Bacterial Identification and Visualization of Bacterial Biofilms Adjacent to Fracture Sites After Internal Fixation

Secondary Bony Defects after Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Limb-Threatening Lower Extremity Injuries: Does the Approach to Flap Elevation Matter?

BACKGROUND

 Limb-threatening lower extremity injuries often require secondary bone grafting after soft tissue reconstruction. We hypothesized that there would be fewer wound complications when performing secondary bone grafting via a remote surgical approach rather than direct flap elevation.

METHODS

 A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single Level 1 trauma center comparing complications after secondary bone grafting in patients who had undergone previous soft tissue reconstruction after open tibia fractures between 2006 and 2020. Comparing bone grafting via a remote surgical incision versus direct flap elevation, we evaluated wound dehiscence requiring return to the operating room as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were deep infection and delayed amputation.

RESULTS

 We identified 129 patients (mean age: 40 years, 82% male) with 159 secondary bone grafting procedures. Secondary bone grafting was performed via a remote surgical approach in 54% (n = 86) and direct flap elevation in 46% (n = 73) of cases. Wound dehiscence requiring return to the operating room occurred in one patient in the flap elevation group (1%) and none of the patients in the remote surgical approach. The odds of deep wound infection (OR, 1.77; p = 0.31) or amputation (OR, 1.43; p = 0.73) did not significantly differ between surgical approaches. No significant differences were found in complications between the reconstructive surgeon elevating and re-insetting the flap and the orthopaedic trauma surgeon performing the flap elevation and re-inset.

CONCLUSION

 Direct flap elevation for secondary bone grafting after soft tissue reconstruction for open tibia fractures did not result in more complications than bone grafting via a remote surgical approach. These findings should reassure surgeons to allow other clinical factors to influence the surgical approach for bone grafting.

Implant surface culture may be a useful adjunct to standard tissue sampling culture for identification of pathogens accounting for fracture-device-related infection: a within-person randomized agreement study of 42 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Identification of pathogens causing fracture-device-related infection (FDRI) is always a challenge as the positive rate of standard tissue sampling culture (TSC) remains unsatisfactory. This study evaluates the efficiency of implant surface culture (ISC) as an adjunct to standard TSC for identification of FDRI-associated microorganisms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 2020 and March 2022, patients diagnosed with FDRI defined by the International Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) Consensus Group, and indicated for implant removal, underwent both methods for bacteria detection. The test order of ISC and TSC was randomly selected for each patient included, as a within-person randomized design. For ISC, the recovered implants were gently covered with tryptic soy agar after rinsing with normal saline twice, and then incubated at 37℃ 5% CO2 for up to 14 days. For TSC, 5 specimens were sampled and sent to the Clinical Laboratory of Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, for culture and identification.

RESULTS

42 consecutive patients were included, with a mean age of 46 years. The most frequent infection site and implant type were the tibia (21 cases) and plates with screws (30 cases), respectively. Altogether 21 patients were found with positive outcomes by both methods, and the identified pathogens were consistent. ISC found an additional 15 patients showing positive results, which were negative by TSC. Furthermore, the mean culture time of ISC was shorter than that of TSC (1.5 days vs. 3.2 days).

INTERPRETATION

ISC may be a useful adjunct to TSC for detection of bacteria causing FDRI, with a relatively higher positive rate and a shorter culture time.

The Presence of Biofilms in Instrumented Spinal Fusions

Study Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Objective: To determine whether biofilms exist on spinal instrumentation recovered during revision surgery in which microbial cultures were negative. Background: Biofilm bacteria are extremely difficult to detect by conventional culture methods used in the standard hospital setting. Chronic infections in which bacteria form biofilms have been demonstrated to slow healing and prevent bony fusion. These slime encased microbial communities serve to isolate the bacteria from the body's immune responses, while simultaneously providing metabolic resistance to antimicrobial therapy. Methods: Traditional debridement wound cultures were taken from each specimen and sent for microbiological analyses. Bacterial DNA testing was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Based on the PCR/ESI-MS results, specific crossed immune electrophoresis was used to detect the bacterial species within biofilms observed on the removed instrumentation. In addition, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probes corresponding to the bacterial species identified by PCR/ESI-MS were used with confocal microscopy to visualize and confirm the infecting bacteria. Results: Fifteen patients presented for surgical revision of thoracolumbar spinal implantation: four for clinical suspicion of infection, six for adjacent segment disease (ASD), one with ASD and pseudoarthrosis (PA), three with PA, and one for pain. Infections were confirmed with PCR/ESI-MS for all four patients who presented with clinical infection, and for five of the patients for whom infection was not clinically suspected. Of the presumed non-infected implants, 50% demonstrated the presence of infectious biofilms. Half of the revisions due to pseudoarthrosis were shown to harbour biofilms. The revisions that were performed for pain demonstrated robust biofilms but did not grow bacteria on traditional culture media. Conclusions: Culture is inadequate as a diagnostic modality to detect indolent/subclinical biofilm infections of spinal instrumentation. The PCR/ESI-MS results for bacterial detection were confirmed using species-specific microscopic techniques for both bacterial nucleic acids and antigens. Biofilms may contribute to pseudoarthrosis and back pain in postoperative wounds otherwise considered sterile.