Biomechanical proof of barbed sutures for the efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Barbed Versus Non-Barbed Suture for Pyeloplasty via the Minimally Invasive Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: There is no agreed protocol on usage of proper and best suturing material in minimally invasive pyeloplasty. The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize and analyze current evidence on suturing materials for laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE) were systematically searched for relevant comparative studies on barbed suture (BS) and non-barbed suture (NBS) in minimally invasive pyeloplasty. Results: Five comparative studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Pooling the data demonstrated a significantly shorter operative duration in patients belonging to the BS group versus the NBS group (95% confidence interval [CI] -81.63 to -10.41, P = .01), with statistically significant estimated heterogeneity among the included studies (P < .0001). Although the incidence of redo-pyeloplasty was higher in the BS group, the pooled risk ratio (RR) for the need for redo-pyeloplasty in subjects belonging to the BS group versus the NBS group was 6.00 (95% CI 0.78-46.14), demonstrating no statistically significant difference (P = .09). A total of 5 patients developed postoperative complications. The pooled RR for the occurrence of these complication showed no significant difference among the patients belonging to both the groups (95% CI 0.22-6.05, P = .88). Conclusions: Minimally invasive pyeloplasty using BS is associated with significantly shorter operative time. The incidence of postoperative complications and requirement of redo-pyeloplasty showed no significant difference among both the treatment groups. Further randomized controlled trials need to be conducted before any definite conclusions are drawn.

[Comparative study on effectiveness of intermittent suture versus cosmetic suture in total knee arthroplasty]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of the intermittent suture and the cosmetic suture in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A clinical data of 48 patients with knee osteoarthritis, who underwent initial TKA between January 2017 and April 2018, was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 23 patients underwent intermittent suture (group A) and 25 patients underwent cosmetic suture (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, degrees of varus and valgus deformities, knee society score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in serum before operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). KSS scores at 1 and 6 months after operation were used to assess the knee function. VAS scores at 1, 3, and 5 days after operation were used to assess the pain degree of knee. Levels of IL-6, PCT, CRP, and ESR in serum at 1 day and 1 month after operation were recorded to evaluate the risk of periprosthetic infection. Likert score at 6 months after operation was used to evaluate the satisfaction of incision. The hospitalization time after operation was also recorded.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up 7- 17 months (mean, 11.3 months). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time after operation between two groups ( t=-1.907, P=0.063). The Likert score in group A was significantly lower than that in group B ( t=-2.196, P=0.033). The VAS score, KSS clinical score and KSS functional score at different time points after operation were significantly better than those before operation in two groups ( P<0.05). The VAS score at 5 days after operation was better than that at 1 day after operation in two groups, and the KSS clinical score and KSS functional score at 6 months after operation were better than those at 1 month after operation in two groups, all showing significant differences ( P<0.05). The VAS scores at 3 and 5 days after operation were significantly lower in group B than in group A ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in VAS score and KSS scores between two groups at other time points after operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of IL-6, PCT, CRP, and ESR between the two groups at different time points after operation ( P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cosmetic suture is superior to intermittent suture in incision appearance and pain management, but there is no significant difference in short-term joint function and risk of periprosthetic infection after TKA.

Retrospective comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty using barbed suture versus nonbarbed suture: A single-center experience

Introduction:

laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an important tool in urology armamentarium. The most important & also the difficult part of this surgery is intracorporial suturing and knotting. There are only a few reports of knotless Barbed sutures for upper tract reconstruction. We report the comparative outcomes of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty with barbed suture vs non barbed sutures used for uretero-pelvic anastomosis.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed patients' records that underwent Laparoscopic pyeloplasty at our Institution from January 2013 to May 2014. Total 37 patients were underwent LP in this period. Whole of the procedure was same as conventional LP except suture material. 3-0 barbed suture was used in 21 patients and 3-0 vicryl used in 16 patients for uretero-pelvic anastomosis and continuous suturing technique was employed. Patients' demographics, total operative time, intracorporial suturing time, post operative complications, symptoms & renal isotope scan were recorded.

