Physician Office Visits That Included Complementary Health Approaches in U.S. Adults: 2005-2015

Analyzing Potential Interactions Between Complementary and Alternative Therapies, Over-the-Counter, and Prescription Medications in the Older Population

BACKGROUND

The escalating use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) raises concerns, particularly among geriatric patients taking multiple medications. Notably, the doubled chance of major drug interactions between prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs in older adults underscores the need for further research. This study aimed to evaluate clinically significant CAM and prescription medication interactions in a geriatric clinic, emphasizing the growing importance of understanding CAM implications in health care.

METHODS

A 2-year cross-sectional study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, enrolled 420 participants aged 65 and older from a geriatric primary care clinic. Participants completed a survey, and pharmacy students conducted chart reviews to evaluate potential CAM products and prescription medication interactions.

RESULTS

Among the 420 participants-who were predominantly White females and who were taking supplements, OTC medications, or both-15.6% experienced potential drug interactions. Ginkgo biloba, garlic, and calcium were common contributors to major, moderate, and minor interactions, respectively, among supplements. Meanwhile, ibuprofen was among the contributors to major and moderate interactions among OTC medications. Most supplements and OTC medications were disclosed to health care professionals. However, there was a lack of investigation by health care professionals regarding CAM use, emphasizing a discrepancy between patient-reported and physician-inquired CAM usage.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the significant use of CAM and/or OTC medications, particularly among vulnerable older adults, revealing a concerning 15.6% rate of potential drug interactions. The findings emphasized the need for awareness among health care practitioners and standardized CAM surveys to enhance accuracy and patient safety.

Natural Product Use Among Veterans with Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Study of Attitudes and Communication with Healthcare Providers

BACKGROUND

Despite mixed evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of natural products, many are marketed for pain and related symptoms. Use of these products is prevalent among veterans, who have disproportionately high rates of chronic pain. To date, however, there is limited research on veterans' beliefs and attitudes about natural products and their communication with healthcare providers about their natural product use.

OBJECTIVE

To explore how veterans experiencing chronic pain make decisions about natural product use, to investigate veterans' beliefs about the safety and efficacy of these products, and to examine veterans' experiences discussing natural products with their providers.

DESIGN

Qualitative sub-study conducted as a supplement to a pragmatic randomized controlled trial for chronic pain management.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty veterans experiencing chronic pain who reported using natural products for pain management or related health concerns.

APPROACH

Qualitative interviews with veterans were conducted over the phone and audio-recorded. Interviews were guided by an original semi-structured interview guide and qualitative data were analyzed using a template-based rapid analysis technique.

KEY RESULTS

Veterans with chronic pain may perceive natural products as safer than pharmaceutical products and may prefer to use natural products. Talking with providers about natural products is important to veterans, who would like information regarding the safety and potential for interaction of natural products with pharmaceutical products. However, veterans were frequently disappointed with these conversations. Veterans felt their providers demonstrated biases against natural products, which negatively impacted patient-provider relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

Veterans wish to have more productive conversations with providers about natural products. They value providers' open-mindedness towards natural products and transparency about limitations in their knowledge. Suggestions for how providers and healthcare systems might better support veterans interested in natural products are discussed.

Complementary health approaches and dietary supplement use trends among U.S. college students: A brief report

OBJECTIVE

Examine differences over time in use of complementary health approaches (CHA) and dietary supplements among college students.

PARTICIPANTS

Two samples of undergraduate students (Sample 1, N = 370; Sample 2, N = 482) from a midsized Midwestern university.

METHOD

Using stratified random sampling, at two time points (spring 2008, spring 2019), students were surveyed. Frequency of CHA and supplement use in the past year were assessed and compared across the two time periods.

RESULTS

Of the CHAs compared, 53% had changed in frequency of use with only the practice of yoga significantly increasing. As for supplements, 78% changed in their frequency of use with the rate of melatonin being the only significant increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the reported use of many CHAs and supplements appeared to change in the time period between assessments, findings suggest that students still report using several CHA practices and, to a lesser extent, supplements.

Mapping Uncharted Terrain: A Systematic Review of Complementary and Integrative Health Communication Using Observational Data in Biomedical Settings

Complementary and integrative health (CIH) use is diverse and highly prevalent worldwide. Prior research of CIH communication in biomedical encounters address safety, efficacy, symptom management, and overall wellness. Observational methods are rarely used to study CIH communication and avoid recall bias, preserve ecological validity, and contextualize situated clinical communication. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed studies at the intersection of social scientific observational research and findings about CIH communication between clinicians, patients, and caregivers in biomedical settings. We identified international, peer-reviewed publications from seven databases between January 2010 and December 2020. Titles and abstracts were first screened for inclusion, then full studies were coded using explicit criteria. We used a standard checklist was modified to assess article quality. Ten of 11,793 studies examined CIH communication using observational methods for CIH communication in biomedical settings. Studies used a range of observational techniques, including participant and non-participant observation, which includes digital audio or video recordings. Results generated two broad sets of findings, one focused on methodological insights and another on CIH communication. Despite methodological and topic similarities, included studies addressed CIH communication as a process and as proximal and intermediate health outcomes. We recommend how observational studies of CIH communication can better highlight relationships between communication processes and health outcomes. Current research using observational methods offers an incomplete picture of CIH communication in biomedical settings. Future studies should standardize how observational techniques are reported to enhance consistency and comparability within and across biomedical settings to improve comparability.

Complementary and integrative health therapies in whole person resilience research

Complementary and integrative health approaches can improve health and well-being, as well as play an important role in disease prevention. The concept of whole person health builds on these concepts by empowering individuals, families, communities, and populations to improve their health in multiple interconnected domains: biological, behavioural, social, and environmental. Research on whole person health involves studies of interconnected biological systems and complex approaches to prevention and treatment. Some of these approaches may involve methods of diagnosis and therapy that differ from those used in conventional Western medicine. Of growing interest is how complementary, integrative, and whole person health approaches contribute to resilience. This brief commentary describes an integrated framework for mapping the connections between various complementary and integrative health therapeutic inputs onto aspects of resilience, including the ability to resist, recover (partially or fully), adapt, and/or grow in response to a following a stressor. The authors present selected examples of research studies supported by the National Institutes of Health that test whether complementary and integrative health approaches can promote some aspect of resilience. We conclude with a discussion of the challenges and opportunities in incorporating the study of resilience in complementary, integrative, and whole person health research.