Aerosolized Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Infections

Comparison of inhalation toxicity studies of gentamicin in rats and dogs

Nebulized gentamicin solution was administered to rats (nose-only) and dogs (face mask) for 14 days with a 14-day recovery period. Control groups of each were exposed to saline aerosols. Mean estimated inhaled lung doses of gentamicin were 39, 123 and 245 mg/kg for rats (deposited doses 6, 17 and 34 mg/kg) over 30, 90 and 180 min, respectively. Since dogs do not tolerate exposures as long as rats, inhaled lung doses were limited to 7, 14 and 41 mg/kg (deposited doses of 1, 3 and 8 mg/kg) over 15, 30 and 60 min. Comparable doses were achieved at the low dose for rats and high dose for dogs. Serum AUCs (14 ± 2 µg/mL h (mean ± SD) at 6 mg/kg in rats and 11 ± 7 µg/mL h at 8 mg/kg in dogs) showed comparable exposure between the two, implying similar absorbed doses and confirming similar deposited lung doses. Rat exposures resulted in dose-related lung pathology (including low dose) manifested as upper respiratory tract irritant reactions with alveolar histiocytosis, inflammation, airway epithelial metaplasia and lymphomegaly in lung tissue. This was associated with high lung tissue gentamicin levels 24 h post-dose on Day 14 (375 ± 33 µg/g at deposited dose of 6 mg/kg). Dose-related kidney tubular necrosis (a well-known toxicity of parenteral gentamicin) was observed, but no test-article related effects on lung histopathology in dogs (even at highest deposited dose of 8 mg/kg) and low levels of lung tissue gentamicin (42 ± 11 µg/g) 24 h post-dose on Day 14.

Safety of inhaled proteins for therapeutic use

The use of the inhalation route for delivery of inhaled proteins has received increasing attention recently. The purpose of this article is to review the available information related to the safety aspects of inhaled proteins. The review focuses primarily on possible toxicity to the respiratory tract, because usually one is either considering an agent to treat the lung or an agent for which the systemic toxicity has been investigated following subcutaneous (s.c.) administration in its clinical use as a therapeutic agent. Some background is provided on mechanisms of absorption and reasons why inhalation delivery is considered for many proteins. Available data are summarized from clinical trials of proteins and protein-like biomolecules, generally showing minimal, if any, adverse respiratory effects. The results of the animal toxicology studies that have been published are presented. In general, the observed lung toxicity has been relatively low, and it has been difficult to interpret in cases where the animal protein differs considerably from the human protein. Discussion is presented on the possibility of adverse immune reactions, suggesting that this is not likely to be any greater issue than it is for subcutaneously injected materials. Although the safety information is relatively sparse at present, the available data suggest that the inhalation route can be an attractive route to consider for many therapeutic proteins.

Toxicologic testing of inhaled pharmaceutical aerosols

This paper reviews technical issues related to the toxicologic testing of inhaled pharmaceuticals. Although there are commonalities between approaches to general and inhalation toxicity testing, there also are specific challenges in the toxicity testing of inhaled pharmaceuticals. A major issue is that of dose; inhaled dose is more difficult to determine than intravenous or oral doses. Also, it is harder to relate dose in laboratory animals to that in man for inhalation exposure than for other routes of administration. Additionally, in the case of inhaled pharmaceuticals, people generally inhale through the mouth, whereas most laboratory animals inhale primarily through the nose. This presents significant challenges in exposure methodology and technology that often need innovative approaches involving alteration to particle size of the agent or dosing procedure. Because the respiratory tract is the site of deposition, local respiratory toxicity and possible damage to lung cells need to be assessed. Systemic toxicity also needs to be evaluated and may be an issue in some cases. Special studies on pulmonary function, mucociliary clearance, or immune response may be needed, depending on the nature of the inhaled pharmaceutical. This review explores the main issues involved in toxicity testing of inhaled pharmaceuticals, the approaches that have been used, and the current and future challenges.

Aerosols for systemic treatment

The development of a new group of drugs (polypeptides) have recently increased the interest of alternative administration to the enteral route because of its proteolytic activity and the catabolism of the "first-pass effect." Aside from the "needle," the administration in the respiratory tract via aerosol is the method with the best efficiency. But several problems prohibited its spreading: (1) the accuracy and the reproducibility of the inhaled dose (range ca. 1:4); (2) the small amount of inhaled drug in relation to the dose in the aerosol delivery system (range ca. 1%-10%); (3) the fear of allergic reactions of the respiratory system; (4) the variability of the drug transport into the systemic circulation. New approaches and data raise hopes in reducing the problems: (1) aerosol delivery systems with defined particle spectrum and storage systems; slow vital capacity inhaling maneuver; (2) delivery systems that nebulizes nearly the total amount of drug; (3) all studies with the inhalation application of insulin, heparin, ergotamin, ribavirin, aminoglycosides, and "cigarette smoke" do not reveal any relevant allergic reaction; (4) many studies were performed in the last 10 years on the influence of substances and especially of diseases on the transport of molecules through the respiratory tract. Only a few of them are relevant (exogen allergic alveolitis, active sarcoidosis, active smoking). Aerosols for (exogen allergic alveolitis, active sarcoidosis, active smoking). Aerosols for systemic drug treatment seems to be a gained alternative to the "syringe."