70 years) were evaluated. The mean stone size was 17.23 mm (range: 8–41 mm). Complete stone-free status was achieved in 122 (90.37%) patients and clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) in two (1.48%), while residual stones were still present in 11 (8.15%) patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 23 (17.4%) cases and were mostly minor, including fever in 17 (12.6%), pyelonephritis in four (3.0%), subcapsular hematoma in one (0.7%) and steinstrasse in one (0.7%). These complications were Clavien I-II, GI in 17 (12.6%) patients, GII in five (3.7%), and Clavien IIIb in one (0.7%). No major complications were observed. Stone size ≥2 cm, operative time ≥30 min, and lasing time ≥20 min were significantly associated with a higher rate of complications and lower stone-free rates upon univariate analysis (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Sheathless and fluoroscopy-free FURSL are effective and safe for renal stone management, especially for stones under 2 cm in diameter. This process is a feasible option for avoiding sheath complications, which can protect surgeons from the negative effects of radiation.

Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (umPCNL) in the management of renal calculi.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between March 2015 and January 2018, a total of 44 patients were treated with umPCNL. The outcomes of these patients were compared with 75 patients who underwent RIRS for renal calculi during the same time period.

RESULTS

Median stone size was 9 mm in the umPCNL group and 7 mm in the RIRS group. Stone-free rates after a single procedure were achieved in 85% of patients for the RIRS group and 98% for the umPCNL group. 16% of RIRS patients were left with a ureteric stent, whilst 7% of patients (n = 5) needed a second RIRS. One patient in the umPCNL group was left with a percutaneous nephrostomy; all other patients were left totally tubeless. The mean operative time was 66 minutes in the RIRS group and 55 minutes in the umPCNL group (p = 0.04). The minor complication rates for the RIRS and umPCNL groups were 17% and 15%, respectively. One patient in the RIRS group required postoperative nephrostomy insertion; there were no major complications in the umPCNL group. The median length of stay was 0 days in the RIRS group and 1 day in the umPCNL group.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall study showed that umPCNL has low complication rates and good stone-free rates, with a lower requirement for ancilliary procedures. UmPCNL is an acceptable alternative in selected patients with small- to moderate-sized renal calculi.

The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi of ≤2 cm: A retrospective study

To assess the clinical effect of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURL) for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi of ≤2 cm.A retrospective analysis was carried out on clinical data of 106 patients with kidney or upper urethral calculi. Among these patients, 58 underwent the MPCNL, and 48 received FURL. Stone-free rates, operating time, blood loss, hemoglobin drop, length of hospital stay, complications, and renal damage indexes were compared.The stone removal rates of the FURL and MPCNL groups were 81.25% versus 87.93% (p > .05). Although operating time was significantly shorter in the MPCNL group, hospital stays were significantly shorter in the FURL group. In addition, pooled analysis showed that mean estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the PCNL group but the hemoglobin decline of the FURL group and PCNL group had no significant difference. The PCNL group had no significant difference in complications compared to the FURL group. Differences on the creatinine levels and urea nitrogen levels before the operation and after the operation were not statistically significant.FURL is an effective method for treating renal stone. FURL not only had a similar stone-free rate as compared to MPCNL but also was associated with less blood loss and more favorable recovery time. However, FURL had a longer operative time.

Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing stone-free rates following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) treatments of renal stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical trials comparing RIRS, SWL, and PCNL for treatment of renal stones were identified from electronic databases. Stone-free rates for the procedures were compared by qualitative and quantitative syntheses (meta-analyses). Outcome variables are shown as risk ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies were included in this network meta-analysis of success and stone-free rates following three different treatments of renal stones. Six studies compared PCNL versus SWL, ten studies compared PCNL versus RIRS, fourteen studies compared RIRS versus SWL, and five studies compared PCNL, SWL, and RIRS. The quality scores within subscales were relatively low-risk. Network meta-analyses indicated that stone-free rates of RIRS (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.22-0.64) and SWL (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.067-0.19) were lower than that of PCNL. In addition, stone-free rate of SWL was lower than that of RIRS (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.20-0.47). Stone free rate of PCNL was also superior to RIRS in subgroup analyses including ≥ 2 cm stone (OR 4.680; 95% CI 2.873-8.106), lower pole stone (OR 1.984; 95% CI 1.043-2.849), and randomized studies (OR 2.219; 95% CI 1.348-4.009). In rank-probability test, PCNL was ranked as No. 1 and SWL was ranked as No. 3.

