A Single Dose of Intraoperative Antibiotics Is Sufficient to Prevent Urinary Tract Infection During Ureteroscopy

Ureterorenoscopic Stone Removal without Antibiotic Prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients without preoperative urinary tract infection undergoing ureterorenoscopy (URS) for stone removal.

METHODS

A retrospective, monocentric study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of a modified perioperative antibiotic management strategy according to the principles of antibiotic stewardship. Patients with preoperative unremarkable urine culture received no antibiotic prophylaxis for URS stone removal (NoPAP). The NoPAP group was compared to a historic URS cohort, when antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) was standard of care. Analysis focused on postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Postoperative fever occurred in 1% of the NoPAP and 2% of the PAP patients (p = 0.589). Clavien 1-3 complications did not differ between groups with 9% in the NoPAP and 6.2% in the PAP (p = 0.159). No Clavien 4-5 complications were seen. We identified a residual stone (p = 0.033) and an ASA score 3-4 (p = 0.004) as significant risk factors for postoperative fever. By sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis, the overall antibiotic usage was reduced from 100% (PAP) to 8.3% (NoPAP).

CONCLUSION

Sparing a routine antibiotic prophylaxis during URS for stone removal seems feasible in patients with unremarkable preoperative urine culture for most of the patients. A prospective validation is warranted.

Prevention of complications in endourological management of stones: What are the basic measures needed before, during, and after interventions?

Objective

This narrative review aims to describe measures to minimise the risk of complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureteroscopy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Methods

A literature search was conducted from the PubMed/PMC database for papers published within the last 10 years (January 2012 to December 2022). Search terms included "ureteroscopy", "retrograde intrarenal surgery", "PCNL", "percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "complications", "sepsis", "infection", "bleed", "haemorrhage", and "hemorrhage". Key papers were identified and included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and primary research. The references of these papers were searched to identify any further relevant papers not included above.

Results

The evidence is assimilated with the opinions of the authors to provide recommendations. Best practice pathways for patient care in the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative periods are described, including the identification and management of residual stones. Key complications (sepsis and stent issues) that are relevant for any endourological procedure are then be discussed. Operation-specific considerations are then explored. Key measures for PCNL include optimising access to minimise the chance of bleeding or visceral injury. The role of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in this regard is discussed. Key measures for ureteroscopy and retrograde intrarenal surgery include planning and technique to minimise the risk of ureteric injury. The role of anaesthetic assessment is discussed. The importance of specific comorbidities on each step of the pathway is highlighted as examples.

Conclusion

This review demonstrates that the principles of meticulous planning, interdisciplinary teamworking, and good operative technique can minimise the risk of complications in endourology.

Preoperative urine culture with contaminants is not associated with increased risk for urinary tract infection after ureteroscopic stone treatment

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess whether the presence of contaminants in the pre-operative urine culture (preop-UC) predicts postoperative urinary tract infection (postop-UTI) in patients undergoing elective ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed from 01/2019 to 12/2021 examining patients with unilateral stone burden ≤ 2 cm who underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy and had a preop-UC within 3 months. Positive, negative, contaminated, and polymicrobial definitions for UCs were established in accordance with current guidelines. Patients with positive and polymicrobial cultures were excluded. Postop-UTI was defined as the presence of urinary symptoms and a positive UC within 30 days of the procedure. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate risk factors for contamination in the preop-UC and the risk of postop-UTI.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients met the inclusion-exclusion criteria. Preop-UC was negative in 153 patients and contaminated in 48 patients. Significant contaminant-related factors included female gender and increased BMI. Postop-UTI was diagnosed in 3.2% of patients with negative preop-UCs and 4.2% of patients with contaminants, with no difference between groups (p = 0.67). The regression model determined that the presence of contaminants in preop-UC failed to predict postop-UTI (OR 0.69, p = 0.64).

