In vitro Performance of Plastic Spacer Devices

Clinical Considerations in the Use of Inhalation Delivery Devices

Medications delivered through oral inhalation represent the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Several options exist as methods of delivering aerosols to the lung, including metered-dose inhalers, metered-dose inhalers attached to spacers or valved holding chambers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulizers. Delivery of aerosols to the lung is affected by numerous factors including characteristics of aerosol particles, patients’ ventilatory patterns, and physical condition of the lung. It has become increasingly clear that the device used to deliver the medication is an important factor in the extent of deposition and the ultimate therapeutic effect. Further, the same therapeutic agent may exhibit differing effects depending on which delivery device is used. Each inhalation device has specific instructions for use, and the techniques for use vary significantly among the available products. In each case, patients should be instructed and observed to ensure that they have the proper technique of use to achieve an optimal effect.

Electrostatics of pharmaceutical inhalation aerosols

Objectives

This review focuses on the key findings and developments in the rapidly expanding research area of pharmaceutical aerosol electrostatics.

Key findings

Data from limited in-vivo and computational studies suggest that charges may potentially affect particle deposition in the airways. Charging occurs naturally in the absence of electric fields through triboelectrification, that is contact or friction for solids and flowing or spraying for liquids. Thus, particles and droplets emitted from pulmonary drug delivery devices (dry powder inhalers, metered dose inhalers with or without spacers, and nebulisers) are inherently charged. Apparatus with various operation principles have been employed in the measurement of pharmaceutical charges. Aerosol charges are dependent on many physicochemical parameters, such as formulation composition, device construction, relative humidity and solid-state properties. In some devices, electrification has been purposefully applied to facilitate powder dispersion and liquid atomisation.

Summary

Currently, there are no regulatory requirements on characterising electrostatic properties of inhalation aerosols. As research in this area progresses, the new knowledge gained may become valuable for the development and regulation of inhalation aerosol products.

Relative lung and systemic bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate inhaled products using urinary drug excretion post inhalation

The relative lung and systemic bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate following inhalation by different methods have been determined using a urinary excretion pharmacokinetic method. On three separate randomised study days, 7 days apart, subjects inhaled (i) 4x5 mg from an Intal metered dose inhaler (MDI), (ii) 4x5 mg from an MDI attached to a large volume spacer (MDI+SP) and (iii) 20 mg from an Intal Spinhaler (DPI). Urine samples were provided at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 24 h post dose. The mean (S.D.) amount of sodium cromoglycate excreted in the urine during the first 30 min post inhalation was 38.1 (27.5), 222.3 (120.3) and 133.1 (92.2) microg following MDI, MDI+SP and DPI, respectively. The mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of these amounts excreted in the urine over the first 30 min for MDI+SP vs. MDI, DPI vs. MDI and MDI+SP vs. DPI was 801.0 (358.0, 1244; p<0.002)%, 457.0 (244.0, 670.0; p<0.02)% and 262.4 (110.2, 414.5)%, respectively. Similarly for the 24 h cumulative amount of sodium cromoglycate excreted over the 24 h post inhalation the ratios were 375.4 (232.9, 517.9; p<0.005)%, 287.5 (183.4, 391.6; p<0.02)% and 211.4 (88.3, 334.5)%, respectively. The results highlight better lung deposition of sodium cromoglycate from a metered dose inhaler attached to a large volume spacer.

Relative lung bioavailability of generic sodium cromoglycate inhalers used with and without a spacer device

The relative lung bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate following inhalation has been evaluated using urinary drug excretion in nine healthly volunteers. Each inhaled four 5 mg sodium cromoglycate doses from a generic metered dose inhaler (MDI) and when it was attached to large volume spacer (MDI + VOL). A breath-actuated MDI was also evaluated either used on its own (EB) or attached to a small volume spacer tube (EBO). The mean (SD) urinary excretion of sodium cromoglycate in the first 30 min post-inhalation was 34.1 (20.2), 211.7 (123.5), 29.3 (19.5) and 52.8 (36.0) microg following MDI, MDI+VOL, EB and EBO, respectively. The cumulative mean (SD) urinary excretion of sodium cromoglycate over the 24 h post-inhalation was 364.7 (266.2), 1227.1 (459.0), 280.2 (155.4) and 429.5 (176.7) microg. A metered dose inhaler attached to a large volume spacer delivers more sodium cromoglycate to the lungs than any other inhalation method.

The effect of spacers on the delivery of metered dose aerosols of nedocromil sodium and disodium cromoglycate

The effect of the spacers (Fisonair, Breath-A-Tech, Volumatic and Nebuhaler) on the in vitro aerosol characteristics of two propellant-driven metered dose inhalers (MDIs), Tilade (nedocromil sodium) and Intal (disodium cromoglycate), was studied. The measurement was carried out on a Marple-Miller impactor operating at 30 l/min. Five actuations were collected for the drug assay. The results showed that Tilade (label claim 2 mg active per actuation) and Intal (label claim 5 mg active per actuation) generated aerosols with a fine particle mass (FPM, i.e. mass of particles 5 microm in the aerosol) of 0.34 mg (S.D. 0.01, n = 4) and 0.02 mg (S.D. 0.01, n = 4) per actuation, respectively. For both inhalers, large volume spacers increased (Fisonair > Nebuhaler > Volumatic) while small volume spacer (Breath-A-Tech) decreased the FPM. The FPM (per actuation) for Tilade with Fisonair, Nebuhaler, Volumatic and Breath-A-Tech was 0.52 (0.03), 0.45 (0.03), 0.41 (0.04) and 0.09 (0.04) mg, respectively, while for Intal the corresponding values were 0.41 (0.02), 0.32 (0.04), 0.28 (0.03) and 0.08 (0.01) mg. Thus, the fine particle mass can be either increased or decreased, depending on the spacer selected. In addition, all spacers significantly reduced the coarse particle (> or = 10 microm) mass, with Fisonair, Breath-A-Tech, Nebuhaler and Volumatic producing only 7.6, 0.4, 5.2 and 2.6, respectively of that from Tilade alone and 15.6, 0.7, 5.4 and 4.1%, respectively of that from Intal alone. The general trends for Tilade and Intal were similar but not quantitatively identical. The proper choice of spacers is therefore important for the optimal delivery of Tilade and Intal.

Aerosol therapy for asthma

Inhaled drugs play an important role in asthma management. The correct use of an appropriate delivery device is necessary to achieve the desired therapeutic effects of the drug. Currently, chlorofluorocarbon-propelled metered-dose inhalers, with or without spacers, are the most popular aerosol delivery devices. With the planned phase out of the chlorofluorocarbon metered-dose inhalers, the use of other delivery devices is being emphasized. To achieve optimal therapeutic effects, the drug and the delivery device should be considered a "couple". Aerosol delivery devices should provide an adequate "drug dose to the lung", be cost effective, simple to operate, minimize oropharyngeal deposition and systemic side effects, and match the patient's requirements. A new generation of aerosol delivery devices, incorporating the latest advances in aerosol technology, is likely to fulfill many of the goals mentioned above.