1
|
Mavridis C, Bouchalakis A, Tsagkaraki V, Somani BK, Mamoulakis C, Tokas T. Recurrent Urinary Stone Formers: Imaging Assessment and Endoscopic Treatment Strategies: A Systematic Search and Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3461. [PMID: 38929988 PMCID: PMC11204450 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Nephrolithiasis is a heterogeneous disease with a high prevalence and recurrence rate. Although there has been much progress regarding the surgical treatment of stones, a standardized follow-up, especially in recurrent stone formers (SFs), has yet to be decided. This fact leads to the overuse of computed tomography (CT) scans and many reoperations in patients, thus increasing their morbidity and the financial burden on the health systems. This review systematically searched the literature for original articles regarding imaging strategies and endoscopic treatment for patients with recurrent urolithiasis, aiming to identify optimal strategies to deal with these patients. Methods: We systematically searched the Medline database (accessed on 1 April 2024) for articles regarding imaging modalities and endoscopic treatment for patients with recurrent urinary tract lithiasis. Results: No specific follow-up or endoscopic treatment strategy exists for patients with recurrent urolithiasis. CT scan was the imaging modality most used in the studies, followed by X-ray, ultrasonography, and digital tomosynthesis. A transparent algorithm could not be identified. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and ureteroscopy (URS) were used in the studies for endoscopic treatment. PCNL showed the best stone-free (SFr) rate and lowest hazard ratio (HR) for reoperation. RIRS showed superiority over extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for recurrent SFs, but fragments over 4 mm increased the recurrent rate. URS has an increased HR for reoperation for bilateral stones. Conclusions: The heterogeneity of urolithiasis leaves urologists without a standardized plan for recurrent SFs. Thus, each patient's follow-up should be planned individually and holistically. Pre-stenting is not to be avoided, especially in high-risk patients, and SFr status needs to be the aim. Finally, CT scans should not be generally overused but should be part of a patient's treatment plan. Prospective studies are required to define SFr status, the size of significant residual fragments, and the modalities of intervention and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charalampos Mavridis
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University General Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Athanasios Bouchalakis
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University General Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Bhaskar Kumar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Charalampos Mamoulakis
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University General Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University General Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neubauer J, Wilhelm K, Gratzke C, Bamberg F, Reisert M, Kellner E. Effect of surface-partial-volume correction and adaptive threshold on segmentation of uroliths in computed tomography. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286016. [PMID: 37352326 PMCID: PMC10289361 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) is used to diagnose urolithiasis, a prevalent condition. In order to establish the strongest foundation for the quantifiability of urolithiasis, this study aims to develop semi-automated urolithiasis segmentation methods for CT images that differ in terms of surface-partial-volume correction and adaptive thresholding. It also examines the diagnostic accuracy of these methods in terms of volume and maximum stone diameter. One hundred and one uroliths were positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom and prospectively examined in CT. Four different segmentation methods were developed and used to segment the uroliths semi-automatically based on CT images. Volume and maximum diameter were calculated from the segmentations. Volume and maximum diameter of the uroliths were measured independently by three urologists by means of electronic calipers. The average value of the urologists´ measurements was used as a reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed with multivariate Bartlett's test. Volume and maximum diameter were in very good agreement with the reference measurements (r>0.99) and the diagnostic accuracy of all segmentation methods used was very high. Regarding the diagnostic accuracy no difference could be detected between the different segmentation methods tested (p>0.55). All four segmentation methods allow for accurate characterization of urolithiasis in CT with respect to volume and maximum diameter of uroliths. Thus, a simple thresholding approach with an absolute value may suffice for robust determination of volume and maximum diameter in urolithiasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Neubauer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Konrad Wilhelm
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marco Reisert
- Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elias Kellner
- Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Re: Removal of Small, Asymptomatic Kidney Stones and Incidence of Relapse. Eur Urol 2023; 83:93. [PMID: 36272944 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
4
|
