Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of caliceal diverticular calculi: a single center experience

Percutaneous treatment of stone containing calyceal diverticula: Strategies and outcomes from a University teaching hospital in a developing country

INTRODUCTION

There is a dearth of research available on the outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of the modalities employed in treatment of diverticula after stone clearance by PCNL. We present our experience of various approaches employed in our institute for treatment of caliceal diverticulum after stone clearance by PCNL. We aimed to review the outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of these procedures which can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of these techniques in the treatment of stone containing caliceal diverticulum.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients diagnosed with caliceal diverticular stone was conducted. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate (SFR) at the time of hospital discharge, determined by a combined nephroscopic/fluoroscopic assessment, and the obliteration of the diverticular sac. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of operative time, duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were evaluated. The mean diverticulum size was 23.2 mm, most common location was the superior calyx (30 (56.7%)). Group 1 (diverticular neck treatment + DJ stent) included 27 patients, group 2 (diverticular wall fulguration + PCN) included 18 patients and group 3 (PCN alone) included 8 patients. Mean operating time was highest in group 1 (80 min). Stone clearance was 100% in group 1, 91% in group 2 and 88% in group 3. Obliteration of caliceal diverticulum was highest in group 1 (90%). Mean duration of hospital stay was lowest in group 1 (3.2 days). Overall complications were lowest in group 2 (3/18).

CONCLUSION

PCNL followed by combination of diverticular wall fulguration and PCN or treatment of diverticular neck and DJ stenting is safe and effective in causing diverticular obliteration. Placement of nephrostomy tube alone was not found to be effective in causing diverticular obliteration in our study.

The treatment option for calyceal diverticulum stones: flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURL) or all-seeing needle-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURL) and all-seeing needle-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of calyceal diverticula (CD) stones. From June 2012 to November 2020, 24 patients, including 14 females and 10 males, with an average age of 45.6 ± 17.4 years were retrospectively reviewed in this study. Among these patients, 14 were treated with FURL, and 10 underwent all-seeing needle-assisted PCNL. The demographic data, perioperative parameters and complications, as well as follow-up data, were recorded. In the FURL group, the ostium of CD was not identified in two patients, and these patients were finally treated with all-seeing needle-assisted PCNL. The stone clearance rate (SCR) was 64.3%, and the mean blood loss was 0.9 ± 0.8 g/dL. The average operation time was 57.5 ± 17.4 min, and the mean hospital stay was 3.5 ± 1.4 days. A complete resolution of CD was observed in five (41.7%) patients over the average follow-up of 10.8 months. In terms of the all-seeing needle-assisted PCNL, the average operation time was 83.5 ± 32.4 min, and the mean hospital stay was 4.38 ± 2.25 days. The SCR reached 91.7%, and the blood loss was 1.7 ± 1.1 g/dL. Nine patients (75%) were observed to have complete CD resolution over an average of 12.2 months of follow-up. All complications were grade I and II in both the groups. CD stones can be treated minimally invasive and effectively by FURL and PCNL. The effect of FURL greatly depends on the location and anatomy of the diverticula. PCNL is more efficient, and its safety was improved with the help of the all-seeing needle assistance.

Systematic Review of Caliceal Diverticulum

PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review of the literature regarding the diagnosis and treatment of caliceal diverticulum (CD).

METHODS

The search strategy was conducted according to the Cochrane review guidelines for systematic reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist.

