Comparative Outcomes of Double-J and Cutaneous Pyeloureteral Stents in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty

Risk factors for adverse outcomes after pediatric pyeloplasty: A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To identify the risk factors for adverse outcomes after pediatric pyeloplasty.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all children under the age of 14 years who underwent primary pyeloplasty for unilateral ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction at a single teaching hospital in Tunisia between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were included. Median age of patients at surgery was 27 months (interquartile range [IQR], 13-44). On ultrasound, median renal pelvic anteroposterior diameter was 3.2 cm (IQR, 2.3-4), and the median renal cortex thickness (RCT) was 2.5 mm (IQR, 2-3.5). Median differential renal function (DRF) on preoperative radionuclide renal scan was 40% (IQR, 30-46). Postoperative adverse outcomes occurred in 28 patients (27.2%). These included 19 cases of urinary tract infections (UTIs), 11 cases of UPJ restenosis, four cases of UPJ leakage, two cases of urinoma, and two cases of diversion-related complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed two factors significantly and independently related to postoperative negative outcomes: RCT <3 mm and DRF > 50%.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that preoperative RCT on ultrasound of less than 3 mm and preoperative DRF on radionuclide renal scan of more than 50% were independent risk factors for adverse outcomes following pediatric pyeloplasty. These factors could be of interest in identifying, early on, patients who will develop postoperative negative outcomes, giving them more attention and support, and explaining the prognosis to the patient and family.

Double J stent combined with pyelostomy tube in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year clinical experience in a single center

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome of using a double J (DJ) stent combined with pyelostomy tube with a DJ stent alone in laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with UPJO treated with LP between January 2017 and November 2021 was conducted in our center. According to different postoperative drainage methods patients were divided into a DJ stent group (52 cases) and a DJ stent combined with pyelostomy tube group (combination group, 41 cases). Operative time, bleeding volume, perirenal drainage stent removal time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and renal function recovery were compared between the two groups. Renal ultrasound and diuretic renogram (DR) were used for preoperative and postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were in the DJ stent group and 41 patients in the combination group. The mean hospital stay was 6.46 ± 2.66 days in the DJ stent group and 5.22 ± 1.63 days in the combination group (p < 0.05). Postoperative complications developed in 14 out of 52 patients in the DJ stent group (26.9%), while complications developed in 8 out of 41 patients in the combination group (19.5%) (p > 0.05). Non-catheter-related complications developed in 10/52 patients in the DJ stent group (19.2%) and only 1/41 patients in the combination group (2.4%) (p < 0.05). The renal function and renal cortex thickness in both groups were improved.

CONCLUSION

Both the DJ stent drainage and the DJ stent combined with pyelostomy drainage are safe and effective. We should fully consider the patient's preoperative and intraoperative conditions and choose appropriate drainage methods. A DJ stent combined with pyelostomy tube can reduce non-catheter related complications, facilitate postoperative recovery, and the hospital stay was significantly shorter than the DJ stent group. However, it is necessary to pay attention to the nursing treatment of the pyelostomy tube and guard against the occurrence of pyelostomy tube shedding.

Comparison of external stents and DJ stents techniques for pediatric pyeloplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety between an external stent and a Double J stent for pediatric Pyeloplasty.

METHODS

Through a systematical search of multiple scientific databases in July 2022, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), whose protocol was registered with PROSPERO(CRD42021274087).

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 1,758 patients were included. No significant differences were observed in operative time (MD: 2.26; 95% CI -9.62 to 14.14; P = 0.79), operative success rate (OR: 1.10; 95% CI 0.57 to 2.10; P = 0.780), length of hospital stay (MD: 0.65; 95% CI -0.04 to 1.34; P = 0.063), or complications (OR: 0.87; 95%CI 0.48 to 1.56; P = 0.630) between external stents and DJ stents in pediatric pyeloplasty. According to the subgroup analysis, we found the external stent group had a shorter operative time than the DJ stent group in terms of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (MD: -17.13; 95% CI -32.8 to -1.45; P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in operative time, operative success rate, length of hospital stay, or complications between external stents and DJ stents in pediatric pyeloplasty. The external stented procedure seemed to have less operative time when using robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. However, due to the limitations of our analysis, more studies are still required to support our conclusion.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO, the registration ID is CRD42021274087.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pediatric Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty (RALP)

INTRODUCTION

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction in children.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the English-language literature on surgical techniques and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction in children was performed without time filters using the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases in July 2020 according to the PRISMA statement recommendations.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 58 studies were selected for qualitative analysis, 46 of which were included in the meta-analysis. Nearly all studies included were observational and retrospective, either cohort or case-control. The quality of evidence was assessed using Modified Newcastle Ottawa Scoring, with the majority of studies scoring medium or high quality. The mean success rate was 95.4% (CI 91.0-99.3%), over a wide age range. There was a noticeable heterogeneity in reported follow up length and definitions of success rate. The majority of studies reported length of stay of ~1 day. The mean overall complication rate was 12%. For studies that reported complication rate by grade, the mean low Clavien grade (grade 2 or less) complication rate was 9.3% and the mean high Clavien grade (grade 3 or more) complication rate was 6.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic assisted surgery is technically feasible and has been shown to achieve very favorable outcomes for pyeloplasty in children. The evidence however is mostly retrospective and from single sites, which introduces potential biases. Further research is needed to further elucidate RALP benefits compared to the open and laparoscopic approach. As a RCT may not be practical in this space, perhaps a prospective multi-institutional design with a uniform reporting system of pediatric RALP is the next step to define its benefits and limits.

Comparison of Drainage Methods After Pyeloplasty in Children: A 14-Year Study

Objective: To summarize our experiences with drainage methods after laparoscopic pyeloplasty with a 14-year study. Methods: We reviewed the data of the 838 children operated on for hydronephrosis due to congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) between July 2007 and July 2020. Patients' demographics, perioperative details, postoperative drainage stents [including double-J stent, percutaneous trans-anastomotic (PU) stent, and trans-uretero-cystic external urethral stent (TEUS)], complications, hospital stay, and long-term follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Long-term follow-up was performed by outpatient visits and telephone follow-up. Moreover, we reviewed the details of nine cases of recurrence after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Results: Comparison of preoperative general data among the three groups indicated that there was no statistical difference in age, gender, and surgical side of the three groups. Statistical differences were found in the incidence of postoperative complications from the three postoperative drainage method groups, especially the incidence of reoperations (p < 0.01): there were six cases (3.19%) of recurrences in the TEUS group, two cases (0.36%) in the DJ group, and one case (0.93%) in the PU group. In the six recurrent cases from the TEUS group, four cases (44.4%) were found to have stenosis, and two cases (22.2%) have iatrogenic valvular formation. Conclusion: Not all three types of drainage methods are suitable for drainage after pyeloplasty. Based on our findings, TEUS is not recommended.