CONCLUSION

The presence of contaminants in preop-UCs is not associated with an increased risk of postop-UTIs after ureteroscopy. Our study supports that contaminants in the preop-UC can be interpreted as a negative UC in terms of postop-UTI risk stratification. Preoperative antibiotics should not be prescribed for patients undergoing uncomplicated ureteroscopy for stone surgery in the setting of a contaminated preop-UC.

Confirmation of negative urine culture status after appropriate antibiotic treatment prior to endourological stone procedures: Is it really necessary?

To evaluate the necessity of confirmation for a negative urine culture test outcome after an appropriate antibiotic regimen for urinary tract infection (UTI) prior to endoscopic stone removal procedures. 170 cases receiving an appropriate antibiotic treatment for culture proven UTI based on test outcomes before endoscopic stone removal were evaluated in two groups: Group 1 (n = 85) Patients in whom a second urine culture test was performed to ensure "negative urine culture" status prior to the procedures after receiving antibiotic therapy and Group 2 (n = 85). Patients receiving the same antibiotic therapy without any additional urine culture test before the procedures. Cases were comparatively evaluated with respect to the statistical significance of post-operative infective complications (fever, sepsis), duration of hospital stay and readmission rates during early post-operative period. Our findings demonstrated no significant difference regarding the rate of infective complications (presence of fever, incidence of septic findings), hospitalization period and readmission rates between the two groups. Although the presence of a negative urine status has been confirmed by urine culture test in group 1 cases, no additional urine culture test was performed with this aim in group 2 cases (negative urine culture was confirmed only with urinalysis) and the outcomes regarding the infective problems were found to be similiar. Our current findings indicate that a second urine culture test may not be a "must" if the patients receive an appropriate antibiotic regimen based on the sensitivity test outcomes for a reasonable time period.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Ureteroscopy and ureterorenoscopy

Technical advances, including miniaturization, have improved the deflection and optical performance of the ureteroscopes, and the availability of dedicated disposable devices have led to their increasing use for kidney and ureteral stone management. Ureterorenoscopy brings diagnostic evidence through the endoscopic description of stones and renal papillary abnormalities. Currently, intracorporeal lithotripsy during ureterorenoscopy is based on laser sources. Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary before ureterorenoscopy, especially because preoperative stenting for>30 days is considered as an independent risk factor of infection. Ureteral access sheaths allow the easy and repeated access to the upper urinary tract and thus facilitate ureterorenoscopy. Their use improves vision, decreases intrarenal pressure, and possibly reduces the operative time, but they may cause ureteral injury. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether or not the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture

Objective

To improve susceptibility profiles of nosocomial bacteria, identifying the difference between infectious complications in patients undergoing endoscopic flexible ureterolithotomy (fURS) with negative urine culture (UC) that received extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EP) compared with standard antibiotic prophylaxis (SP).

Methodology

This is a retrospective, observational, analytical cohort study, comparing infectious complications between patients undergoing fURS with negative UC who received EP versus SP. We include patients with susccessfull fURS, <20-mm stones and complete information.

Results

Overall, 10.3% of patients had complications, 7.2% of patients had postoperative urinary infection, 1.8% had upper urinary tract infection (UTI) and 1.4% had urinary sepsis. Lower UTI were significantly more likely in the extended prophylaxis group with 6.8% versus 2.7% (RR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.10-7.37, p = 0.030). The risk of upper UTI and sepsis did not show significant differences. A total of 69% patients with postoperative infection had isolated multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) in the UC, with a higher risk in patients with extended prophylaxis (RR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.33-7.59, p = 0.009).

Conclusions

Patients with negative UC who underwent fURS using extended prophylaxis have two times higher risk of low UTI than patients with standard prophylaxis, without differences in the incidence of upper UTI or urinary sepsis. The risk of MDRB isolation in the postoperative UC is higher in the extended prophylaxis group, therefore we recommend the standard 60-min preoperative prophylaxis.