Hausmann T, Becker B, Gross AJ, Netsch C, Rosenbaum CM. Novel Biocompatible Adhesive to Remove Stone Dust: Usability Trial in a Kidney Model. J Endourol 2021; 35:1223-1228. [PMID: 33559523 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: "Clinically insignificant residual fragments" are an independent predictive factor for recurrence of nephrolithiasis. To improve the stone-free rates (SFR), we tested the viability of a novel bioadhesive system for intrarenal embedding and retrieval of residual fragments <1 mm in a kidney model. Materials and Methods: All procedures were performed in a standardized setting, including a kidney model (Kidney module right, Samed GmbH, Dresden) in a plastic basin filled with water. We used a Viper URF flexible ureterorenoscope (fURS) (6.6/8F, Richard Wolf, Knittlingen). A mean amount of 138 mg (standard deviation [SD] ±32.2 mg) of sand grains (range, 0.2-0.8 mm) was inserted in renal calices of the kidney model. We assessed the extraction efficacy of fURS using the bioadhesive system. In total, eight different surgeons performed each one trial, respectively. The endoscopic and macroscopic SFR, the level of the surgeons' experience, and the overall time of stone retrieval were evaluated. Additionally, a survey of the participants was conducted, to assess the contentment with this novel system. Results: The extraction of the sand grains was only possible using the bioadhesive system, otherwise they were too small sized to grab with a retrieval basket. The total SFR was 84% (SD ±11.7%). The operation time (p = 0.052) and the percentage of extracted sand grains (p = 0.194) were not significantly different between experienced and less experienced surgeons. All participants stated that it was a promising technique, which they could imagine using on a daily basis. Conclusions: The bioadhesive system improves the SFR with fragments from 0.2 to 0.8 mm (0% vs 84%). Also, the performance of this operation is not dependent on the surgeon's experience level. This method might improve the SFR in difficult anatomic conditions, that is, lower calices or anomalous kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Hausmann
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Becker
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas J Gross
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christopher Netsch
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clemens M Rosenbaum
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek (Institution to Which this Work Is Attributed), Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Interventionelle Therapie: Wann und wie? Urolithiasis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-62454-8_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
6
|
Perkutane Nephrolithotomie. Urolithiasis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-62454-8_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
7
|
[Stone therapy-use and limitations of the guidelines]. Urologe A 2020; 59:1498-1503. [PMID: 33237370 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01394-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Increase of medical knowledge, technical innovation together with a demographic change, and increase of stone incidence in daily practice challenges guideline preparation and clinical studies. Increasing interdisciplinary collaboration in stone treatment can also be demonstrated in the number of affiliated professional and working groups in the current guideline update. The following case illustrates treatment options in a symptomatic patient harbouring bilateral stones and metabolic risk factors. Decision guidance for treatment and recurrence prevention measures are presented on the basis of expert opinion and available published evidence.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this study was to summarize the recent innovations of the holmium laser with special respect to lithotripsy. Therefore, we reviewed and discussed the most recent and pivotal publications on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS The current literature underlines Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) lithotripsy as a well tolerated and efficient method to treat urinary calculi. Because of modifiable adjustments of pulse energy, pulse frequency, and pulse length, especially with newer generations of holmium lasers, urologists can accurately choose between the 'fragmentation' and 'dusting' technique with its alterations. Recently, the 'Moses mode' as a new feature incorporated in the Lumenis Pulse P120H holmium laser showed less retropulsion with higher rates of stone ablation because of an improved energy transmission from the laser fiber towards the targeted calculus in in-vitro studies. SUMMARY Based on technological developments, Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy has become more efficient in reducing retropulsion and increasing stone ablation volume. However, despite its widespread use as a lithotripter, a newly developed thulium fiber laser, which has already shown promising results in experimental studies, could become an alternative in future practice.
Collapse
|
9
|
Future of kidney stone surgery: will we treat small stones with large-sized PCNL and big stones with RIRS? World J Urol 2019; 38:3291-3292. [PMID: 31628511 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02983-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
10
|
Prezioso D, Barone B, Di Domenico D, Vitale R. Stone residual fragments: A thorny problem. Urologia 2019; 86:169-176. [DOI: 10.1177/0391560319860654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Urolithiasis represents a widespread and common disorder among the world population, with a predicted increase in affected patients in the coming years. Treatment of renal and ureteral stones varies widely, and achieving true stone-free status in all patients is still difficult. Moreover, imaging used to assess residual fragments following procedure impacts the diagnosed stone-free rate percentage considerably. In particular, the use of computed tomography scans has led to a better evaluation of residual fragments as well as so-called clinically insignificant residual fragments, which in a considerable number of cases are, despite their definition, causes of adverse urological events, thus creating a thorny problem for both patients and urologists. Currently, there is no gold standard or validated protocol regarding the management, clearance and prevention of residual fragments. In this article, we review the current literature regarding residual fragments, clinically insignificant residual fragments and their natural history, reporting on diagnostic methods, incidence, complications and outcome with the use of less invasive procedures, taking into consideration viable treatment and management of patients affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Prezioso
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Dante Di Domenico
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Vitale
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mannil M, von Spiczak J, Hermanns T, Poyet C, Alkadhi H, Fankhauser CD. Three-Dimensional Texture Analysis with Machine Learning Provides Incremental Predictive Information for Successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Kidney Stones. J Urol 2018; 200:829-836. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/08/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Mannil
