1
|
Hamilton JG, Shah IH, Salafia C, Schofield E, Garzon MG, Cadet K, Stadler ZK, Hay JL, Offit K, Robson ME. Development of a novel measure of advanced cancer patients' perceived utility of secondary germline findings from tumor genomic profiling. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100124. [PMID: 37214538 PMCID: PMC10194097 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) can inform advanced cancer patients' treatment decisions, and also reveal secondary germline findings-information about inherited risks for cancer and other disorders. We sought to develop a measure of patient perceptions of the clinical and personal utility of secondary germline findings. Methods We developed a draft survey based on literature and patient interview data (n=40). We evaluated and refined the survey through cognitive interviews with advanced cancer patients who received secondary germline findings from TGP (n=10). The survey was psychometrically validated with data from two independent samples of advanced cancer patients undergoing TGP (total n=349). Results Cognitive interviews offered opportunities for survey refinement and confirmation of its comprehensible nature. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the survey identified 16 items across three subscales with strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.79): perceived utility for others, perceived utility for self and health, and confidence in secondary findings. Conclusion We developed a novel valid scale with promise for measuring advanced cancer patients' perceptions of the utility of secondary germline findings. Innovation We offer a new patient-derived measure of perceived utility of and confidence in secondary germline findings with potential applications for precision oncology research and clinical communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jada G. Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ibrahim H. Shah
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caroline Salafia
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaux Genoff Garzon
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kechna Cadet
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Hay
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E. Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schneider JL, Firemark AJ, Gille S, Davis J, Pawloski PA, Liang SY, Epstein MM, Lowery J, Lu CY, Sharaf RN, Burnett-Hartman AN, Schlieder V, Salvati ZM, Cragun D, Rahm AK, Hunter JE. "Go ahead and screen" - advice to healthcare systems for routine lynch syndrome screening from interviews with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2023; 21:24. [PMID: 37978552 PMCID: PMC10657118 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-023-00270-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer (CRC). Universal tumor screening (UTS) of newly diagnosed CRC cases is recommended to aid in diagnosis of LS and reduce cancer-related morbidity and mortality. However, not all health systems have adopted UTS processes and implementation may be inconsistent due to system and patient-level complexities. METHODS To identify barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improvements of the UTS process from the patient perspective, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with patients recently diagnosed with CRC, but not screened for or aware of LS. Patients were recruited from eight regionally diverse US health systems. Interviews were conducted by telephone, 60-minutes, audio-recorded, and transcribed. An inductive, constant comparative analysis approach was employed. RESULTS: We completed 75 interviews across the eight systems. Most participants were white (79%), about half (52%) were men, and the mean age was 60 years. Most self-reported either no (60%) or minimal (40%) prior awareness of LS. Overall, 96% of patients stated UTS should be a routine standard of care for CRC tumors, consistently citing four primary motivations for wanting to know their LS status and engage in the process for LS identification: "knowledge is power"; "family knowledge"; "prevention and detection"; and "treatment and surveillance." Common concerns pertaining to the process of screening for and identifying LS included: creating anticipatory worry for patients, the potential cost and the accuracy of the genetic test, and possibly having one's health insurance coverage impacted by the LS diagnosis. Patients suggested health systems communicate LS results in-person or by phone from a trained expert in LS; offer proactive verbal and written education about LS, the screening steps, and any follow-up surveillance recommendations; and support patients in communicating their LS screening to any of their blood relatives. CONCLUSION Our qualitative findings demonstrate patients with CRC have a strong desire for healthcare systems to regularly implement and offer UTS. Patients offer key insights for health systems to guide future implementation and optimization of UTS and other LS screening programs and maximize diagnosis of individuals with LS and improve cancer-related surveillance and outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not available: not a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Schneider
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, 97227, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Alison J Firemark
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, 97227, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sara Gille
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, 97227, Portland, OR, USA
| | - James Davis
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, 97227, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Su-Ying Liang
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Mara M Epstein
- Division of Health Systems Science, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Jan Lowery
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Christine Y Lu
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ravi N Sharaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Deborah Cragun
- University of South Florida, 3720 Spectrum Blvd, Suite 304, Tampa, Fl, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Subramonian A, Smith D, Dicks E, Dawson L, Borgaonkar M, Etchegary H. Universal tumor screening for lynch syndrome: perspectives of patients regarding willingness and informed consent. Per Med 2020; 17:373-387. [PMID: 32875945 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Aim: Lynch Syndrome is associated with a significant risk of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and other cancers. Universal tumor screening is a strategy to identify high-risk individuals by testing all CRC tumors for molecular features suggestive of Lynch Syndrome. Patient interest in screening and preferences for consent have been underexplored. Methods: A postal survey was administered to CRC patients in a Canadian province. Results: Most patients (81.4%) were willing to have tumors tested if universal tumor screening were available and were willing to discuss test results with family members and healthcare professionals. The majority (62.6%) preferred informed consent be obtained prior to screening. Conclusion: Patients were supportive of universal screening. They expected consent to be obtained, contrary to current practice across Canada and elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusree Subramonian
- Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada
| | | | - Elizabeth Dicks
- Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada
| | - Lesa Dawson
- Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Health & Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada.,Women's Health and Genetics, Eastern Health, St John's NL, Canada
| | - Mark Borgaonkar
- Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada
| | - Holly Etchegary
- Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drury A, Payne S, Brady AM. Cancer survivorship: Advancing the concept in the context of colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2017; 29:135-147. [PMID: 28720260 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Revised: 06/10/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous conceptualizations of cancer survivorship have focused on heterogeneous cancer survivors, with little consideration of the validity of conclusions for homogeneous tumour groups. This paper aims to examine the concept of cancer survivorship in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD Rodgers' (1989) Evolutionary Method of Concept Analysis guided this study. A systematic search of PUBMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library was conducted in November 2016 to identify studies of CRC survivorship. The Braun and Clarke (2006) framework guided the analysis and interpretation of data extracted from eighty-five publications. RESULTS Similar to general populations of cancer survivors, CRC survivors experience survivorship as an individual, life-changing process, punctuated by uncertainty and a duality of positive and negative outcomes affecting quality of life. However, CRC survivors experience specific concerns arising from the management of their disease. The concept of cancer survivorship has evolved over the past decade as the importance of navigating the healthcare system and its resources, and the constellation of met and unmet needs of cancer survivors are realised. CONCLUSIONS The results highlight core similarities between survivorship in the context of CRC and other tumour groups, but underlines issues specific to CRC survivorship. Communication and support are key issues in survivorship care which may detrimentally affect CRC survivors' well-being if they are inadequately addressed. Healthcare professionals (HCP's) therefore have a duty to ensure cancer survivors' health, information and supportive care needs are met in the aftermath of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Drury
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
| | - Sheila Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Brady
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vindigni SM, Kaz AM. Universal Screening of Colorectal Cancers for Lynch Syndrome: Challenges and Opportunities. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61:969-76. [PMID: 26602911 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3964-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2015] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common heritable colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome, accounting for approximately 3 % of CRC cases in the USA each year. LS results from a genetic mutation in one of the four mismatch repair genes, and clinically LS is associated with CRC and other gastrointestinal and extra-gastrointestinal malignancies. In this review, we describe the various clinical criteria utilized for the identification of LS patients and the inherent flaws with these criteria. We discuss the concept of universal testing for LS in all cases of newly diagnosed CRC, along with the potential benefits and challenges of universal testing. Several studies have shown that universal tumor testing is cost-effective and identifies cases of LS that are missed using traditional clinical criteria, which may result in reduced cancer mortality for probands and their families. Yet the full benefits of universal tumor testing may be limited by the availability and patient acceptance of genetic testing, and by logistical obstacles affecting the implementation of universal testing programs. Lastly, we comment on developing technologies such as massively parallel next-generation sequencing, which permits simultaneous sequencing of multiple genes involved in LS and other inherited colon cancer syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M Vindigni
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356424, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
| | - Andrew M Kaz
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356424, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. .,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, S-111-Gastro, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hunter JE, Zepp JM, Gilmore MJ, Davis JV, Esterberg EJ, Muessig KR, Peterson SK, Syngal S, Acheson LS, Wiesner GL, Reiss JA, Goddard KAB. Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: Assessment of the perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer regarding benefits and barriers. Cancer 2015; 121:3281-9. [PMID: 26036338 PMCID: PMC4560979 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2015] [Revised: 03/12/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome, the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC), has been recommended among all patients newly diagnosed with CRC. However, there is limited literature regarding patient perspectives of tumor screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with CRC who are not selected for screening based on family history criteria. METHODS A total of 145 patients aged 39 to 87 years were administered surveys assessing perceived risk, patient perspectives, and potential benefits of and barriers to tumor screening for Lynch syndrome. Associations between patient‐specific and cancer‐specific factors and survey responses were analyzed. RESULTS The majority of participants perceived their risk of developing Lynch syndrome as being low, with 9 participants (6.2%) anticipating an abnormal screening result. However, most participants endorsed the potential benefits of screening for themselves and their families, with 84.8% endorsing ≥6 benefits and 50.3% endorsing all 8 benefits. Participants also endorsed few potential barriers to screening, with 89.4% endorsing ≤4 of 9 potential barriers. A common barrier was worry about the cost of additional testing and surveillance, which was endorsed by 54.5% of participants. The level of distress associated with tumor screening for Lynch syndrome, which was very low, was not associated with age or CRC stage. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study indicate that patients with CRC overall have a positive attitude toward tumor screening for Lynch syndrome, endorse the benefits of screening, and experience low levels of distress. These findings provide insight into patient attitudes toward tumor screening for Lynch syndrome among unselected patients with CRC to inform educational approaches that assist in patient decision‐making and guide the successful implementation of screening programs. Cancer 2015;121:3281–3289. © 2015 American Cancer Society. In the current study, perspectives among patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer are assessed regarding universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome. The majority of patients appear to have a positive attitude toward screening and endorse the benefits for themselves and their families, whereas potential barriers include concerns over the cost of additional genetic counseling and testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Mari J Gilmore