RESULTS

In total 1189 titles and abstracts were reviewed, of which 101 were selected for article evaluation. Of these 101 articles, 40 were selected for inclusion after full article evaluations. In the extracted article, intravenous urography (IVU), rather than CT urography, was the main imaging tool for diagnosis, although many articles had failed to provide any imaging modality information. The extracted articles included 88, 153, and 487 patients who underwent shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), flexible ureteroscopy/retrograde intrarenal surgery (fURS/RIRS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), respectively. Stone-free rates were 21.3% (SWL), 61.4% (fURS/RIRS), and 83.0% (PCNL). The complication rates were 8.0% (SWL), 3.3% (fURS/RIRS), and 11.9% (PCNL). There was incomplete and inconsistent reporting of even basic clinical parameters, such as the size and location of the CD, number of stones, outcomes, and complications. There was a striking lack of follow-up data, despite a known high recurrence rate. The literature on laparoscopic management was too sparse to analyze.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed that there are not enough high-quality studies to evaluate the ideal strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of CDs. This systematic review emphasizes (a) the importance of contrast imaging for CD diagnosis, (b) higher success rates but also higher complication rates in PCNL compared with SWL and FURS, and (c) the need for standardized reporting of outcomes to include complications, number of interventions, symptom resolution, stone clearance, and CD ablation.

Management of renal caliceal diverticular stones: A decade of experience

Objective:

The objective of this study is to evaluate our methods for management of renal caliceal diverticular stones (CDS).

Materials and Methods:

We conducted a retrospective study from January 2005 to July 2015 and included patients who were treated for renal CDS. Patients were evaluated for treatment modality, puncture site (in case percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL] attempted), operative time, stone clearance rate, and complications. During PCNL, if the infundibulum was found to connect the diverticulum to the calyx, then a double J stent was placed. No attempt was made to dilate the diverticular neck or to create a neoinfundibulum.

Results:

Twenty-four patients were treated for CDS during the study period. Two patients underwent shockwave lithotripsy, and 22 were managed by PCNL. Mean stone size was 16.37 mm (range: 6–35 mm) and mean diverticulum size was 20.62 mm (range: 12–37 mm). No fulguration was done in initial 17 patients, while fulguration by Holmium Laser was performed in the last five cases treated with PCNL. Mean operative time was 70.31 min (range: 47–90 min). Mean follow-up was 34 months, diverticulum resolved in 14 patients and reduced in size in 7 patients.

Conclusion:

Caliceal diverticular calculi can be treated most efficiently by PCNL. Stone-guided puncture and no attempt to dilate or create neoinfundibulum reduces operative time and morbidity while yielding high stone-free rate.

Stones in special situations

There are several special situations in which urinary lithiasis presents management challenges to the urologist. An in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiology, unique anatomy, and treatment options is crucial in order to maintain good health in these patients. In this review, we summarize the current literature on the management of the following scenarios: bladder stones, stones in bowel disease, during pregnancy, in association with renal anomalies, with skeletal deformities, in urinary diversions, and in children.

Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy

Objective

To retrospectively evaluate appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi, by comparing the therapeutic outcomes for those undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS).

Methods

From March 2009 to May 2014, 36 consecutive patients with caliceal diverticular calculi were divided into 2 groups: 21 patients underwent MPCNL, and 15 were treated by F-URS. All procedures were performed by one surgical group, which ensured relatively constant parameters. Patient characteristics, operative time, hospital stay after surgery, stone-free rate, symptomatic improvement rate, complications, diverticular obliteration, and stone composition were analyzed retrospectively in the 2 groups.

Results

Patient preoperative variables were comparable between the two groups, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mean operative time was 136.9 ± 22.8 min in the MPCNL group and 117.3 ± 24.3 min in the F-URS group (P = 0.019). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the MPCNL group than in the F-URS group (9.4 ± 3.1 vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 days, P = 0.010). The stone-free rates after MPCNL and F-URS were 90.5% (19/21) and 60.0% (9/15), respectively (P = 0.046). Additionally, 71.4% (15/21) of patients in the MPCNL group and 46.7% (7/15) of patients in the F-URS group had symptomatic improvement at the 6-month follow-up (P = 0.175); the rates of complications in the 2 groups were 19.0% (4/21) and 13.3% (2/15), respectively (P = 0.650). Complete diverticular obliteration was achieved in 16 (76.2%) cases in the MPCNL group and 5 (33.3%) cases in the F-URS group (P = 0.017). The distributions of calcium oxalate and hydroxyapatite in the stones were 66.7% (14/21) and 33.3% (7/21), respectively, in the MPCNL group; however, the distributions in the F-URS group were 46.7% (7/15) and 53.3% (8/15), respectively (P = 0.310).