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Department of Urology (TH, CP, CDF), University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jochen von Spiczak
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Department of Urology (TH, CP, CDF), University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Department of Urology (TH, CP, CDF), University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Poyet
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Department of Urology (TH, CP, CDF), University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hatem Alkadhi
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Department of Urology (TH, CP, CDF), University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Daniel Fankhauser
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Department of Urology (TH, CP, CDF), University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Urolithiasis 2018; 47:297-301. [PMID: 29947994 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-018-1068-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
To assess the safety and efficacy of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), we retrospectively evaluated 44 patients with symptomatic LPSs with previously failed SWL or RIRS and consequently underwent SMP from October 2014 to March 2016. The percutaneous renal access was performed 12-14F with C-arm fluoroscopy or ultrasonographic guidance. Stone disintegration was performed using either Holmium laser or pneumatic lithotripter. Perioperative parameters along with operations were assessed in detail. A total of 44 patients (mean age 49.1 ± 13.7 years) were included in the study. Stone size was 18.4 ± 6.0 mm (range 9-29), operative time was 63.9 ± 32.7 min (range 14-145) and hospital stay was 2.8 ± 1.2 days (range 1-5). The hemoglobin drop was 12.4 ± 8.8 g/L (range 0-31), and no patients required blood transfusion. Complete stone-free status was achieved in 40 (90.9%) patients. Clinically insignificant residual fragments were observed in three (6.8%) patients and only one (2.3%) patient had a 6 mm residual calculus. A total of three minor complications (urinary tract infection, hemorrhage resolved by hemostatics and renal colic requiring analgesics) were observed postoperatively. For symptomatic LPSs after the failure of SWL or RIRS, SMP is a safe and efficient auxiliary option and even might be an alternative to SWL or RIRS, while further considering the stone-free rates and stone-related events.
Collapse
|
13
|
Fankhauser CD, Hermanns T, Lieger L, Diethelm O, Umbehr M, Luginbühl T, Sulser T, Müntener M, Poyet C. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi. Clin Kidney J 2018; 11:364-369. [PMID: 29992018 PMCID: PMC6007408 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfx151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The reported success rates for treatments of kidney stones with either extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) are conflicting. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ESWL and URS for previously untreated renal calculi. Methods All patients treated with ESWL or URS at our tertiary care centre between 2003 and 2015 were retrospectively identified. Patients with previously untreated kidney stones and a stone diameter of 5–20 mm were included. Stone-free, freedom from reintervention and complication rates were recorded. Independent predictors of stone-free and freedom from reintervention rates were identified by multivariable logistic regression and a propensity score-matched analysis was performed. Results A total of 1282 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 999 (78%) underwent ESWL and 283 (22%) had URS. During post-operative follow-up, only treatment modality and stone size could independently predict stone-free and freedom from reintervention rates. After propensity score matching, ESWL showed significantly lower stone-free rates [ESWL (71%) versus URS (84%)] and fewer patients with freedom from reintervention [ESWL (55%) versus URS (79%)] than URS. Complications were scarce for both treatments and included Clavien Grade 3a in 0.8% versus 0% and Grade 3b in 0.5% versus 0.4% of ESWL and URS treated patients, respectively. Conclusions Treatment success was mainly dependent on stone size and treatment modality. URS might be the better treatment option for previously untreated kidney stones 5–20 mm, with similar morbidity but higher stone-free rates and fewer reinterventions than ESWL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Laura Lieger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivia Diethelm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Umbehr
- Department of Urology, City Hospital Triemli of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Tullio Sulser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Müntener
- Department of Urology, City Hospital Triemli of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hein S, Schoeb DS, Grunwald I, Richter K, Haberstroh J, Seidl M, Bronsert P, Wetterauer U, Schoenthaler M, Miernik A. Viability and biocompatibility of an adhesive system for intrarenal embedding and endoscopic removal of small residual fragments in minimally-invasive stone treatment in an in vivo pig model. World J Urol 2018; 36:673-680. [PMID: 29368229 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2188-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the viability and biocompatibility of a novel, patented bioadhesive system for intrarenal embedding and retrieval of residual fragments after endoscopic lithotripsy. Complete stone clearance via active removal of residual fragments (RF) after intracorporeal laser lithotripsy may be time-consuming and fail in many cases. Therefore, the novel adhesive has been developed and evaluated for the first time in an in vivo pig model in the present work. METHODS Four female domestic pigs underwent flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) under general anesthesia (8 kidneys, 4 × RIRS, 4 × PNL) evaluating the bioadhesive system. INTERVENTIONS RIRS without adhesive system (sham procedure, kidney I); 3 × RIRS using the bioadhesive system (kidneys II-IV); and 4 × PNL using the bioadhesive system (V-VIII). We endoscopically inserted standardized human stone probes followed by comminution using Ho:YAG lithotripsy. The bioadhesive (kidney II-VIII) was then applied and the adhesive-stone fragment complex extracted. After nephrectomy, all kidneys were evaluated by two independent, blinded pathologists. Endpoints were the procedure's safety and adhesive system's biocompatibility. RESULTS We observed no substantial toxic effects. We were able to embed and remove 80-90% of fragments. However, because of the pig's hampering pyelocaliceal anatomy, a quantified, proportional assessment of the embedded fragments was compromised. CONCLUSIONS For the first time, we demonstrated the proven feasibility and safety of this novel bioadhesive system for embedding and endoscopically removing small RF in conjunction with a lack of organ toxicity in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Hein
