The effects of Heliox on the output and particle-size distribution of salbutamol using jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers

Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis

Lung disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF patients inhale antibiotics regularly as treatment against persistent bacterial infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of clinical intervention on aerosol therapy during the escalation of care using a bench model of adult CF. Droplet size analysis of selected antibiotics was completed in tandem with the delivered aerosol dose (% of total dose) assessments in simulations of various interventions providing oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support. Results highlight the variability of aerosolised dose delivery. In the homecare setting, the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) delivered significantly more than the jet nebuliser (JN) (16.15 ± 0.86% versus 6.51 ± 2.15%). In the hospital setting, using VMN only, significant variability was seen across clinical interventions. In the emergency department, VMN plus mouthpiece (no supplemental oxygen) was seen to deliver (29.02 ± 1.41%) versus low flow nasal therapy (10 L per minute (LPM) oxygen) (1.81 ± 0.47%) and high flow nasal therapy (50 LPM oxygen) (3.36 ± 0.34%). In the ward/intensive care unit, non-invasive ventilation recorded 19.02 ± 0.28%, versus 22.64 ± 1.88% of the dose delivered during invasive mechanical ventilation. These results will have application in the design of intervention-appropriate aerosol therapy strategies and will be of use to researchers developing new therapeutics for application in cystic fibrosis and beyond.

Administration of dry powders during respiratory supports

Inhaled drugs are routinely used for the treatment of respiratory-supported patients. To date, pressurized metered dose inhalers and nebulizers are the two platforms routinely employed in the clinical setting. The scarce utilization of the dry powder inhaler (DPI) platform is partly due to the lack of in vivo data that proves optimal delivery and drug efficacy are achievable. Additionally, fitting a DPI in-line to the respiratory circuit is not as straightforward as with the other aerosol delivery platforms. Importantly, there is a common misconception that the warm and humidified inspiratory air in respiratory supports, even for a short exposure, will deteriorate powder formulation compromising its delivery and efficacy. However, some recent studies have dispelled this myth, showing successful delivery of dry powders through the humidified circuit of respiratory supports. Compared with other aerosol delivery devices, the use of DPIs during respiratory supports possesses unique advantages such as rapid delivery and high dose. In this review, we presented in vitro studies showing various setups employing commercial DPIs and effects of ventilator parameters on the aerosol delivery. Inclusion of novel DPIs was also made to illustrate characteristics of an ideal inhaler that would give high lung dose with low powder deposition loss in tracheal tubes and respiratory circuits. Clinical trials are urgently needed to confirm the benefits of administration of dry powders in ventilated patients, thus enabling translation of powder delivery into practice.

Aerosol delivery via invasive ventilation: a narrative review

In comparison with spontaneously breathing non-intubated subjects, intubated, mechanically ventilated patients encounter various challenges, barriers, and opportunities in receiving medical aerosols. Since the introduction of mechanical ventilation as a part of modern critical care medicine during the middle of the last century, aerosolized drug delivery by jet nebulizers has become a common practice. However, early evidence suggested that aerosol generators differed in their efficacies, and the introduction of newer aerosol technology (metered dose inhalers, ultrasonic nebulizer, vibrating mesh nebulizers, and soft moist inhaler) into the ventilator circuit opened up the possibility of optimizing inhaled aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation that could meet or exceed the delivery of the same aerosols in spontaneously breathing patients. This narrative review will catalogue the primary variables associated with this process and provide evidence to guide optimal aerosol delivery and dosing during mechanical ventilation. While gaps exist in relation to the appropriate aerosol drug dose, discrepancies in practice, and cost-effectiveness of the administered aerosol drugs, we also present areas for future research and practice. Clinical practice should expand to incorporate these techniques to improve the consistency of drug delivery and provide safer and more effective care for patients.

Regional Ventilation and Aerosol Deposition with Helium-Oxygen in Bronchoconstricted Asthmatic Lungs

BACKGROUND

Theoretical models suggest that He-O2 as carrier gas may lead to more homogeneous ventilation and aerosol deposition than air. However, these effects have not been clinically consistent and it is unclear why subjects may or may not respond to the therapy. Here we present 3D-imaging data of aerosol deposition and ventilation distributions from subjects with asthma inhaling He-O2 as carrier gas. The data are compared with those that we previously obtained from a similar group of subjects inhaling air.

METHODS

Subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma were bronchoconstricted with methacholine and imaged with PET-CT while inhaling aerosol carried with He-O2. Mean-normalized-values of lobar specific ventilation sV* and deposition sD* were derived and the factors affecting the distribution of sD* were evaluated along with the effects of breathing frequency (f) and regional expansion (FVOL).

