Shaved Cartilage Gel Versus Diced Cartilage on Final Dorsal Camouflage: Prospective Study of 200 Patients

Rib Plaster: A Versatile, Moldable Derivative from Scraping the Periphery of the Rib

SUMMARY

A simple technique is described for obtaining rib plaster by scraping the whitish peripheral portion of residual segments of rib after the perichondrium is removed and appropriate multiple laminations are derived. This putty-like substance tends to conglomerate appropriately because of its high density and has unique properties. It is readily compacted into diced cartilage inserters, smoothly injected, and easy to mold. Rib plaster works well for camouflage of irregularities of the dorsum and tip as well as in mild augmentation. It adds no further cost, and is in adequate supply once a full-thickness rib segment has been harvested for secondary rhinoplasty.

Utilization and efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin in otolaryngology: a systematic evidence-based review

PURPOSE

To explore utilization and efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in different sub-specialties of otolaryngology.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Clinicaltrials.gov, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to March 2024. English language randomized controlled trials with original data evaluating the use of PRP and PRF in various surgical and non-surgical procedures related to otolaryngologic sub-specialties. Dataset was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to have the best quality of evidence and possible recommendation.

RESULTS

Our database search resulted in 591 manuscripts. Four hundred twenty-six studies were primarily excluded after reviewing the title and abstract. The remaining 165 articles were studied completely, and 51 articles met the inclusion criteria. All the studies were RCTs and dated from 2001 to 2024. They included 19 studies related to otology, 10 studies related to rhinology, 7 studies related to facial plastic surgery, 6 studies related to head and neck surgery, 3 studies related to general otolaryngology, 3 studies related to pediatrics, 2 studies related to laryngology, and 1 study related to sleep medicine.

CONCLUSION

PRP and PRF are safe, easy to use, and potentially effective treatment options for multiple otolaryngology pathologies. As an autologous material, there is no risk of immune reaction, and thus has been selected as a viable treatment option by many otolaryngologists. Larger studies would be helpful to confirm efficacy and allow for optimized patient selection for this treatment option.

Clinical Benefits of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Aesthetic Outcome Assessment in Rhinoplasty: An Update

Presently, there is no consensus on which patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) instrument is best suited to assess the aesthetic outcomes of rhinoplasty. In this regard, at least seven different validated PROMs are available from the literature, each one with advantages and disadvantages.In this article, we review the development, validation, international translation, and clinical application of the Utrecht Questionnaire (UQ). The UQ was developed in 2009 with the idea to be a short and practical tool for the rhinoplasty surgeon to assess the aesthetic outcomes of rhinoplasty. The questionnaire was then validated in 2013. Body image in relation to nasal appearance is quantified with five simple questions on a 5-point Likert scale and a Visual Analogue Scale score. We discuss how the UQ can easily be incorporated and become an important asset in a rhinoplasty practice. Practical benefits, such as its role in the shared decision-making process, patient expectations management, identification of unsuitable patients, avoiding revision surgery, and the evaluation of the surgeon's personal performance curve, are exemplified. Currently, the UQ has been translated and validated in four languages, providing scientific opportunities to generate and compare international data for advances in rhinoplasty. We describe some of the significant scientific contributions of leaders in the field of rhinoplasty that used the UQ.

Complications of Diced Cartilage Wrapped in Blood Products in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Diced cartilage wrapped in blood products has been increasingly advocated in rhinoplasty. The complication is a major concern of the procedure. This meta-analysis aims to assess the complication rates and revision rate of this procedure.

METHODS

All original articles published up to March 2022 were searched through PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Additional articles were added through reference searching. Articles were included for meta-analysis according to inclusion criteria. Data were extracted by 2 individuals independently and the analysis was conducted through Stata 12.0 software (StataCorp., College Station, Texas).

