Outcomes of intrarenal Bacillus Calmette-Guérin/interferon-α2B for biopsy-proven upper-tract carcinoma in situ

Sequential endoluminal gemcitabine and docetaxel vs. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for the treatment of upper tract carcinoma in situ

INTRODUCTION

Nephroureterectomy is commonly performed for high-grade (HG) upper tract (UT) urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, some patients may benefit from a de-escalation of surgical management, particularly for noninvasive disease and carcinoma in situ (CIS). Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is currently the only guideline-recommended endoluminal treatment option. Gemcitabine/Docetaxel (Gem/Doce) has shown promising efficacy as a treatment for noninvasive HG UTUC, though a comparison to BCG is lacking. We report the outcomes of patients treated with endoluminal Gem/Doce vs. BCG for UT-CIS.

METHODS

A single-institutional retrospective review of patients treated with Gem/Doce vs. BCG for UT-CIS was performed. Treatment was instilled via nephrostomy or retrograde ureteral catheter. In both treatment groups, induction consisted of 6 weekly instillations. Maintenance was initiated if disease-free and consisted of 6 monthly instillations in the Gem/Doce group and a reduced dose (one-tenth) 3-week course at 3 months in the BCG group. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven disease or HG cytology.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 53 patients with 65 upper tract units; 31 received BCG and 34 received Gem/Doce. Median follow-up was 88 and 29 months in the BCG and Gem/Doce groups, respectively. Presenting pathology included biopsy-proven CIS and HG cytology in 9.7% and 90% of the BCG group, and 8.8% and 91% of the Gem/Doce group, respectively. The 2-year estimates for recurrence-free and nephroureterectomy-free survival were 61% and 89% for the BCG group and 54% and 100% for the Gem/Doce group, respectively. Upon multivariable analysis, instillation via percutaneous nephrostomy tube was associated with an increased risk of recurrence (HR 3.89, 95% CI 1.59-9.53). The development of any symptom was not statistically different between treatment groups (P = 0.12). There were 2 treatment-related deaths that occurred, 1 within each treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Endoluminal Gem/Doce and BCG have similar oncological outcomes and major adverse event rates in the treatment of UT-CIS. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.

The Utility of Intraluminal Therapies in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Nephron sparing surgery (NSS) is considered for selected cases of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) as it maintains renal function and avoids morbidity associated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The appropriate selection of patients suitable for NSS without compromising oncological outcomes can sometimes be difficult, given the limitations of diagnostic modalities. Recurrence rates for UTUC can be as high as 36 to 54% after NSS. Intraluminal adjuvant therapy can be attempted following NSS to reduce recurrence, but delivery to the upper tract is more challenging than into the bladder. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and chemotherapy such as Mitomycin (MMC) have been administered via nephrostomy or ureteric catheter, which requires invasive/repeated instrumentation of the upper urinary tract. Drug delivery by reflux from bladder instillation along indwelling stents has also been tried but can potentially be unreliable. Recently, a gel formulation of mitomycin has been developed for the controlled exposure of the upper urinary tract to treatment over a number of hours. Drug-eluting stents to deliver chemotherapy to the upper urinary tract have been developed but have not yet entered clinical practice. Endoluminal phototherapy utilising an intravenous photosensitising agent is another novel approach that has recently been described. Intraluminal therapies may be beneficial in decreasing recurrence rates in UTUC, but currently have some limitations in their usage.

Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Rare Malignancy with Distinct Immuno-Genomic Features in the Era of Precision-Based Therapies

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, occurring in 5-10% of patients diagnosed with UC, and involves the renal pelvis, calyces, or ureters. UTUC can be sporadic or hereditary as a clinical manifestation of Lynch syndrome. Therapeutic management of these patients is challenging. Following risk stratification of localized disease, patients with low-grade UTUC may undergo kidney-sparing surgery or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and/or chemoablation with mitomycin-c instillation to reduce recurrence. In high-grade disease, RNU followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard of care. For decades, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment for locally advanced and metastatic disease. The aim of the present review is to summarize recent advances in UTUC's therapeutic management through the lens of its genomic and immune landscape. Accumulating knowledge on the genetic and immune aspects of UTUC tumors has increased our understanding of their underlying biology, supporting a luminal papillary, T-cell depleted contexture and enrichment in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) expression. These advances have fueled successful clinical testing of several precision-based therapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan, and agents targeting the FGFR axis such as erdafitinib and other kinase inhibitors, allowing their entry into the therapeutic armamentarium and improving the prognosis of these patients. Not all patients respond to these precision-based targeted therapies; thus, validating and expanding the toolkit of potential biomarkers of response or resistance, including molecular subtypes, FGFR pathway gene alterations, DNA repair gene defects, tumor mutational burden (TMB), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), nectin-4, TROP2, and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), are key to maximizing the benefit to these particular subgroups of patients.

