In-hospital outcomes and cost assessment between bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate

Evaluating Factors That Influence Healthcare Resource Utilization in Transurethral Resection of Prostate

INTRODUCTION

Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) but is associated with complications. The association of healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and TURP has been poorly studied. We seek to evaluate HRU in patients undergoing TURP and identify factors contributing to outcomes.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was reviewed from 2012-2018 for TURP by CPT code. HRU was defined as discharge to continued care, unplanned readmission within 30 days, or prolonged length of stay (>75th percentile). We included preoperative variables, including age, BMI, diabetes, and ASA class. OD was broken into deciles by minutes. Preoperative characteristics and outcomes were compared against OD. Predictors of HRU were found using a stepwise multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

38,749 patients were included. Variables significantly associated with OD (values are 3 shortest and 3 longest deciles, respectively): any HRU (35.9%, 32.4%, 31.4% and 32.4%, 33.7%, 37.6%), and prolonged length of stay (31.3%, 27.6%, 26.5% and 28.0%, 30.4%, 34.1%). Findings in the first decile seemed to be an outlier, shown in Figure 1. Complications associated with OD are shown in Figure 2. On multivariable analysis, patients with OD > 58 minutes were more likely to have increased HRU, OR 1.22, 1.33, 1.54, 1.78 for deciles 58-66, 67-78, 78-99 and >100, respectively, p<0.005. Preoperative variables associated with HRU on multivariable analysis include age 71-80 and >80, COPD, dyspnea, hypertension, diabetes, not functionally independent, ASA class III and IV-V, and dirty/infected wound class, p<0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

OD is an independent predictor of HRU in patients undergoing TURP and is more modifiable than other preoperative variables associated with increased HRU. Patients in the longest decile were more likely to have complications and increased HRU. Further study is needed to evaluate causation.

Post-transurethral resection of prostate urethral strictures: Are they often underreported? A single-center retrospective observational cohort study

Objectives

Post-transurethral resection of prostate urethral stricture (PTS) is a well-documented delayed complication following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The aim is to analyze various risk factors of PTS and see if the overall incidence is underreported.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in our institution between January 2017 and December 2018 in men who underwent TURP. Data obtained from the medical records department were analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test. A two-tailed P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 447 men who underwent TURP, 57 developed PTS. Fifteen of 334 patients who underwent calibration before the procedure developed stricture compared to 42 of 137 without calibration (P < 0.01). There was a significantly lesser incidence of stricture with 24 Fr resectoscope compared with 26 Fr sheath (P < 0.04). Two patients with 24 Fr Foley and 30 of 35 (86%) patients with 22 Fr Foley catheter developed stricture of urethra. Distal bulbar urethra was the most common site of narrowing following TURP. Eighteen patients had Salvaris swab placed for traction and 12 patients required full-thigh traction, of which majority developed meatal stenosis.

Conclusions

TURP is one of the common surgical procedures performed by urologists. Meatitis and meatal stenosis, if included as complications of TURP, would increase the overall incidence of PTS. Factors such as the size of resectoscope sheath used, size of catheter inserted, placement of Salvaris swab traction, and preoperative calibration of urethra have a significant impact on the ultimate outcome.

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Bipolar TURP for the Treatment of Bladder Outflow Obstruction

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard surgical technique for endoscopic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Introduced in 2001, the bipolar energy appeared to be a valid alternative to the classical monopolar one with reduced risk of complication related to the use of saline irrigation and to the increased hemostatic efficacy. More recently, raising attention has been given to laser enucleation and vaporization techniques, which appear to achieve further advantages in terms of reduced hospital stay and complications compared to the resection ones. Few studies have investigated the cost/benefit ratio related to these techniques. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the cost/benefit ratio of bipolar TURP (B-TURP) compared with other endoscopic procedures.

