A Modified Retroperitoneoscopic Technique in Supine Position for Primary Retroperitoneal Tumors: Technique and Clinical Outcomes

Comprehensive neurosurgical and visceral surgical therapy of retroperitoneal nerve tumors: a descriptive and retrospective analysis

Nerve tumors in the retroperitoneal space are a rarity. Radical surgery according to soft tissue tumors can lead to persistent pain and neurological deficits. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients treated by a visceral- / neurosurgical approach. 33 patients with a retroperitoneal nerve tumor underwent surgery between 01/2002 and 12/2022 at our department. A visceral surgeon provided access to the retroperitoneal space, followed by micro-neurosurgical tumor preparation under neuromonitoring. Clinical examination and MRI were performed 12 weeks after surgery and further 3 months (WHO grade > 1) or 12 months (WHO grade 1). Further examinations were based on MRI findings and residual symptoms with median follow-up time of 24 months. One patient was treated for two distinct masses resulting in a total of 34 histological findings. Schwannomas (n = 15; 44.1%) and neurofibromas (n = 10; 29.4%) were the most common tumors. Long-term improvements were noted in radicular pain (15/18 patients; 83.3%), motor deficits (7/16 patients; 43.8%), abdominal discomfort and pain (5/7 patients; 71.4%). Recurrences were observed in 3/33 (9,1%) patients. This study represents the largest series of retroperitoneal BPNSTs treated with microsurgical techniques. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to establish standardized treatment guidelines.

Retroperitoneoscopic or Transperitoneal Approach for Neurogenic and Adrenal Tumors in Children? A Comparison on the Way to Enhanced Recovery in Pediatric Surgical Oncology

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly utilized for resection of neurogenic tumors in children. The minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic approach was recently reported in children, but transperitoneal laparoscopy still remains the most common technique. The aim of this study is to compare a novel single-port retroperitoneoscopy (SPR) approach for pediatric neurogenic tumor resection with transperitoneal laparoscopic (TPL).

METHODS

Patients undergoing minimally invasive resection of abdominal neurogenic tumors over 5 years at a single institution (from 2018 to 2022) were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor volume, stage, presence of image-defined risk factors (IDRFs), neoadjuvant chemotherapy, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), complications, oral morphine equivalents per kilogram (OME/Kg), and time to chemotherapy were assessed and compared with SPR and TPL approaches.

RESULTS

Eighteen and fifteen patients underwent TPL and SPR, respectively. No significant differences were found between the TPL and SPR approaches in terms of tumor characteristics and IDRFs. Patients who underwent SPR had a significantly faster recovery (p = 0.008) and less postoperative opioid use compared to those in TPL (p = 0.02), thus allowing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol application. TPL and SPR approaches were performed in presence of IDRFs, respectively in 2 (11%) and 4 patients (27%), with a IDRFs-related conversion in one TPL procedure. Both approaches had one < Grade 3 Clavien Dindo complication, but not requiring further surgery.

DISCUSSION

SPR approach can be considered as a safe and feasible minimally invasive approach for the resection of pediatric primary adrenal and neurogenic tumors. The retroperitoneoscopic approach performed using a single port technique represents a promising new frontier of ERAS application in pediatric surgical oncology.

CONCLUSION

SPR is a viable surgical alternative in selected neurogenic abdominal tumors with limited IDRFs, thus allowing for the application of ERAS protocols in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Integrated Neurosurgical Management of Retroperitoneal Benign Nerve Sheath Tumors

Peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNST) of the retroperitoneum are rare and are often treated by general surgeons dealing with retroperitoneal cancers. However, resection without the correct microsurgical technique can cause permanent neurological deficits and pain. Here, we discuss our interdisciplinary approach based on the integration of expertise from neurosurgery and abdominal surgery, allowing for both safe exposure and nerve-sparing microsurgical resection of these lesions. We present a series of 15 patients who underwent resection of benign retroperitoneal or pelvic PNST at our institution. The mean age of patients was 48.4 years; 67% were female. Tumors were 14 schwannomas and 1 neurofibroma. Eight patients (53%) reported neurologic symptoms preoperatively. The rate of complete resection was 87% (n = 13); all symptomatic patients showed improvement of their preoperative symptoms. There were no postoperative motor deficits; one patient (7%) developed a permanent sensory deficit. At a mean postoperative follow-up of 31 months, we observed no recurrences. To our best knowledge, this is the second-largest series of benign retroperitoneal PNST consistently managed with microsurgical techniques. Our experience confirms that interdisciplinary management allows for safe treatment of these tumors with good neurological and oncological outcomes.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Strategy of Retroperitoneal Schwannoma Adjacent to Important Abdominal Vessels: Three Case Reports and Literature Review

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of patients with retroperitoneal schwannomas adjacent to important abdominal vessels.

Case Presentation: A total of three patients with retroperitoneal schwannoma immediately adjacent to important blood vessels in the abdominal cavity underwent successful surgical resection. They all had symptoms of abdominal pain and discomfort, two cases underwent three-dimensional reconstruction. There were no serious complications such as peripheral blood vessels and organ damage in all three cases. One case had chyle leakage after surgery, conservative treatment was successfully discharged.

Conclusions: Retroperitoneal schwannomas immediately adjacent to important abdominal vessels have unique clinical characteristics. Preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction can fully show the local vascular relationship of the tumor, which is conducive to surgical planning and risk assessment. Benign tumors with large size and adjacent complex vessels can still be completely resected by surgery. Laparotomy resection is safe and feasible.

Minimally Invasive Surgery of Primary Retroperitoneal Tumors from the Perspective of General Surgeons: 6 Years of Experience at a Single Institution

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to present our surgical experience in patients with primary retroperitoneal tumors (PRTs) who underwent laparoscopic surgery and to compare the results with those of patients who underwent an open operation. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the medical data of patients who underwent retroperitoneal tumor resection through laparoscopic surgery or open operation between February 2014 and November 2019. Results: In total, 77 patients were enrolled. In total, 37 patients underwent open surgery and 40 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The tumor size in the open surgery group (10.2 ± 5.4 cm) was more significant than that in the laparoscopic surgery group (6.5 ± 3.1 cm) (P < .001). No difference was observed in operative time, blood loss, and transfusion between the two groups. Postoperative hospitalization in the open group (8.43 ± 2.77 days) was longer than that in the laparoscopic group (5.63 ± 2.16 days) (P < .001). The patients with PRTs in the IV area had minimal bleeding (16.67 ± 40.82 mL) and minimum postoperative hospitalization (3.83 ± 1.60 days). Conclusions: Laparoscopic resection of PRT is feasible in the selection of appropriate cases. The advantages are small trauma, light pain, quick recovery, and short hospital stay. It is especially suitable for benign PRTs with small size and cystic or small adhesion with vital organs or great vessels.

Retroperitoneoscopic resection of a T11-L2 right-sided ganglioneuroma

Paraspinal tumors arising from the sympathetic chain include those on the ganglioneuroma-neuroblastoma spectrum. Accurate diagnosis often requires excision owing to the histopathologic heterogeneity of these tumors and the risk of false negative biopsy results. Choice of approach is dictated by location and extirpation is usually amenable to minimally invasive techniques. We present a patient whose paraspinal tumor included the T11-L2 vertebral body levels and was removed using a retroperitoneoscopic approach. This approach is rarely considered in pediatric general surgery and afforded a useful alternative to thoracoscopy or laparoscopy.

Retroperitoneoscopic resection of retroperitoneal nonadrenal ganglioneuromas: our technique and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience of retroperitoneoscopic technique in semi-lateral decubitus position for the retroperitoneal nonadrenal ganglioneuromas in 18 patients, and to evaluate its clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2012 to May 2016, 18 patients with retroperitoneal nonadrenal ganglioneuromas underwent retroperitoneoscopic resection. With the patients in semi-lateral decubitus position, a 4-port retroperitoneal approach was used. Data were collected on the tumor size, tumor location, perioperative outcomes, pathology, and lastknown disease status. We reviewed the operative videos to identify surgical tips and tricks.

