Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Ablation of Small Renal Masses: A Multi-Institutional Multimodality Analysis

Percutaneous CT-Guided Renal Cryoablation: Technical Aspects, Safety, and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in a Single Center

Background and objectives: Cryoablation is emerging as a safe and effective therapeutic option for treating renal cell carcinoma. This study analyzed the safety and long-term oncological outcomes of cryoablation in our center. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous cryoablation between February 2011 and June 2020 for one or more clinically localized renal tumors were identified. Technical success and treatment efficacy were assessed. Post-procedural complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Recurrence-free survival was determined for biopsy-proven malignant renal tumors. Results: A total of 174 renal tumors, 78 of which were biopsy-proven malignant carcinomas, were treated in 138 patients (97 males and 41 females, mean age: 73 years, range: 43-89 years). Mean tumor size was 2.25 cm and 54.6% of the lesions required a complex approach. Technical success was achieved in 171 out of 174 tumors (98.3%). Primary treatment efficacy was 95.3% and increased to 98.2% when retreats were taken into account. The overall complication rate was 29.8%. No complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or more were encountered. Median follow-up was 21.92 months (range: 0.02-99.87). Recurrence-free survival was 100% at 1 year, 95.3% (95% CI: 82.1%-98.8%) at 3 years, and 88.6% (95% CI: 71.8%-95.7%) at 5 years. Conclusions: Cryoablation is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of small renal lesions, with no major complications when performed by expert interventional radiologists. The multidisciplinary discussion is essential, especially considering the high number of histologically undetermined lesions. Our long-term oncological outcomes are encouraging and in line with the literature.

Safety and Oncologic Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Cryoablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Magnetic resonance imaging guidance has been sporadically reported for renal tumor cryoablation (CA); therefore, clinical experience with this modality is still limited.The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze our 10-year experience with renal tumor CA performed on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging unit with the intent of reporting procedural safety and oncologic outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 143 patients (102 men; 41 women; median age, 73 years; range, 34-91 years) with 149 tumors (median size, 2.6 cm; range, 0.6-6.0 cm), treated between 2009 and 2019. Patient, tumor, procedure, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local recurrence-free (LRFS), metastasis-free (MFS), disease-free (DFS), cancer-specific, and overall (OS) survival. Univariate and multivariate models were used to identify factors associated with complications, LRFS, MFS, DFS, and OS.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate was 10.7% (16/149 tumors), with 1 major (1/149 [0.7%]; 95% confidence interval, 0.0%-3.7%) hemorrhagic complication. Other minor complications (15/149 [10.1%]; 95% confidence interval, 0.6%-16.1%) did not include any cases of injury to nearby organs. There were no factors associated with complications.Five-year estimates of LRFS (primary/secondary), MFS, DFS, cancer-specific survival, and OS were 82.8%/91.5%, 91.1%, 75.1%, 98.2%, and 89.6%, respectively. Increasing tumor size (hazard radio [HR], 1.8; P = 0.02) and intraparenchymal tumor location (HR, 5.6; P < 0.01) were associated with lower LRFS; increasing patient's age (HR, 0.5; P = 0.01), high tumor grade (HR, 23.3; P < 0.01) and non-clear-cell/nonpapillary histology (HR, 20.1; P < 0.01) with metastatic disease; and high tumor grade (HR, 3.2; P = 0.04) with lower DFS.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided CA of renal tumors is associated with acceptable morbidity and high survival estimates at 5-year follow-up. Given the absence of complications resulting from injuries to nearby organs, further studies are required to evaluate whether the potential reduced incidence of these adverse events justifies large-scale implementation of this interventional modality.