Usefulness of bicarbonate Ringer's solution as perfusate during transurethral resection of the prostate

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the most common standard surgical procedure used for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transurethral resection in saline (TURis) is a bipolar electrosurgery system used to prevent TURP (or TUR) syndrome. The bicarbonate Ringer's solution is not generally used as perfusate for TURP. Hence, we compared the efficacy of the bicarbonate Ringer's solution with that of physiological saline as perfusate during TURP. This prospective, multicenter, cooperative study was conducted on 40 adult patients admitted to a medical college hospital. After obtaining informed consent from all the patients, they were divided into two groups (20 patients per group). For patients of one group, bicarbonate Ringer's solution, and for other group, physiological saline was used as perfusate. Compared to the physiological saline, the electrolyte composition of the bicarbonate Ringer's solution was closer to that of plasma. Hence, the group using bicarbonate Ringer's solution as perfusate was exhibited less variation in plasma electrolytes and blood gas data. The primary endpoints were adverse events of grade 1 or higher according to the JCOG postoperative complication criteria ver. 2.0, unintended diseases, or related signs in patients who underwent the protocol therapy. The secondary endpoints were changes in blood pH, bicarbonate ion level, anion gap (AG), base excess (BE), and chloride (C1), which occurred during and after the surgeries. Therefore, bicarbonate Ringer's solution has superior with that of physiological saline as perfusate during TURP which is directly administered into the blood vessels as an infusion solution.Bicarbonate Ringer's solution is directly administered into the blood vessels as an infusion solution.

Monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Operative outcomes and surgeon preferences, a real-world scenario

Context:

Monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (M-TURP) is considered the gold standard for the management of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Its newly introduced modification, bipolar TURP (B-TURP), promises to overcome its most prominent shortcomings, namely bleeding and dilutional hyponatremia. Literature is conflicting regarding merits of B-TURP over M-TURP.

Aims:

To find a difference, if any, in perioperative outcomes between M-TURP and B-TURP in a real-wold setting.

Settings and Design:

Prospective nonrandomized study.

Subjects and Methods:

Operative outcomes of patients undergoing M-TURP and B-TURP from February 2014 to October 2015 were compared.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Categorical data were compared by Fischer exact test and numerical data were compared by independent samples Mann–Whitney U-test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

The mean size of prostate operated by bipolar technology was significantly greater than those operated by monopolar technology (38.12 ± 9.59 cc vs. 66.49 ± 22.95 cc; P < 0.001). The mean fall in postoperative serum sodium concentration was 0.99 ± 0.76 mEq/L for the B-TURP group as compared to 3.60 ± 2.89 mEq/L for the M-TURP group (P < 0.001). The mean drop in postoperative hemoglobin concentration (P = 0.28) was statistically insignificant, even though larger glands were operated by B-TURP. There were three instances of the transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome in the M-TURP group whereas no TUR syndrome occurred in the B-TURP group.

Conclusions:

In spite of various contrary viewpoints in literature, surgeons prefer to operate on larger prostates using bipolar technology. B-TURP definitely reduces the incidence of bleeding and dilutional hyponatremia, making it a contender to replace M-TURP as the new gold standard.

The TURis System for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

The transurethral resection in saline (TURis) system was notified by the company Olympus Medical to the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence's (NICE's) Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme. Following selection for medical technologies guidance, the company developed a submission of clinical and economic evidence for evaluation. TURis is a bipolar surgical system for treating men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement. The comparator is any monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (mTURP) system. Cedar, a collaboration between Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff University and Swansea University in the UK, acted as an External Assessment Centre (EAC) for NICE to independently critique the company's submission of evidence. Eight randomised trials provided evidence for TURis, demonstrating efficacy equivalent to that of mTURP for improvement of symptoms. The company presented meta-analyses of key outcome measures, and the EAC made methodological modifications in response to the heterogeneity of the trial data. The EAC analysis found that TURis substantially reduced the relative risks of transurethral resection syndrome (relative risk 0.18 [95 % confidence interval 0.05-0.62]) and blood transfusion (relative risk 0.35 [95 % confidence interval 0.19-0.65]). The company provided a de novo economic model comparing TURis with mTURP. The EAC critiqued the model methodology and made modifications. This found TURis to be cost saving at £70.55 per case for existing Olympus customers and cost incurring at £19.80 per case for non-Olympus customers. When an additional scenario based on the only available data on readmission (due to any cause) from a single trial was modelled, the estimated cost saving per case was £375.02 for existing users of Olympus electrosurgery equipment and £284.66 per case when new Olympus equipment would need to be purchased. Meta-analysis of eight randomised trials showed that TURis is associated with a statistically significantly reduced risk of transurethral resection syndrome and a reduced need for blood transfusion-two factors that may drive cost saving for the National Health Service. The clinical data are equivocal as to whether TURis shortens the hospital stay. Limited data from a single study suggest that TURis may reduce the rate of readmission after surgery. The NICE guidance supports adoption of the TURis technology for performing transurethral resection of the prostate in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement.