CONCLUSIONS

PCNL showed the highest success and stone-free rate in the surgical treatment of renal stones. In contrast, SWL had the lowest success and stone-free rate.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat lower pole renal stones 1.5-2.5 cm in diameter

AIM

To compare the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in treating lower pole (LP) renal stones with a diameter of 1.5-2.5 cm.

METHODS

A total of 216 patients who underwent mini-PCNL (n = 103) or RIRS n = 113) for LP stones with a diameter of 1.5-2.5 cm were enrolled between December 2015 and April 2017 at the Urology Department of Ningbo Urology and Nephrology Hospital.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in the hospital stay (9.39 ± 4.01 vs 14.08 ± 5.26, P < 0.0001) and hospitalization costs (2624.5 ± 513.36 vs 3255.2 ± 976.5, P < 0.0001) between the RIRS and mini-PCNL groups. The mean operation time was not significantly different between the RIRS group (56.48 ± 24.77) and the mini-PCNL group (60.04 ± 30.38, P = 0.345). The stone-free rates at the first postoperative day (RIRS vs mini-PCNL: 90.2% vs 93.2%, P = 0.822) and the second month postoperatively (RIRS vs mini-PCNL: 93.8% vs 95.1%, P = 0.986) were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

RIRS and mini-PCNL are both safe and effective methods for treating LP stones with a diameter of 1.5-2.5 cm. RIRS can be considered as an alternative to PCNL for the treatment for LP stones of 1.5-2.5 cm.

The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)

To assess the safety and efficacy of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), we retrospectively evaluated 44 patients with symptomatic LPSs with previously failed SWL or RIRS and consequently underwent SMP from October 2014 to March 2016. The percutaneous renal access was performed 12-14F with C-arm fluoroscopy or ultrasonographic guidance. Stone disintegration was performed using either Holmium laser or pneumatic lithotripter. Perioperative parameters along with operations were assessed in detail. A total of 44 patients (mean age 49.1 ± 13.7 years) were included in the study. Stone size was 18.4 ± 6.0 mm (range 9-29), operative time was 63.9 ± 32.7 min (range 14-145) and hospital stay was 2.8 ± 1.2 days (range 1-5). The hemoglobin drop was 12.4 ± 8.8 g/L (range 0-31), and no patients required blood transfusion. Complete stone-free status was achieved in 40 (90.9%) patients. Clinically insignificant residual fragments were observed in three (6.8%) patients and only one (2.3%) patient had a 6 mm residual calculus. A total of three minor complications (urinary tract infection, hemorrhage resolved by hemostatics and renal colic requiring analgesics) were observed postoperatively. For symptomatic LPSs after the failure of SWL or RIRS, SMP is a safe and efficient auxiliary option and even might be an alternative to SWL or RIRS, while further considering the stone-free rates and stone-related events.

Total tubeless ultra-mini supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

The ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for treating low-volume renal nephrolithiasis is being used as an alternative modality to the conventional PCNL. However its use in the supine position has been scarcely reported.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who underwent ultra-mini PCNL in the supine position within the time frame of January 2017 to July 2017 were studied. All these patients had this as their first-line treatment. The patients had calculus limited to either a single calyx or just extending to the pelvis and the stone size was less than 2 cm in its maximal dimension. An 8.5 Fr operating nephroscope was used. The patients were positioned in the Galdakao modified Valdivia supine position. The stones were fragmented using Holmium-YAG laser. Various surgical outcomes including duration of the surgery, stone-free rate and any subsequent complications-if any-were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study includes a series of 14 patients with 15 renal units (one patient treated with bilateral renal stone disease). The mean age of the patients was 39.07 years and body mass index was 25.5 kg/m². Intrarenal stone location was as follows: lower calyx, n=8; middle calyx, n=3, upper calyx, n=1, and pelvis, n=3. Median operative time was 52.66 min (range: 40-70) and the stone-free rate was 93.3%. Only one patient had residual fragments and needed subsequent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-mini PCNL in supine position with a complete tubeless approach for renal stone disease is a safe method for treating low-volume disease. Studies with a larger cohort may be required to finally validate this technique.

