Heat Damage Zones Created by Different Energy Sources Used in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in a Pig Liver Model

Evaluation of early apical release with bipolar Collins knife versus Thulium-Yag laser enucleation of large-sized prostate. A randomized study

Introduction and objectives

Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) provides durable management for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to large-sized prostate over other surgical modalities. We aimed to assess the early outcomes of Collins knife-assisted bipolar enucleation (BipolEP) versus Thulium-Yag enucleation (ThuLEP) in a group of patients with LUTS secondary to a prostate larger than 80 grams.

Methods

We included patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) having a prostate volume > 80 grams, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) >7, urine flow (Q-max) <15, and post-void residual (PVR)>150 ml. We excluded those with a history of previous prostatic surgery, stone, or neurogenic bladder. Bipolar enucleation with early apical release was performed using Collins knife at an 80/100-watt setting (Lamidey Noury), while ThuLEP was conducted using 550- micron fiber and 40/15-watt energy (Lisa Laser). Patients were evaluated before then 2 weeks and 3, 6,12 months postoperatively for changes in IPSS, Q- max, PVR, and the incidence of stress incontinence.

Result

One hundred and twenty patients were equally randomized with a mean prostate size of 104 ± 25 gram. The mean IPSS score was 25 ± 6, Qmax 7.6 ± 1.3 mL/S, and PVR 225 ± 39. There was no significant difference regarding enucleation time, morcellation time, and enucleated tissue volume. Irrigation volume and post-operative hemoglobin drop were significantly lower in the bipolar group (p = 0.008, p = 0.0002), respectively. At the third-month follow-up, IPSS, Q-max, and PVR were comparable across both groups, with stress incontinence at 3.3% in the bipolar group versus 1.6% in the thulium group, showing an insignificant difference (p = 0.5)."

Conclusion

Both BipolEP and ThuLEP, with early apical release, provide a safe and effective management of large-size prostate resulting in significant decrease in post-operative stress incontinence incidence during early follow-up. Intraoperative irrigation saline volume, and post-operative hemoglobin drop favored the bipolar group.

Necrosis zone depth after bipolar plasma vaporization and resection in the human prostate

Objectives

To compare the depth of thermal necrosis after use of bipolar resection and vaporization technique comparing intra-individually bipolar loop and bipolar button electrodes.

Methods

Transurethral resection and vaporization of the prostate was performed in 55 male patients (260 specimens in total). In a standardized procedure, a bipolar resection loop was used for resection, and a bipolar button electrode was used for vaporization. Both electrodes were applied in each patient, either in the left or in the right lateral lobe. The depth of necrotic zones in the resected or vaporized tissue of each patient was measured in a standardized way by light microscopy.

Results

The mean depth with standard deviation of thermal injury caused by the loop electrode was 0.0495±0.0274 mm. The vaporization electrode caused a mean thermal depth with standard deviation of 0.0477±0.0276 mm. The mean difference of necrosis zone depths between the two types of electrodes (PlasmaButton-resection loop) was -0.0018 mm (p=0.691).

Conclusion

For the first time, we present directly measured values of the absolute necrosis zone depth after application of plasma in the transurethral treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The measured values were lower than in all other transurethral procedures. Standardized procedures of measurement and evaluation allow a statistically significant statement that the low necrosis depth in bipolar procedures is independent of the applied electrodes.

Transpapillary endopancreatic surgery: decompression of duct system and comparison of greenlight laser with monopolar electrosurgical device in ex vivo and in vivo animal models

BACKGROUND

Endopancreatic surgery (EPS) is an experimental minimally invasive technique for resection of pancreatic tissue from inside the pancreatic duct, accessed via the duodenum and papilla. It is proposed as an alternative to duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in benign diseases such as chronic pancreatitis (CP). This study evaluated the use of EPS for resection of pancreatic duct stenoses. Moreover, greenlight laser (GLL) and monopolar electrosurgical device (MES) were compared as resection tools for EPS.

METHODS

The suitability of EPS for resection of stenoses was evaluated in ex vivo bovine pancreas (n = 8). Artificially created stenoses in the pancreatic head were accessed via the duodenal papilla and resected from inside the organ with MES through a rigid endoscope. Furthermore, standardized pancreatic resections were performed in an in vivo porcine model using either GLL (n = 18) or MES (n = 18) to compare blood loss, operating time, and complications. Thermal damage to the surrounding tissue was assessed using a standardized histological classification.

RESULTS

Stenosis resection by EPS was feasible in 8/8 bovine pancreases, with a procedure time of 17 (12-24) min. No perforation of the organ occurred. Resection by GLL was associated with reduced blood loss [median 1.7 (interquartile range 0.6-2.6) ml vs. 5.1 (3.8-13.2) ml; p < 0.01] and shorter operating time [109 (81-127) s vs. 390 (337-555) s; p < 0.01] compared with MES. The zone of thermal tissue damage was more extensive when using GLL than with MES [4.12 (3.48-4.89) mm vs. 1.33 (1.09-1.48) mm; p < 0.01].

CONCLUSION

Transduodenal-transpapillary EPS can be used to resect stenoses and decompress the pancreatic duct system. Both GLL and MES are feasible resection methods for EPS. However, GLL showed better hemostatic characteristics than MES in an in vivo porcine model. Safety measures such as temperature control and image-guided navigation should be employed to monitor the resection and tissue heating.