Evaluation of Perirenal Anatomic Landmarks on Computed Tomography to Reduce the Risk of Thoracic Complications During Supracostal Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Supine versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of supine and prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: A retrospective search of a tertiary medical center database yielded 517 patients who underwent supine (n = 91) or prone (n = 426) PCNL between September 2015 and July 2020. Data on demographics, baseline clinical parameters, and stone burden were included as predictors in a logistic regression model, generating a set of propensity scores. Seventy patients after supine PCNL were propensity score-matched 1:1 with patients after prone PCNL and compared for operative time, perioperative complications, system complexity, and stone-free rate. Results: We found that the operative time was significantly shorter in the supine PCNL group than in the prone PCNL group (85.5 ± 25.2 min vs. 96.4 ± 25.8 min, respectively; p = 0.012). The majority of both groups had low-grade (I-II) complexity systems (85.6% and 88.6%, respectively), with no significant difference among all grade groups (p = 0.749). There were no significant differences between the supine and prone PCNL groups in terms of the overall perioperative complication rate (8.6% vs. 4.3%, respectively; p = 0.301) or stone-free rate (74.3 vs. 65.7%, respectively; p = 0.356), while the rate of blood transfusion was significantly higher in the supine group (p = 0.023). Conclusions: In our study, we used propensity score matching to compare patients who underwent PCNL in the supine or prone position, adjusting for selection bias. Supine PCNL was associated with a shorter operative time but a higher blood transfusion rate, with no differences in the overall complication and stone-free rates.

Comparative Study of Prone Position Variations for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Objective

In this comparative study, we evaluated the results of flat prone and prone hip flexed percutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of efficacy and safety to contribute to the optimal prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy position.

Materials and Methods

Data of the patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy operations in a flat-prone or prone hip flexed positions due to renal pelvis and/or ≥2 Calix filling stones between January 2016 and January 2022 were collected retrospectively. Demographic data of the patient groups in different prone positions as well as clinical findings, stone characteristics and operative data were analyzed. The groups were also compared in terms of post-operative findings and complications.

Results

The average age and CROES scores of patients included in the study were 47.15±15.6 years and 221.76±62.49, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient demographic data, stone-free status and complication rates. Operation Room Time (ORT) (min) in flat prone PCNL group was shorter in average (100.57±32.74 min vs 92.32±28.75 min, p = 0.041) and duration with nephrostomy (days) and hospitalization (days) parameters were statistically significantly shorter in prone hip flexed PCNL (respectively, p < 0.001; p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Flat-prone PCNL provides significantly shorter ORT. However, the time with nephrostomy and hospitalization with the prone hip flexed PCNL were shorter than flat-prone position. The findings will guide the optimal prone PCNL position.