Conclusion

MPCNL is an effective method for the treatment of caliceal diverticular calculi. However, F-URS is an alternative technique in selected patients with a patent infundibulum, despite lower stone-free rates than with MPCNL. Fulguration of the diverticular lining with a high-power holmium laser and permitting the cavity to collapse are useful to increase the chance of diverticular obliteration.

Is retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy feasible for calyceal diverticular stone?

The aim of this study is to manage the calyceal diverticular (CD) stone, several treatment options were applied but it is still a challenging condition of endourology. In this retrospective study, we aim to report the results of our patients with CD stones treated with retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy (RFNL). A total of 47 patients (55 procedures) who underwent RFNL by a single surgeon for CD stones from January 2004 to March 2013 were evaluated retrospectively. The demographic properties and initial complaints of those patients have been recorded along with their comorbidities and previous history of stone management. Moreover, the size and number of the stones, the duration of the surgery, fluoroscopy time, stone-free rate (SFR) and postoperative complications of the patients have been evaluated. The mean age was 41.8 years (range 16-71). Of the study population, 31 (65.9%) were male. Mean stone size was 21.1 (7-52) mm whereas in 3 (6.4%) of the cases the stones could not be reached. Mean duration of the surgery was 92.8 (57-163) min whereas mean fluoroscopy time was 35.9 (14-103) s. After 3 months of follow-up period, the SFR was 85.1%. No major complications occurred. RFNL with holmium laser and nitinol basket catheter application is a feasible and successful procedure in the management of CD stones. With its high success rates, low incidence of complications and minimal morbidity when compared with other treatment options, RFNL has the potential of becoming the preferred treatment option in the minimally invasive management of patients with CD stones.

Percutaneous management of renal caliceal diverticular stones: Ten-year experience of a tertiary care center with different techniques to deal with diverticula after stone extraction

Introduction:

Caliceal diverticulae are a frequent surgical problem. We present our experience with caliceal diverticular stones (CDS) managed with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and describe the two different techniques to deal with diverticula after stone retrieval.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed 10-year data of 44 consecutive patients who underwent PCNL for CDS. During PCNL, if the guide wire could be negoted through the neck of the diverticula, we dilated and stented it. If we couldnot find the neck, we fulgurated the diverticular walls. Follow-up included intravenous urogram at 3 months and annual plain films thereafter. We analyzed the outcome, complications, and recurrence rate.

Results:

Total stone clearance was obtained in 40 (90.90%) patients. We dilated and stented the diverticula in 35 (79.5%) patients and fulgurated the walls in nine (20.5%) patients. Complications occurred in three patients. The postoperative intravenous urogram showed obliteration of diverticula in seven patients and the improved drainage in 37 patients. At the average follow-up of 2 years, 41 (93.18%) patients were asymptomatic and two (4.5%) patients showed the recurrence of stone.

Conclusions:

PCNL can clear calculi from caliceal diverticula in most cases with minimal morbidity. After stone retrieval, the diverticula may be drained into the pyelocaliceal system, if the neck is negotiable and fulgurated if the neck cannot be dilated.

Minimally invasive percutaneous cystostomy with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for calculus in bladder diverticula

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of minimally invasive percutaneous cystostomy with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for treating calculus in bladder diverticula. Percutaneous cystostomy with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy was performed on six elderly male patients with calculi in bladder diverticula, who could not be treated with transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The stones were successfully removed from all patients, with no complications such as bladder perforation, rupture, urethritis or cystitis. The surgery time was 15–60 min, with an average time of 32 min. Postoperative ultrasound or X-ray examination showed no stone residues and the bladder stoma healed well. No recurrent stones were detected in the follow-up of 3–24 months (average, 16 months). Minimally invasive percutaneous cystostomy with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy is a safe, efficient and easy treatment for calculus in bladder diverticula. This method provides a new clinical approach for lithotripsy and we suggest that it is worthy of wider use.