Optimized pH Method for DNA Elution from Buccal Cells Collected in Whatman FTA®Cards

Comparison of oral fluid collection methods for the molecular detection of hepatitis B virus

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare the efficiency of four oral fluid collection methods (Salivette, FTA Card, spitting and DNA-Sal) to detect HBV DNA by qualitative PCR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-four individuals (32 HBV reactive and 42 with no HBV markers) donated serum and oral fluid. In-house qualitative PCR to detect HBV was used for both samples and commercial quantitative PCR for serum.

RESULTS

HBV DNA was detected in all serum samples from HBV-infected individuals, and it was not detected in control group. HBV DNA from HBV group was detected in 17 samples collected with Salivette device, 16 samples collected by FTA Card device, 16 samples collected from spitting and 13 samples collected by DNA-Sal device. Samples that corresponded to a higher viral load in their paired serum sample could be detected using all oral fluid collection methods, but Salivette collection device yielded the largest numbers of positive samples and had a wide range of viral load that was detected.

CONCLUSION

It was possible to detect HBV DNA using all devices tested, but higher number of positive samples was observed when samples were collected using Salivette device, which shows high concordance to viral load observed in the paired serum samples.

An optimized method for elution of enteroviral RNA from a cellulose-based substrate

The Flinders Technology Australia (FTA) Elute Card is a commercial product that facilitates the collection, transport, archiving and processing of nucleic acids from a wide variety of biological samples at room temperature. While the cards have been designed so that sterile/deionized water can elute DNA easily, they are not suitable for some less stable RNAs. This study was undertaken to determine the optimal conditions such as the buffer type, buffer pH and incubation temperature for the elution of enteroviral RNA from FTA Elute Cards prior to quantitative analysis using real-time PCR (qPCR) or consensus degenerate hybrid oligonucleotide primer VP1 RT-semi nested PCR (CODEHOP VP1 RT-snPCR). TE-1 (pH 8.0), rather than sterile water, was the best buffer for high efficiency elution of enteroviral RNA at 95°C. However, as the estimated recovery rate of viral RNA eluted from the cards averaged to be only 6.1%, enterovirus assays using FTA elution should be considered qualitative, especially at low virus titers, and therefore the results of the assay should be interpreted carefully.

Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms of interleukins-1β, -6, and -12B with contact lens keratitis susceptibility and severity

PURPOSE

To investigate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-12β are associated with the susceptibility and severity of contact lens-related keratitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case control study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred twelve cases of keratitis and 225 controls were recruited from studies conducted at Moorfields Eye Hospital and in Australia during 2003 through 2005.

METHODS

Buccal swab samples were collected on Whatman FTA cards and were mailed by post for analysis. IL-1β (-31), IL-6 (-174, -572, -597), and IL-12B (3'+1158) genotypes were analyzed with pyrosequencing and analyzed using a regression model for susceptibility (sterile, microbial keratitis, controls) and severity. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The relative risk of developing contact lens-related keratitis and more severe forms of the disease based on allele, genotype, and haplotype associations.

RESULTS

Carriers of IL-6 SNPs were more likely to experience moderate and severe events compared with those with nonmutated genotypes (-174 heterozygous: odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-8.3; homozygous: OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.4-28.4; -174/-597: OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.6-11.0). More severe keratitis and microbial keratitis were less likely to occur in wearers with the nonmutated IL-6 haplotype (severity OR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.7]; microbial OR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.4-0.9]). Wearers carrying an IL-12B SNP had an increased risk of sterile keratitis (OR, 9.7; 95% CI, 1.2-76.9) compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The IL-6 SNPs are known to reduce protein expression of this cytokine and thus ocular immune defense, and carriers of these SNPs were more likely to experience more severe and microbial keratitis, suggesting that IL-6 decreases the severity and susceptibility of contact lens-related keratitis. Carriers of a functional SNP of IL-12B that is known to increase IL-12 expression and stability are more likely to experience sterile keratitis, suggesting that this is associated with the intense inflammatory reaction that occurs in this condition.

Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area

This study compared quantitatively and qualitatively the DNA extracted from buccal cells collected from the upper or lower gutter areas. Buccal cells were collected from the upper (n=15) and lower gutter (n=15) region from 15 volunteers using a special cytobrush (Gentra), totaling 2 collections from each individual. DNA was extracted from the samples according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA obtained was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated by 2 calibrated blind examiners using spectrophotometry and analysis of DNA bands (0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis). Data was statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA (?=0.05). Means and standard derivation (SD) for total DNA yield from the upper and lower gutter area were 12.2 ?g (12.0) and 9.4 ?g (8.5), respectively (p=0.821). There was higher (p<0.05) DNA purity for the upper gutter (1.79; 0.05) when compared to lower gutter area (1.66; 0.10). Regarding to the DNA quality, no differences were observed between the 2 location sites, but all samples showed similar degree of degradation. In conclusion, it would be recommendable that buccal cells for DNA extraction be collected from the upper gutter area in the attempt to increase DNA purity.

Collection of blood, saliva, and buccal cell samples in a pilot study on the Danish nurse cohort: comparison of the response rate and quality of genomic DNA

In this study, we compared the response rates of blood, saliva, and buccal cell samples in a pilot study on the Danish nurse cohort and examined the quantity and quality of the purified genomic DNA. Our data show that only 31% of the requested participants delivered a blood sample, whereas 72%, 80%, and 76% delivered a saliva sample, buccal cell sample via mouth swabs, or buccal cell sample on FTA card, respectively. Analysis of purified genomic DNA by NanoDrop and agarose gel electrophoresis revealed that blood and saliva samples resulted in DNA with the best quality, whereas the DNA quality from buccal cells was low. Genotype and PCR analysis showed that DNA from 100% of the blood samples and 72% to 84% of the saliva samples could be genotyped or amplified, whereas none of the DNA from FTA cards and only 23% of the DNA from mouth swabs could be amplified and none of the DNA from swabs and 94% of the DNA from FTA cards could be genotyped. Our study shows that the response rate of self-collection saliva samples and buccal cell samples were much higher than the response rate of blood samples in our group of Danish nurses. However, only the quality of genomic DNA from saliva samples was comparable with blood samples as accessed by purity, genotyping, and PCR amplification. We conclude that the use of saliva samples is a good alternative to blood samples to obtain genomic DNA of high quality and it will increase the response rate considerably in epidemiologic studies.