DNA methylation biomarkers of stool and blood for early detection of colon cancer

Early Detection of Cancers in the Era of Precision Oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The increasing global incidence of cancer demands innovative cancer detection modalities. The current population-based early cancer detection approaches focus on several major types of cancers (breast, prostate, cervical, lung and colon) at their early stages, however, they generally do not target high-risk individuals at precancerous stages.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some cancers, such as pancreatic cancer, are challenging to detect in their early stages. Therefore, there is a pressing need for improved, accessible, noninvasive, and cost-effective early detection methods. Harnessing cell-free-based biomarker-driven strategies paves a new era of precision diagnosis for multicancer early detection. The majority of these tests are in the early stages and expensive, but these approaches are expected to become cost sensitive in the near future.

SUMMARY

This review provides an overview of early cancer detection strategies, highlighting the methods, challenges, and issues to be addressed to revolutionize and improve global early cancer detection.

Lessons From a Systematic Literature Search on Diagnostic DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer: How to Increase Research Value and Decrease Research Waste?

OBJECTIVES

To improve colorectal cancer (CRC) survival and lower incidence rates, colonoscopy and/or fecal immunochemical test screening are widely implemented. Although candidate DNA methylation biomarkers have been published to improve or complement the fecal immunochemical test, clinical translation is limited. We describe technical and methodological problems encountered after a systematic literature search and provide recommendations to increase (clinical) value and decrease research waste in biomarker research. In addition, we present current evidence for diagnostic CRC DNA methylation biomarkers.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified 331 diagnostic DNA methylation marker studies published before November 2020 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. For 136 bodily fluid studies, extended data extraction was performed. STARD criteria and level of evidence were registered to assess reporting quality and strength for clinical translation.

RESULTS

Our systematic literature search revealed multiple issues that hamper the development of DNA methylation biomarkers for CRC diagnosis, including methodological and technical heterogeneity and lack of validation or clinical translation. For example, clinical translation and independent validation were limited, with 100 of 434 markers (23%) studied in bodily fluids, 3 of 434 markers (0.7%) translated into clinical tests, and independent validation for 92 of 411 tissue markers (22%) and 59 of 100 bodily fluids markers (59%).

DISCUSSION

This systematic literature search revealed that major requirements to develop clinically relevant diagnostic CRC DNA methylation markers are often lacking. To avoid the resulting research waste, clinical needs, intended biomarker use, and independent validation should be better considered before study design. In addition, improved reporting quality would facilitate meta-analysis, thereby increasing the level of evidence and enabling clinical translation.

Relation between expression of hMLH1 and p53 mRNA genes, in the feces of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cross-sectional study

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the main public health problems. The mortality of CRC is about 8%. Early detection of CRC is very important to prevent death because this cancer could be cured through surgery if the diagnosis can be made as early as possible. Therefore screening strategy for early detection of CRC is critical in reducing mortality. Many investigations supporting the detection of CRC have been developed, including the fecal DNA mutation test using advanced cytological techniques. It is capable of assessing colonocytes for the presence of DNA, RNA, and protein as molecular biomarkers of neoplasia in CRC, including p53 and hMLH1. This study implemented observational approach with a cross-sectional study of the feces of patients with CRC regardless of the stage and grade. The purpose of this study was to determine the expression of the hMLH1 and p53 mRNA genes in the feces of 48 patients with CRC from two hospitals in Indonesia, Siloam Hospitals in Cikarang and Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital in Makassar. The results showed that all adenocarcinoma feces samples with various tumor stages and grades had excess mRNA expression (more than twice the normal amount in Fold Change units) for both the hMLH1 and p53 genes. The average expression of the hMLH1 mRNA gene was the highest at stage two and grade one, while the lowest was at stage four and grade three. In contrast, the average p53 mRNA gene expression was the highest at stage four and grade three, while the lowest was at stage two and grade one. The study suggested that there was a relation between and the expression of hMLH1 and p53 mRNA gene. We concluded that while both hMLH1 and p53 genes in patients’ feces with CRC were overexpressed, they did not significantly affect the grade of CRC.

•

Relation of mRNA expression of hMLH1 and p53 gene in colorectal carcinoma patients feces.