RESULTS

Lobar distributions of sD* and sV* with He-O2 were not statistically different from those previously measured with air. However, with He-O2 there was a larger number of lobes having sV* and sD* closer to unity and, in those subjects with uneven deposition distributions, the correlation of sD* with sV* was on average higher (p < 0.05) in He-O2 (0.84 ± 0.8) compared with air (0.55 ± 0.28). In contrast with air, where the frequency of breathing during nebulization was associated with the degree of sD*-sV* correlation, with He-O2 there was no association. Also, the modulation of f on the correlation between FVOL and sD*/sV* in air, was not observed in He-O2.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in the inter-lobar heterogeneity of sD* or sV* in this group of mild asthmatic subjects breathing He-O2 compared with patients previously breathing air. Future studies, using these personalized 3D data sets as input to CFD models, are needed to understand if, and for whom, breathing He-O2 during aerosol inhalation may be beneficial.

Nebulizers for drug delivery to the lungs

INTRODUCTION

Nebulizers are the oldest modern method of delivering aerosols to the lungs for the purpose of respiratory drug delivery. While use of nebulizers remains widespread in the hospital and home setting, certain newer nebulization technologies have enabled more portable use. Varied fundamental processes of droplet formation and breakup are used in modern nebulizers, and these processes impact device performance and suitability for nebulization of various formulations.

AREAS COVERED

This review first describes basic aspects of nebulization technologies, including jet nebulizers, various high-frequency vibration techniques, and the use of colliding liquid jets. Nebulizer use in hospital and home settings is discussed next. Complications in aerosol droplet size measurement owing to the changes in nebulized droplet diameters due to evaporation or condensation are discussed, as is nebulization during mechanical ventilation.

EXPERT OPINION

While the limelight may often appear to be focused on other delivery devices, such as pressurized metered dose and dry powder inhalers, the ease of formulating many drugs in water and delivering them as aqueous aerosols ensures that nebulizers will remain as a viable and relevant method of respiratory drug delivery. This is particularly true given recent improvements in nebulizer droplet production technology.

Using helium-oxygen to improve regional deposition of inhaled particles: mechanical principles

BACKGROUND

Helium-oxygen has been used for decades as a respiratory therapy conjointly with aerosols. It has also been shown under some conditions to be a means to provide more peripheral, deeper, particle deposition for inhalation therapies. Furthermore, we can also consider deposition along parallel paths that are quite different, especially in a heterogeneous pathological lung. It is in this context that it is hypothesized that helium-oxygen can improve regional deposition, leading to more homogeneous deposition by increasing deposition in ventilation-deficient lung regions.

METHODS

Analytical models of inertial impaction, sedimentation, and diffusion are examined to illustrate the importance of gas property values on deposition distribution through both fluid mechanics- and particle mechanics-based mechanisms. Also considered are in vitro results from a bench model for a heterogeneously obstructed lung. In vivo results from three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques provide visual examples of changes in particle deposition patterns in asthmatics that are further analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on analytical modeling, it is shown that deeper particle deposition is expected when breathing helium-oxygen, as compared with breathing air. A bench model has shown that more homogeneous ventilation distribution is possible breathing helium-oxygen in the presence of heterogeneous obstructions representative of central airway obstructions. 3D imaging of asthmatics has confirmed that aerosol delivery with a helium-oxygen carrier gas results in deeper and more homogeneous deposition distributions. CFD results are consistent with the in vivo imaging and suggest that the mechanics of gas particle interaction are the source of the differences seen in deposition patterns. However, intersubject variability in response to breathing helium-oxygen is expected, and an example of a nonresponder is shown where regional deposition is not significantly changed.

Noninvasive ventilation with helium-oxygen in children

Most existing literature on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in combination with helium-oxygen (HELIOX) mixtures focuses on its use in adults, basically for treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This article reviews and summarizes the theoretical basis, existing clinical evidence, and practical aspects of the use of NIV with HELIOX in children. There is only a small body of literature on HELIOX in pediatric NIV but with positive results. The reported experience focuses on treatment for patients with severe acute bronchiolitis who cannot be treated with standard therapies. The inert nature of helium adds no biological risk to NIV performance. Noninvasive ventilation with HELIOX is a promising therapeutic option for children with various respiratory pathologies who do not respond to conventional treatment. Further controlled studies should be warranted.

