Robot-Assisted Ureteroneocystostomy: Technique and Comparative Outcomes

Perioperative and functionnal outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open ureterovesical reimplantation for benign lower ureteral pathologies: a single-center comparative study

PURPOSE

The robot-assisted laparoscopic (RALUVR) and open (OUVR) approaches have both been described for ureterovesical reimplantation to treat benign lower ureteral pathologies. Thus, we aimed to compare the perioperative and functional outcomes of RALUVR vs. OUVR.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective comparative study including all consecutive patients treated with RALUVR or OUVR for benign lower ureteral pathologies between January 2013 and December 2022 at our center. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the predictors of complication ≥ Clavien-Dindo (CD) III within 90 days, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and 90-day overall success. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses were used to assess vesicoureteral reflux-free (VU-RFS) and stenosis-free (SFS) survivals.

RESULTS

Overall, 44 patients underwent RALUVR (n = 19; 43%) and OUVR (n = 25; 57%). In univariable logistic regression analyses, the use of RALUVR vs. OUVR was not significantly associated with postoperative complications ≥ CDIII (OR = 0.98; 95% CI=[0.17-5.09]; p = 0.98), and 90-day overall success (OR = 1.43; 95% CI=[0.24-11.28]; p = 0.7). Despite a shorter median LOS after RALUVR vs. OUVR (4 vs. 10 days, respectively; p < 0.001), multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no impact of the surgical approach on prolonged LOS (OR = 0.51, 95% CI=[0.03-13.86]; p = 0.65). No significant difference was observed in 2-year VU-RFS (72.9% vs. 100%, respectively; p = 0.2) and 2-year SFS between the RALUVR and OUVR groups (85.7% vs. 87.7%, respectively; p = 0.8). In Cox regression analysis, the use of RALUVR vs. OUVR was not significantly associated with VU-RFS (HR = 4.26; 95% CI=[0.38-47.84]; p = 0.24) or SFS (HR = 1.32; 95% CI=[0.22-8.01]; p = 0.76).

CONCLUSION

We observed that RALUVR provides similar perioperative and functional outcomes as compared to OUVR, except for potentially shorter LOS.

Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Approximately 5% to 10% of patients who undergo kidney transplantation develop ureteral stricture, which can be treated endoscopically or by open surgery, which is more effective but complications are common and potentially severe. Robotic surgery has begun to emerge as an alternative in reconstructive procedures. However, few studies have evaluated the role of robotic surgery in this clinical setting. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of robotic surgery in treating ureteral stricture after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Single-center study of patients (n = 27), who developed ureteral stricture following kidney transplantation. All patients were treated from 2018 to 2023. We describe the patients' baseline characteristics and clinical and surgical features. We determined the success rate as a measure of efficacy and complications to measure safety.

RESULTS

We perform 15 pyeloureterostomies to the native ureter and 12 ureteroneocystostomies. At a median follow-up of 15 mo, the success rate was 92.6%. Fourteen patients (52%) developed treatment-related complications, mainly grade II (Clavien-Dindo classification), except for one grade IVb complication. The median length of hospital stay was 3 d [interquartile range (2-6)].

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that robotic surgery is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of ureteral strictures after kidney transplantation. The success rate was high with a low complication rate. To our knowledge, this is the largest series to date to evaluate robotic surgery in this clinical setting.

Robot-assisted ureteric reconstructive surgeries for benign diseases: Initial single-center experience with point of technique

INTRODUCTION

We present our initial experience with robot-assisted reconstructive surgeries with the Da Vinci Xi robotic system for benign ureteric pathologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent robot-assisted reconstructive procedures for benign diseases of the ureter at our department from April 2018 to November 2022. Demographic and perioperative details were recorded. Patients were followed up and surgical success was evaluated on the basis of symptomatic, functional, and radiological improvement.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients underwent robot-assisted reconstructions for benign ureteric pathologies by various techniques. Mean age, body mass index (BMI), hospital stay and follow-up duration were 36 years, 24.1 kg/m2, 5.29 days, and 7.08 months respectively. Procedures included pyeloplasty in eight, primary ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) in seven, Psoas hitch UNC in five, Boari flap UNC in six, Ureteroureterostomy in four, ureterocalicostomy in two and ileal ureteral transposition in two patients. Mean docking time, total operative time, and estimated blood loss were 31.5 min, 178 min, and 64.3 ml, respectively. All patients had radiologic or functional improvement on follow-up after 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery for benign ureteric and bladder pathologies imparted excellent short-term outcomes without major complications with all the advantages of a minimally invasive approach.

Robotic ureteral reconstruction for benign ureteral strictures: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes : Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction for Ureteral Strictures

INTRODUCTION

Robotic ureteral reconstruction (RUR) has been widely used to treat ureteral diseases. To summarize the surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes following RUR, as well as to compare data on RUR with open and laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction.