Preoperative patient optimization for endourological procedures: the current best clinical practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite technological advancements in endourological surgery, there is room for improvement in preoperative patient optimization strategies. This review updates recent best clinical practices that can be implemented for optimal surgical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Outcome and complication predictions using novel scoring systems and techniques have shown to assist clinical decision-making and patient counseling. Innovative preoperative simulation and localization methods for percutaneous nephrolithotomy have been evaluated to minimize puncture-associated adverse events. Novel antibiotic prophylaxis strategies and further recognition of risk factors that attribute to postoperative infections have shown the potential to minimize perioperative morbidity. Accumulating data on the roles of preoperative stenting and selective oral alpha-blockers adds evidence to the current paradigm of preventive measures for ureteral injury.

SUMMARY

Ample tools and technologies exist that can be utilized preoperatively to improve surgical outcomes. The combination of these innovations, along with validation in larger-scale studies, presents the cornerstone of future urolithiasis management.

Post-procedural Antibiotic Use and Associated Outcomes After Common Urologic Procedures Across a National Healthcare System

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the benefits and harms of post-procedural antibiotic use after common urologic procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent an endoscopic urologic procedure (transurethral resection of bladder tumor, transurethral resection of prostate, or ureteroscopy) within the Veterans Health Administration between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2021. A post-procedural antibiotic was any qualifying antibiotic prescribed for administration on the day after the procedure. Guidelines generally do not recommend post-procedural antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis. Outcomes included unplanned return visits and Clostridioides difficile infection within 30 days. Log-binomial models with risk-adjustment were used to measure the association between post-procedural antibiotic use and outcomes. Hospital-level observed-to-expected (O:E) ratios were constructed to compare post-procedural antibiotic use.

RESULTS

There were 74,629 qualifying procedures across 105 hospitals; 27,422 (36.7%) received post-procedural antibiotics (median 3 days, IQR 3-6). An unplanned return visit occurred in 20.2% of patients who received post-procedural antibiotics vs 17.2% who did not (adjusted RR 1.032, 95% CI 0.999-1.066). C. difficile infection was diagnosed in 0.27% vs 0.10% in those who received and did not receive post-procedural antibiotics (adjusted RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.13-2.45). The O:E ratio for post-procedural antibiotic use ranged from 0.46 among hospitals in the lowest-use quartile to 1.93 in the highest-use quartile.

CONCLUSION

Post-procedural antibiotics were frequently prescribed after urologic procedures with large inter-facility variability even after adjusting for case-mix differences. Post-procedural antibiotic use was associated with increased risk for C. difficile infection but not fewer unplanned return visits. Efforts to reduce guideline-discordant use of post-procedural antibiotics are needed.

Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022

PURPOSE

The European Association of Urology (EAU) has updated its guidelines on clinical best practice in urolithiasis for 2021. We therefore aimed to present a summary of best clinical practice in surgical intervention for patients with upper tract urolithiasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The panel performed a comprehensive literature review of novel data up to May 2021. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating was given for each recommendation, graded using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology.

RESULTS

The choice of surgical intervention depends on stone characteristics, patient anatomy, comorbidities, and choice. For shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), the optimal shock frequency is 1.0-1.5 Hz. For ureteroscopy (URS), a postoperative stent is not needed in uncomplicated cases. Flexible URS is an alternative if percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or SWL is contraindicated, even for stones >2 cm. For PCNL, prone and supine approaches are equally safe. For uncomplicated PCNL cases, a nephrostomy tube after PCNL is not necessary. Radiation exposure for endourological procedures should follow the as low as reasonably achievable principles.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a summary of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines on best clinical practice in interventional management of urolithiasis. The full guideline is available at https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The European Association of Urology has produced guidelines on the best management of kidney stones, which are summarised in this paper. Kidney stone disease is a common condition; computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to diagnose it. The guidelines aim to decrease radiation exposure to patients by minimising the use of x-rays and CT scans. We detail specific advice around the common operations for kidney stones.

