1
|
Menso JE, Rahimi AM, Zwart MJW, Daams F, de Hondt J, Karadza E, Montorsi RM, Nickel F, Bonjer HJ, van Dijkum EJMN, Besselink MG. Robotic hepaticojejunostomy training in novices using robotic simulation and dry-lab suturing (ROSIM): randomized controlled crossover trial. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10914-8. [PMID: 38958718 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10914-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic suturing training is in increasing demand and can be done using suture-pads or robotic simulation training. Robotic simulation is less cumbersome, whereas a robotic suture-pad approach could be more effective but is more costly. A training curriculum with crossover between both approaches may be a practical solution. However, studies assessing the impact of starting with robotic simulation or suture-pads in robotic suturing training are lacking. METHODS This was a randomized controlled crossover trial conducted with 20 robotic novices from 3 countries who underwent robotic suturing training using an Intuitive Surgical® X and Xi system with the SimNow (robotic simulation) and suture-pads (dry-lab). Participants were randomized to start with robotic simulation (intervention group, n = 10) or suture-pads (control group, n = 10). After the first and second training, all participants completed a robotic hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) in biotissue. Primary endpoint was the objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) score during HJ, scored by two blinded raters. Secondary endpoints were force measurements and a qualitative analysis. After training, participants were surveyed regarding their preferences. RESULTS Overall, 20 robotic novices completed both training sessions and performed 40 robotic HJs. After both trainings, OSATS was scored higher in the robotic simulation-first group (3.3 ± 0.9 vs 2.5 ± 0.8; p = 0.049), whereas the median maximum force (N) (5.0 [3.2-8.0] vs 3.8 [2.3-12.8]; p = 0.739) did not differ significantly between the groups. In the survey, 17/20 (85%) participants recommended to include robotic simulation training, 14/20 (70%) participants preferred to start with robotic simulation, and 20/20 (100%) to include suture-pad training. CONCLUSION Surgical performance during robotic HJ in robotic novices was significantly better after robotic simulation-first training followed by suture-pad training. A robotic suturing curriculum including both robotic simulation and dry-lab suturing should ideally start with robotic simulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E Menso
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Masie Rahimi
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maurice J W Zwart
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joey de Hondt
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emir Karadza
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roberto M Montorsi
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H Jaap Bonjer
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dos Santos Almeida Farinha RJ, Piro A, Mottaran A, Paciotti M, Puliatti S, Breda A, Porter J, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Vander Sloten J, Mottrie A, Gallagher AG. Development and validation of metrics for a new RAPN training model. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:153. [PMID: 38563887 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01911-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a complex and index procedure that urologists need to learn how to perform safely. No validated performance metrics specifically developed for a RAPN training model (TM) exist. A Core Metrics Group specifically adapted human RAPN metrics to be used in a newly developed RAPN TM, explicitly defining phases, steps, errors, and critical errors. A modified Delphi meeting concurred on the face and content validation of the new metrics. One hundred percent consensus was achieved by the Delphi panel on 8 Phases, 32 Steps, 136 Errors and 64 Critical Errors. Two trained assessors evaluated recorded video performances of novice and expert RAPN surgeons executing an emulated RAPN in the newly developed TM. There were no differences in procedure Steps completed by the two groups. Experienced RAPN surgeons made 34% fewer Total Errors than the Novice group. Performance score for both groups was divided at the median score using Total Error scores, into HiError and LoError subgroups. The LowErrs Expert RAPN surgeons group made 118% fewer Total Errors than the Novice HiErrs group. Furthermore, the LowErrs Expert RAPN surgeons made 77% fewer Total Errors than the HiErrs Expert RAPN surgeons. These results established construct and discriminative validity of the metrics. The authors described a novel RAPN TM and its associated performance metrics with evidence supporting their face, content, construct, and discriminative validation. This report and evidence support the implementation of a simulation-based proficiency-based progression (PBP) training program for RAPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adele Piro
- Division of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Angelo Mottaran
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Division of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James Porter
- Swedish Urology Group, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ben Van Cleynenbreugel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jos Vander Sloten
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Section of Biomechanics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Orsi Academy, Proefhoevestraat 12, 9090, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Anthony G Gallagher
- Orsi Academy, Proefhoevestraat 12, 9090, Ghent, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Derry, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schneyer RJ, Scheib SA, Green IC, Molina AL, Mara KC, Wright KN, Siedhoff MT, Truong MD. Validation of a Simulation Model for Robotic Myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31:330-340.e1. [PMID: 38307222 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Several simulation models have been evaluated for gynecologic procedures such as hysterectomy, but there are limited published data for myomectomy. This study aimed to assess the validity of a low-cost robotic myomectomy model for surgical simulation training. DESIGN Prospective cohort simulation study. SETTING Surgical simulation laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Twelve obstetrics and gynecology residents and 4 fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons were recruited for a 3:1 novice-to-expert ratio. INTERVENTIONS A robotic myomectomy simulation model was constructed using <$5 worth of materials: a foam cylinder, felt, a stress ball, bandage wrap, and multipurpose sealing wrap. Participants performed a simulation task involving 2 steps: fibroid enucleation and hysterotomy repair. Video-recorded performances were timed and scored by 2 blinded reviewers using the validated Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) scale (5-25 points) and a modified GEARS scale (5-40 points), which adds 3 novel domains specific to robotic myomectomy. Performance was also scored using predefined task errors. Participants completed a post-task questionnaire assessing the model's realism and utility. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Median task completion time was shorter for experts than novices (9.7 vs 24.6 min, p = .001). Experts scored higher than novices on both the GEARS scale (median 23 vs 12, p = .004) and modified GEARS scale (36 vs 20, p = .004). Experts made fewer task errors than novices (median 15.5 vs 37.5, p = .034). For interrater reliability of scoring, the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.91 for the GEARS assessment, 0.93 for the modified GEARS assessment, and 0.60 for task errors. Using the contrasting groups method, the passing mark for the simulation task was set to a minimum modified GEARS score of 28 and a maximum of 28 errors. Most participants agreed that the model was realistic (62.5%) and useful for training (93.8%). CONCLUSION We have demonstrated evidence supporting the validity of a low-cost robotic myomectomy model. This simulation model and the performance assessments developed in this study provide further educational tools for robotic myomectomy training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Schneyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Drs. Schneyer, Molina, Wright, Siedhoff, and Truong).
| | - Stacey A Scheib
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Lousiana (Dr. Scheib)
| | - Isabel C Green
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Green), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Andrea L Molina
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Drs. Schneyer, Molina, Wright, Siedhoff, and Truong)
| | - Kristin C Mara
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Ms. Mara), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kelly N Wright
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Drs. Schneyer, Molina, Wright, Siedhoff, and Truong)
| | - Matthew T Siedhoff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Drs. Schneyer, Molina, Wright, Siedhoff, and Truong)
| | - Mireille D Truong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Drs. Schneyer, Molina, Wright, Siedhoff, and Truong)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Checheili Sobbi S, Jung Y, Fillet M, Bakhtiary F, Maessen JG, Sardari Nia P. Simulation-based training for endoscopic mitral valve repair: the impact on basic surgical skills for placement of sutures at mitral valve annulus during 2-h training workshop. INTERDISCIPLINARY CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY 2024; 38:ivae003. [PMID: 38218724 PMCID: PMC10903172 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivae003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of simulation-based training on surgical skills during 2-h learning labs during surgical annual meeting. METHODS During the 36th European Association of Cardiothoracic Surgery annual meeting a learning drylab for simulation-based training for endoscopic mitral valve repair was set up. For this purpose, a validated high-fidelity endoscopic mitral valve surgery simulator and a validated suturing map were used. The training lasted 2 h. Technical pre- and post-assessment were carried out based on time and accuracy to place a suture at the posterior mitral valve annulus. The suture had to be placed within 60 s. The suture was considered anatomically correct if it entered and exited the annulus at the designated place (on the posterior annulus) and accurate if placed within the right width (8-12 mm). RESULTS In total, 46 participants were included in this study, of whom 18 (38%) were experienced/staff surgeons, 23 (51%) fellows and 5 (11%) residents. Before the training, 48% of the participants failed to place any suture for pre-assessment. After completing the training, 100% of the participants succeeded in placing an anatomically correct suture. There was a significant improvement in the time taken [pre-assessment mean 45 (standard deviation: 25) s vs post-assessment mean 18 (standard deviation: 12) s, P < 0.001] and the accuracy to place a suture in the mitral valve annulus after completing the training (pre-assessment 32.6% vs post-assessment 65.2%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study shows a significant improvement in endoscopic skills for mitral valve surgery after completing a 2-h training with a high-fidelity endoscopic mitral valve surgery simulator. This suggests that simulation trainings during scientific annual meetings are effective on surgical skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shokoufeh Checheili Sobbi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Yochun Jung
