1
|
Bernal J, Venkatesan K, Martins FE. Erectile Dysfunction in Pelvic Cancer Survivors and Current Management Options. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072697. [PMID: 37048780 PMCID: PMC10095222 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Pelvic malignancies, including prostate, rectal, and bladder cancers, are among the most frequent malignancies found in the male population. These issues are most effectively and commonly treated with radiotherapy and/or surgery. However, these treatments can cause collateral damage, resulting in significant impacts on quality of life, with erectile dysfunction being one of the most frequent postoperative complications. Currently, there are several treatment options for erectile dysfunction, including oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, vacuum erection devices, intracorporeal injections, and penile prosthesis. The latter has shown to be an effective and safe technique, with results comparable to those obtained by patients without pelvic surgery or radiotherapy. The results of early penile rehabilitation programs are promising and they have been incorporated into a greater proportion of treatment plans more recently, with varying degrees of success. In this narrative review, we summarize the literature on erectile dysfunction after pelvic cancer treatments and its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Bernal
- Department of Urology, Hospital Sotero del Rio/Clinica Indisa, Santiago 13123, Chile
| | - Krishnan Venkatesan
- Department of Urology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - Francisco E Martins
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Hospital Santa Maria, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou JQ, Xu CJ, Liu S, Kang XL, Wang Y. Efficacy and safety evaluation of complete intrafascial prostatectomy in suspected prostate cancer patients with dysuria: a retrospective cohort study. Transl Androl Urol 2023; 12:300-307. [PMID: 36915882 PMCID: PMC10005996 DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Suspected localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients with dysuria Complete intrafascial prostatectomy (CIP) can remove the whole prostate gland with the maximal retain of adjacent normal tissues around the prostate, and can be applied in some suspected localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients with dysuria. However, precious few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of CIP in these patients without preoperative needle biopsies. Methods In this retrospective single-arm cohort study, all 22 suspected PCa patients with dysuria who underwent CIP at our hospital were enrolled. The clinical data including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free-serum PSA, prostate volume, perioperative and postoperative complications were collected. The PSA level at 6 weeks after CIP and recoveries of urinary continence and erectile function were acquired in the follow-up procedures, and were used as the main measurements of efficacy and safety for CIP respectively. Results The patients had an average age of 71.91±8.29 years and an average preoperative PSA level of 10.75±4.25 ng/mL. The operations for all 22 patients were successfully completed. The average operation time was 135.20±41.44 min (range, 40.0-215.0 min), and the average blood loss volume was 128.64±145.09 mL. In total, 17 patients (77.27%) had PCa confirmed by postoperative pathology, and 5 patients (22.73%) had benign prostatic hyperplasia. The PSA level dropped to 0.010±0.004 ng/mL at 6 weeks after surgery. According to the loose criteria to assess urinary incontinence, the patients achieved continence rates of 63.6% immediately after the operation, 95.5% at 1 month, and 100% at 3 months. According to the strict criteria, the continence rates immediately, and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery were 27.3%, 63.6%, 90.9%, 95.5%, and 100%, respectively. None of the patients complained of urinary obstruction symptoms after surgery. Before CIP, all the patients had erectile dysfunction and an International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) score of 9.64±5.91. After surgery, the patients had IIEF-5 scores at 3, 6, and 12 months of 5.45±4.43, 6.95±5.30, and 7.57±5.69, respectively. Conclusions Although the study had some limitations, CIP may be a prudent option for patients with suspected localized PCa who also present with dysuria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Quan Zhou
- Department of Urology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China
| | - Cong-Jie Xu
- Department of Urology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China
| | - Shuan Liu
- Department of Urology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China
| | - Xin-Li Kang
- Department of Urology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Urology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoeh B, Wenzel M, Hohenhorst L, Köllermann J, Graefen M, Haese A, Tilki D, Walz J, Kosiba M, Becker A, Banek S, Kluth LA, Mandel P, Karakiewicz PI, Chun FKH, Preisser F. Anatomical Fundamentals and Current Surgical Knowledge of Prostate Anatomy Related to Functional and Oncological Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Front Surg 2022; 8:825183. [PMID: 35273992 PMCID: PMC8901727 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.825183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Meticulous knowledge about the anatomy of the prostate and surrounding tissue represents a crucial and mandatory requirement during radical prostatectomy for reliable oncological and excellent replicable, functional outcomes. Since its introduction two decades ago, robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has evolved to become the predominant surgical approach in many industrialized countries. Objective To provide and highlight currently available literature regarding prostate anatomy and to help in improving oncological and functional outcomes in RALP. Methods/Evidence Acquiring PubMed database was searched using the following keywords: "robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy," "anatomy," "neurovascular bundle," "nerve," "periprostatic fascia," "pelvis," "sphincter," "urethra," "urinary incontinence," and "erectile dysfunction." Relevant articles and book chapters were critically reviewed and if eligible, they were included in this review. Results New evidence in regards to prostatic anatomy and surgical approaches in RALP has been reported in recent years. Besides detailed anatomical studies investigating the meticulous structure of the fascial structures surrounding the prostate and neurovascular bundle preservation, debate about the optimal RALP approach is still ongoing, inspired by recent publications presenting promising functional outcomes following modifications in surgical approaches. Conclusions This review provides a detailed overview of the current knowledge of prostate anatomy, its surrounding tissue, and its influence on key surgical step development for RALP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lukas Hohenhorst
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Marina Kosiba
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Severine Banek
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A. Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy remains an important means to treat prostate cancer. A major limiting factor to radical prostatectomy is short- and long-term complications, especially incontinence and sexual dysfunction. With the advent of robotic radical prostatectomy, the ability to easily evaluate technical issues with video has been realized. In this article, we present a step-by-step examination of our procedure and our results over the past 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M. Huynh
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine Health, Orange, California
| | - Thomas E. Ahlering
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine Health, Orange, California
| |
Collapse
|