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg (Institution to Which this Work is Attributed), Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Dominik Stefan Schoeb
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg (Institution to Which this Work is Attributed), Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Grunwald
- Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM, Wiener Str. 12, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Katharina Richter
- Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM, Wiener Str. 12, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Jörg Haberstroh
- Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, CEMT-FR, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 66, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Seidl
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 115a, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 115a, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Wetterauer
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg (Institution to Which this Work is Attributed), Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Schoenthaler
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg (Institution to Which this Work is Attributed), Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arkadiusz Miernik
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg (Institution to Which this Work is Attributed), Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schoeb DS, Schoenthaler M, Schlager D, Petzold R, Richter K, Grunwald I, Wetterauer U, Miernik A, Hein S. New for Old-Coagulum Lithotomy vs a Novel Bioadhesive for Complete Removal of Stone Fragments in a Comparative Study in an Ex Vivo Porcine Model. J Endourol 2017; 31:611-616. [PMID: 28385037 DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate a recently reported new bioadhesive system for the retrieval of small residual fragments (RFs) after intracorporeal lithotripsy, we systematically compared this system with coagulum lithotomy in retrograde intrarenal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS We extracted 30 human stone fragments (≤1 mm) in an ex vivo porcine kidney model using a flexible ureteroscope for three groups: (1) the novel bioadhesive, (2) autologous blood as a natural adhesive, and (3) (control group) a conventional retrieval basket. Each group consisted of 15 test runs. Outcomes were evaluated regarding the macroscopic stone-free rate (SFR), retrieval time, and number of ureteral passages. RESULTS For groups 1 and 2, a significant advantage in stone clearance, mean retrieval time, and number of retrievals was detected compared to the control group (p = 0.001). The time and number of retrievals were significantly lower in group 1 (10:36 minutes, p = 0.001) than in group 2 (26:12 minutes, p = 0.001), with shorter clotting time and better visibility. CONCLUSIONS These data show the general feasibility of intrarenal RF embedding to improve the SFR. Our data furthermore suggest the superiority of the artificial bioadhesive embedding agent over the application of native blood. Further in vivo studies and other research are necessary to confirm the adhesive's effect in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Stefan Schoeb
- 1 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Schoenthaler
- 1 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Schlager
- 1 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Petzold
- 1 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Richter
- 2 Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM , Bremen, Germany
| | - Ingo Grunwald
- 2 Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM , Bremen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Wetterauer
- 1 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arkadiusz Miernik
- 1 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Hein
- 1 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gadzhiev N, Sergei B, Grigoryev V, Okhunov Z, Ganpule A, Pisarev A, Iskakov Y, Petrov S. Evaluation of the effect of Bernoulli maneuver on operative time during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized study. Investig Clin Urol 2017; 58:179-185. [PMID: 28480343 PMCID: PMC5419106 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.3.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Accepted: 01/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of 'Bernoulli maneuver' (bringing the access sheath to horizontal plane) on operative time and stone free rates in patients undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS All consecutive patients with a solitary kidney stone undergoing a mini-PCNL between 2015 and 2016 were included into this study. Patients were randomized either to standard prone or control (C) group patients or to tilted prone with 'Bernoulli maneuver' group (B) patients. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative characteristics of these 2 groups were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 67 patients were included in the study. Of these, 40 patients were randomized to group C and 27 to group B. The mean (95% confidence limits) stone size (mm) in group C and B was 14 (13, 15) and 13 (11, 14), respectively (p=0.26). Nephroscopy time was shorter in Bernoulli group (35 minutes vs. 23 minutes, p=1.5·10-5, and Bayes factor BF10=2,340, and Cohen standardized effect size dst=1.2). The difference made it up 12 minutes (with 95% confidence interval from 8 to 18 minutes). There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding white blood cell, creatinine level and stone-free status defined by computed tomography on the first postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS In our study the 'Bernoulli maneuver' led to a shorter nephroscopy time in mini-PCNL. This maneuver can significantly reduce nephroscopy time and save significant amount of operative time, especially in tertiary referral centers with high-volume mini-PCNL procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nariman Gadzhiev