METHODS

Our systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO (CRD42022309364) database. The PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched for publications in English on 06-Feb-2022. Randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised cohort studies with sample size ≥ 10 cases were included.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included involving 996 patients and 1004 ureters from 13 non-comparative, and 10 retrospective comparative studies. No RCT study of RUR was reported. The success rate was reported ≥ 90% in 15 studies. Four studies reported 85-90% success rate. Meta-analyses for comparative studies showed that RUR had significantly lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (P = 0.006) and shorter length of stay (LOS) (P < 0.001) than the open approach. RUR had shorter operative time than laparoscopic surgery (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RUR is associated with lower EBL and shorter LOS than the open approach, and shorter operative time than the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of benign ureteral strictures. However, further studies and more evidence are needed to determine whether RUR is more superior.

A Multi-Institutional Experience Utilizing Boari Flap in Robotic Urinary Reconstruction

Objectives: There is presently scarce literature describing the outcomes of patients undergoing robotic ureteral reconstruction (RUR) using the Boari flap (BF) technique. Herein, we report our prospective, multi-institutional experience using BF in patients undergoing robotic urinary reconstruction. Patients and Methods: We reviewed our prospective, multicenter database for all patients undergoing RUR between September 2013 and September 2021 in which a BF was utilized. Preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Major complications were defined as a Clavien-Dindo classification grade >2. Surgical failure was defined as recurrent symptoms, obstruction on imaging, or the need for additional surgical interventions. Results: We identified 50 patients who underwent RUR using a BF. Four (8%) underwent the Single Port approach. Twenty-four patients (48%) were active or former tobacco users. Thirty-four patients (68%) had previously undergone abdominal surgery, 17 (34%) had prior ureteral stricture interventions, and 9 (18%) had prior abdominopelvic radiation. The most common stricture etiology was malignancy (34.4%). The median follow-up was 15.0 months with a 90% (45/50) success rate. The five documented cases of failure occurred at a median of 1.8 months following the procedure. Conclusion: In the largest prospective, multi-institutional study of patients undergoing RUR with BF in the literature to date, we demonstrate a low rate of complications and a high rate of surgical success in three tertiary academic medical centers. All observed failures occurred within 2 months of surgical intervention.

Uretero-neocystostomy: a retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic techniques

BACKGROUND

Uretero-neocystostomy (UNC) is the gold-standard for distal-ureter repair. Whether the surgery should be conducted minimally invasive (laparoscopic (LAP), robotic RAL)) or open remains unanswered by the literature.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients treated with UNC for distal ureteral stenosis (January 2012 - October 2021). Patient demographics, estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical technique, operative time, complications and length of hospital stay (LOS) were recorded. During the follow-up period, patient underwent renal ultrasound and kidney function tests. Success was defined as relieve of symptoms or no findings of obstruction needing urine drainage.

RESULTS

60 patients were included (9 RAL, 25 LAP, 26 open). The different cohorts were similar of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body-mass index and history of prior treatment of the ureter. No intraoperative complications were detected in all groups. There was no conversion to open surgery in the RAL group, whereas one was found in the LAP arm. Six patients had a recurrent stricture, but with no significant difference between the cohorts. EBL was not different between the groups. LOS was significantly lower in the RAL + LAP group compared to open (7 vs. 13 days, p = 0.005) despite significantly longer operating times (186 vs. 125.5 min, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Minimal invasive UNC, especially RAL, is a feasible and safe surgical method and provides similar results in terms of success rates in comparison to open approach. A shorter LOS could be detected. Further prospective studies need to be done.

Long-term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Rendezvous Procedures to Treat Complex Ureteric Strictures and Injuries

Background

Complex ureteric strictures and injuries occurring during major abdominal and pelvic operations may cause significant morbidity and distress to patients. A rendezvous procedure is an endoscopic technique used in case of such injuries.

Objective

To evaluate perioperative and long-term outcomes of rendezvous procedures to treat complex ureteric strictures and injuries.

Design setting and participants

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing a rendezvous procedure for ureteric discontinuity including strictures and injuries, treated between 2003 and 2017 at our Institution and completing at least 12 mo of follow-up. We divided patients into two groups: early postsurgical obstruction, leakage, or detachment (group A) and late strictures (oncological/postsurgical; group B).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

If appropriate, we performed a retrograde study ± rigid ureteroscopy to assess the stricture 3 mo after the rendezvous procedure, followed by a MAG3 renogram at 6 wk, 6 mo, and 12 mo, and annually thereafter for 5 yr.

Results and limitations

Forty-three patients underwent a rendezvous procedure, 17 in group A (median age 50 yr, range 30-78) and 26 in group B (median age 60 yr, range: 28-83). Ureteric strictures and ureteric discontinuities were stented successfully in 15 out of 17 patients in group A (88.2%) and 22 out of 26 patients (84.6%) in group B. For both groups, the median follow-up was 6 yr. In group A, of 17 patients, 11 (64.7%) were stent free with no further interventions, two (11.7%) had a subsequent Memokath stent insertion (38%), and two (11.7%) required reconstruction. Of 26 patients in group B, eight (30.7%) required no further interventions and were stent free, ten (38.4%) were maintained with long-term stenting, and one was managed with a Memokath stent (3.8%). Of the 26 patients, only three (11.5%) required major reconstruction, while four patients with malignancy (15%) died during follow-up.