Short-stay transurethral prostate surgery: A randomized controlled trial comparing transurethral resection in saline bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate with monopolar transurethral resection

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to establish the safety and efficacy profile of transurethral resection in saline (TURis) bipolar vaporization of the prostate relative to monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and to test the hospital stay efficiency after TURis vaporization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

in this multicenter, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial, men aged 50-75 years old were randomized into two arms: TURis bipolar vaporization and monopolar TURP. Intraoperative details, perioperative parameters, and postoperative functional outcomes were assessed after intervention. Follow-up with symptom score assessment, prostate volume measurement, and uroflowmetry were performed at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients (mean age, 65.0 ± 5.6 years) were randomized into each study arm. TURis bipolar vaporization had a longer operative time than monopolar TURP (51.6 ± 24.5 vs 38.5 ± 20.3 min, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the TURis group had a shorter catheter time (33.6 ± 23.7 vs 40.8 ± 29.4 h, P = 0.013) and a shorter length of hospital stay (43.14 ± 18.79 vs 52.33 ± 30.58 h, P = 0.013). The postoperative dysuria score was higher in the TURis vaporization arm. There was no statistically significant difference between the two arms in terms of hemoglobin change and postoperative complication. No significant difference was observed in quality of life score at 3 and 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

TURis bipolar vaporization of the prostate is a safe and comparable alternative to monopolar TURP. It leads to a reduction in both catheter time and length of hospital stay.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of bipolar compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)

To compare monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for clinical effectiveness and adverse events. We conducted an electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Science Citation Index, and also searched reference lists of articles and abstracts from conference proceedings for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing monopolar and bipolar TURP. Two reviewers independently undertook data extraction and assessed the risk of bias in the included trials using the tool recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. From the 949 abstracts that were identified, 94 full texts were assessed for eligibility and a total of 24 trials were included in the review. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) or health-related quality of life (HRQL) score. Results for maximum urinary flow rate were significant at 3, 6 and 12 months (all P < 0.001), but no clinically significant differences were found and the meta-analysis showed evidence of heterogeneity Bipolar TURP was associated with fewer adverse events including transurethral resection syndrome (risk ratio [RR] 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.31, P < 0.001), clot retention (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.77, P = 0.002) and blood transfusion (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.82, P = 0.004) Several major methodological limitations were identified in the included trials; 22/24 trials had a short follow-up of ≤1 year, there was no evidence of a sample size calculation in 20/24 trials and the application of GRADE showed the evidence for most of the assessed outcomes to be of moderate quality, including all those in which statistical differences were found. Whilst there is no overall difference between monopolar and bipolar TURP for clinical effectiveness, bipolar TURP is associated with fewer adverse events and therefore has a superior safety profile. Various methodological limitations were highlighted in the included trials and as such the results of this review should be interpreted with caution. There is a need for further well-conducted, multicentre RCTs with long-term follow-up data.

Does mechanical bowel preparation improve quality of laparoscopic nephrectomy? Propensity score-matched analysis in Japanese series

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before laparoscopic nephrectomy in terms of operation time and perioperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1-T3 tumors were identified in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2008 to 2010. The patients were stratified into a preoperative MBP group (polyethylene glycol electrolyte, magnesium citrate solution, and sodium picosulfate) and a non-MBP group and were matched using one-to-one propensity score matching according to age, sex, Charlson score, T category, hospital volume, and hospital academic status. The operation time, postoperative length of stay, and overall complication rate were assessed by multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 2740 patients in 355 hospitals, 1110 pairs were generated. The median operation time, postoperative stay, and overall complication rate (MBP vs non-MBP group) was 278 and 268 minutes (P<.004), 10.3 and 10.0 days (P=.695), and 11.8% and 11.4% (P=.740), respectively. The multivariate regression analyses did not find significant superiority of MBP for the 3 endpoints (all P>.05). A shorter operation time was significantly associated with female sex and early-stage tumor. Older age, greater Charlson score, and lower hospital volume adversely affected the postoperative stay and overall complication rate. Stage T3 tumor was unfavorable for the postoperative stay.

CONCLUSION

Our large-scale propensity score-matched analysis did not demonstrate a benefit for MBP in operation time, postoperative stay, or overall complications. The results suggest that MBP can be safely omitted before laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1-T3 tumors.