The "all-seeing needle" micro-PCNL versus flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower calyceal stones of ≤ 2 cm

The objectives of the study are to compare the safety and efficacy of "all-seeing needle" optical puncture system micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (micro-PCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) for the treatment of lower calyceal stones of ≤ 2 cm and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each. 116 patients in total with lower calyceal stones of ≤ 2 cm were randomly divided into two equal groups, "all-seeing needle" optical puncture system micro-PCNL and FURS. In both groups, holmium laser was utilized for lithotripsy. The perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups. Compared to the "all-seeing needle" micro-PCNL group, the mean operative time was significantly longer in the FURS group (P = 0.000). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to mean hemoglobin reduction (P = 0.087), complications (P = 0.731) and LOS (P = 0.856). The overall SFR of the "all-seeing needle" micro-PCNL group and FURS group was 84.5% (49/58) and 79.3% (46/58), respectively, without any significant difference between the groups (P = 0.469). For treating lower calyceal stones of ≤ 2 cm, the "all-seeing needle" micro-PCNL group had shorter operative time than FURS, while no significant differences between the two groups with respect to mean hemoglobin reduction, complications, LOS and SFR were found.

A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of RIRS, SWL and PCNL for lower calyceal stones sized 1-2 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with a single lower calyceal stone with an evidence of a CT diameter between 1 and 2 cm were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, unblinded, clinical trial study. Patients were randomized into three groups: group A: SWL (194 pts); group B: RIRS (207 pts); group C: PCNL (181 pts). Patients were evaluated with KUB radiography (US for uric acid stones) at day 10 and a CT scan after 3 months. The CONSORT 2010 statement was adhered to where possible. The collected data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean stone size was 13.78 mm in group A, 14.82 mm in group B and 15.23 mm in group C (p = 0.34). Group C compared to group B showed longer operative time [72.3 vs. 55.8 min (p = 0.082)], fluoroscopic time [175.6 vs. 31.8 min (p = 0.004)] and hospital stay [3.7 vs. 1.3 days (p = 0.039)]. The overall stone-free rate (SFR) was 61.8% for group A, 82.1% for group B and 87.3% for group C. The re-treatment rate was significantly higher in group A compared to the other two groups, 61.3% (p < 0.05). The auxiliary procedure rate was comparable for groups A and B and lower for group C (p < 0.05). The complication rate was 6.7, 14.5 and 19.3% for groups A, B and C, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RIRS and PCNL were more effective than SWL to obtain a better SFR and less auxiliary and re-treatment rate in single lower calyceal stone with a CT diameter between 1 and 2 cm. RIRS compared to PCNL offers the best outcome in terms of procedure length, radiation exposure and hospital stay. ISRCTN 55546280.

The "old" 15 mm renal stone size limit for RIRS remains a clinically significant threshold size

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the 1-2 cm renal stone size range in comparison to smaller stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a data base of 3000 ureteroscopies between 2004 and 2014, 635 consecutive patients underwent RIRS for renal stones. Patients were divided to three groups according to their renal stone size (<10, 10-15, 15-20 mm). Preoperative, operative, stone free rate (SFR) and follow-up data were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The SFR for the three groups was 94.1, 90.1 and 85%, respectively. Patients with renal stone size above 15 mm had a statistically significantly lower SFR. The efficiency quotient calculated for stones larger and smaller than 15 mm was 83.9 vs. 91.8%, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean operative time and hospital stay were longer for patients with renal stones larger than 15 mm (73.6 ± 29.9 vs. 53 ± 19.4 min, p < 0.01 and 2.2 ± 2 vs. 1.8 ± 1.8 days, p = 0.031, respectively). Moreover, the complication rate was almost two times higher (10 vs 5.4%, p = 0.08). Concomitant ureteral stones and older age were independent predictors of failure in the large stone group.

CONCLUSIONS

While the overall SFR following RIRS for renal stones up to 2 cm is generally high, the SFR for 15-20 mm stones is significantly lower, with a longer operating time and hospital stay, and a higher complication rate.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones - Part 2

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has become an effective and safe treatment modality in the management of urinary system stone disease. Recent developments and innovations in the flexible ureterorenoscope and auxiliary equipment have made this procedure easier and more effective with increased success rates. RIRS can be used as a primary treatment in patients with renal stones smaller than 2 cm, prior unsuccessful shock wave lithotripsy, infundibular stenosis, renoureteral malformation, skeletal-muscular deformity, bleeding diathesis and obese patients. In the second part of this detailed review for RIRS, effect of stone composition on success rate, preoperative assessment of stone-free rate, the cost of this modality, education for RIRS, fluoroscopy use, the current role of RIRS in the treatment of various urolithiasis types and special conditions, and combined treatment methods are discussed with up-to-date literature.

