Low-dose computed tomography in the evaluation of urolithiasis

Ultra-low-dose CTKUB: the new standard of follow-up of ureteric calculi not visible on plain radiograph?

PURPOSE

With sensitivities over 95%, non-contrast computer tomography of kidney, ureter and bladder (CTKUB) is the investigation of choice in renal colic to diagnose or exclude ureteric calculi. CTKUB delivers an average effective radiation dose of 5.4 millisievert (mSv) and is used to follow-up calculi not visible on plain X-ray, whereas plain radiography has a radiation exposure of 0.7 mSv and is used to follow-up radio-opaque calculi. We assessed the effectiveness of using ultra-low-dose CTKUB (ULDCTKUB) for the follow-up of ureteric calculi not visible on plain radiograph of the kidneys, ureter and bladder (KUB), as an emerging option to reduce radiation exposure compared to standard dose CTKUB.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2016 we retrospectively analysed 86 patients who underwent ULDCTKUB for CTKUB-confirmed ureteric calculi that were not visible on plain radiography. Patients were identified from our Radiology Management System with additional information from electronic patient records.

RESULTS

98% of ULDCTKUBs were of diagnostic quality; two patients required further cross-sectional imaging. 67% of patients had passed their calculi after the initial diagnostic CTKUB. In the remaining 33% who had persistent calculi on ULDCTKUB, 20% required surgical intervention and 13% required no intervention. The mean ULDCTKUB effective radiation dose was six times lower than conventional CTKUB (0.8 vs 5.4 mSv). 67% of patients had a radiation dose equivalent to X-ray KUB (< 1 mSv).

CONCLUSION

ULDCTKUB is a reliable and safe follow-up investigation of ureteric calculi and has absorbed radiation doses similar to plain radiography and lower than annual background radiation. We advocate ULDCTKUB as the primary imaging modality in the follow-up of ureteric calculi not visible on plain radiograph.

Radiation Dose Reduction in Kidney Stone CT: A Randomized, Facility-Based Intervention

OBJECTIVE

Kidney stones are common, tend to recur, and afflict a young population. Despite evidence and recommendations, adoption of reduced-radiation dose CT (RDCT) for kidney stone CT (KSCT) is slow. We sought to design and test an intervention to improve adoption of RDCT protocols for KSCT using a randomized facility-based intervention.

METHODS

Facilities contributing at least 40 KSCTs to the American College of Radiology dose index registry (DIR) during calendar year 2015 were randomized to intervention or control groups. The Dose Optimization for Stone Evaluation intervention included customized CME modules, personalized consultation, and protocol recommendations for RDCT. Dose length product (DLP) of all KSCTs was recorded at baseline (2015) and compared with 2017, 2018, and 2019. Change in mean DLP was compared between facilities that participated (intervened-on), facilities randomized to intervention that did not participate (intervened-off), and control facilities. Difference-in-difference between intervened-on and control facilities is reported before and after intervention.

RESULTS

Of 314 eligible facilities, 155 were randomized to intervention and 159 to control. There were 25 intervened-on facilities, 71 intervened-off facilities, and 96 control facilities. From 2015 to 2017, there was a drop of 110 mGy ∙ cm (a 16% reduction) in the mean DLP in the intervened-on group, which was significantly lower compared with the control group (P < .05). The proportion of RDCTs increased for each year in the intervened-on group relative to the other groups for all 3 years (P < .01).

DISCUSSION

The Dose Optimization for Stone Evaluation intervention resulted in a significant (P < .05) and persistent reduction in mean radiation doses for engaged facilities performing KSCTs.

Assessment of Residual Stone Fragments After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To define the most suitable approach to assess residual stone fragments after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

METHODS

Ninety-two patients (115 renal units) submitted to RIRS for symptomatic kidney stones >5 mm and <20 mm or <15 mm in the lower Calyx diagnosed by noncontrast CT (NCCT) were prospectively studied. Residual fragments were assessed by endoscopic evaluation (END) at the end of the procedure and by NCCT, ultrasonography (US), and kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph (KUB) on the 90th postoperative day (POD). NCCT was considered the gold standard for the evaluation of residual fragments after RIRS.

RESULTS

The 90th POD NCCT resulted in stone-free status in 74.8% (86/115), 0-2 mm in 8.7% (10/115), and >2 mm residual fragments in 16.5% (19/115) renal units. Stone-free status by END at the end of RIRS was coincident with NCCT in 93.0% of the cases (40/43). There were no cases of residual fragments >2 mm on NCCT if END resulted in stone-free status. In all cases where END resulted in residual fragments >2 mm, US proved to be correct according to NCCT. Neither US nor KUB was able to identify residual fragments between 0 and 2 mm. KUB had only 31.6% (6/19) sensitivity to detect residual fragments >2 mm and did not add sensitivity or specificity to US.