Results:

Average total operative time was significantly less in barbed suture group vs vicryl group (162 vs 208 minutes) (p=0.0811). Average time taken for intracorporial suturing was 31.2 minutes vs 70 minutes (p=0.0576). 1 patient developed post operative urine leak which persisted for 5 days in barbed group (4.76 %) vs no leak in vicryl group. Most common complication was UTI presented in 2 patients (9.5 %) vs 2 in vicryl (12.5%). JJ stent was removed at 4 weeks. Median follow up was 3 months with 7 patients lost to follow up. None of the patients found to have obstructive drainage or deterioration of split function on follow up isotope renogram at 3 months.

Conclusions:

In this study, Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with barbed suture has acceptable outcome when compared to conventional non barbed suture on short term basis. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty with barbed suture can potentially become the standard approach in near future.

In Vivo Comparison of "V-Loc 90 Wound Closure Device" With "Vicryl" and "Monocryl" in Regard to Tissue Reaction in a Rabbit Bladder Model

OBJECTIVE

To compare the barbed polyglyconate suture (BPS) with 2 commonly used conventional sutures, this prospective randomized trial was designed. The sutures applied in the urinary collecting system, in terms of long-term histopathologic and macroscopic suture material features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight female and 6 male New Zealand rabbits were included in the study. Each animal served as its own control and was subjected to cystotomy. Watertight running cystorrhaphies were performed using 3 different sutures in a randomized fashion, namely Monocryl, Vicryl, and V-Loc 90. Seven animals were sacrificed after the third and 7 after the sixth week. Macroscopic and histopathologic examinations were performed. Tissue reaction, like inflammation and fibrosis, around the sutures were evaluated. Friedman and Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The BPS demonstrated no adhesion. However, in the six-week group, stone formation was recorded on 4 BPS and 1 Vicryl thread, a difference being statistically significant (P = .039). Additionally, in the third- and in the sixth-week group, 1 (P = .368) and 3 (P = .050) BPS threads migrated, respectively. The histopathologic analysis revealed less inflammation and fibrosis associated with the BPS thread in both the third and the sixth-week groups (P = .010 and P = .002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The BPS appears to be superior to conventional sutures in terms of local inflammation and fibrosis. However, suture migration and stone formation following collecting system closure could be potential predicaments.

Laparoscopic single-incision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS) pyeloplasty: a description of the first 32 cases

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Transumbilical laparoendoscopic (LESS) procedures reduce access trauma. Laparoendocopic single-incision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS) utilizes straight instruments in a triangulated fashion, via three trocars placed through a single umbilical incision.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients underwent an SITUS pyeloplasty. Access is performed by incision of the umbilical fold by 3/4 of its circumference, a 5-mm camera port, and consequently, cranial and caudal 3 or 5 mm working trocars are placed at a distance of 3-6 cm, thus allowing triangulation. SITUS laparoscopy utilizes the standard straight instruments with a length of 43 cm.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully performed and no conversion to open, or conventional laparoscopic approach was deemed necessary. Thirty patients underwent a dismembered and two a Fenger pyeloplasty. A crossing vessel was identified in 68.75% of the cases. The median laparoscopic and suturing times were 130 and 30 min, respectively; median blood loss was 50 ml. The median duration of hospitalization was 4 days. The visual analogue scores (VAS) reported were 1 on the first and 0 on the third postoperative day. The indwelling double-J or mono-J stents were removed after a median time of 5 weeks and 4 days, respectively. The overall success rate was 96.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The SITUS technique for pyeloplasty is an attractive alternative to conventional laparoscopy and a viable competitor to LESS surgery. It combines the common principles of traditional laparoscopy, such as conventional instrumentation and triangulation, with the benefits of single-port surgery.

Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Background

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the standard procedure for large (≥2 cm) renal calculi; however, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) can be used as an alternative management procedure. The aim of present study was to compare LPL and PCNL in terms of efficacy and safety for the management of large renal pelvic stones.