•

mRNA expression in feces colorectal carcinoma by RT-PCR examination.

•

Gene hMLH1 and p53 in feces colorectal carcinoma patients.

Bioinformatics analysis of methylation in cervical adenocarcinoma in Xinjiang, China

This study is to investigate the genomic methylation in cervical adenocarcinoma in Xinjiang, China, using the DNA methylation analysis chips.Methylation of 5 cases of cervical adenocarcinoma tissues and 5 cases of normal cervical tissues were analyzed by the Illumina 850K methylation chip. The genes with abnormal methylation modification were screened out and analyzed by the gene ontology (GO) functional annotation analysis. Enrichment analysis of kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) signal transduction pathways was also performed.Totally 4056 sites showed differential expression patterns in cervical adenocarcinoma tissues compared to normal cervical tissues, of which 3738 were hypermethylated, and 318 were hypomethylated. The distribution of these sites covered from the 1st to 22nd chromosomes. GO functional annotation analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes in cervical adenocarcinoma tissues were mainly involved in the processes of tumor growth, development, metabolism, ion transport, transcriptional regulation, cell division, cell cycle regulation, and signal transduction. KEGG signaling pathway analysis showed that the most significantly different signaling pathway was the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction. Gene-net-work analysis suggested that CCND1, CTNNB1, MAPK10, and PRKCA were involved.Methylated genes are specifically expressed in cervical adenocarcinoma tissues in Xinjiang, China. Four of these genes (CCND1, CTNNB1, MAPK10, and PRKCA) with differential expression patterns may play important regulatory roles in cervical adenocarcinoma development through affecting the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction.

Aflatoxin B1-induced epigenetic alterations: An overview

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is widely distributed in nature, especially in a variety of food commodities. It is confirmed to be the most toxic of all the aflatoxins. The toxicity of AFB1 has been well investigated, and it may result in severe health problems including carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, growth retardation, and immune suppression. Epigenetic modifications including DNA methylation, histone modifications and regulation of non-coding RNA play an important role in AFB1-induced disease and carcinogenesis. To better understand the evidence for AFB1-induced epigenetic alterations and the potential mechanisms of the toxicity of AFB1, we conducted a review of published studies of AFB1-induced epigenetic alterations.

Case-control study of candidate gene methylation and adenomatous polyp formation

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common and preventable forms of cancer but remains the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Colorectal adenomas are precursor lesions that develop in 70-90 % of CRC cases. Identification of peripheral biomarkers for adenomas would help to enhance screening efforts. This exploratory study examined the methylation status of 20 candidate markers in peripheral blood leukocytes and their association with adenoma formation.

METHODS

Patients recruited from a local endoscopy clinic provided informed consent and completed an interview to ascertain demographic, lifestyle, and adenoma risk factors. Cases were individuals with a histopathologically confirmed adenoma, and controls included patients with a normal colonoscopy or those with histopathological findings not requiring heightened surveillance (normal biopsy, hyperplastic polyp). Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was used to characterize candidate gene promoter methylation. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using unconditional multivariable logistic regression to test the hypothesis that candidate gene methylation differed between cases and controls, after adjustment for confounders.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 107 participants; 36 % had adenomas (men 40 %, women 31 %). Hypomethylation of the MINT1 locus (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.0-28.2) and the PER1 (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.7) and PER3 (OR 11.6, 95% CI 1.6-78.5) clock gene promoters was more common among adenoma cases. While specificity was moderate to high for the three markers (71-97 %), sensitivity was relatively low (18-45 %).

CONCLUSION

Follow-up of these epigenetic markers is suggested to further evaluate their utility for adenoma screening or surveillance.

Epigenetic Determinants of Cancer

SUMMARYEpigenetic changes are present in all human cancers and are now known to cooperate with genetic alterations to drive the cancer phenotype. These changes involve DNA methylation, histone modifiers and readers, chromatin remodelers, microRNAs, and other components of chromatin. Cancer genetics and epigenetics are inextricably linked in generating the malignant phenotype; epigenetic changes can cause mutations in genes, and, conversely, mutations are frequently observed in genes that modify the epigenome. Epigenetic therapies, in which the goal is to reverse these changes, are now one standard of care for a preleukemic disorder and form of lymphoma. The application of epigenetic therapies in the treatment of solid tumors is also emerging as a viable therapeutic route.