The Role of Local Agents for the Treatment of Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review of the Current Evidence

Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a promising alternative to radical nephroureterectomy, especially for low-risk cases. However, due to the established risk of ipsilateral UTUC recurrence caused by the implantation of floating neoplastic cells after endoscopic resection, adjuvant endocavitary (endoureteral) instillations have been proposed. Instillation therapy may be also used as primary treatment for UTUC. The two most studied drugs that have been evaluated in both the adjuvant and primary setting of endocavitary instillation are mitomycin C and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. The current paper provides an overview of the endocavitary treatments for UTUC, focusing on methods of administration, novel formulations, oncologic outcomes (in terms of endocavitary recurrence and progression), as well as on complications. In particular, the role of UGN-101 as a primary chemoablative treatment of primary noninvasive, endoscopically unresectable, low-grade, UTUC has been analysed. The drug achieved a complete response rate of 58% after the induction cycle, with a durable response independently of the maintenance cycle. The cumulative experience on the role of UUT instillation therapy appears encouraging; however, no definitive conclusions can be drawn about its therapeutic benefit. Given the current state of the art, any decision to administer adjuvant endoureteral therapy for UTUC should be carefully weighed against the potential adverse events. Nevertheless, newer investigations that improve visualization during ureteroscopy, genomic characterization, novel drugs and innovative strategies of improved drug delivery are under evaluation. The landscape of KSS for the treatment of the UTUC is evolving and seems promising.

Management of primary upper urinary tract carcinoma in situ diagnosed by ureteroscopic biopsy: Is bacillus Calmette-Guerin an alternative to nephroureterectomy?

BACKGROUND

Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) represents the gold standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, attempts have been made to treat upper urinary tract CIS (UT-CIS) conservatively. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with primary UT-CIS treated in our center by means of RNU vs. bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with diagnosis of primary UT-CIS between 1990 and 2018. All patients had histological confirmation of UT-CIS in the absence of other concomitant UTUC. Histological confirmation was obtained by ureteroscopy with multiple biopsies. Patients were treated with BCG instillations, RNU or distal ureterectomy. Clinicopathological features and outcomes were compared between RNU and BCG groups.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients and 29 renal units (RUs) were included. Sixteen (57.1%) patients (17 RUs) received BCG. BCG was administered via nephrostomy tube in 4 patients, with a single-J ureteral stent in 5, and using a Double-J stent in 7. Complete response and persistence or recurrence were detected in ten (58.8%) and seven (41.2%) RUs treated with BCG, respectively. Eight (27.6%) RUs underwent RNU, and 4 (13.8%) Rus distal ureterectomy. No differences were found in recurrence-free survival (p=0.841) and cancer-specific survival (p=0.77) between the RNU and BCG groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although RNU remains the gold standard treatment for UT-CIS, our results confirm that BCG instillations are also effective. Histological confirmation of UT-CIS is mandatory before any treatment.

Nephron-Sparing Approaches in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current and Future Strategies

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare cancer, and much of the approach to treatment has been derived from strategies employed in treating bladder cancer. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is regarded as the gold standard treatment for UTUC. However, due to potential complications, such as renal function impairment, that can affect oncologic outcomes, the demand for nephron-sparing treatment to effectively treat cancer while preserving renal function has increased. As a result, various treatment methods for low-grade, low-volume UTUC, such as segmental ureterectomy, endoscopic resection, and intraluminal therapy, have been attempted and reported. Although these treatment modalities have exhibited acceptable oncological results, further studies are required. In the future, the introduction of new technologies, such as improved diagnostic and surgical equipment, and new drug delivery systems, could enhance the effectiveness of nephron-sparing strategies in the treatment of UTUC. Additionally, understanding the biological and genetic characteristics of UTUC that distinguish it from those of bladder cancer will also aid in establishing strategies for nephron-sparing.