Heterogeneity in stone culture protocols and endourologist practice patterns: a multi-institutional survey

Kidney stone cultures can be beneficial in identifying bacteria not detected in urine, yet how stone cultures are performed among endourologists, under what conditions, and by what laboratory methods remain largely unknown. Stone cultures are not addressed by current clinical guidelines. A comprehensive REDCap electronic survey sought responses from directed (n = 20) and listserv elicited (n = 108) endourologists specializing in kidney stone disease. Questions included which clinical scenarios prompt a stone culture order, how results influence post-operative antibiotics, and what microbiology lab protocols exist at each institution with respect to processing and resulting stone cultures. Logistic regression statistical analysis determined what factors were associated with performing stone cultures. Of 128 unique responses, 11% identified as female and the mean years of practicing was 16 (range 1-46). A specific 'stone culture' order was available to only 50% (64/128) of those surveyed, while 32% (41/128) reported culturing stone by placing a urine culture order. The duration of antibiotics given for a positive stone culture varied, with 4-7 days (46%) and 8-14 days (21%) the most reported. More years in practice was associated with fewer stone cultures ordered, while higher annual volume of percutaneous nephrolithotomy was associated with ordering more stone cultures (p < 0.01). Endourologists have differing practice patterns with respect to ordering stone cultures and utilizing the results to guide post-operative antibiotics. With inconsistent microbiology lab stone culture protocols across multiple institutions, more uniform processing is needed for future studies to assess the clinical benefit of stone cultures and direct future guidelines.

A Novel Nomogram for Predicting Post-Operative Sepsis for Patients With Solitary, Unilateral and Proximal Ureteral Stones After Treatment Using Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Flexible Ureteroscopy

Background

The postoperative sepsis is a latent fatal complication for both flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). An effective predictive model constructed by readily available clinical markers is urgently needed to reduce postoperative adverse events caused by infection. This study aims to determine the pre-operative predictors of sepsis in patients with unilateral, solitary, and proximal ureteral stones after fURS and PNL.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 910 patients with solitary proximal ureteral stone with stone size 10–20 mm who underwent fURS or PNL from Tongji Hospital's database, including 412 fURS cases and 498 PNL cases. We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify the risk factors for sepsis. Finally, a nomogram was assembled utilizing these risk factors.

Results

In this study, 49 patients (5.4%) developed sepsis after fURS or PNL surgery. Lasso regression showed postoperative sepsis was associated with gender (female), pre-operative fever, serum albumin (<35 g/L), positive urine culture, serum WBC (≥10,000 cells/ml), serum neutrophil, positive urine nitrite and operation type (fURS). The multivariate logistic analysis indicated that positive urine culture (odds ratio [OR] = 5.9092, 95% CI [2.6425–13.2140], p < 0.0001) and fURS (OR = 1.9348, 95% CI [1.0219–3.6631], p = 0.0427) were independent risk factors of sepsis and albumin ≥ 35g/L (OR = 0.4321, 95% CI [0.2054–0.9089], p = 0.0270) was independent protective factor of sepsis. A nomogram was constructed and exhibited favorable discrimination (area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.78), calibration [Hosmer–Lemeshow (HL) test p = 0.904], and net benefits displayed by decision curve analysis (DCA).

Conclusions

Patients who underwent fURS compared to PNL or have certain pre-operative characteristics, such as albumin <35 g/L and positive urine culture, are more likely to develop postoperative sepsis. Cautious preoperative evaluation and appropriate operation type are crucial to reducing serious infectious events after surgery, especially for patients with solitary, unilateral, and proximal ureteral stones sized 10–20 mm.

Infectious complications of endourological treatment of kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Endourological treatment is associated with a risk of postoperative febrile urinary tract infections and sepsis. The aim of this study was to review the reported rate of infectious complications in relation to the type and modality of the endourologic procedure.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Two electronic databases (PubMed and EMBASE) were searched. Out of 243 articles retrieved we included 49 studies after full-text evaluation.