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Farhad Bakhtiary
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Universitatsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jos G Maessen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Peyman Sardari Nia
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boal MWE, Anastasiou D, Tesfai F, Ghamrawi W, Mazomenos E, Curtis N, Collins JW, Sridhar A, Kelly J, Stoyanov D, Francis NK. Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad331. [PMID: 37951600 PMCID: PMC10771126 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need to standardize training in robotic surgery, including objective assessment for accreditation. This systematic review aimed to identify objective tools for technical skills assessment, providing evaluation statuses to guide research and inform implementation into training curricula. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Ovid Embase/Medline, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Inclusion criterion: robotic surgery technical skills tools. Exclusion criteria: non-technical, laparoscopy or open skills only. Manual tools and automated performance metrics (APMs) were analysed using Messick's concept of validity and the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence and Recommendation (LoR). A bespoke tool analysed artificial intelligence (AI) studies. The Modified Downs-Black checklist was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS Two hundred and forty-seven studies were analysed, identifying: 8 global rating scales, 26 procedure-/task-specific tools, 3 main error-based methods, 10 simulators, 28 studies analysing APMs and 53 AI studies. Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills and the da Vinci Skills Simulator were the most evaluated tools at LoR 1 (OCEBM). Three procedure-specific tools, 3 error-based methods and 1 non-simulator APMs reached LoR 2. AI models estimated outcomes (skill or clinical), demonstrating superior accuracy rates in the laboratory with 60 per cent of methods reporting accuracies over 90 per cent, compared to real surgery ranging from 67 to 100 per cent. CONCLUSIONS Manual and automated assessment tools for robotic surgery are not well validated and require further evaluation before use in accreditation processes.PROSPERO: registration ID CRD42022304901.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W E Boal
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Anastasiou
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Freweini Tesfai
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Walaa Ghamrawi
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Evangelos Mazomenos
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Nathan Curtis
- Department of General Surgey, Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, UK
| | - Justin W Collins
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Danail Stoyanov
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Computer Science, UCL, London, UK
| | - Nader K Francis
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset Foundation NHS Trust, Yeovil, Somerset, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Woodall WJ, Chang EH, Toy S, Lee DR, Sherman JH. Does Extended Reality Simulation Improve Surgical/Procedural Learning and Patient Outcomes When Compared With Standard Training Methods?: A Systematic Review. Simul Healthc 2024; 19:S98-S111. [PMID: 38240622 DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of extended reality (XR) technologies, including virtual, augmented, and mixed reality, has increased within surgical and procedural training programs. Few studies have assessed experiential learning- and patient-based outcomes using XR compared with standard training methods. METHODS As a working group for the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, we used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and a PICO strategy to perform a systematic review of 4238 articles to assess the effectiveness of XR technologies compared with standard training methods. Outcomes were grouped into knowledge, time-to-completion, technical proficiency, reactions, and patient outcomes. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible. RESULTS Thirty-two studies met eligibility criteria: 18 randomized controlled trials, 7 comparative studies, and 7 systematic reviews. Outcomes of most studies included Kirkpatrick levels of evidence I-III (reactions, knowledge, and behavior), while few reported level IV outcomes (patient). The overall risk of bias was low. With few exceptions, included studies showed XR technology to be more effective than standard training methods in improving objective skills and performance, shortening procedure time, and receiving more positive learner ratings. However, XR use did not show significant differences in gained knowledge. CONCLUSIONS Surgical or procedural XR training may improve technical skill development among trainees and is generally favored over standard training methods. However, there should be an additional focus on how skill development translates to clinically relevant outcomes. We recommend longitudinal studies to examine retention and transfer of training to clinical settings, methods to improve timely, adaptive feedback for deliberate practice, and cost analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Woodall