DNA Methyltransferase Activity Assays: Advances and Challenges

DNA methyltransferases (MTases), a family of enzymes that catalyse the methylation of DNA, have a profound effect on gene regulation. A large body of evidence has indicated that DNA MTase is potentially a predictive biomarker closely associated with genetic disorders and genetic diseases like cancer. Given the attention bestowed onto DNA MTases in molecular biology and medicine, highly sensitive detection of DNA MTase activity is essential in determining gene regulation, epigenetic modification, clinical diagnosis and therapeutics. Conventional techniques such as isotope labelling are effective, but they often require laborious sample preparation, isotope labelling, sophisticated equipment and large amounts of DNA, rendering them unsuitable for uses at point-of-care. Simple, portable, highly sensitive and low-cost assays are urgently needed for DNA MTase activity screening. In most recent technological advances, many alternative DNA MTase activity assays such as fluorescent, electrochemical, colorimetric and chemiluminescent assays have been proposed. In addition, many of them are coupled with nanomaterials and/or enzymes to significantly enhance their sensitivity. Herein we review the progress in the development of DNA MTase activity assays with an emphasis on assay mechanism and performance with some discussion on challenges and perspectives. It is hoped that this article will provide a broad coverage of DNA MTase activity assays and their latest developments and open new perspectives toward the development of DNA MTase activity assays with much improved performance for uses in molecular biology and clinical practice.

MGMT-B gene promoter hypermethylation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease - a novel finding

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a disease strongly associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) as a well-known precancerous condition. Alterations in DNA methylation and mutation in K-ras are believed to play an early etiopathogenic role in CRC and may also an initiating event through deregulation of molecular signaling. Epigenetic silencing of APC and SFRP2 in the WNT signaling pathway may also be involved in IBD-CRC. The role of aberrant DNA methylation in precancerous state of colorectal cancer (CRC) is under intensive investigation worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the status of promoter methylation of MGMT-B, APC1A and SFRP2 genes, in inflamed and normal colon tissues of patients with IBD compared with control normal tissues. A total of 52 IBD tissues as well as corresponding normal tissues and 30 samples from healthy participants were obtained. We determined promoter methylation status of MGMT-B, SFRP2 and APC1A genes by chemical treatment with sodium bisulfite and subsequent MSP. The most frequently methylated locus was MGMT-B (71%; 34 of 48), followed by SFRP2 (66.6 %; 32 of 48), and APC1A (43.7%; 21 of 48). Our study demonstrated for the first time that hypermethylation of the MGMT-B and the SFRP2 gene promoter regions might be involved in IBD development. Methylation of MGMT-B and SFRP2 in IBD patients may provide a method for early detection of IBD-associated neoplasia.

Base resolution methylome profiling: considerations in platform selection, data preprocessing and analysis

Bisulfite treatment-based methylation microarray (mainly Illumina 450K Infinium array) and next-generation sequencing (reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, Agilent SureSelect Human Methyl-Seq, NimbleGen SeqCap Epi CpGiant or whole-genome bisulfite sequencing) are commonly used for base resolution DNA methylome research. Although multiple tools and methods have been developed and used for the data preprocessing and analysis, confusions remains for these platforms including how and whether the 450k array should be normalized; which platform should be used to better fit researchers' needs; and which statistical models would be more appropriate for differential methylation analysis. This review presents the commonly used platforms and compares the pros and cons of each in methylome profiling. We then discuss approaches to study design, data normalization, bias correction and model selection for differentially methylated individual CpGs and regions.