RESULTS

Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated that retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were associated with not significantly different odds of getting fever (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.99 to 2.39; p = 0.06) or sepsis (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.37 to 6.20, p = 0.56). The odds of getting fever were not significantly different for mini PCNL compared to standard PCNL (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.44; p = 0.45) and for tubeless PCNL compared to standard PCNL (OR = 1.34 95% CI: 0.61 to 2.91, p = 0.47). However, the odds for fever after PCNL with suctioning sheath were lower than the corresponding odds for standard PCNL (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.70, p = 0.002). The odds of getting fever after PCNL with perioperative prophylaxis were not different from the corresponding odds after PCNL with perioperative prophylaxis plus a short oral antibiotic course (before or after the procedure) (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.39, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of endourological procedure does not appear to be decisive in the onset of infectious complications, although the prevention of high intrarenal pressure during the procedure could be crucial in defining the risk of infectious complications.   on behalf of U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai.

Risk factors for urinary infection after retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy: Implication for nursing

ABSTRACT

There are needs to evaluate the risk factors for urinary infection after retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy, to provide insights into the management and nursing care of patients with retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy.Patients who received retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy with a Foley 20 urinary tube insertion from June 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020 in our hospital were selected. Patients were grouped urinary infection and no infection group according to the culture results of urine, and the clinical data of the 2 groups of patients were collected and compared. Single factor and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors of urinary tract infection after retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy.Four hundred ten patients with retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy were included, of whom 62 patients had the urinary tract infection, the incidence of urinary tract infection was 15.12%. There were significant differences in the gender, age, diabetes, stone diameter, duration of urinary tube insertion and duration of surgery between infection and no-infection group (all P < .05). The Escherichia coli (62.90%) was the most commonly seen bacterial in patients with urinary tract infection. Female (odds ratio [OR]: 1.602, 95% confidence interval 95% [CI]: 1.132∼2.472), age >50 years (OR: 2.247, 95% CI: 1.346∼3.244), diabetes (OR: 2.228, 95% CI: 1.033∼3.451), stone diameter ≥2 cm (OR: 2.152, 95% CI: 1.395∼3.099), duration of urinary tube insertion ≥3 days (OR: 1.942, 95% CI:1.158∼2.632), duration of surgery ≥90 minutes (OR: 2.128, 95% CI: 1.104∼3.846) were the independent risk factors for the postoperative urinary tract infection in patients with retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy (all P < .05).The incidence of urinary tract infection in patients undergoing retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy was high, counteractive measures targeted on those risk factors are needed to prevent and reduce the postoperative urinary infection in clinical settings.

Trends of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in Saudi Arabia

Objective:

The objective of the study was to present the current practice patterns on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in Saudi Arabia and to compare it with the international patterns and to observe the adherence to the guidelines.

Materials and Methods:

A survey consisting of 28 questions was sent to urologists working in Saudi Arabia using a Google Forms questionnaire. The questioner covered most aspects of performing PCNL starting from preparing the patient till discharging him.

Results:

One hundred and thirty-two replied to the survey. Almost 70.2% performed PCNL and 59.1% of them learned PCNL during residency. The access was obtained by the urologists in 80.3% from the participants, 68.2% of them uses fluoroscopic guidance for the puncture. The majority (80.3%) perform PCNL in the prone position. Nearly 69.7% use the balloon dilators and 16.7% use the Amplatz dilators. For kidney drainage, 60.6% place a nephrostomy tube and a double-J stent (DJ stent) together and 4.5% perform tubeless PCNL (DJ stent only). About 45.5% stated that the introduction of flexible ureteroscopy decreased the rate of doing PCNL for >20%.

Conclusions:

Data obtained from a group of urologists in Saudi Arabia showed that the majority of urologists practicing in Saudi Arabia perform PCNL. They usually learn PCNL during residency. We observe that the majority of urologists attach to the original patterns in PCNL, i.e., they predominantly prefer the prone position and use fluoroscopy to gain the PCNL access. Furthermore, the data showed that new trends in PCNL did not gain a lot of momentum as few practices miniaturized PCNL and tubeless PCNL. The majority use balloon dilators and combined ultrasonic/pneumatic lithotripters. The complication rate encountered by the participants is concomitance with the published international figures. The introduction of flexible ureteroscopy highly decreased the rate of doing PCNL for most urologists.