Methods

A literature search was performed in Jan 2016 using electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and EMBASE) to identify relevant studies for the meta-analysis. Only comparative studies investigating LPL versus PCNL were included. Effect sizes were estimated by pooled odds ratio (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Five randomized and nine non-randomized studies were identified for analysis, involving a total of 901 patients. Compared with PCNL, LPL provided a significantly higher stone-free rate (OR 3.94, 95% CI 2.06–7.55, P < 0.001), lower blood transfusion rate (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13–0.61, P = 0.001), lower bleeding rate (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06–0.61, P = 0.005), fewer hemoglobin decrease(MD -0.80, 95% CI -0.97 to −0.63, P < 0.001), less postoperative fever (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21–0.68; P = 0.001), and lower auxiliary procedure rate (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.12–0.46, P < 0.001) and re-treatment rate (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07–0.55, P = 0.002). However, LPL had a longer operative time and hospital stay. There were no significant differences in conversion to open surgery and prolonged urine leakage rates between LPL and PCNL.

Conclusions

Our present findings suggest that LPL is a safe and effective approach for management of patients with large renal stones. However, PCNL still suitable for most cases and LPL can be used as an alternative management procedure with good selection of cases.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Barbed suture tissue closure device in urological surgery – a comprehensive review

The development and implementation of barbed sutures has transformed the technique of tissue closure with increasing application across multiple surgical disciplines. Changes in design and handling such as the introduction of absorbable and non-absorbable bidirectional barbed sutures reflect an increasing applicability in tissues of varying qualities. We undertook a comprehensive review of available literature to provide an evidence-based rationale for the clinical use of barbed suture tissue closure devices. We summarise uses along with advantages and disadvantages reported across a number of surgical specialties such as urology, orthopaedics, gynaecology and plastic surgery. Tangible benefits noted were faster closure speed, maintenance of suture integrity, improved efficiency in closure, avoidance of knots and possibly a cost-benefit effect. In terms of complications, the barbed sutures compared equally with standard sutures with no significant differences. In conclusion, barbed sutures have demonstrated versatility and safety across surgical specialties and compares favourably with standard sutures. There appears to be an increasing popularity in the use of barbed sutures with clear advantages to both surgeon and patient.

1.2 French stone retrieval baskets further enhance irrigation flow in flexible ureterorenoscopy

Ureterorenoscopy (URS) has revolutionized upper urinary tract stone therapy. However, the size of the working channel and the stone baskets limit irrigation flow as well as vision. This study determined further improvements of irrigation flow, deflection capacities and impairments of breaking resistance in a new 1.2 French (F) ultra-miniaturized basket. Irrigation measurements were performed in semirigid URS (semiURS, working channel 5F) and in flexible URS (flexURS, 3.6F) in 0°, 90° and 270° deflection with 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets and compared with empty channel. Breaking strength of 1.2F, 1.8F and 1.9F baskets were evaluated using a material testing machine. Tested baskets affected irrigation in semiURS and flexURS (p < 0.05). Mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean) for semiURS flow rates counted 197.1 ± 2.0, 140.9 ± 1.6, 111.1 ± 1.5, 98.0 ± 1.3 and 77.1 ± 0.9 ml/min for empty channel, 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets (p < 0.05). Using unbent flexURS flow rates of 44.2 ± 0.4, 20.4 ± 0.2, 5.9 ± 0.1, 5.4 ± 0.1 and 1.5 ± 0.1 ml/min for empty channel, 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets, were observed (p < 0.05). The 1.2F versus 2.2F basket showed a 13.6-fold increase in flexURS irrigation (p < 0.05), while only the 2.2F basket reduced deflection by 20.3 %. The breaking strength decreased with a reduced basket size (1.2F: 6.4 ± 0.46 vs. 1.8F: 16.8 ± 2.79 vs. 1.9F: 32.2 ± 2.74 N, p < 0.05). Ultra-miniaturized baskets of 1.2F ensured a sufficient irrigation flow as needed for high quality vision in URS stone management. However, miniaturization of the 1.2F basket resulted in a reduced breaking strength compared with larger sized devices which in turn may hamper stone removal by an increased vulnerability.