Conclusions

With a combined antegrade and retrograde approach, the majority of complex ureteric strictures/injuries can be bridged and stented with an overall immediate technical success rate of above 80%, avoiding major surgery in unfavourable circumstances and allowing time for stabilisation and recovery of the patient. Additionally, in case of technical success, further interventions may be unnecessary in up to 64% of patients with acute injury and about 31% of patients with late stricture.

Patient summary

The majority of complex ureteric strictures and injuries can be resolved using a rendezvous approach, avoiding major surgery in unfavourable circumstances. Moreover, this approach can help avoid further interventions in 64% of such patients.

Long-term outcome of non-antireflux robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureter reimplantation in ureteral obstruction

PURPOSE

Although robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureter reimplantation (RALUR) is a recognized alternative to open and laparoscopic ureter reimplantation in treating distal ureteral obstruction, there are limited data on long-term efficacy and safety outcomes of non-antireflux RALUR. We assessed patients undergoing RALUR, evaluating operative, functional and safety determinants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing non-antireflux RALUR between April 2015 and January 2020 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome endpoint was recurrent distal ureteral obstruction.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 41.3 months (CI 95%, 33.3-49.2). Among the 26 included patients, none developed recurrent distal ureteral obstruction. Kidney function in terms of serum creatinine level (72.0 vs. 71.0 µmol/L, p=0.988) and glomerular filtration rate (92.0 vs. 91.0 mL/min, p=0.831) was stable between the preoperative period and the last follow-up. Renal pelvis dilatation decreased significantly postoperatively, from grade 2 to grade 0 (p<0.001). Most patients (73.1%) remained free from any clinical symptoms of reflux during the follow-up. The rate of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II) was 23.1%. All complications resolved without sequelae. No recurring urinary tract infections were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-antireflux RALUR appears to be safe and effective in the management of distal ureteral obstruction. There was no recurrent ureteral obstruction after RALUR in our cohort during a mean follow-up of more than 3 years. Non-antireflux reimplantation did not seem to have any notable impact on renal function during the follow-up period.

Rate of recurrent hydronephrosis after laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy for ureteral endometriosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in patients with ureteral endometriosis (UE).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the ureter endometriosis with hydronephrosis.

SETTING

A private hospital that provide primary, secondary and tertiary care.

PATIENTS

30 consecutive patients with UE who underwent laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy at our institution between May 2008 and April 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy, if necessary, hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, cystectomy, partial bladder resection, or partial bowel resection were performed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The most common chief complaint was pelvic pain (40%). Endometriosis affected only the left ureter in 56.7% of patients, only the right ureter in 33.3%, and both ureters in 6.7%. Involvement of the ipsilateral ovary was confirmed in 64.3%. The most frequent location of UE was 1-3 cm above the UVJ (46.7%). A psoas hitch was performed in 7 patients (23.3%), and the Boari flap was used in 9 patients (30%). Hysterectomy was performed in 12 patients (40%), and 6 of them had a concomitant bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (20%). In addition, 3 patients (10%) underwent partial bowel resection, and 2 patients (6.7%) underwent partial bladder resection. After surgery, 24 of 27 patients (80.0%) were free of sever hydronephrosis after surgery. Hydronephrosis recurred in a single patient (3.3%), but the grade of hydronephrosis improved significantly after surgery (P < 0.001). At 6 months of follow up, 4 patients (13.3%) experienced urinary tract infections and 2 patients (6.7%) reported dysuria. Patients reported a regression of dysmenorrhea symptoms (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that ureteroneocystostomy provides good results in terms of relapses and symptom control in patients with ureteral endometriosis.

Robotic ureteral reimplantation: systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes in adults

INTRODUCTION

The surgical treatment of ureteral strictures in adults represents a challenging procedure for the variability of location, extension, and etiology of the disease. Open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) offered high success rates even when considering complex ureteral disease. The debate for defining the role of robotic in the treatment of adult ureteral disease is still ongoing. The aim of the current systematic review is to provide an updated analysis of the comparative outcomes of robot-assisted UR (RAUR) versus OUR based on the available literature.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An independent systematic review of the literature was performed from 2010 to 2021. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations were followed to design search strategies, selection criteria, and evidence reports. The quality of the included studies was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for nonrandomized controlled trials. Pooled analysis of demographics and clinical characteristics, as well as surgical and postoperative outcomes, was performed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

After an initial screening and full-text review, 5 studies published between 2002 and 2021 were identified and included in the analysis. All the studies were observational retrospective case-control studies. Among the 225 patients included in the pooled analysis, 94 (41.8%) and 131 (58.2%) were RAUR and OUR, respectively. There was no difference between groups in terms of baseline characteristics. No differences in surgical approach and operative time were reported among the groups. Estimated blood loss was lower for robotic approach (WMD: -121.71ml; p=0.0006). There were no significant differences between groups in overall (OR: 0.85; p=0.69) and major (OR:0.69; p=0.52) complication. RAUR group reported shorter length of stay (WMD: -2.39day; p<0.00001), catheter (WMD: -5.26day; p=0.004) and stent (WMD: -11.9day; p=0.001) time.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence shows that RAUR offers similar surgical outcomes if compared to OUR, and potential advantages in terms of lower blood loss, shorter hospital stay, catheter, and stent time. The adoption of one approach over the other is likely to be mainly dictated by the surgeon's preference and expertise.