Role of Ureteroscopy in Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Purpose of Review

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is uncommon accounting for less than 10% of all urothelial tumours. Ureteroscopic management (URS) is the first line treatment for low-risk disease and has been increasingly utilised due to technological advances and increasing surgical experience. This review looks at patient outcomes relating to URS, emerging technologies and the role of adjuvant intracavitary therapy in the management of UTUC.

Recent Findings

URS has firmly established itself in the management algorithm for UTUC, and a good body of evidence supports its use for low-risk disease, wherein oncological outcomes are comparable to traditional nephroureterectomy (RNU). Larger tumours can now be managed using URS with a lower morbidity than radical surgery, though with higher associated local recurrence rate and risk of progression to RNU, and as a result, patient selection and close surveillance remains key. There is limited evidence for adjuvant intracavitary therapy (Mitomycin C or BCG) in UTUC although the development of novel polymers and biodegradable stents may improve drug delivery to the upper urinary tract.

Summary

URS has a clearly defined role in low-risk UTUC, and its use in larger tumours appears to be appropriate in a selected cohort of patients. The efficacy of adjuvant intracavitary therapy is as of yet undetermined, though developments in delivery techniques are promising. Likewise further developments of laser technology are anticipated to further expand the role of URS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11934-021-01065-7.

Future strategies to enhance kidney preservation in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Though radical nephroureterectomy remains the gold standard treatment for high grade or invasive disease in upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC), kidney-sparing surgery has become preferred for low risk disease, in order to minimize morbidity and preserve renal function. Many methods exist for endoscopic management, whether via an antegrade percutaneous or retrograde ureteroscopic approach, including electroresection, laser ablation, and fulguration. There has been an increase in use of adjuvant intracavitary therapy, predominantly using mitomycin and bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), to reduce recurrence after primary endoscopic management for noninvasive tumors, although efficacy remains questionable. Intraluminal BCG has additionally been used for primary treatment of CIS in the upper tract, with around 50% success. Newer investigations include use of narrow band imaging or photodynamic diagnosis with ureteroscopy to improve visualization during diagnosis and treatment. Genomic characterization may improve selection for kidney-sparing surgery as well as identify actionable mutations for systemic therapy. The evolution in adjuvant management has seen strategies to increase the dwell time and the urothelial contact of intraluminal agents. Lastly, chemoablation using a hydrogel for sustained effect of mitomycin is under investigation with promising early results. Continued expansion of the armamentarium available and better identification and characterization of tumors ideal for organ-sparing treatment will further improve kidney preservation in UTUC.

Biological Behavior and Long-Term Outcomes of Carcinoma In Situ in Upper Urinary Tract Managed by Radical Nephroureterectomy

PURPOSE

In patients with urothelial carcinoma CIS (carcinoma in situ) generally has a poor prognosis. However, to our knowledge the outcomes of pure/primary CIS and the behavior of CIS concomitant with pTa-pT4 upper tract urothelial carcinoma managed by nephroureterectomy have not been previously specified. We explored the biological and prognostic features of concomitant CIS compared with those of pure/primary CIS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried a multicenter upper tract urothelial carcinoma database. Data from NUOG (Nishinihon Uro-Oncology Group) were analyzed, including patient gender, age, presence of bladder cancer and pT stage. Clinicopathological features were compared between the different subtypes. Cancer specific and overall survival, and the relative excess risk of death were estimated by CIS subtype.

RESULTS

We identified 163 patients with CIS in the upper urinary tract, of whom pure/primary CIS was noted in 24.5%. In the concomitant CIS cohort the pathological diagnosis of the nonCIS region was pTa, pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 in 4.9%, 22.8%, 25.2%, 44.7% and 1.6% of patients, respectively. The sensitivity of a selective urine cytology test was higher in the pure/primary CIS group than in the concomitant CIS group (60.0% vs 37.4%). At a median followup of 32 months 10-year estimated mean cancer specific survival was 92.4 months (range 83.7 to 101.0) in the overall CIS cohort. Ten-year estimated mean cancer specific survival in patients with pure/primary CIS was significantly longer than in patients with concomitant carcinoma in situ (111.8 months, range 101.0 to 122.6 vs 85.89, range 75.3 to 96.5, log rank p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with concomitant CIS have a worse outcome than those who present with pure/primary CIS, suggesting a need to differentiate these 2 entities in the treatment decision process.