Outcomes of Microwave Ablation for Small Renal Masses: A Single Center Experience

Purpose: To investigate the safety of microwave ablation (MWA) as an emerging technology for treating small renal masses. Materials and Methods: Patients with renal masses treated at a high-volume center with MWA between March 2015 and June 2019 were retrospectively identified. Safety, changes in renal function, primary treatment efficacy, and the natural history of imaging characteristics of masses postablation were examined. Results: Forty-five patients underwent MWA during the study period. Median age was 71 years (range 31-87). Median RENAL nephrometry score was 6 (range 4-9) with mean tumor size 2.6 ± 0.7 cm. Thirty-three percent of tumors were within 4 mm of the collecting system. Median total microwave energy applied was 400 W (range 105-2600 W). There was no significant change in creatinine (p = 0.21) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p = 0.09) from preoperative to postoperative day 1 (POD#1) levels. There was a statistically but not clinically significant decrease in hemoglobin from preoperative to POD#1 levels (estimated -0.06 from 7 days before procedure to POD#1, p = 0.02). There was no durable change in creatinine (p = 0.16) or GFR (p = 0.72) at median follow-up of 7.5 months. There were 4 (9%) complications: three Clavien grade 1 and one Clavien grade 3 that led to loss of the kidney. Tumor size decreased postoperatively by an estimated -0.03 cm/month (range 0-1.9 cm, p < 0.01). Initial technical success was 100%. Primary treatment efficacy was 94%. Conclusion: MWA shows promise as an alternative thermal ablative technique with excellent short-term outcomes.

Percutaneous cryoablation for renal cell carcinoma using ultrasound-guided targeting and computed tomography-guided ice-ball monitoring: radiation dose and short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Usefulness of ultrasound (US)-guided mass targeting and computed tomography (CT)-guided ice-ball monitoring in percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still uncertain.

PURPOSE

To assess radiation dose and short-term outcomes of PCA for RCC using US-guided targeting and CT-guided ice-ball monitoring.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-nine consecutive patients who underwent PCA for biopsy-proven RCC were included. Mass targeting was performed with US and ice-ball was monitored with CT guidance. Effective radiation dose of CT during PCA was recorded. Follow-up was conducted with contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (mean follow-up time = 10.1 ± 7.0 months). Local tumor progression was defined by the presence of focal enhancing areas at the ablation zone (CT, ≥ 20 HU; MRI, presence of focal enhancement on subtraction contrast-enhanced image). Technical success, major complication rate (e.g. Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3), and one-year local tumor progression-free survival (PFS) rate were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean effective radiation dose in association with PCA was 12.1 ± 4.5 mSv (range = 7.0-25.2 mSv). Technical success was achieved in 100%. Local tumor progression occurred in a single patient (2.6%, 1/39), and one-year local tumor PFS rate was 95.7%. No major complication was found.

CONCLUSION

PCA using US-guided targeting and CT-guided ice-ball monitoring may allow acceptable local tumor control for RCC, as a radiation-reducing strategy.

Radiation Exposure of Interventional Radiologists During Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Renal Cryoablation and Lung Radiofrequency Ablation: Direct Measurement in a Clinical Setting

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided renal cryoablation and lung radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have received increasing attention as promising cancer therapies. Although radiation exposure of interventional radiologists during these procedures is an important concern, data on operator exposure are lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiation dose to interventional radiologists during CT fluoroscopy-guided renal cryoablation (n = 20) and lung RFA (n = 20) was measured prospectively in a clinical setting. Effective dose to the operator was calculated from the 1-cm dose equivalent measured on the neck outside the lead apron, and on the left chest inside the lead apron, using electronic dosimeters. Equivalent dose to the operator's finger skin was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeter rings.

RESULTS

The mean (median) effective dose to the operator per procedure was 6.05 (4.52) μSv during renal cryoablation and 0.74 (0.55) μSv during lung RFA. The mean (median) equivalent dose to the operator's finger skin per procedure was 2.1 (2.1) mSv during renal cryoablation, and 0.3 (0.3) mSv during lung RFA.

CONCLUSION

Radiation dose to interventional radiologists during renal cryoablation and lung RFA were at an acceptable level, and in line with recommended dose limits for occupational radiation exposure.