Validation of methylation biomarkers that distinguish normal colon mucosa of cancer patients from normal colon mucosa of patients without cancer

We have validated differences in DNA methylation levels of candidate genes previously reported to discriminate between normal colon mucosa of patients with colon cancer and normal colon mucosa of individuals without cancer. Here, we report that CpG sites in 16 of the 30 candidate genes selected show significant differences in mean methylation level in normal colon mucosa of 24 patients with cancer and 24 controls. A support vector machine trained on these data and data for an additional 66 CpGs yielded an 18-gene signature, composed of ten of the validated candidate genes plus eight additional candidates. This model exhibited 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity in a 40-sample training set and classified all eight samples in the test set correctly. Moreover, we found a moderate-strong correlation (Pearson coefficients r = 0.253-0.722) between methylation levels in colon mucosa and methylation levels in peripheral blood for seven of the 18 genes in the support vector model. These seven genes, alone, classified 44 of the 48 patients in the validation set correctly and five CpGs selected from only two of the seven genes classified 41 of the 48 patients in the discovery set correctly. These results suggest that methylation biomarkers may be developed that will, at minimum, serve as useful objective and quantitative diagnostic complements to colonoscopy as a cancer-screening tool. These data also suggest that it may be possible to monitor biomarker methylation levels in tissues collected much less invasively than by colonoscopy.

Role of CDH1 promoter methylation in colorectal carcinogenesis: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the role of CDH1 promoter methylation in colorectal carcinogenesis. The PubMed, CISCOM, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, and CBM databases were searched for relevant articles published before November 1st, 2013 without any language restrictions. Meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Nine clinical cohort studies met all our inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. A total of 883 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were assessed. Our meta-analysis results revealed that the frequencies of CDH1 promoter methylation in CRC tissues were higher than those in control tissues (OR=2.61, 95% CI=1.24-5.50, p=0.012). A subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed that CDH1 promoter methylation was closely linked to the pathogenesis of CRC among Asians and Africans (Asians: OR=2.90, 95% CI=1.26-6.67, p=0.012; Africans: OR=3.81, 95% CI=1.56-9.34, p=0.003; respectively), but not among Caucasians (OR=1.68, 95% CI=0.24-11.72, p=0.598). A further subgroup analysis by type of control tissues suggested that CRC tissues also exhibited higher frequencies of CDH1 promoter methylation than those of normal and adjacent tissues (normal: OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.12-2.21, p=0.009; adjacent: OR=5.07, 95% CI=2.91-8.82, p<0.001; respectively). However, we found no evidence for any significant difference in the frequencies of CDH1 promoter methylation between CRC tissues and adenomas tissues (OR=1.18, 95% CI=0.74-1.90, p=0.485). Our findings provide empirical evidence that CDH1 promoter methylation may play an important role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Thus, CDH1 promoter methylation may be a useful biomarker for the early diagnosis of CRC.

Relationship between methylation of tumor suppressor genes and colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is ranked third both in incidence and mortality rate among malignant tumor diseases worldwide, posing a serious threat to human health. The improvement of people's living standards and changes in dietary habits and structure have led to a rapid increase in the incidence and mortality rate of colorectal cancer. The methylation of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) participates in the genesis and progression of colorectal cancer and has become a hotspot in colorectal cancer research in recent years. Elucidation of the clinical significance of methylation of TSG can be helpful in the early screening and diagnosis, recurrence and metastasis monitoring, effective treatment, and evaluation of prognosis of this malignancy. This article reviews the recent progress in understanding the relationship between TSG methylation and colorectal cancer.

Relative defects in mucosal immunity predict acute graft-versus-host disease

Impairment of gut mucosal immunity by the transplant process could facilitate translocation of commensal bacteria and thereby augment the graft-versus-host response. To begin to assess the influence of gut mucosal immunity on the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), we conducted a prospective study in 24 pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, assessing 4 fecal markers of mucosal immunity: calprotectin, soluble CD8 (sCD8), soluble intracellular adhesion molecule 1, and β-defensin-2. Stool samples were collected prospectively on transplant days 0, +5, +10, and +15 and analyzed by ELISA. Lower levels on day +5 (calprotectin and β-defensin-2) and day +10 (calprotectin, β-defensin-2, and sCD8) were associated with subsequent acute GVHD. The most striking difference was with calprotectin on day +10. Patients with levels below 424 mg/kg had an incidence of 77.8%, whereas those with levels above this threshold had a cumulative incidence of 0% (P = .002). Relative defects in gut mucosal immunity may be important in the pathogenesis of acute GVHD.