- From the Medical College of Georgia (W.J.W.), Augusta, GA; Department of Otolaryngology (E.H.C.), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Departments of Basic Science Education and Health Systems & Implementation Science (S.T.), Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA; University of Michigan School of Nursing (D.R.L.), Ann Arbor, MI; and WVU Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute (J.H.S.), Morgantown, WV
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ballesta Martinez B, Kallidonis P, Tsaturyan A, Peteinaris A, Faitatziadis S, Gkeka K, Tatanis V, Vagionis A, Pagonis K, Obaidat M, Anaplioti E, Haney C, Vrettos T, Liatsikos E. Transfer of acquired practical skills from dry lab into live surgery using the avatera robotic system: An experimental study. Actas Urol Esp 2023; 47:611-617. [PMID: 37574013 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the transfer of the practical skills of robot-assisted surgery acquired in the dry-lab into a real live experimental setting for performing upper and lower urinary tract surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS An in vivo experimental study design was utilized. Six urology trainees and fellows; two 2nd year trainees with no previous exposure to laparoscopic surgery (Group 1), two 4th year residents with medium exposure to laparoscopic surgery (Group 2) and two fellows trained to perform laparoscopic surgeries (Group 3) performed ureteral reimplantation into the bladder, pyeloplasty, and radical nephrectomy on three female pigs under general anesthesia. Prior to performing the requested procedures, each participant completed 10-14 h dry-lab robotic training acquiring skills in basic surgical tasks, such as suturing, cutting and needle passage. The recorded variables were the successful completion of the procedures, the console time, and the time to perform different steps and major complications. RESULTS All procedures were completed successfully by all groups except the pyeloplasty by group 1 which was complicated by bleeding from the renal vein, and the procedure was abandoned. Group 3 achieved shorter console time for all successfully completed procedures and for separate surgical steps compared to all groups, followed by Group 2. The slowest group for all procedures and steps analyzed was Group 3. CONCLUSIONS Although further clinical evidence is needed, the robotic-assisted urological procedures and the most challenging steps could be performed safely and effectively after proper training in the dry lab under mentor supervision according to our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Ballesta Martinez
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece; Department of Urology, Hospital Vinalopó, Elche, Spain
| | - P Kallidonis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - A Tsaturyan
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - A Peteinaris
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - S Faitatziadis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - K Gkeka
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - V Tatanis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - A Vagionis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - K Pagonis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - M Obaidat
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - E Anaplioti
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - C Haney
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - T Vrettos
- Department of Anesthesiology and ICU, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - E Liatsikos
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Co M, Chiu S, Billy Cheung HH. Extended reality in surgical education: A systematic review. Surgery 2023; 174:1175-1183. [PMID: 37640664 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of extended reality-based training in surgical education. METHODS This systematic review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS A total of 33 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Nine studies evaluated the effectiveness of virtual reality-based training against no substitutional training. Seven studies looked at training for laparoscopic surgery, and the results were contradicting. Two studies focused on orthopedics training, and the outcomes were positive. Fourteen studies compared the outcomes of virtual reality-based training to conventional didactic teaching, all demonstrating superior outcomes for virtual reality-based training. Nine studies compared the outcomes of virtual reality simulation training to dry lab simulation training. The inferior outcomes of virtual reality simulation training were demonstrated by 5 studies for laparoscopic surgery, 1 study for arthroscopic procedures, 1 study for robotic surgery, and 1 study for dental procedures. One study found potential benefits of virtual reality simulation training on orthopedics surgeries. One study found virtual reality simulation training to be superior to cadaveric training, and 3 studies found augmented reality and virtual reality-based training to be comparable to supervised operative opportunities. CONCLUSION Extended reality-based training is a potentially useful modality to serve as an adjunct to the current physical surgical training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Co
- Centre of Education and Training, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, China.