RESULTS

All procedures were carried out successfully without converting to open surgery. The tumors had an average size of 5.2cm. The mean operative time was 86.5 min, with a mean estimated blood loss of 85.4mL. There were three patients suffering from intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, all patients achieved an uneventful recovery; the mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.5 days. The postoperative pathology revealed to be retroperitoneal ganglioneuromas. With a mean follow-up of 39.5 months, all patients were recurrence free. The review of the operative videos revealed several tips and tricks, including keeping peritoneum and posterior Gerota fascia intact to provide a favorable operative exposure of tumors, and placing the harmonic scalpel through different ports during tumor dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

With the patient in semi-lateral decubitus position and a 4-port retroperitoneal approach, retroperitoneoscopic resection of retroperitoneal nonadrenal ganglioneuroma is a feasible, effective, and safe procedure. This approach has distinct advantages including direct access to the tumor, optimal exposure of tumor and less intraperitoneal interference.

The diagnostic utility of retroperitoneoscopic tissue biopsy for unresectable retroperitoneal lesions excluding urogenital cancers

Background

Retroperitoneal tumors are an uncommon disease known to consist of a diverse group of benign and malignant neoplasms. Treatment of unresectable retroperitoneal lesions requires pathological diagnosis. Here, we report the utility and safety of retroperitoneoscopic biopsy for unresectable retroperitoneal lesions excluding urogenital cancers.

Methods

We analyzed 47 patients consisting of 23 (49%) and 24 (51%) cases that underwent retroperitoneoscopic tissue biopsy and open biopsy, respectively. The clinicopathological features, including postoperative complications, were compared between the two groups.

Results

Tumor pathology was diagnosed successfully with a single operation in all patients. Malignant pathology (68%) was more common than benign pathology (32%). The most common pathology was malignant lymphoma, which accounted for about 50% of all cases. There was no significant difference with respect to the age, sex, tumor size, presence of tumor-related symptom, histopathology, operative time, and complications. Three (13%) of 23 patients in the retroperitoneoscopic biopsy group received percutaneous needle biopsy before laparoscopic excisional biopsy because the evaluation of needle cores failed to confirm subclasses of diagnosed pathologies. One patient was converted to open surgery just after the initiation of operation due to severe adhesion of adjacent structures. We had two cases with iatrogenic urinoma due to ureteral injury after retroperitoneoscopic biopsy.

Conclusions

We conclude that retroperitoneoscopic biopsy is a safe and useful tool for benign and malignant retroperitoneal lesions, in comparison to open biopsy. It is critical to carefully examine the preoperative imaging for the location of tumors, especially those close to the renal pelvis and ureter.

Resection of a thoracoabdominal ganglioneuroma via a retroperitoneal minimally invasive approach

A 10-year-old girl presented to her pediatrician with a history of cough and fever. A chest radiograph revealed a paraspinal mass. On cross-sectional imaging, the mass traversed the diaphragm, extending from T9 to L1 spinal levels with involvement of the T10–12 neural foramen. Vanillylmandelic and homovanillic acid levels were normal. On review of historical radiographs, the mass had increased in size. Thus, surgical resection was recommended for diagnosis and treatment.

The patient was placed in left lateral decubitus position. The retroperitoneal space was accessed inferior to the twelfth rib. One 12 mm and two 5 mm ports were used. Development of the retroperitoneal space was achieved with both blunt dissection and a vessel-sealing device. The diaphragm was incised to resect the thoracic component of the mass. The tumor was adherent at the neural foramen and was resected flush with the spine. The diaphragm repaired primarily. She was discharged home on post-operative day four without complication. Pathology demonstrated a ganglioneuroma. The patient was well at her follow-up, and imaging one year postoperatively was without recurrence. No additional treatment was required.

A laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach allows for a safe, minimally invasive resection of a thoracoabdominal mass without violation of the abdominal cavity.