In vitro comparison of heliox and oxygen in aerosol delivery using pediatric high flow nasal cannula

Drug administration via high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been described in pediatrics but the amount of albuterol delivery with an HFNC is not known. The purpose of this study is to quantify aerosol delivery with heliox and oxygen (O(2)) in a model of pediatric ventilation. A vibrating mesh nebulizer (Aeroneb Solo, Aerogen) was placed on the inspiratory inlet of a heated humidifier and heated wire circuit attached to a pediatric nasal cannula (Optiflow, Fisher & Paykel). Breathing parameters were tidal volume (V(t)) 100 ml, respiratory rate (RR) 20/min, and I-time of 1 sec. Albuterol sulfate (2.5 mg/3 ml) was administered through a pediatric HFNC with O(2) (100%) and heliox (80/20% mixture). A total of 12 runs, using O(2) and heliox were conducted at 3 and 6 L/min (n = 3). Drug was collected on an absolute filter, eluted and measured using spectrophotometry. The percent inhaled dose (mean ± SD) was similar with heliox and O(2) at 3 L/min (11.41 ± 1.54 and 10.65 ± 0.51, respectively; P = 0.465). However at 6 L/min drug deposition was ≥ 2-fold greater with heliox (5.42 ± 0.54) than O(2) (1.95 ± 0.50; P = 0.01). Using a pediatric model of HFNC, reducing delivered flow from 6 to 3 L/min increased inhaled albuterol delivery ≥ 2-fold but eliminated the increase in inhaled drug efficiency associated with heliox.

An in vitro assessment of aerosol delivery through patient breathing circuits used with medical air or a helium-oxygen mixture

BACKGROUND

The bench experiments presented herein were conducted in order to investigate the influence of carrier gas, either medical air or a helium-oxygen mixture (78% He, 22% O2), on the droplet size distribution and aerosol mass delivered from a vibrating mesh nebulizer through a patient breathing circuit.

METHODS

Droplet size distributions at the exit of the nebulizer T-piece and at the patient end of the breathing circuit were determined by laser diffraction. Additional experiments were performed to determine the effects on measured size distributions of gas humidity and of the droplet residence time during transport from the nebulizer to the laser diffraction measurement volume. Aerosol deposition in the nebulizer, breathing circuit, and on expiratory and patient filters was determined by photometry following nebulization of sodium fluoride solutions into the breathing circuit during simulated patient breathing.

RESULTS

With no humidification of the carrier gas, droplet volume median diameter (VMD) at the exit of the nebulizer T-piece was 5.5±0.1 μm for medical air, and 4.3±0.1 μm for helium-oxygen. Varying the aerosol residence time between the nebulizer and the measurement volume did not affect the measured size distributions; however, humidification of the carrier gases reduced differences in VMD at the nebulizer exit between medical air and helium-oxygen. At the patient end of the breathing circuit, droplet VMDs were 1.8±0.1 μm for medical air and 2.2±0.1 μm for helium-oxygen. The percentages of sodium fluoride recovered from the nebulizer, breathing circuit, patient filter, and expiratory filter were, respectively, 29.9±8.3, 40.4±5.6, 8.3±1.5, and 21.5±2.1% for air, and 32.6±2.2, 36.3±0.7, 12.0±1.4, and 19.1±1.1% for helium-oxygen.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilation with helium-oxygen in place of air-oxygen mixtures can influence both the droplet size distribution and mass of nebulized aerosol delivered through patient breathing circuits. Assessment of these effects on aerosol delivery is important when incorporating helium-oxygen into patient ventilation strategies.

Aerosol drug delivery: developments in device design and clinical use

Aerosolised drugs are prescribed for use in a range of inhaler devices and systems. Delivering drugs by inhalation requires a formulation that can be successfully aerosolised and a delivery system that produces a useful aerosol of the drug; the particles or droplets need to be of sufficient size and mass to be carried to the distal lung or deposited on proximal airways to give rise to a therapeutic effect. Patients and caregivers must use and maintain these aerosol drug delivery devices correctly. In recent years, several technical innovations have led to aerosol drug delivery devices with efficient drug delivery and with novel features that take into account factors such as dose tracking, portability, materials of manufacture, breath actuation, the interface with the patient, combination therapies, and systemic delivery. These changes have improved performance in all four categories of devices: metered dose inhalers, spacers and holding chambers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulisers. Additionally, several therapies usually given by injection are now prescribed as aerosols for use in a range of drug delivery devices. In this Review, we discuss recent developments in the design and clinical use of aerosol devices over the past 10-15 years with an emphasis on the treatment of respiratory disorders.