Novel Prevention Procedure for Inguinal Hernia after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial

Peritoneal closure and the processus vaginalis transection method to prevent inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative inguinal hernia (IH) is one of the most common complications of radical prostatectomy (RP) including robot-assisted RP (RARP). However, a procedure to prevent IH after RARP has not been established. We investigated the impact of processus vaginalis transection (PVT) and PVT with peritoneal closure on IH after RARP.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent RARP at two tertiary hospitals in Japan, where PVT with subsequent peritoneal closure was introduced after 2014. The incidence of IH for 2 years after RARP was compared among 79 patients without PVT or peritoneal closure, 232 patients with only PVT, and 325 patients with PVT and peritoneal closure. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models that adjusted for hospital, age, history of abdominal operation, body mass index, operation time, and prostate weight were used.

RESULTS

Postoperative IH was observed in seven (8.9%) patients without PVT or peritoneal closure, 34 (15%) patients with only PVT, and nine (2.8%) patients with PVT and peritoneal closure. Compared with patients without PVT or peritoneal closure, the incidence of IH was not different in patients with only PVT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34, 2.38) and significantly lower in patients with PVT and peritoneal closure (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07, 0.70).

CONCLUSION

PVT with peritoneal closure may reduce the risk of postoperative IH after RARP. Future randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

Impact of Pelvic Anatomical Changes Caused by Radical Prostatectomy

Simple Summary

After radical prostatectomy, the pelvic anatomy is altered such that the postoperative structure differs from the preoperative one, resulting in a variety of complications. In this review, the complications and mechanisms of pelvic anatomical changes associated with radical prostatectomy, as well as countermeasures, are outlined. An analysis of the anatomical mechanisms that cause complications after radical prostatectomy using imaging and other modalities is in progress. In addition, many surgical techniques that ensure the prevention of postoperative complications have been reported, and their usefulness has been evaluated. The preservation of as much periprostatic tissue and periprostatic structures as possible may lead to favorable postoperative functions, as long as the cancer condition permits.

Abstract

During radical prostatectomy, the prostate is removed along with the seminal vesicles, and the urinary tract is reconstructed by dropping the bladder onto the pelvic floor and suturing the bladder and urethra together. This process causes damage to the pelvic floor and postoperative complications due to the anatomical changes in the pelvic floor caused by the vesicourethral anastomosis. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction are major complications that impair patients’ quality of life after radical prostatectomy. In addition, the shortening of the penis and the increased prevalence of inguinal hernia have been reported. Since these postoperative complications subsequently affect patients’ quality of life, their reduction is a matter of great interest, and procedural innovations such as nerve-sparing techniques, Retzius space preservation, and inguinal hernia prophylaxis have been developed. It is clear that nerve sparing is useful for preserving the erectile function, and nerve sparing, urethral length preservation, and Retzius sparing are useful for urinary continence. The evaluation of pre- and postoperative imaging to observe changes in pelvic anatomy is also beginning to clarify why these techniques are useful. Changes in pelvic anatomy after radical prostatectomy are inevitable and, therefore, postoperative complications cannot be completely eliminated; however, preserving as much of the tissue and structure around the prostate as possible, to the extent that prostate cancer control is not compromised, may help reduce the prevalence of postoperative complications.

Evaluating the incidence, management, and recurrence of inguinal hernia during robotic prostatectomy: A literature review

Objectives:

Robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a well-established treatment for localised prostate adenocarcinoma. The benefits of this minimally invasive technique include shortened operative time and improved patient recovery. However, the development of inguinal hernia (IH) before, during, and following RARP has been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence, management, and recurrence of IHs in patients undergoing RARP for prostate cancer.

Methods:

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database from August 2007 to October 2020 using the keywords ‘robotic prostatectomy’ and ‘inguinal hernia’. Studies evaluating the incidence and recurrence of IH in patients undergoing RARP were identified and included. The initial search identified 77 articles. After excluding one duplicate, six case reports, three editorial comments, four articles not in English, eight review articles, and 14 studies that did not mention hernia incidence, 41 studies were included in our final literature review.

Results:

Concomitant IH repair (IHR) during RARP resulted in decreased symptomatic hernia recurrence during the follow-up period. When compared to patients who had not undergone hernia repair, the patients who underwent IHR during RARP did not experience greater complications in the postoperative period.

Conclusions:

Patients that undergo an intraoperative IHR during RARP did not experience significant adverse postoperative complications. Although operative time can slightly increase compared to RARP alone, we recommend a thorough preoperative physical examination in all patients scheduled to undergo RARP to evaluate for IH in addition to a thorough discussion with the patient of the risks and benefits of intraoperative repair.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable

Role and importance of ergonomics in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): outcomes of a narrative review

BACKGROUND

With recent technological advancement, new and improved endoscopic instruments and laser devices have catapulted flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) to the forefront, hence making retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) a popular choice for the management of renal stones. However, RIRS has also resulted in an increasing number of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, which can have a detrimental impact on surgeons' physical health and operative lifespan. The aim of our review is to examine the impact and feasibility of ergonomic adjustments, and outline future directions and recommendations in order to improve the awareness of and reduce the prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries among urologists.

METHODS

This study was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. A thorough literature review was conducted of several databases using the following keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms to generate a search strategy: nephrolithiasis, kidney calculus, renal calculus, staghorn calculus, ergonomics, position, fatigue, comfort, tire, physical strain, visual strain, muscle, ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), laser, and lithotripsy. Studies were chosen for inclusion by reviewers independently, and the data was consolidated for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1446 articles were identified on initial literature search; 23 were included in the final analysis. The impact of various ergonomic modifications on operative outcomes, surgeons, surgical equipment, and patients, was analysed. In addition, we summarized all the improvements that resulted in better ergonomics in RIRS.

CONCLUSION

Ergonomics in RIRS is poorly understood and there are currently no formal guidelines for this aspect. While modern endourology armamentarium seems to help with procedural ergonomics, more needs to be done to enhance surgeon comfort, protect surgeon longevity, and prioritize the health and safety of endourologists.