Contemporary management of upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma

Upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUCC), formerly known as transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract, is a rare oncologic disease in Western countries. Thus its disease process and its management are not as well defined as other urologic cancers. We are reviewing the current evidence based literature available to develop a plan for the treatment of UTUCC. A PubMed search was completed using the key words “upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma”, “epidemiology”, “risk factor”, “treatment” and “prognosis”. Six hundred fifty two articles were found. We narrowed our search to articles published between January 2004 and June 2016 for a more contemporary review of the topic. Four hundred seventy articles were then available for review. Further detailed search was performed for relevance on the topic and hundred one articles were selected for the review. Many risk factors have been found to be associated with the development of UTUCC, including tobacco use. Patients are often asymptomatic and may only present with microscopic or gross hematuria. Tumor grade and stage are pivotal in determining the treatment options for UTUCC. Advancements in endoscopic techniques have aided in the diagnosis, grading and treatment of this disease. Treatment options include topical therapy, with combinations of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin or gemcitibine or cisplatin, endoscopic resection, segmental ureterectomy and ureteral implantation, and nephroureterectomy, including bladder cuff. Treatment recommendations depend on tumor grade and stage, renal function, tumor location and the patient’s prognosis. There are currently no tissue or blood-based biomarkers available to accurately monitor the disease. Further studies of gene expression and biomarkers may hopefully improve the management of this disease. Although rare in many countries, UTUCC is becoming more prevalent due to exposure to carcinogenic herbal remedies and other identifiable risk factors. Numerous treatment modalities, both surgical and chemotherapeutic, have been utilized to treat both low and high grade UTUCC tumors. Additional clinical trials are necessary to further develop methods for screening, treatment, and surveillance to improve management.

Minimally Invasive Therapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Cancer

Minimally invasive therapy for upper tract urothelial cell cancer has assumed an important role in the management of this relatively uncommon genitourinary malignancy. In this review, current standards for patient selection, surgical approach, as well as overall outcomes will be discussed. Moreover, the use of intraluminal agents in upper tract disease is examined along with its efficacy and associated complications.

The Expanded Use of Percutaneous Resection for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 30-Year Comprehensive Experience

INTRODUCTION

The gold standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The role of endoscopic resection is limited to low-risk patients. In this study, we present our 30-year experience in the endoscopic management of UTUC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we identified 141 patients who underwent percutaneous UTUC resection. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including tumor characteristics, bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and mitomycin use, tumor recurrence, progression to RNU, and overall survival (OS), and compared in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 66 months. Recurrence occurred in 37% of low-grade patients and 63% of high-grade (HG) patients, with a median time to recurrence of 71.4 vs 36.4 months, respectively. Grade was the only predictor of recurrence (HR 2.12, p = 0.018). The latest time to recurrence occurred after 116 months of surveillance. RNU was avoided by 87% of patients. Age, imperative indications for endoscopy, a history of bladder cancer, and tumor stage and grade were predictors of OS; however, in multivariate analysis, grade and stage lost significance. BCG and mitomycin did not protect against recurrence, progression to RNU, or death over resection alone.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous management of UTUC allows for renal preservation in the majority of patients with resectable disease. Patients with HG tumors are more likely to experience recurrence, but are not at an increased risk of death. Intraluminal BCG and mitomycin continue to have a limited adjuvant role to resection. Recurrence may occur many years following initial resection and therefore prolonged surveillance is advised.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for approximately 5% of all urothelial carcinoma. There are many risk factors for UTUC, including environmental and genetic risk factors, some of which are in common with bladder cancer. The gold standard surgical management of UTUC is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with excision of bladder cuff, which is increasingly being performed laparoscopically or robotically with various methods used for the distal ureter. There are increasing numbers of patients being treated endoscopically, with excellent oncological outcomes in low-grade disease. The use of topical BCG and chemotherapy agents has been extrapolated from bladder cancer and may be an adjunct to endoscopic management in those patients in whom it is imperative to avoid RNU.