- The Federal State Institute of Public Health 'The Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine', Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Brovkin Sergei
- The Federal State Institute of Public Health 'The Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine', Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Vladislav Grigoryev
- The Federal State Institute of Public Health 'The Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine', Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Zhamshid Okhunov
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | | - Aleksei Pisarev
- The Saint-Petersburg State University clinic, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Sergei Petrov
- The Federal State Institute of Public Health 'The Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine', Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Guven S, Basiri A, Varshney AK, Aridogan IA, Miura H, White M, Kilinc M, de la Rosette J. Examining Pediatric Cases From the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. Urology 2017; 101:31-37. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
18
|
|
19
|
[Stone treatment tomorrow and the day after]. Urologe A 2016; 55:1309-1316. [PMID: 27620184 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-016-0227-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Urological and surgical treatment of urinary stones are highly technological and technology-driven disciplines in present-day surgery. German medical engineering has always been recognized for its technical innovations in endoscopic surgery. Current and future trends are indicative of further miniaturization and automation of surgical instruments and assist systems to facilitate endourological procedures as well as improvements in the quality of results and ergonomics. These technologies include, e. g. 3D-tracking to facilitate access to the pelvicaliceal system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) or robotic master-slave systems for endourology. The aim of all future stone treatment should be complete stone removal. This could be achieved by improved stone fragmentation ("micron-sized debris") or complete removal of fragments (e. g. using a "stone glue"). Integration of diagnostic procedures and treatments will constitute a key aspect of future developments in medical engineering. Intelligent laser systems may be capable of distinguishing stones from mucosa and artificial surfaces and may be used for immediate stone analysis during surgery. A simpler and faster availability of metabolic ("metabolomics") and genetic ("genomics") diagnostics will help to facilitate and improve individual metaphylaxis, e. g. in patient self-management. Nanotechnology and microrobots that may be used for endoluminal diagnostics and treatment of the urinary tract are already in development.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hein S, Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Schlager D, Thiel K, Brandmann M, Richter K, Grunwald I, Wetterauer U, Miernik A. Novel Biocompatible Adhesive for Intrarenal Embedding and Endoscopic Removal of Small Residual Fragments after Minimally Invasive Stone Treatment in an Ex Vivo Porcine Kidney Model: Initial Evaluation of a Prototype. J Urol 2016; 196:1772-1777. [PMID: 27256206 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Residual fragments related to endoscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy are a challenging problem. The impact of residual fragments remains a subject of discussion and growing evidence highlights that they have a central role in recurrent stone formation. Therefore, we developed a novel bioadhesive system for intrarenal embedding and retrieval of residual fragments after endoscopic lithotripsy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a standardized setting 30 human stone fragments 1 mm or less were inserted in the lower pole of an ex vivo porcine kidney model. We assessed the extraction efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy using the bioadhesive system in 15 preparations and a conventional retrieval basket in 15. Outcomes were compared regarding the endoscopic and macroscopic stone-free rate, and overall time of retrieval. RESULTS Embedding and retrieving the residual fragment-bioadhesive complex were feasible in all trial runs. We observed no adverse effects such as adhesions between the adhesive and the renal collecting system or the instruments used. The stone-free rate was 100% and 60% in the bioadhesive and conventional retrieval groups, respectively (p = 0.017). Mean retrieval time was significantly shorter at 10 minutes 33 seconds vs 36 minutes 56 seconds in the bioadhesive group vs the conventional group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This novel method involving adhesive based complete removal of residual fragments from the collecting system has proved to be feasible. Our evaluation in a porcine kidney model revealed that this technology performed well. Further tests, including inpatient studies, are required to thoroughly evaluate the benefit and potential drawbacks of bioadhesive based extraction of residual fragments after intracorporeal lithotripsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Hein
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany.
| | - Martin Schoenthaler
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany
| | - Konrad Wilhelm
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany
| | - Daniel Schlager
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany
| | - Karsten Thiel
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany
| | - Maria Brandmann
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany
| | - Katharina Richter
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany
| | - Ingo Grunwald
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Wetterauer
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany
| | - Arkadiusz Miernik
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials (KT, MB, KR, IG), Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|