Predictors and Strategies to Avoid Mortality Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Sections of Urolithiasis (EULIS) and Uro-technology (ESUT)

CONTEXT

While kidney stone disease is common and ureteroscopy (URS) is perceived as minimally invasive, there is mortality associated with treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to ascertain the number of mortalities from URS for stone disease over the past three decades, identify relevant patient risk factors and predictors of mortality, and summarise the key recommendations so that similar instances can be avoided, and lessons can be learnt.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search was conducted following Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology for English-language article reporting on data from 1990 to December 2020. Data collated from each study included patient and stone characteristics, number of mortalities, and cause of death.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Fifteen studies met our inclusion criteria and revealed a total of 72 mortalities from ten countries. The age range of reported patients varied from 21 to 89 yr, with over 60% being above 65 yr of age and 97% with some comorbidity. Based on available data, death reports in females were three times more than those in males. The stone size ranged from 10 to 38 mm. Treatment of larger stones corresponded to a longer operative time, with procedural duration varying from 30 to 120 min. Of the reported causes of mortality in 42 patients, the aetiology was sepsis in over half of the patients, with other causes being cardiac-related, respiratory-related, multiorgan failure, and haemorrhagic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the reported URS mortality rate seems to be low, there has been a rise in deaths over the past decade. Efforts must be made to have preoperative urine culture, and reduce operative time and stage procedures in patients with a large stone burden. Care must be taken in patients with robust preoperative assessment, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative monitoring for early detection of complications with interdisciplinary management of complex cases.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the risk factors associated with postureteroscopy mortality and ways to minimise this. Evidence shows that although reported mortality remains low, there seems to be an increase in mortality in the past decade and urologists must remain vigilant of this.

How does pre-operative antimicrobial treatment influence the intra-operative culture results and infectious complications in patients with positive baseline bladder urine culture undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy?

We investigated how pre-operative antimicrobial treatment influenced intra-operative culture (IC) results and infectious complications in patients with positive pre-operative bladder urine culture (PBUC) undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. We assessed 162 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy from April 2019 to March 2020. Based on PBUC findings, they were divided into positive and negative PBUC groups. We administered pre-operative antimicrobial treatment to the positive PBUC group and only peri-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis to the negative PBUC group. We examined intra-operative cultures (ICs), including bladder urine culture, renal pelvic urine culture and stone culture, in all cases. We studied the association between the results of PBUC, ICs and infectious complications in both groups. A total of 67 and 95 patients had positive and negative PBUC, respectively. In the positive PBUC group, 19 (28.4%) patients still had positive bladder urine culture after the antibiotic treatment. Positive ICs (43.3% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001) and post-operative fever (16.4% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.001) were more common in the positive PBUC group than in the negative PBUC group. In the positive PBUC group, 11 patients had a post-operative fever, regardless of the ICs results (6 positive ICs and 5 negative ICs). Furthermore, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria were detected from ICs in 5 patients with positive PBUC, including 4 suffering from a post-operative fever. Although the effect of pre-operative antimicrobial treatment is not definitive, to avoid serious infectious complications, we should recognize high-risk patients and perform more careful infection control based on the pre- and intra-operative culture results.

Preoperative urine culture - Is it necessary to prevent infectious complications following ureterorenoscopy?