CONCLUSIONS

In the follow-up imaging after RIRS, we suggest that if END resulted in residual fragments <2 mm, a 90th POD NCCT should be performed. US may be used if END showed fragments >2 mm.

Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements

OBJECTIVES

Measurements of stone features may vary according to the non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) technique. Using magnified bone window is the most accurate method to measure urinary stones. Possible differences between stone measurements in different NCCT windows have not been evaluated in stones located in the kidney. The aim of this study is to compare measurements of kidney stone features between NCCT bone and soft tissue windows in patients submitted to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative and 90th postoperative day NCCT were performed in 92 consecutive symptomatic adult patients (115 renal units) with kidney stones between 5 mm to 20 mm (< 15 mm in the lower calyx) treated by RIRS. NCCT were evaluated in the magnified bone window and soft tissue window in three axes in a different time by a single radiologist blinded for the measurements of the NCCT other method.

RESULTS

Stone largest size (7.92±3.81 vs. 9.13±4.08; mm), volume (435.5±472.7 vs. 683.1±665.0; mm3) and density (989.4±330.2 vs. 893.0±324.6; HU) differed between bone and soft-tissue windows, respectively (p<0.0001) 5.2% of the renal units (6/115) were reclassified from residual fragments > 2 mm on soft tissue window to 0-2 mm on bone window.

CONCLUSION

Kidney stone measurements vary according to NCCT window. Measurements in soft tissue window NCCT of stone diameter and volume are larger and stone density is lesser than in bone window. These differences may have impact on clinical decisions.

Image quality and pathology assessment in CT Urography: when is the low-dose series sufficient?

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to compare CT images from native, nephrographic and excretory phases using image quality criteria as well as the detection of positive pathological findings in CT Urography, to explore if the radiation burden to the younger group of patients or patients with negative outcomes can be reduced.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 40 patients who underwent a CT Urography examination on a 192-slice dual source scanner. Image quality was assessed for four specific renal image criteria from the European guidelines, together with pathological assessment in three categories: renal, other abdominal, and incidental findings without clinical significance. Each phase was assessed individually by three radiologists with varying experience using a graded scale. Certainty scores were derived based on the graded assessments. Statistical analysis was performed using visual grading regression (VGR). The limit for significance was set at p = 0.05.

RESULTS

For visual reproduction of the renal parenchyma and renal arteries, the image quality was judged better for the nephrogram phase (p < 0.001), whereas renal pelvis/calyces and proximal ureters were better reproduced in the excretory phase compared to the native phase (p < 0.001). Similarly, significantly higher certainty scores were obtained in the nephrogram phase for renal parenchyma and renal arteries, but in the excretory phase for renal pelvis/calyxes and proximal ureters. Assessment of pathology in the three categories showed no statistically significant differences between the three phases. Certainty scores for assessment of pathology, however, showed a significantly higher certainty for renal pathology when comparing the native phase to nephrogram and excretory phase and a significantly higher score for nephrographic phase but only for incidental findings.

CONCLUSION

Visualisation of renal anatomy was as expected with each post-contrast phase showing favourable scores compared to the native phase. No statistically significant differences in the assessment of pathology were found between the three phases. The low-dose CT (LDCT) seems to be sufficient in differentiating between normal and pathological examinations. To reduce the radiation burden in certain patient groups, the LDCT could be considered a suitable alternative as a first line imaging method. However, radiologists should be aware of its limitations.

Diagnostic performance of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction applied images for detecting urinary stones on submillisievert low-dose computed tomography

Background Repeated computed tomography (CT) scans may be an issue in young adults with urinary stones. Therefore, it is important to know how far the dose can be reduced while maintaining the diagnostic performance. Purpose To generate a hypothesis that it is feasible to decrease the radiation dose to a sub-millisievert (mSv) level with the addition of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) while maintaining the sensitivity to standard-dose CT (SDCT) for the detection of urinary stones. Material and Methods Ninety-two consecutive patients with urinary stones underwent non-enhanced CT that consisted of standard (120 kVp, 200 mAs) and lose-dose (LDCT) (80 kVp, 60 mAs). The LDCT images were reconstructed separately with five different strengths of ADMIRE (hereafter, S1-S5) and filtered back projection (FBP). Two blinded radiologists independently recorded a number of urinary stones in the six LDCT datasets and SDCT. The sensitivity of each set for detecting urinary stones was compared using the McNemar test. Results A total of 240 urinary stones were analyzed. The sensitivities of the six LDCT datasets showed no difference (FBP, S1-S5, for reader 1: 78%, 79%, 79%, 80%, 80%, and 80%; for reader 2: 64%, 63%, 64%, 64%, 65%, and 66%, P > 0.05, respectively), which were lower than those of SDCT for both readers (reader 1: 88%; reader 2: 81%, P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion Despite the addition of ADMIRE, it may not be feasible to decrease the radiation dose to a sub-mSv level while maintaining the sensitivity to SDCT for the detection of urinary stones.