A prospective multicenter European study on flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of renal stone

Purpose

The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes and the complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones in a multi-institutional working group.

Materials and Methods

From 2012 to 2014, we conducted a prospective study including all RIRS performed for kidney stones in 4 European centers. Demographic information, disease characteristics, and perioperative and postoperative data were gathered. Patients and stone data, procedure characteristics, results and safety outcomes were analyzed and compared by descriptive statistics. Complications were reported using the standardized Clavien system.

Results

Three hundred and fifty-six patients underwent 377 RIRS with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones. The RIRS was completed in all patients with a mean operative time of 63.5 min. The stone-free status was confirmed endoscopically and through fluoroscopic imaging after the first procedure in 73.6%. The second procedure was performed in twenty patients (5.6%) achieving an overall stone free rate of 78.9%. The overall complication rate was 15.1%. Intra-operative and post-operative complications were seen in 24 (6.7%) and 30 (8.4%) cases, respectively.

Conclusions

RIRS is a minimally invasive procedure with good results in terms of stone-free and complications rate.

[S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium]

Every tenth German citizen will suffer from at least one urinary calculus during the lifetime. The diagnostics, treatment and follow-up treatment of urolithiasis are, therefore, part of the daily routine practice for all urologists in hospitals and private practices as well as in many other disciplines, such as general practitioners, internists, nephrologists and pediatricians. Although the diagnostics and therapy have experienced substantial alterations over the last 10 years, the possibilities of metabolic diagnostics and secondary prevention for patients at risk are, unfortunately and unjustly, in many places very poorly represented. The present S2k guidelines, which for the first time were established in an interdisciplinary consensus process, represent the current practical recommendations and, whenever possible, use tables and algorithms in order to facilitate easy reference in the routine daily work. Last but not least, this greatly simplifies the measures for metaphylaxis.

Treatment for residual stones using flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy after the management of complex calculi with single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy

This study validated the effectiveness and safety of the treatment for residual stones using flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) and holmium laser (0.6-1.2 J, 20-30 Hz) lithotripsy via a fiber with a 200-μm core diameter and 0.22 numerical aperture (NA) after the management of complex calculi with single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Between January 2014 and June 2016, 27 consecutive patients with complex calculi underwent fURS and holmium laser lithotripsy after a planned single-tract PCNL. Among the 27 patients with complex calculi, 9 had full staghorn calculi, 7 had partial staghorn calculi, and 11 had multiple calculi. After the first single-tract PCNL session, the mean stone size and mean stone surface area were 18.0 ± 10.7 mm and 181.9 ± 172.2 mm², respectively. Treatment for residual stones with fURS and holmium laser lithotripsy was successfully completed and was performed without intraoperative complications. The mean operative time of the fURS procedure was 69.1 ± 23.6 min, and the mean hospital stay was 5.3 ± 2.4 days. The mean decrease in the hemoglobin level was 7.3 ± 6.5 g/l. After the fURS procedure, the overall stone-free rate was 88.9%. The overall postoperative complication rate was 14.8% (Clavien grade I 11.1%; Clavien grade II 3.7%). The current approach tested here combines the advantages of both PCNL and fURS and effectively manages complex calculi with a high stone-free rate (SFR) (88.9%). This approach also reduced the number of treatment sessions, the number of percutaneous access tracts, and the blood loss and potential morbidity associated with multiple tracts.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery by flexible ureteroscope in patients with spinal deformities

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for managing renal stones in patients with spinal deformities.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of seven patients with congenital scoliosis (n = 5), spina bifida (n = 2) who had undergone RIRS for renal stones. Stone-free status was determined by CT 30 days after the procedure and was defined as the absence of stones in the kidney or residual fragments ≤1 mm.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 27 years (18-45 years), and mean stone size was 176 mm (143-340 mm). The average operative time was 38 minutes (25-53 minutes), and postoperative hospital stay was 1 day (1-2 days). A stone-free status was obtained in six (85.7 %) patients, and one patient was considered to have treatment failure. This patient was managed by a repeat RIRS. A Double-J stent was placed at the end of the procedure in all (100 %) patients. No severe complications, either from anesthesia or the surgical procedure, were observed, and no blood transfusion was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The good clearance rate with a low incidence of complications shown by the present study has demonstrated that RIRS is a safe and effective procedure for renal stones in patients with spinal deformities.