To prevent postoperative infectious complications, a urinary tract infection should be either diagnostically excluded or treated prior to ureterorenoscopy (URS). URS is a frequently performed endoscopic surgery for urological stone removal. Although the urinary dipstick test represents a simple and cost-effective method to gain information about the presence of urinary tract infection, the prevailing procedure is the more expensive and more time-consuming method of urine culture. The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to compare two strategies of perioperative prophylaxes prior to URS and to evaluate their impact on postoperative infectious complications: I) Obtaining a urine culture in every patient prior to URS or II) only in case of a positive dipstick test. Therefore, we retrospectively compared 201 patients in two cohorts undergoing URS. In one cohort a urine culture was obtained only in case of a positive dipstick test of midstream urine sample and in the second cohort a urine culture was prepared for every patient regardless of the dipstick's test results. The study's end point was determined as "infectious failure" (IF), if more than one of the following criteria are fulfilled: postoperative fever, elevation of inflammation laboratory values, significant prolongation of hospital stay and readmission within short-notice. Simple and multiple logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the influence of patient characteristics and preoperative urine analysis strategy on the occurrence of IF. Patients with a score of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) > 2 had a nearly statistically higher risk (p = .09) to develop an IF than healthier patients with an ASA score ≤ 2. Prestenting was determined as a significant predictive factor (p = .04) for a postoperative IF. No difference in patients with or without IF was detected regarding the two preoperative urine analysis strategies. Sensitivity of dipstick test was 87.5% and the negative predictive value was 89.66%. We found that a negative urine dipstick test result obtained prior to URS eliminated the need for urine culturing in predicting postoperative infectious complication. This approach can reduce preoperative preparation-time and costs without affecting postoperative complication outcomes.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for stone therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview about state-of-the-art antibiotic prophylaxis in urolithasis therapy and focus on recent publications in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

The number of high-quality publications within the recent time is limited. Preoperative inflammatory blood parameters like C-reactive protein and erythrocyte-sedimentation rate might help in prediction of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). White blood cell count is nonpredictive for urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients with acute renal colic. In patients with low risk for infectious complications, antibiotic prophylaxis during shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) is unnecessary and single-dose antibiotics are comparably effective as prolonged antibiotic usage during PCNL and ureterorenoscopy (URS).

SUMMARY

Current findings support the American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline recommendations for a risk-adapted minimal antibiotic usage. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is sufficient for low-risk PCNL and URS. For SWL no antibiotic prophylaxis is needed.

Prevention and management of urosepsis triggered by ureteroscopy

Urosepsis is a potentially life-threatening phenomenon that may occur after an ureteroscopic procedure. With the increasingly widespread adoption of ureteroscopy, there is a concern that the rates of urosepsis may increase. This review examines the current work being undertaken to minimize postprocedure infections both in the field of device development and in clinical care. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of urosepsis will be discussed.

Tailored perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in urological surgery: myth or reality?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The controversies surrounding perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) are about the use and especially misuse of antibiotics. The overall lack of evidence to facilitate a rational perioperative AMP policy in urological surgery and the postoperative infectious complications remain a challenge. Therefore, a basic tool to aid decision-making would be useful. A model based on the patients' risk factors, the level of contamination and grading of surgical procedures is discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

A series of studies have shown that infectious complications and healthcare-associated infections remain consistently at an average of 10%, with a great variation in frequency dependent on the patients' preoperative status and the type, severity and contamination level of the surgical procedure. Preoperative patient assessment and preparation are key factors for well tolerated surgery and recovery. Adherence to the guidelines appears to reduce both the prescription of antimicrobials and the total costs without risking the patient outcome. Several studies of a series of interventions such as cystoscopy, endoscopic stone surgery and selected clean-contaminated interventions give support to the model. Bacteriuria, upgrading the patient to the contaminated level, requires preoperative control.

SUMMARY

The discussed model assists the urologists in decision-making on perioperative AMP and contributes to a responsible use of antibiotics.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis and the different strategies used to prevent infection in ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search using Pubmed, Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese CBM, CNKI and VIP databases was performed to find comparative studies on the efficacy of different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies in URL for preventing postoperative infections. The last search was conducted on 25 June 2017. Summarized unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the efficacy of different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies in 4 591 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. No significant difference was found in the risk of postoperative febrile urinary tract infections (fUTIs) between groups with and without antibiotic prophylaxis (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.40-1.67; P = 0.59). Patients receiving a single dose of preoperative antibiotics had a significantly lower risk of pyuria (OR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.69; P = 0.0007) and bacteriuria (OR: 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.58; P = 0.001) than those who did not. Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis was not superior to single-dose oral antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing fUTI (OR: 1.00, 95% CI 0.26-3.88; P = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis did not lower the risk of postoperative fUTI, but a single dose could reduce the incidence of pyuria or bacteriuria. A single oral dose of preventive antibiotics is preferred because of its cost-effectiveness. The efficacy of different types of antibiotics and other strategies could not be assessed in our meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials with a larger sample size and more rigorous study design are needed to validate these conclusions.

