Identifying Preoperative Predictors of Operative Time and Their Impact on Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Mayo Adhesion Probability Score Predicts Perioperative Outcome of Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: Assessing whether Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) levels affect perioperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A systematic search of the literature published before February 1, 2023 was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, Cochran, and Web of Science libraries. We included all articles evaluating adherent perirenal fat by MAP during PN. Results: A total of 1807 patients from 7 studies meeting the criteria were included. In the high MAP group, the operation time was longer, and the estimated blood loss and postoperative complications were increased. There was no significant difference in positive surgical margin, warm ischemia time, and hospitalization time. Conclusions: As a simple and easy scoring method, MAP can predict the perioperative outcome of PN patients, especially when ≥3 is the boundary. However, more cohort studies are still needed to determine the optimal cutoff point of MAP.

Impact of Assistant Experience on Perioperative Outcomes of Simple and Radical Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Does It Really Matter?

Background and Objectives: While systematic reviews highlight the advantages of laparoscopic nephrectomy over traditional open surgery, the impact of an assistant's experience on surgical outcomes remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate whether the level of assistant expertise influences laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data from our institutional database were analyzed for patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy between January 2018 and December 2022. Procedures were performed by a highly experienced surgeon, including postgraduate year (PGY)-3 to PGY-5 residents as assistants. Senior-level assistants had completed at least 10 procedures. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative details were collected. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were performed to test the effect of assistant experience (low vs. high) on estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), operative time (OT), and postoperative complications. Results: 105 patients were included, where 53% had highly experienced assistants and 47% had less experienced ones. Low assistant experience and higher BMI predicted longer operative time (OT), confirmed by multivariable regression (β = 40.5, confidence interval [CI] 18.7-62.3, p < 0.001). Assistant experience did not significantly affect EBL or LOS after adjusting for covariates (β = -14.2, CI -91.8-63.3, p = 0.7 and β = -0.83, CI -2.7-1.02, p = 0.4, respectively). There was no correlation between assistant experience and postoperative complications. Conclusions: Assistant experience does not significantly impact complications, EBL, and LOS in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Surgeries with less experienced assistants had longer OT, but the overall clinical impact seems limited. Trainee involvement remains safe, guided by experienced surgeons.

Single-port vs multi-port robot-assisted renal surgery: analysis of perioperative outcomes for excision of high and low complexity renal masses

There is emerging but limited data assessing single-port (SP) robot-assisted surgery as an alternative to multi-port (MP) platforms. We compared perioperative outcomes between SP and MP robot-assisted approaches for excision of high and low complexity renal masses. Retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing robot-assisted partial or radical nephrectomy using the SP surgical system (n = 23) at our institution between November 2019 and November 2021. Renal masses were categorized as high complexity (7+) or low complexity (4-6) using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients were matched using a prospectively maintained MP database in a 2:1 (MP:SP) ratio. For high complexity tumors (n = 12), SP surgery was associated with a significantly longer operative time compared to MP (248.4 vs 188.1 min, p = 0.02) but a significantly shorter length of stay (1.9 vs 2.8 days, p = 0.02). For low complexity tumors (n = 11), operative time (177.7 vs 161.4 min, p = 0.53), estimated blood loss (69.6.0 vs 142.0 mL, p = 0.62), and length of stay (1.6 vs 1.8 days, p = 0.528) were comparable between SP and MP approaches. Increasing nephrometry score was associated with a greater relative increase in operative time for SP compared to MP renal surgery (p = 0.07) using best of fit linear modeling. SP robot-assisted partial and radical nephrectomy is safe and feasible for low complexity renal masses. For high complexity renal masses, the SP system is associated with a significantly longer operative time compared to the MP technique. Careful consideration should be given when selecting patients for SP robot-assisted kidney surgery.

Risk factors for postoperative complications after pheochromocytoma and/or paraganglioma: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Perioperative complications are higher in patients with pheochromocytoma and/or paraganglioma. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of postoperative complications after pheochromocytoma and/or paraganglioma resection surgery.

Method

We retrospectively reviewed 438 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for pheochromocytoma and/or paraganglioma at our center between January 2014 and December 2019. Demographic characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative data were recorded. Complications were defined as deviations from the normal postoperative course and Clavien-Dindo classification was used to grade the severity of postoperative complication. Patients with complications of grade II or above were included for analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the risk factors for postoperative complications.

Results

The median age of the patients was 47 years old. There were 295 cases (67.4%) of phepchromocytoma and 143 cases (32.6%) of paraganglioma. Three hundred sixty-seven (87.8%) patients had laparoscopic approach, and 55 (12.6%) patients had laparotomy; the conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy was 3.7%. Eighty-seven complications occurred in 65 patients (14.8%). No death occurred in our study and transfusion (36, 8.2%) was the most common complication. The mean follow-up length was 14 months. Independent risk factors for postoperative complications included a tumor size larger than 5.6 cm (OR = 2.427, 95% CI 1.284-4.587, P = 0.006), laparotomy (OR 2.590, 95% CI 1.230-5.453, P = 0.012), conversion to laparotomy (OR = 8.384, 95% CI 2.247-31.285, P = 0.002), and the operation time longer than 188 min (OR = 3.709, 95% CI 1.847-7.450, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Complications were not uncommon after pheochromocytoma and/or paraganglioma surgery. Tumor size, surgical type, and operation time were determined as the risk factors for postoperative complications. These factors should be considered to improve perioperative management.

Clinical implications for da Vinci SP partial nephrectomy in high complexity tumors; Propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

To compare surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using the da Vinci Si or Xi system and the da Vinci SP system for partial nephrectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 2008 to 2020, 66 partial nephrectomies were performed using a single-site robotic approach: 44 used the da Vinci Xi or Si system (R-LESS group) and 22 used the da Vinci SP system (SP group). After 1:1 propensity score-matching, surgical outcomes were compared between groups Results: Median patient age was 51.5 years. Median tumor size was 2.1 cm and was not significantly different between groups. Median operation time was longer in the R-LESS group (R-LESS vs SP: 180 min vs 155 min, p=0.034), but median warm ischemic time was comparable between groups. Estimated blood loss was higher in the R-LESS group (R-LESS vs SP: 215 mL vs 20 mL, p<0.001). Median operation time was significantly shorter in the SP group in patients with moderate to high complexity tumors (R-LESS vs SP: 200 min vs 172 min, p=0.035). Rates of trifecta achievement were similar between groups (63.6% in both groups, p=1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

R-LESS and da Vinci SP methods are both feasible approaches for single-site incision robotic partial nephrectomy. The da Vinci SP platform allows "true" single-site surgery without additional ports and provides a wider working space. It was associated with better performance than R-LESS partial nephrectomy. In moderate to high complex tumors, operation time was shorter with SP partial nephrectomy than with R-LESS partial nephrectomy, suggesting that the SP method is especially advantageous for managing complex renal tumors.