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - James V Davis
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Kristin R Muessig
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Louise S Acheson
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Reproductive Biology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- Vanderbilt Hereditary Cancer Program, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jacob A Reiss
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reflex testing for Lynch syndrome: if we build it, will they come? Lessons learned from the uptake of clinical genetics services by individuals with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC). Fam Cancer 2015; 13:75-82. [PMID: 24002367 PMCID: PMC3927060 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9677-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this qualitative study was to examine the experience of individuals facing a choice about genetic counselling/testing in the context of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC). Nineteen individuals with newly diagnosed CRC, including 12 individuals who accepted genetic counselling (“acceptors”) and 7 individuals who declined genetic counselling (“refusers”), were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire guide which focused on motivations and barriers experienced in the decision process. Data were analyzed using Karlsson’s Empirical Phenomenological method of data analysis (Karlsson in Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Almgvist and Wiksell International, Stockholm, 1993). Three major themes were identified: facing challenges in health literacy; mapping an unknown territory; and adjusting to cancer. The study participants’ testimonies provided novel insights into potential reasons for patient non-engagement in pilot studies of reflex testing for Lynch syndrome, and allowed us to formulate several recommendations for enhancing patient engagement. Our study findings suggest that patient engagement in clinical cancer genetics services, including reflex testing for Lynch syndrome, can only be achieved by addressing current health literacy issues, by deconstructing current misconceptions related to potential abuses of genetic information, by emphasizing the clinical utility of genetic assessment, and by adapting genetics practices to the specific context of cancer care.
Collapse
|
8
|
Averyt JC, Nishimoto PW. Psychosocial issues in colorectal cancer survivorship: the top ten questions patients may not be asking. J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 5:395-400. [PMID: 25276412 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2014.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in colorectal cancer screening and treatment have increased survivorship significantly in recent years. This has led to an increased emphasis on the need for continuing patient care long after cancer treatment is completed. Colorectal cancer survivors may face a number of psychosocial issues following treatment, including cancer-related distress, adjustment to physical changes following treatment, and challenges related to returning to work. Although there are many resources available to assist with these challenges, many patients may not seek this information from their providers during follow-up care visits. This article highlights some of the most common patient concerns related to survivorship in colorectal cancer and serves as a reminder to ask about these concerns throughout the course of treatment and follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Averyt
- 1 Department of Behavioral Health, 2 Department of Oncology/Hematology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Patricia W Nishimoto
- 1 Department of Behavioral Health, 2 Department of Oncology/Hematology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cohen SA, Leininger A. The genetic basis of Lynch syndrome and its implications for clinical practice and risk management. APPLICATION OF CLINICAL GENETICS 2014; 7:147-58. [PMID: 25161364 PMCID: PMC4142571 DOI: 10.2147/tacg.s51483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary colon cancer, and accounts for as much as 3% of all colon and endometrial cancers. The identification and management of individuals with Lynch syndrome have evolved over the past 20 years, yet the syndrome remains vastly underdiagnosed. It is important for clinicians to recognize individuals and families who are at risk in order to be able to manage them appropriately and reduce their morbidity and mortality from this condition. This review will touch on the history of Lynch syndrome, the current knowledge of genotype–phenotype correlations, the cancers associated with Lynch syndrome, and management of individuals who are gene carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Cohen
- Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment Program, St Vincent Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sweeny K, Ghane A, Legg AM, Huynh HP, Andrews SE. Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:263-88. [PMID: 24719248 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9712-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2013] [Accepted: 03/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing is increasingly available in medical settings and direct-to-consumer. However, the large and growing literature on genetic testing decisions is rife with conflicting findings, inconsistent methodology, and uneven attention across test types and across predictors of genetic testing decisions. Existing reviews of the literature draw broad conclusions but sacrifice nuanced analysis that with a closer look reveals far more inconsistency than homogeny across studies. The goals of this paper are to provide a systematic review of the empirical work on predictors of genetic testing decisions, highlight areas of consistency and inconsistency, and suggest productive directions for future research. We included all studies that provided quantitative analysis of subjective (e.g., perceived risk, perceived benefits of testing) and/or objective (e.g., family history, sociodemographic variables) predictors of genetic testing interest, intentions, or uptake, which produced a sample of 115 studies. From this review, we conclude that self-reported and test-related (as opposed to disorder-related or objective) predictors are relatively consistent across studies but that theoretically-driven efforts to examine testing interest across test types are sorely needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Sweeny
- Department of Psychology, University of California, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA, 92521, USA,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|