Single-Port Robotic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Bowel Diversion: Initial Experience and Review of Surgical Outcomes

Postoperative Outcomes and Analgesic Requirements of Single-Port vs Multiport Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy

Objective: To compare outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with urinary diversion for bladder cancer with either the single-port (SP) or multiport (MP) robotic platform. Methods: All patients who underwent SP and MP RARC at our institution between January 2018 and January 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative analgesia was administered by a departmentwide narcotic stewardship protocol, and inpatient and outpatient narcotic use was tracked. The available preoperative clinical, operative, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using t-test, chi-square, and Fischer exact statistical measures. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing was used to determine the freedom from high-grade (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) postoperative complications stratified by SP or MP robotic use. Results: Overall, 96 patients underwent RARC with urinary diversion at our institution, with 49 MP and 47 SP procedures performed. Preoperative clinical parameters including age, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery, and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were similar between the two groups. Patients undergoing SP RARC had a shorter operative time (386.0 ± 90.9 minutes vs 453.6 ± 94.8 minutes, p < 0.01) and faster return of bowel function (3.4 ± 1.4 days vs 4.5 ± 2.2 days, p < 0.01). However, both cohorts had similar length of hospitalization, postoperative narcotic use, pathologic staging, and rate of positive surgical margin. Within 3 months postoperatively, both cohorts had a similar high-grade complication, hospital readmission, and cancer recurrence rate. Conclusions: The SP robot allows a safe alternative surgical approach for RARC and offers similar postoperative outcomes compared to the MP robot.

Single incision robotic cystectomy and urinary diversion

PURPOSE

In this review, we aim to provide readers with a balanced understanding of all aspects of single incision robotic cystectomy (SIRC) and urinary diversion using the single-port (SP) robot. The review will trace the historical progression from open surgery to the introduction of minimally invasive approaches and present an in-depth description of the SIRC technique, offering a step-by-step guide for reference. Emphasis will be placed on indications and patient selection criteria to equip surgeons with well-rounded insights for decision-making.

METHODS

The review analyzes preliminary surgical outcomes by drawing from existing literature and clinical experiences, endeavoring to present a balanced view of the potential benefits and limitations. Addressing the learning curve and training prerequisites is paramount, and this review explores strategies and challenges in preparing surgeons for proficiency. Finally, the focus shifts to current challenges and future directions, identifying key issues and potential advancements in the field.

CONCLUSIONS

By presenting historical context, technical insights, clinical evidence, and strategic foresight, the review aims to provide a comprehensive resource that engages surgeons, researchers, and trainees from diverse perspectives.

Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port (SP) versus multi-port (MP) robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries.

METHODS

A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA criteria for primary outcomes of interest, and quality assessment followed AMSTAR. Four databases were systematically searched: Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search time range is from database creation to December 2022. Stata16 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 17 studies involving 5015 patients. In urological surgeries, single-port robotics had shorter length of stay (WMD = - 0.63, 95% Cl [- 1.06, - 0.21], P < 0.05), less estimated blood loss (WMD = - 19.56, 95% Cl [- 32.21, - 6.91], P < 0.05), less lymph node yields (WMD = - 3.35, 95% Cl [- 5.16, - 1.55], P < 0.05), less postoperative opioid use (WMD = - 5.86, 95% Cl [- 8.83, - 2.88], P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, positive margins rate, overall complications rate, and major complications rate.

CONCLUSION

Single-port robotics appears to have similar perioperative outcomes to multi-port robotics in urological surgery. In radical prostatectomy, single-port robotics has shown some advantages, but the specific suitability of single-port robots for urological surgical types needs to be further explored.

Preliminary Surgical Outcomes After Single Incision Robotic Cystectomy (SIRC)

OBJECTIVE

To report the preliminary surgical outcomes for single incision robotic cystectomy (SIRC). Robotic cystectomy is associated with low utilization rates of orthotopic neobladders due to challenges related to intracorporeal sowing and configuration. A new technique that shortens the learning curve and reduces the incisional footprint may improve outcomes and lead to greater utilization of neobladders.

METHODS

Patients undergoing SIRC using the Da Vinci Single Port (SP) robot between March 2021 and March 2022 are included in this retrospective study. We report 30-day perioperative outcomes and test the hypothesis that patients undergoing SIRC have lower analgesic requirements by comparing them to a cohort of patients for whom SIRC was attempted but converted to open during the study period.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent SIRC, with 17 (41%) patients undergoing conversion to open. Of the SIRC patients, 50% underwent orthotopic neobladder reconstruction, and 13% underwent concomitant nephroureterectomy or urethrectomy. The median operative time was 480 minutes, and the median length of hospitalization was 7 days. Seventeen percent required readmission to the hospital, 17% developed small bowel obstruction or ileus, and 13% required a blood transfusion. With respect to analgesic requirements, there were no differences in the median morphine milligram equivalents between the 2 cohorts (SIRC: 81.4; converted: 77.0; P = .64).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that SIRC is safe and feasible with a high neobladder utilization rate. Wider adoption of this technique may lead to greater utilization of neobladders for patients undergoing robotic cystectomy.