Should We Manage Large Ovarian Cysts Laparoscopically?

A method of laparoscopic treatment of large adnexal cysts - Two port trocar suction

OBJECTIVE

The size of the adnexal cyst is a limitation to perform laparoscopic adnexal surgery. Large adnexal cysts may constrain the surgery space and may increase the risk of inadvertent cyst rupture during the surgery. Here, we offer a method to solve the difficulty in laparoscopic management of large adnexal cysts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 43 patients with large (≧10 cm) adnexal cysts, managed laparoscopically at one center from October 2016 to October 2019. All the surgeries were performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Malignancy was excluded before the surgeries according to the sonographic features. Cystectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy was decided according to the age, the sonographic pattern of the cyst and the patients' willingness. A 2 cm vertical incision was made at the umbilicus, and an open laparoscopy method was used to enter the peritoneal cavity. A wound protector was applied with a glove and two trocars being set up. The second wound was made at the left abdomen, and a 5 mm trocar was inserted. Then the cyst was punctured by means of the 5 mm trocar, and the content of the cyst was then soon aspirated by means of the air-flow hole of the trocar. Afterward, cystectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation unless stated otherwise.

RESULTS

The mean operative duration was 54.7 ± 33.4 min, and the result was shorter than the previous study (P < 0.05, CI (-32.92, -12.38)) according to one sample t-test. Most estimated blood loss (EBL) was minimum. No obvious complication was found.

CONCLUSION

Two-port trocar suction in laparoscopic management of large adnexal cysts is feasible after proper evaluation, and it takes short operative time.

Surgical treatment of large adnexal masses: a retrospective analysis of 330 consecutive cases

Introduction: In the present study, perioperative outcomes of laparoscopy (LPS) were compared to open surgery (OS) for the treatment of large adnexal masses (AM).Material and methods: Retrospective observational cohort study. Data of consecutive patients who underwent ovarian cystectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy for large AM (diameter ≥10 cm) at a referral minimally invasive gynecologic center were analyzed. Propensity score match (PSM) analysis was used to minimize covariate imbalances between the two groups.Results: Overall 330 patients, 285 (86.4%) LPSs and 45 (13.6%) OSs were included. PSM showed LPS (vs. OS) to be associated with less intraoperative blood loss (mL: 131.1 ± 52.6 vs. 545.5 ± 101.2; p = .007), shorter operative time (min: 84.8 ± 77.9 vs. 123.7 ± 70.1; p < .001), but higher rate of spillage (54.5% vs. 12.1%; p < .001). Among the LPS group, a positive correlation between AM size and both conversion to open surgery and need for mini-laparotomy was found (p < .05).Conclusions: An accurate patient selection, a dedicated workup, and an appropriate counselling are mandatory before LPS for large AM. The increased risks of intraoperative spillage associated with the minimally invasive approach should be acknowledged.