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteroureterostomy for Distal Benign Ureteral Strictures with Long-Term Follow Up

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) ureteroureterostomy (UU) for benign distal ureteral strictures (DUS) in our robotic reconstruction series with long term follow up.

PATIENTS & METHODS

In a retrospective review of our prospectively maintained RAL ureteral reconstruction database, we followed patients between 6/2012-2/2019 who underwent a UU for DUS. In addition to patient demographics, we recorded the etiology, stricture length and recurrence rates. Recurrence was defined as findings of recurrent or persistent obstruction by postoperative mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic renal scan or the need for additional intervention with ureteral drainage or revisional surgery.

RESULTS

We identified 22 patients who underwent a RAL-UU for DUS of benign etiologies. Median age was 42 years old (IQR 39-57) and 20 of 22 patients (90.1%) were female. Median stricture length was 1.5 cm (IQR 1-2). Iatrogenic surgical injury was noted in 16 patients (73%). All ureteral reconstruction was performed using RAL. Post-operative imaging consisted of renal ultrasonography, diuretic renal scan or cross-sectional radiology within 3 months of the index operation. Further imaging was dependent on clinical judgment. Twenty patients (90.1%) had success with median follow-up time of 54.6 months with two recurrences necessitating RAL ureteroneocystostomy (UNC).

CONCLUSION

RAL-UU for DUS is technically viable and shows promising efficacy in properly selected patients. This technique may serve a niche for preserving the natural anatomical drainage of the bladder and ureter in addition to obviating the sequela of vesicoureteral reflux as seen in UNC.

ROBOT-ASSISTED URETERAL REIMPLANTATION: A SINGLE CENTER COMPARATIVE STUDY

BACKGROUND

To report a single-center experience with robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation (RAUR) and to compare its outcomes with those of open ureteral reimplantation (OUR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent RAUR or OUR for ureteral disease between 2016 and 2020 were identified. Data collected included baseline, pathological, perioperative and postoperative features. The RAUR outcomes were compared with those of OUR.

RESULTS

Overall, twenty-one (42.8%) patients underwent RAUR, and 28 (57.2%) underwent OUR. The two groups were similar in terms of baseline and pathological characteristics. There was a statistically significant difference in favor of RAUR for median operative time (216 vs. 317min, p=0.01) and median blood loss (35 vs. 175ml, p=0.001). No difference was observed in overall complication rate (33.3 vs. 46.4%, p=0.9), as well as major complications (Clavien-Dindo≥III grade) rate between RAUR and OUR groups. Median LOS was shorter for RAUR (2 vs. 6 days; p=0.001), as well as median catheterization time (16 vs. 28 days; p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

RAUR is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical procedure for the management of mid to distal ureteral strictures. It can recapitulate the success rate of the gold standard OUR while offering a benefit in terms of lower surgical morbidity and faster postoperative recovery.

Robot-assisted Boari flap and psoas hitch ureteric reimplantation: technique insight and outcomes of a case series with ≥1 year of follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To describe step-by-step surgical techniques and report outcomes of the largest single-centre series of patients with distal ureteric disease exclusively treated with robot-assisted ureteric reimplantation with Boari flap (RABFUR) and psoas hitch (RAPHUR), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year and complete postoperative data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 37 patients with distal ureteric disease were treated between 2010 and 2018. Of these, 81% and 19% underwent RAPHUR and RABFUR, respectively. Intra-, peri- and postoperative outcomes were assessed. The 90-day postoperative complications were reported according to the standardised methodology proposed by the European Association of Urology Ad Hoc Panel. Functional outcomes (creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) and postoperative symptoms (visual analogue pain scale) were assessed.

RESULTS

The median operating time and blood loss were 180 min and 100 mL, respectively. There were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative transfusions. The median length of stay, bladder catheter indwelling time and stent removal were 4, 7 and 30 days, respectively. The median follow-up was 24 months. Overall, 10 patients (27%) had postoperative complications and of these, eight (22%) and two (5.4%) were Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II and III, respectively. At the last follow-up, the median postoperative creatinine level and eGFR were 0.9 mg/dL and 73.5 mL/min/1.73 m² , respectively. At the last follow-up, five (13.5%) and three (8%) patients had Grade 1 hydronephrosis and mild urinary symptoms, respectively. The study limitations include its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, we present our RABFUR and RAPHUR techniques. We confirm the feasibility and safety profile of both approaches in patients with distal ureteric disease relying on the largest single-centre series with ≥1 year of follow-up.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplant: A single-center experience

Introduction:

Open ureteral reimplant has been the gold standard for management of lower ureteric strictures. With the widespread acceptance of robotic surgery, robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplant (RALUR) is becoming the preferred choice for performing ureteral reimplant. We present our single-institution and single-surgeon experience of performing RALUR.

