Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Bilateral Synchronous Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Bilateral Stone Disease: Evidence from a Systematic Review

The Impact of Bilateral Stone Disease on Patients' Disease Progression and Health-Related Quality of Life

Purpose: Patients with recurring kidney stone events can expect significant morbidity and functional impairment. Few studies have evaluated the effect of bilateral kidney stones on disease progression and quality of life. We wanted to determine the association of bilateral stone disease on age of onset, and the impact on number of stone events and individual kidney stone disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) by analyzing the validated and prospectively collected Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) database. Materials and Methods: We studied 2906 stone patients from 16 centers in North America after having completed the WISQOL questionnaire from 2014 to 2019. Kidney stone formers were assessed if kidney stones were bilateral or unilateral on imaging. Analysis with a chi-square test compared categorical variables. Bilateral kidney stone disease and its impact on HRQOL were evaluated through a multivariable linear regression model. Results: Of 2906 kidney stone formers, 1340 had unilateral kidney stones and 1566 had bilateral kidney stones. We observed more frequently that patients with bilateral stones had an increased number of depression/anxiety symptoms, renal tubular acidosis, and rheumatoid arthritis (all p < 0.05). Patients with bilateral stones had a younger mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of kidney stone disease onset (37.2 ± 15.8 vs 46.4 ± 15.9 years of age, p < 0.001). Bilateral kidney stone formers had a higher mean (SD) number of stone events (11.3 ± 21.8) than unilateral kidney stone formers (3.0 ± 5.1) (p < 0.001). Within our multivariable analysis, we found that HRQOL was negatively affected by the presence of bilateral stones for kidney stone patients (β = -11.2 [confidence interval: -19.5 to -3.0] points, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Bilateral kidney stone formers had a younger age of kidney stone disease onset and a higher number of stone events compared with unilateral kidney stone disease formers. The presence of bilateral kidney stone disease negatively impacted HRQOL.

Concurrent two surgeon approach for bilateral synchronous percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Initial experience at a University Teaching Hospital

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has long been considered the bench-mark intervention for complicated urinary stones and has undergone important advancements since it was first described. Given the proven safety and efficacy of PNL, simultaneous bilateral PNL has been attempted for bilateral renal calculi to cut down on total procedure costs. To further cut down on operative time, concurrent bilateral synchronous PNL (BS-PNL) has been performed involving two surgeons, each operating concurrently on one renal unit. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BS-PNL in patients who consented for the procedure. Mean operative time taken from percutaneous access to skin closure was 78 min which was lower than that taken during the single surgeon approach for simultaneous bilateral PNL. Two (12%) out of 16 renal units required multiple punctures for stone clearance. Sheath size varied between 26Fr to 30Fr depending on the stone burden. Mean duration of hospital stay was 2 days. Fourteen (88%) out of 16 renal units had complete stone clearance. Fifteen (94%) out of 16 renal units had a double J stent placed for drainage. Only two patients had complications in the form of postoperative fever. In the background of already proven safety and efficacy of SB-PNL, the concurrent two surgeon approach appears to be feasible and safe with additional advantage of reduced operative time. However, the number of patients in this series were limited and a bigger and preferably multi-institutional study would be required before we can come to a definitive conclusion.

Paediatric kidney stone surgery: state-of-the-art review

While urolithiasis in children is rare, the global incidence is rising, and the volume of minimally invasive surgeries being performed reflects this. There have been many developments in the technology, which have supported the advancement of these interventions. However, innovation of this kind has also resulted in wide-ranging practice patterns and debate regarding how they should be best implemented. This is in addition to the extra challenges faced when treating stone disease in children where the patient population often has a higher number of comorbidities and for example, the need to avoid risk such as ionising exposure is higher. The overall result is a number of challenges and controversies surrounding many facets of paediatric stone surgery such as imaging choice, follow-up and different treatment options, for example, medical expulsive therapy, shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This article provides an overview of the current status of paediatric stone surgery and discussion on the key topics of debate.

The treatment option for calyceal diverticulum stones: flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURL) or all-seeing needle-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURL) and all-seeing needle-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of calyceal diverticula (CD) stones. From June 2012 to November 2020, 24 patients, including 14 females and 10 males, with an average age of 45.6 ± 17.4 years were retrospectively reviewed in this study. Among these patients, 14 were treated with FURL, and 10 underwent all-seeing needle-assisted PCNL. The demographic data, perioperative parameters and complications, as well as follow-up data, were recorded. In the FURL group, the ostium of CD was not identified in two patients, and these patients were finally treated with all-seeing needle-assisted PCNL. The stone clearance rate (SCR) was 64.3%, and the mean blood loss was 0.9 ± 0.8 g/dL. The average operation time was 57.5 ± 17.4 min, and the mean hospital stay was 3.5 ± 1.4 days. A complete resolution of CD was observed in five (41.7%) patients over the average follow-up of 10.8 months. In terms of the all-seeing needle-assisted PCNL, the average operation time was 83.5 ± 32.4 min, and the mean hospital stay was 4.38 ± 2.25 days. The SCR reached 91.7%, and the blood loss was 1.7 ± 1.1 g/dL. Nine patients (75%) were observed to have complete CD resolution over an average of 12.2 months of follow-up. All complications were grade I and II in both the groups. CD stones can be treated minimally invasive and effectively by FURL and PCNL. The effect of FURL greatly depends on the location and anatomy of the diverticula. PCNL is more efficient, and its safety was improved with the help of the all-seeing needle assistance.

Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function

INTRODUCTION

Patients with bilateral kidney stones and burdened by large stones are challenging cases for endourologists. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sbPCNL) is an option; however, it may be accompanied by important morbidity. An alternative is a staged PCNL, operating one side each time. Herein, we compare the impact of sbPCNL and staged PCNL on complication rates and renal function.