RESULTS

A total of 559 articles were initially found and an additional 1 article was added through reference searching. A total of 11 articles including 469 patients were included for meta-analysis. The results indicated that the total complication rates were 1.2% for irregularity, 0.2% for visibility, 0.7% for deviation, 1% for erythema, and 0% for graft resorption, depression, and infection. The revision rate was 1.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall complication and revision rates of diced cartilage wrapped in blood products in rhinoplasty were relatively low. Considering the limited number of related studies, a larger sample size, long-term follow-up, clear diagnostic criteria, and detailed methods of measurement are expected in further research.

Viability and Stability of Various-Sized Free Diced Cartilage in an Experimental Study

BACKGROUND

Historically, research of diced cartilage for rhinoplasty has mainly explored the efficacy of wrapped materials, with few studies dedicated to various sizes of diced cartilage.

OBJECTIVES

The authors of this study sought to evaluate the viability and stability of various-sized free diced cartilage.

METHODS

The remaining costal cartilage was harvested during rhinoplasties and implanted into subcutaneous pockets on the backs of nude mice: shaved cartilage (group A, n = 8), diced cartilage with a diameter <0.5 mm (group B, n = 8), 0.5 to 1.0 mm (group C, n = 8), and 1.0 to 1.5 mm (group D, n = 8). After 12 weeks, weight and volume retention rates, histopathological examinations, and biomechanical properties were evaluated.

RESULTS

Cartilage grafts in groups A and B showed an obvious loss of contour and severe dispersion. The weight and volume of cartilage graft in group A were significantly decreased (all P < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference, group D (122.8 ± 15.4%) achieved the highest weight retention rate compared with groups B and C (114.6 ± 7.1% and 114.3 ± 10.1%, respectively). Group A showed the most apparent chondrocyte nucleus loss with the least peripheral proliferation, and group D showed the best regeneration potential (all P < 0.05). Group C achieved less chondrocyte nucleus loss than group B (P < 0.05). The compressive elastic modulus increased with the diameter of diced cartilage (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Diced cartilage with a diameter of 1.0 to 1.5 mm may have the highest viability and stability, followed by those of 0.5 to 1.0 mm and <0.5 mm.

Nasal Reconstruction in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Two Decade Review

Background: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) leads to progressive destruction of the nasal tissues resulting varying degrees of saddle deformity and nasal obstruction. Reconstructive techniques are numerous, but there are no large series reporting their results. Objective: This study sought to measure complications and outcomes after rhinoplasty for GPA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 42 patients with GPA who underwent nasal reconstruction of saddle nose deformity between 2005 and 2019 using primarily costal cartilage and soft tissue grafts. Results: Thirty-six patients met the criteria for inclusion. All were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Six patients required revision surgery due to infection or GPA flare ups. Five patients had complications. All patients were given a questionnaire at 12 months to rate their degree of satisfaction with their appearance and breathing. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the use of strong cartilage grafts and the timing of surgery result in improvement in breathing and appearance after rhinoplasty in patients with GPA. Clinical Trial Registration number: REB # 21-125.

Diced Cartilage Techniques in Rhinoplasty

Diced cartilage has been widely applied in rhinoplasty, especially for segmental dorsal augmentation, with favorable outcomes over time. Various techniques were developed to increase both stability and viability of diced cartilage, including wrappings with non-blood material/blood products and changing the shapes of the diced cartilage, while the optimal technique is inconclusive. This article systematically reviews the current strategies of diced cartilage technique for rhinoplasty in the databases and emphasizes different wrapping materials. Free diced cartilage has a potential risk of gathering in certain regions and causing postoperative irregularities. Among non-blood wrapping materials, Surgicel is now rarely used due to severe foreign body reactions. The obvious drawbacks of fascia are donor site morbidity, inadequate quantity, and time-consuming. Although diced cartilage wrapped in tutoplast-processed fascia lata, AlloDerm, or esterified hyaluronic acid has achieved primary encouraging results, the increased inflammation raised controversies regarding their clinical use. Diced cartilage wrapped with blood products, such as platelet-rich fibrin or concentrated growth factor, achieved long-term reliable aesthetic results, and shaved cartilage and ultra-diced cartilage have recently shown satisfactory clinical outcomes, while further study is still needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .