Outcomes of a Treatment Protocol for Compromised Nasal Skin in Primary and Revision Open Rhinoplasty

Outcome Evaluation of Reconstructive Septorhinoplasty in Patients with a History of Nasal Skin Necrosis

Background: Nasal skin necrosis represents a severe rhinoplasty complication, potentially leading to nasal deformity and psychological distress. Objectives: To assess the safety, nasal function enhancement, and esthetic satisfaction in individuals with a history of nasal skin necrosis following reconstructive septorhinoplasty using patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: The case series included patients who underwent reconstructive septorhinoplasty 1 year after experiencing skin necrosis. Skeletal reconstruction was performed with an open approach using various autografts and techniques. The data collected encompassed demographics, medical history, operative reports, and postoperative events. The Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) was administered preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Results: Most patients were female (35/38, 92%), with median age of 33.5 years (17-57) and 2 prior rhinoplasties (1-5) by 1 surgeon (1-2). The follow-up median was 23.78 months (11.83-54.23). Necrosis predominantly affected the nasal tip and soft tissue triangles. Septorhinoplasty utilized 11 V-shaped columellar base and 27 mid-columella incisions, lasting on average 274 min (175-405). Septal grafts were adequate for reconstruction in only three cases. Autografts for reconstruction encompassed auricular cartilage (31), rib cartilage (22), temporal fascia (14), and rectus fascia (6). SCHNOS scores improved significantly, with the obstruction domain decreasing from a preoperative mean of 75.92 (±22.83) to 34.08 (±27.87) and the cosmesis domain from 85.43 (±19.06) to 39.73 (±23.77). No postoperative severe vascular complication occurred. More previous surgeries linked to decreased patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Reconstructive septorhinoplasty can be successful in restoring relatively normal nasal contour following prior soft tissue necrosis, with limited risk for complications.

A Procedure and Complication-Specific Assessment of Smoking in Aesthetic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The popularity of aesthetic surgery is on the rise, as is patients' expectations towards excellent surgical results. In order to meet these expectations, risk factors that hinder desired outcomes, such as smoking, need to be identified and addressed. To that end, the present study summarizes an updated systematic review focused on the effects of smoking on cosmetic surgical procedures and outcomes. Methods: A systematic review of studies comparing aesthetic surgical outcomes by procedure, between tobacco smokers and non-smokers was carried out, querying PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane databases. Data regarding surgical outcomes were extracted and meta-analyzed by a random effects model in conjunction with the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method. Results: Eighty-two studies were included in the final synthesis. Abdominoplasty/panniculectomy (n = 19 cohorts) and breast reduction (n = 27 cohorts) were the most common types of procedures included in this review. Other than mastopexy and rhinoplasty, smoking conferred a statistically significant increased risk of overall complications for all studied aesthetic procedures. Conclusions: The data demonstrates that smoking is a clear risk factor for the vast majority of aesthetic plastic surgeries studied. Although our meta-analysis suggests that smoking is not a risk factor for complications in mastopexies and rhinoplasties, these two specific analyses may have been biased, and should therefore be re-evaluated with future additional evidence. The results of this systematic review confirm the importance of smoking cessation and education relative to the outcomes of common cosmetic surgical procedures.

Facial Rejuvenation in a Patient With Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis-Treatment Protocol for Compromised Skin Flap

Facial rejuvenation outcomes have not been well studied in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GP)-formerly Wegener granulomatosis. This report highlights a case of a 49-year-old female with a history of GP, presenting with facial aging and functional nasal concerns. The patient underwent facial rejuvenation and nasal reconstruction procedures, including primary open functional rhinoplasty, septal perforation repair with Alloderm, deep-plane rhytidectomy, platysmaplasty, nanofat grafting, and fractionated erbium laser to the face (sparing the nose and peri-incisional areas). Despite a routine operation, postoperative course was complicated by wound healing and vascular congestion issues related to her underlying autoimmune disease. This case highlights the risks associated with postsurgical healing in patients with GP undergoing esthetic surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this report is the first to discuss management considerations in a patient with GP undergoing facial rejuvenation surgery.