Materials and Methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of 40 patients who underwent RALUR at our institute in the last 5 years. Demographic data were recorded along with presenting complaint and diagnosis. Intraoperative variables included operative and docking time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, technique, and procedure performed. Postoperative data that were analyzed included complications, hospital stay, and outcomes. Patient satisfaction score was calculated using a numerical scale of points 1–6.

Results:

The mean age of patients was 31.5 ± 9.8 years (r = 4–45). Male: female ratio was 3:5. The most common presenting symptom was flank pain, and the most common etiology was iatrogenic strictures in adults and congenital vesicoureteral reflux in children. The mean operative time and blood loss were 135.3 ± 45.1 min (r = 84–221) and 67.7 ± 31.4 ml (r = 32–118), respectively. There were no intraoperative complications and nil conversion to open surgery. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.5 ± 2.3 days (r = 3–9). Radiographic success was achieved in 41 out of 44 ureters. Eighty-five percent of the patients were completely satisfied with robotic approach and its outcomes.

Conclusion:

RALUR is a minimally invasive, safe, feasible, less morbid technique with good outcome.

The robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction in adult: A narrative review on the surgical techniques and contemporary outcomes

Despite the rapid increase in the use of robotic surgery in urology, the majority of ureteric reconstruction procedures are still performed using laparoscopic or open approaches. This is primarily due to uncertainty regarding the advantages of robotic approaches over conventional ones, and the unique difficulty in identifying the specific area of interest due to the lack of tactile feedback from the current robotic systems. However, with the potential benefits of minimal invasiveness, several pioneering reports have been published on robotic surgery in urology. By reviewing the literature on this topic, we aimed to summarize the techniques, considerations, and consistent findings regarding robotic ureteral reconstruction in adults. Robotic applications for ureteral surgery have been primarily reported for pediatric urology, especially in the context of relieving a congenital obstruction in the ureteral pelvic junction. However, contemporary studies have also consistently demonstrated that robotic surgery could be a reliable option for malignant, iatrogenic, and traumatic conditions, which generally occur in adult patients. Nevertheless, the lack of comparative studies on heterogeneous hosts and disease conditions make it difficult to determine the benefit of the robotic approach over the conventional approach in the general population; thus, qualified prospective trials are needed for wider acceptance. However, contemporary reports have demonstrated that the robotic approach could be an alternative option for ureteral construction, even in the absence of haptic feedback, which can be compensated by various surgical techniques and enhanced three-dimensional visualization.

Robotic Surgery for the Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Strictures

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility and success of a robotic approach to reconstruction of ureterovesical anastomotic strictures in kidney transplants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2017 and December 2019, a total of 5 patients with transplant ureteral stricture were identified and treated with robot assisted laparoscopic repair. All patients were confirmed to have ureteral stricture with a preoperative antegrade nephrostogram through their nephrostomy tube and cystogram. The patients demographics, ureteral characteristics, type of procedure, and outcomes are reported.

RESULTS

All patients were diagnosed after evaluation for renal deterioration. The average age of the patients was 49 years old. The average stricture length was 2.5 cm, and the location was variable, though more commonly in the distal ureter. Three patients required a pyelo-vesicostomy, while 2 required a ureteroneocystostomy. The mean length of stay was 2.2 days. Average follow-up was 97 days, with all 5 patients having successful outcomes, no strictures or delayed leaks were identified. There were no wound infections or readmissions within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Though a complex repair, the robot-assisted approach to transplant ureter reconstruction using either an end to side neoureterocystotomy or direct pyelo-vesicotomy is technically feasible and successful. Given the many advantages inherent in comparison to an open approach, the robotic repair offers significant advantages to both the patient and the surgeon who is experienced with robotic surgery and reconstructive principles.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in adults: A single surgeon experience and literature review

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience and technique with robot-assisted ureteroneocystostomy (RAUN) procedure in adults.

METHODS

Between February 2015 and August 2018, a total of 30 (34 ureters) patients who underwent RAUN surgery under a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative data such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American society of anesthesiologists score, estimated blood loss, surgical technique, operative time, complications, length of hospital stay, and stent removal time were recorded. During the follow-up, patients underwent renal function test, urinalysis, and renal ultrasound examination for evaluation. Success was defined as symptomatic and radiologic relieve. Lastly, a literature search was conducted to review all published articles regarding RAUN surgery in adults.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age, BMI, EBL, operative time, and follow-up period were 45.4 years, 23.1 kg/m2, 65.6 mL, 182.9 min, and 21.3 months, respectively. The two most common indications for the surgery were benign ureteral strictures and ureteric injuries secondary to a previous radical hysterectomy. Of the 34 cases, 26 (76.5%) and 8 (23.5%) patients received primary RAUN and RAUN with psoas hitch technique, respectively. Refluxing RAUN method was performed in all cases. No intraoperative complications were found. Two patients had a radiologic and symptomatic recurrence; one was managed with a repeat surgery while the other received ureteral dilatation treatment.

CONCLUSION

Both our study and the published literature showed that RAUN is a safe, less invasive, and effective surgical technique that can easily replicate the open ureteroneocystostomy for managing lower ureteral diseases.

Management of recurrent ureteral stricture: a retrospectively comparative study with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open approach

Background

Management of recurrent ureteral stricture is challenging. Consensus on the best surgical choice has not been demonstrated. In this study, we aim to report our experience in treating recurrent ureteral stricture and demonstrate whether robot-assisted procedure for redo ureteral surgery is as effective as open procedure while remaining less invasive.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed 41 patients (22 robot-assisted surgeries and 19 open surgeries) who underwent consecutive robot-assisted and open procedures for redo ureteral surgery from January 2014 to 2018 in our institution. Perioperative outcomes, including demographics, operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, pain scores, success rate and cost, were compared between two groups.

Results

There was no significant intergroup difference in terms of age, body mass index, gender composition and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. A total of 31 patients underwent redo pyeloplasty and ten underwent redo uretero-ureterostomy. Compared with open group, robot-assisted group showed shorter operative time (124.55 min vs. 185.11 min, p < 0.0001), less estimated blood loss (100.00 mL vs. 182.60 mL, p = 0.008) and higher cost (61161.77¥ vs. 39470.79¥, p < 0.0001). Complication rate and pain scores were similar between two groups. Median follow-up periods were 30 and 48 months for robot-assisted and open group respectively. Success rate in the robot-assisted (85.71%) and the open group (82.35%) was not significantly different.

Conclusions

Robot-assisted surgery for recurrent stricture after previous ureteral reconstruction is as effective as open procedure and is associated with shorter operative time and less estimated blood loss.

Robot-assisted distal ureteral reconstruction for benign pathology: Current state

Distal ureteral reconstruction for benign pathologies such as stricture disease or iatrogenic injury has posed a challenge for urologist as endoscopic procedures have poor long-term outcomes, requiring definitive open reconstruction. Over the past decade, there has been an increasing shift towards robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) with multiple institutions reporting their outcomes. In this article, we reviewed the current literature on RAL distal ureteral reconstruction, focusing on benign pathologies only. We present peri-operative data and outcomes on the most common technique, ureteral reimplantation, as well as adjunct procedures such as psoas hitch and Boari flap. Additionally, we present alternative techniques reported in the literature with some technical considerations. Lastly, we describe the outcomes of the comparative studies between open, laparoscopy, and RAL. Although the body of literature in this field is limited, RAL reconstruction of the distal ureter appears to be safe, feasible, and with some advantages over the traditional open approach.

Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: A systematic review of the literature

Objectives

To evaluate the recent developments in robotic urological surgery, as the introduction of robotic technology has overcome many of the difficulties of pure laparoscopic surgery enabling surgeons to perform complex minimally invasive procedures with a shorter learning curve. Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is now offered as the standard for various surgical procedures across multiple specialities.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify studies evaluating robot-assisted simple prostatectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, surgery for urolithiasis, distal ureteric reconstruction, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, augmentation ileocystoplasty, and artificial urinary sphincter insertion. Article titles, abstracts, and full text manuscripts were screened to identify relevant studies, which then underwent data extraction and analysis.

Results

In all, 72 studies evaluating the above techniques were identified. Almost all studies were retrospective single-arm case series. RAS appears to be associated with reduced morbidity, less blood loss, reduced length of stay, and comparable clinical outcomes in comparison to the corresponding open procedures, whilst having a shorter operative duration and learning curve compared to the equivalent laparoscopic techniques.

Conclusion

Emerging data demonstrate that the breadth and complexity of urological procedures performed using the da Vinci® platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is continually expanding. There is a gaining consensus that RAS is producing promising surgical results in a wide range of procedures. A major limitation of the current literature is the sparsity of comparative trials evaluating these procedures.

Contemporary management of ureteral strictures

Ureteral stricture disease is a luminal narrowing of the ureter leading to functional obstruction of the kidney. Treatment of strictures is mandatory to preserve and protect renal function. In recent times, the surgical management of ureteral strictures has evolved from open repair to include laparoscopic, robotic and interventional techniques. Prompt diagnosis and early first line intervention to limit obstructive complications remains the cornerstone of successful treatment. In this article, we discuss minimally invasive, endo-urological and open approaches to the repair of ureteral strictures. Open surgical repair and endoscopic techniques have traditionally been employed with varying degrees of success. The advent of laparoscopic and robotic approaches has reduced morbidity, improved cosmesis and shortened recovery time, with results that are beginning to mirror and in some cases surpass more traditional approaches.

Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction: а systematic review of literature

Introduction

To review the literature, as well as to analyze and compare available data on robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) surgery versus open surgery, carried out in ureteral reconstructions in terms of different surgical characteristics.

Materials and methods

Eligible studies, published between 1997 and July 2016, were retrieved through MEDLINE by applying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria with the English language restriction. Publications on RAL surgeries, carried out in different ureteral reconstructions and of any study design, including case series and comparative studies, were included. The study was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement.

Results

A total of 12 retrospective studies (case series and comparative studies) met the systematic review selection criteria involving 245 RAL and 76 open ureteral surgery cases. Main indications for ureter reconstruction were strictures, tumors and injuries. The individual results of comparative studies revealed that the EBL was statistically significantly lower for RAL than for open surgery. As for operation time, length of hospital stay and follow-up time, the data was contradictory. The rate of recurrent stricture in RAL and open groups was similar: -9.0%. The meta-analysis of three comparative studies confirmed that patients lose statistically significantly less blood in RAL, compared to open surgery.

Conclusions

The analysis of limited data available shows that robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique with high cure rates similar to those of the conventional open approach and, with favorable safety profile. Future well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to strengthen our findings.

[Urinary tract involvement by endometriosis. Techniques and outcomes of surgical management: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]

Urinary tract involvement by endometriosis is reported in 1% of endometriosis patients (NP3). Consequences range from pelvic pain for bladder localizations to silent kidney loss in case of chronic ureteral obstruction (NP3). The feasibility of laparoscopic management was widely proven (NP3) and may reduce hospital stay length (NP4). Radical surgery with partial cystectomy for bladder localizations was shown to significantly and durably reduce pain symptoms with low risk of a severe postoperative complications (NP3). Medical hormonal treatment also shows short-term reduction of pain symptoms (NP4). Transureteral resection of bladder endometriosis nodule is not recommended (grade C) because of a high postoperative recurrence rate (NP4). Given a high risk of silent kidney loss, it is recommended that patients with ureteral involvement by endometriosis are managed by a multidisciplinary team considering urinary and potential extra-urinary localizations of endometriosis (grade C). No recommendation can be made on which technique to prefer between conservative (ureterolysis) or radical surgical techniques or on benefit and length of ureteral stents in case of ureteral involvement. Surgical management of bladder and ureteral localizations of endometriosis do not seem to be associated with altered or improved postoperative fertility (NP4). Since late postoperative ureteral anastomosis stenosis were reported with silent kidney loss, repeated postoperative imaging monitoring is justified (expert opinion).

Robotic ureteral reconstruction distal to the ureteropelvic junction: a large single institution clinical series with short-term follow up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Use of the robotic platform for urinary reconstructive surgery is growing in popularity since its initial application with pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) repair. Although clinical series of adult robotic ureteral reconstruction appear in the literature, these reports tend to be limited in size and scope. We present the largest series to date of patients undergoing surgery for any obstruction distal to the UPJ along with outcomes and short-term follow up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing robotic ureteral reconstructive procedures for any indication at our institution. Patients undergoing pyeloplasty, planned open procedures, and pediatric patients were excluded from the current analysis. Patient demographic data, etiology, procedure performed, and perioperative outcomes were reviewed. Postoperative follow up, imaging, and any re-interventions were also captured. The procedures performed included ureteroneocystostomy, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, ureterolysis, ureterolithotomy, and nephropexy.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients underwent robotic ureteral reconstructive procedures distal to the UPJ. Of these patients, 45 underwent intervention for a benign etiology and 10 for upper tract malignancy. All cases were successfully completed robotically with no open conversions and no intraoperative complications. Concurrent endoscopy was performed in 31 patients. The median operating room time was 221 minutes overall. Median blood loss was 50 ml with no intraoperative transfusions. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days, with 39 patients (71%) discharged on postoperative day 1. All surgical margins were negative for malignancy. The median follow up with imaging was 181 days. There were two serious complications (3.6%) and three failures (5.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic reconstruction of the ureter distal to the UPJ is feasible, safe, effective, and able to replicate techniques of open surgery with equivalent outcomes to large robotic pyeloplasty and smaller distal ureteral reconstruction series.

Open, laparoscopic, and robotic ureteroneocystotomy for benign and malignant ureteral lesions: a comparison of over 100 minimally invasive cases

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic (LAP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) approaches have been applied to ureteroneocystostomies (UNC) although such experience has been limited to a small number of patients and limited follow-up. Herein, we detail our experience with over 100 minimally invasive UNC, the largest such series to date.