Does the use of ureteral stents with extraction strings increase urinary infection rates?

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of ureteral stents with extraction string on the rate of postoperative UTI after ureteroscopies.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patient records who underwent ureteroscopy from January 2011 to August 2014 was performed. Patients were grouped into three groups according to postoperative stent status: non-stented or ureteral catheter for up to 24 h (NS), ureteral stent without extraction string (US) and ureteral stent with an extraction string (US-E).

RESULTS

There were 144, 133 and 282 cases in the NS, US and US-E groups, respectively. Overall infection rate was 4.7%; NS-2.1%, US-3.0% and US-E-6.7% (p = 0.057). Four percentage of men and 6.6% of women had postoperative UTI (p = 0.22). Within the group of men infection rates were 0, 2.4 and 6.4% for the NS, US and US-E groups, respectively (p = 0.01). For women, UTI rates were 7.5, 4.0 and 8.5% in the NS, US and US-E groups, respectively (p = 0.6). Infection rates were 20 and 3.9% (p = 0.001) for patients with extraction strings for >8 and <8 days. In multivariate analysis the presence of an extraction string was found to be a risk factor for infection OR 7.7 (1.01-58.9, 95% CI, p = 0.049) along with renal stone location OR 5.09 (2.1-12.05, 95% CI, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant difference was found between overall infections rates for patients with and without extraction strings, and such difference was found within the male group, suggesting extraction strings in men may increase the risk of infection.

Analysis of Factors' Association with Risk of Postoperative Urosepsis in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Stone Disease

INTRODUCTION

To investigate which patient, stone, infective, and surgical factors were most likely to increase the risk of postoperative urosepsis within 28 days of ureteroscopy (URS) and laser stone fragmentation for ureteral or renal stones.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively in a single National Health Service institution. A logistic regression model was used to assess the association of factors with postoperative urosepsis. Two matched-pair analyses were used to assess the risk of postoperative urosepsis in patients with (a) an emergency presentation to hospital with urosepsis in the 90 days preceding URS and (b) a positive midstream sample of urine (MSSU) identified, but who were asymptomatic at preoperative assessment, who then received an appropriate course of antibiotics.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty-two consecutive patients were included in the study. Thirty-four patients (7.4%) had an episode of urosepsis within 28 days of their operation. A positive preoperative MSSU was significantly associated with postoperative urosepsis on multivariable analysis, despite appropriate treatment with a preoperative course of antibiotics: odds ratio (OR) 4.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.11, 11.31, p < 0.001. The presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of ischemic heart disease, patient American Society of Anesthesiologists score, same-session bilateral URS, and stone volume were the other variables significantly associated with postoperative infection on univariable analysis, but these ceased to be significantly associated on multivariable analysis. Subgroup analysis found that a positive MSSU in both patients with a preoperative ureteral stent and those without was significantly associated with postoperative urosepsis, however, the OR was much lower for the stented group (OR 3.23 vs OR 16.67). On matched-pair analysis, patients with a positive preoperative MSSU were significantly more likely to have postoperative urosepsis compared to controls (OR 17.46, 95% CI 2.18, 139.80, p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the OR of postoperative urosepsis in patients who had a preceding urine infection requiring hospital admission in the 90 days preceding URS (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.19, 1.92, p = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive preoperative MSSU was significantly associated with postoperative urosepsis by logistic regression and matched-pair analysis. These higher risk patients should be counseled appropriately before surgery, and should be the focus of vigilant postoperative monitoring. The study suggests particular caution in patients with a positive preoperative MSSU without a preoperative ureteral stent.