| | - Shirley Chiu
- Centre of Education and Training, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, China
| | - Ho Hung Billy Cheung
- Centre of Education and Training, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee CS, Khan MT, Patnaik R, Stull MC, Krell RW, Laverty RB. Model Development of a Novel Robotic Surgery Training Exercise With Electrocautery. Cureus 2022; 14:e24531. [PMID: 35651377 PMCID: PMC9138208 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has undergone rapid adoption in general surgery due to features such as three-dimensional visualization, wrist dexterity, improved precision of movement, and operator ergonomics. While many surgical trainees encounter RAS during their residency, robotic skills training programs and curricula vary across institutions and there is broad variation in graduating general surgeons’ robotic proficiency levels. Due to a need for a formalized process to achieve competence on the robotic platform, simulation-based training has become instrumental in closing this gap as it provides training in a low-stakes environment while allowing the trainee to improve their psychomotor and basic procedural skills. Several different models of simulation training exist including virtual reality, animal, cadaveric, and inanimate tissue platforms. Each form of training has its own merits and limitations. While virtual reality platforms have been well evaluated for face, content, and construct validity, their initial set-up costs can be as high as $125,000. Similarly, animal and cadaveric models are not only costly but also have ethical considerations that may preclude participation. There is an unmet need in developing high-fidelity, cost-effective simulations for basic videoscopic skills such as cautery use. We developed a cost-effective and high-fidelity inanimate tissue model that incorporates electrocautery. Using a double-layered bowel model secured to a moistened household sponge, this inanimate exercise simulates fundamental skills of robotic surgery such as tissue handling, camera control, suturing, and electrocautery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina S Lee
- General Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, USA
| | - Mustafa T Khan
- General Surgery, UT (University of Texas ) Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Ronit Patnaik
- General Surgery, UT (University of Texas ) Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Mamie C Stull
- General Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, USA
| | - Robert W Krell
- General Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Azadi S, Green IC, Arnold A, Truong M, Potts J, Martino MA. Robotic Surgery: The Impact of Simulation and Other Innovative Platforms on Performance and Training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:490-495. [PMID: 33310145 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the current status of robotic training and the impact of various training platforms on the performance of robotic surgical trainees. DATA SOURCES Literature review of Google Scholar and PubMed. The search terms included a combination of the following: "robotic training," "simulation," "robotic curriculum," "obgyn residency robotic training," "virtual reality robotic training," "DaVinci training," "surgical simulation," "gyn surgical training." The sources considered for inclusion included peer-reviewed articles, literature reviews, textbook chapters, and statements from various institutions involved in resident training. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION A literature search of Google Scholar and PubMed using terms related to robotic surgery and robotics training, as mentioned in the "Data Sources" section. RESULTS Multiple novel platforms that use machine learning and real-time video feedback to teach and evaluate robotic surgical skills have been developed over recent years. Various training curricula, virtual reality simulators, and other robotic training tools have been shown to enhance robotic surgical education and improve surgical skills. The integration of didactic learning, simulation, and intraoperative teaching into more comprehensive training curricula shows positive effects on robotic skills proficiency. Few robotic surgery training curricula have been validated through peer-reviewed study, and there is more work to be completed in this area. In addition, there is a lack of information about how the skills obtained through robotics curricula and simulation translate into operating room performance and patient outcomes. CONCLUSION Data collected to date show promising advances in the training of robotic surgeons. A diverse array of curricula for training robotic surgeons continue to emerge, and existing teaching modalities are evolving to keep up with the rapidly growing demand for proficient robotic surgeons. Futures areas of growth include establishing competency benchmarks for existing training tools, validating existing curricula, and determining how to translate the acquired skills in simulation into performance in the operating room and patient outcomes. Many surgical training platforms are beginning to expand beyond discrete robotic skills training to procedure-specific and team training. There is still a wealth of research to be done to understand how to create an effective training experience for gynecologic surgical trainees and robotics teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirin Azadi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania (Drs. Azadi, Potts, and Martino)
| | - Isabel C Green
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetric, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr. Green)
| | - Anne Arnold
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education, Philadelphia, PA (Ms. Arnold)
| | - Mireille Truong
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Dr. Truong)
| | - Jacqueline Potts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania (Drs. Azadi, Potts, and Martino)
| | - Martin A Martino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania (Drs. Azadi, Potts, and Martino); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida (Dr. Martino).
| |
Collapse
|