METHODS

All minimally invasive UNC performed at our institution between 1997 and 2013 and all open UNC performed between 2008 and 2013 were identified. Perioperative parameters of relevance were identified and recorded. Chi-squared and ANOVA with post hoc Tukey analysis were performed for all categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients met our study criteria. One hundred five underwent the minimally invasive approach (20 RAL and 85 LAP). Mean follow-up duration was 504 days. Patients in the RAL, LAP, and open cohorts were of similar age, gender and laterality distribution, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body-mass index, history of previous abdominal surgery, history of prior treatment for the ureteral lesion, and surgical indication ( Table 1 ). Operative time was similar across all cohorts (235-257 minutes, p=0.123). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in the RAL and LAP cohorts (100 and 150 mL) compared to their open counterparts (300 mL, p=0.001) although a decrease in hematocrit was similar across all groups. Only four intraoperative complications (4.7%) and two (2.4%) conversions to open were identified in the LAP group, without statistical significance. No intraoperative complications or conversions were identified in the RAL or open cohorts. Median length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter in the minimally invasive cohorts compared to open (p<0.002). Ninety-day readmission rates (18.8-20%), major complications (10-20%), and failure rates (5.9-16%) were highest in the open cohort although without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

RAL or LAP UNC is feasible, safe, and comparable to the open technique with some perioperative benefit in EBL, LOS, and stent duration.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic approaches to the ureter: Pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The benefits of robotic surgery when compared to standard laparoscopy have been well established, especially when it comes to reconstructive procedures. The application of robotic technology to laparoscopic pyeloplasty has reduced the steep learning curve associated with the procedure. Consequently, this has allowed surgeons who are less experienced with laparoscopy to offer this treatment to their patients, instead of referring them to centers of excellence. Robotic pyeloplasty has also proved useful for repairing secondary UPJO, a procedure which is considered extremely difficult using a conventional laparoscopic approach. Finally, the pursuit of scarless surgery has seen the development of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) procedures. The application of robotics to LESS (R-LESS) has also reduced the difficulty in performing conventional LESS pyeloplasty. Herein we present a literature review with regards to robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. We also discuss the benefits of robotic surgery with regards to reconstruction of the lower urinary tract.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed to identify relevant studies. There were no time restrictions applied to the search, but only studies in English were included. We utilized the following search terms: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction and laparoscopy; laparoscopic pyeloplasty; robotic pyeloplasty; robotic ureteric reimplantation; robotic ureteroneocystostomy; robotic boari flap; robotic psoas hitch.

RESULTS

There has been considerable experience in the literature with robotic pyeloplasty. Unfortunately, no prospective randomized studies have been conducted, however there are a number of meta analyses and systematic reviews. While there are no clear benefits when it comes to surgical and functional outcomes when compared to standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty, it is clear that robotics makes the operation easier to perform. There is also a benefit to the robotic approach when performing a redo-pyeloplasty. Robotic pyeloplasty has also been applied to the pediatric population, and there may be a benefit in older children while in very young patients, retroperitoneal open pyeloplasty is still the gold standard. In the field of single incision surgery R-LESS is technically easier to perform than conventional LESS. However, the design of the current robotic platform is not completely suited for this application, limiting its utility and often requiring a larger incision. Optimized R-LESS specific technology is awaited. What is clear, from a number of analyses, is that robotic pyeloplasty is considerably more expensive than the laparoscopic approach, largely due to costs of instrumentation and the capital expense of the robot. Until cheaper robotic technology is available, this technique will continue to be expensive, and a cost-benefit analysis must be undertaken by each hospital planning to undertake this surgery. Finally, the benefits of upper tract reconstruction apply equally to the lower tract although there is considerably less experience. However, there have been a number of studies demonstrating the technical feasibility of ureteral reimplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is gaining popularity, likely due to the shorter learning curve, greater surgeon comfort, and easier intracorporeal suturing. This has allowed more surgeons to perform the procedure, improving accessibility. Robotic technology is also beneficial in the field of LESS. Nevertheless, the procedure still is not as cost-effective as the conventional laparoscopic approach, and until more affordable robotic technology is available, it will not be universally offered.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: recent advances in urology

The aim of the present review is to summarize recent developments in the field of urologic robotic surgery. A nonsystematic literature review was performed to retrieve publications related to robotic surgery in urology and evidence-based critical analysis was conducted by focusing on the literature of the past 5 years. The use of the da Vinci Surgical System, a robotic surgical system, has been implemented for the entire spectrum of extirpative and reconstructive laparoscopic kidney procedures. The robotic approach can be applied for a range of adrenal indications as well as for ureteral diseases, including benign and malignant conditions affecting the proximal, mid, and distal ureter. Current evidence suggests that robotic prostatectomy is associated with less blood loss compared with the open surgery. Besides prostate cancer, robotics has been used for simple prostatectomy in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Recent studies suggest that minimally invasive radical cystectomy provides encouraging oncologic outcomes mirroring those reported for open surgery. In recent years, the evolution of robotic surgery has enabled urologic surgeons to perform urinary diversions intracorporeally. Robotic vasectomy reversal and several other robotic andrological applications are being explored. In summary, robotic-assisted surgery is an emerging and safe technology for most urologic operations. The acceptance of robotic prostatectomy during the past decade has paved the way for urologists to explore the entire spectrum of extirpative and reconstructive urologic procedures. Cost remains a significant issue that could be solved by wider dissemination of the technology.