METHODS

Patients who underwent sbPCNL or staged bilateral PCNL with a frame time of 6 months were searched in our prospectively collected kidney stone database. Groups were compared for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (classification by the American Society of Anesthesiology - ASA), stone size, Guy's score, stone-free status, renal function, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, complication rate, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients and 52 kidney units were enrolled. The mean operative time was 134.7 min. Only 11.3% of cases had complications, all of them minor (Clavien ≤ 2). Overall, the stone-free rate was 61.50%. Comparing the groups, there was a significantly longer operative time in the sbPCNL group (172.5 vs. 126.3 min; p=0.016), as well as a higher transfusion rate (12.5% vs. 5.6%; p=0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in creatinine levels between the groups. Regarding the stone-free rate, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the staged PCNL group (64.9% vs. 43.8%; p=0.012).

CONCLUSION

sbPCNL is a safe procedure; however, when compared to staged procedures it has a higher transfusion and lower stone-free rate.

Simultaneous and synchronous bilateral endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis: a multicentric study

Introduction

The general prevalence of bilateral urolithiasis has risen to 15% and bilateral non-simultaneous treatment has been reported to have good outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES).

Material and methods

An international multicenter analysis was performed between May 2015 and December 2017. All patients with bilateral stone disease that underwent SBES were included. Patients were treated under general anesthesia in either the supine or lithotomy position. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed.

Results

A total of 47 patients were included. Mean age was 53.8 years and 70% of the patients were males. The mean American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score was 2. The mean diameter of right- and left-sided stones was 29.43 mm (2–83 mm) and 31.15 (4–102 mm), respectively. Staghorn stones were treated in 18 cases (8 right-sided and 10 left-sided), four of them were defined as complete staghorn. The procedures performed were 42 cases of bilateral URS and PCNL and ureteroscopy. Additionally, 5 bilateral flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) cases were described. Intraoperative complications occurred in five patients: four of them were classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) I and one as CD II. Postoperatively, there were two cases with CD I, 6 with CD II and one CD IIIa.

The stone-free status was 70%. Residual stones (30%) were detected only on the side treated for high-volume (complete) staghorn calculi.

Conclusions

SBES is a feasible, effective and safe procedure. It may potentially avoid repeated anesthetic sessions as needed for staged procedures and reduce the length of patients' hospital stay.

The role of robotic surgery in the management of renal tract calculi

The role of robotic assisted surgery in contemporary urolithiasis management is in its infancy. The mainstay in the management of renal tract calculi remains ureterorenoscopy (URS), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, in rare clinical circumstances, such as large impacted pelvic and ureteric calculi, endo-urological techniques may not be adequate. Furthermore, patient may have a synchronous pathology such as pelvi-ureteric obstruction which preferably should be concurrently treated with the renal calculi in a single sitting. Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RALU), robotic assisted laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (RPL) with or without concurrent pyeloplasty and Robotic assisted laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy have all been described for complex stones. Additionally, technical challenges with a flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) have led to the development of robotic assisted flexible ureteroscopes. In the article we summarize the role of robotic assisted surgery in complex renal tract calculi.

Updates in endourological management of urolithiasis

Urinary stone disease, or urolithiasis, is a very common disease with increasing prevalence and incidence. With the advancement of endoscopic techniques, the treatment outcomes of ureteroscopy (or transureteral lithotripsy) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are continuously improving. In recent years, there have been many new developments in the field, including new endoscopy design, more effective auxiliary tools, improvement in treatment protocols, introduction of robotic technology, combining both ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery or transureteral lithotripsy-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy), improvement in laser technology, and so on. All these new inputs will further improve the treatment efficacy and safety of the procedures, thus benefiting our patients. In the present review, we briefly go through the main steps of ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy, with a concise description and application of these new advances.

Clinical outcomes of the simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with kidney stones: A prospective cohort study

Background

Urinary tract stones is one of the most frequent medical emergencies which leads to life-threatening complications, namely obstructive uropathy as well as renal failure in some situations. Previously, bilateral stones were treated with either open surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, these treatment options were associated with lengthy operation time, need for more anesthesia, further bleeding, and long hospitalization. Therefore, much effort has been made to treat both sides simultaneously.

Objective

The aim of this study was an attempt to prospectively review cases undergoing simultaneous bilateral PCNL in terms of the therapy outcomes, complications, and consequences.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, 39 adult patients with bilateral renal stones were randomly recruited at Imam Reza hospital in Mashhad, Iran between January 2016 and January 2017. Adult patients with bilateral renal stones were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: Patients with severe heart or lung disease, patients with coagulation disorders, pregnant women, and cases with any contraindications for general anesthesia. After insertion of bilateral ureteral catheters, all patients underwent simultaneous bilateral PCNL in prone position. Transureteral lithotripsy was performed for patients with ureteral stones. The surgery was initially carried out on the symptomatic side and then iterated on the remaining kidney. Major complications including bleeding, fever, pain, urine leakage, and residual stones were recorded. SPSS software was used for data analysis. Data were expressed as percentage and mean ± SD. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 39 patients (27 males with mean age of 37.6 years and 12 females with mean age of 45.7 years) were studied. As many as 15 (38%) patients received a unilateral nephrostomy. Three underwent totally tubeless surgery. Bleeding (41.0%) was the most common complication, followed by residual stones (20.5%) and fever (20.5%), urine leakage (15.3%), pain (12.8%), blood transfusion (2.5%) and colon perforation (2.5%).

Conclusions

It was concluded that simultaneous bilateral PCNL was not associated with higher morbidity than the unilateral method.