Evaluation of Kidney Stones with Reduced-Radiation Dose CT: Progress from 2011-2012 to 2015-2016-Not There Yet

Purpose To determine if the use of reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) for evaluation of kidney stones increased in 2015-2016 compared with that in 2011-2012, to determine variability in radiation exposure according to facility for this indication, and to establish a current average radiation dose for CT evaluation for kidney stones by querying a national dose registry. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study was exempt from institutional review board approval. Data were obtained from the American College of Radiology dose registry for CT examinations submitted from July 2015 to June 2016. Study descriptors consistent with single-phase unenhanced CT for evaluation of kidney stones and associated RadLex® Playbook identifiers (RPIDs) were retrospectively identified. Facilities actively submitting data on kidney stone-specific CT examinations were included. Dose metrics including volumetric CT dose index, dose-length product, and size-specific dose estimate, when available, were reported, and a random effects model was run to account for clustering of CT examinations at facilities. A z-ratio was calculated to test for a significant difference between the proportion of reduced-radiation dose CT examinations (defined as those with a dose-length product of 200 mGy · cm or less) performed in 2015-2016 and the proportion performed in 2011-2012. Results Three hundred four study descriptors for kidney stone CT corresponding to data from 328 facilities that submitted 105 334 kidney stone CT examinations were identified. Reduced-dose CT examinations accounted for 8040 of 105 334 (7.6%) CT examinations, a 5.6% increase from the 1010 of 49 903 (2%) examinations in 2011-2012 (P < .001). Mean overall dose-length product was 689 mGy · cm (95% confidence interval: 667, 712), decreased from the mean of 746 mGy · cm observed in 2011-2012. Median facility dose-length product varied up to sevenfold, from less than 200 mGy · cm to greater than 1600 mGy · cm. Conclusion Use of reduced-radiation dose CT for evaluation of kidney stones has increased since 2011-2012, but remains low; variability of radiation dose according to facility continues to be wide. National mean CT radiation exposure for evaluation of renal colic during 2015-2016 decreased relative to 2011-2012 values, but remained well above what is reasonably achievable. ^© RSNA, 2017.

Ureteral Stones: Implementation of a Reduced-Dose CT Protocol in Patients in the Emergency Department with Moderate to High Likelihood of Calculi on the Basis of STONE Score

Purpose To determine if a reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) protocol could effectively help to identify patients in the emergency department (ED) with moderate to high likelihood of calculi who would require urologic intervention within 90 days. Materials and Methods The study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent with HIPAA authorization was obtained. This was a prospective, single-center study of patients in the ED with moderate to high likelihood of ureteral stone undergoing CT imaging. Objective likelihood of ureteral stone was determined by using the previously derived and validated STONE clinical prediction rule, which includes five elements: sex, timing, origin, nausea, and erythrocytes. All patients with high STONE score (STONE score, 10-13) underwent reduced-dose CT, while those with moderate likelihood of ureteral stone (moderate STONE score, 6-9) underwent reduced-dose CT or standard CT based on clinician discretion. Patients were followed to 90 days after initial imaging for clinical course and for the primary outcome of any intervention. Statistics are primarily descriptive and are reported as percentages, sensitivities, and specificities with 95% confidence intervals. Results There were 264 participants enrolled and 165 reduced-dose CTs performed; of these participants, 108 underwent reduced-dose CT alone with complete follow-up. Overall, 46 of 264 (17.4%) of patients underwent urologic intervention, and 25 of 108 (23.1%) patients who underwent reduced-dose CT underwent a urologic intervention; all were correctly diagnosed on the clinical report of the reduced-dose CT (sensitivity, 100%; 95% confidence interval: 86.7%, 100%). The average dose-length product for all standard-dose CTs was 857 mGy · cm ± 395 compared with 101 mGy · cm ± 39 for all reduced-dose CTs (average dose reduction, 88.2%). There were five interventions for nonurologic causes, three of which were urgent and none of which were missed when reduced-dose CT was performed. Conclusion A CT protocol with over 85% dose reduction can be used in patients with moderate to high likelihood of ureteral stone to safely and effectively identify patients in the ED who will require urologic intervention. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.