Inhibition of cell growth in synchronous human hypernephroma cells by recombinant interferon alpha-D and irradiation

Combining Radiation Therapy With Interferons: Back to the Future

Radiation therapy has been linked to the induction of an intratumoral type I interferon (IFN) response, which positively affects the response to treatment. This has spiked the interest to combine radiation therapy with IFN-based treatment. Interestingly, this combination treatment has been considered previously, since preclinical studies demonstrated a radiosensitizing effect of interferons. As a result, multiple clinical trials have been performed combining radiation therapy with interferons in different tumor types. Although potential benefit has been suggested, the outcomes of the trials are diverse and challenging to interpret. In addition, increased grade ≥3 toxicity frequently resulted in a negative recommendation regarding the combination therapy. The latter appears premature because many studies were small and several aspects of the combination treatment have not yet been sufficiently explored to justify such a definite conclusion. This review summarizes the available literature on this combination therapy, with a focus on IFN-α and IFN-β. Based on preclinical studies and clinical trials, we evaluated the potential opportunities and describe the current challenges. In addition, we identify several issues that should be addressed to fully exploit the potential benefit of this combinatorial treatment approach.

Radiotherapy as a New Player in Immuno-Oncology

Recent development in radiation biology has revealed potent immunogenic properties of radiotherapy in cancer treatments. However, antitumor immune effects of radiotherapy are limited by the concomitant induction of radiation-dependent immunosuppressive effects. In the growing era of immunotherapy, combining radiotherapy with immunomodulating agents has demonstrated enhancement of radiation-induced antitumor immune activation that correlated with improved treatment outcomes. Yet, how to optimally deliver combination therapy regarding dose-fractionation and timing of radiotherapy is largely unknown. Future prospective testing to fine-tune this promising combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy is warranted.

The combination of IFN-alpha2 and IFN-alpha8 exhibits synergistic antiproliferative activity on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines through increased binding affinity for IFNAR-2

Although there are at least 13 interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) subtypes in humans, interactions between the subtypes remain unknown. To understand IFN-alpha interactions, we examined the antiproliferative activities and the receptor binding affinities of different combinations of IFN-alpha2 and IFN-alpha8 using six renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines. Although IFN-alpha8 was the more potent subtype, synergistic and antagonistic antiproliferative effects were also observed in certain combinations of IFN-alpha2 and IFN-alpha8. To analyze the interactions between IFN-alpha2 and IFN-alpha8, the receptor-binding kinetics of different combinations of IFN-alpha2 and IFN- alpha8 to the IFN-alpha receptors, IFNAR-1 or IFNAR-2, were measured using a surface plasmon resonance-based biosensor. Unexpectedly, the receptor binding kinetics to IFNAR-2 but not to IFNAR-1 were mutually related to antiproliferative activity and increase in the binding speed (K(a)) for IFNAR-2. Moreover, we observed the increased fluorescence intensity (FI) of biotin-labeled IFN-alpha8 to IFNAR-2 by receptor binding inhibition assay with unlabeled IFN-alpha2 but not the other combinations. These findings indicate that the binding manner of IFN-alpha8 for IFNAR-2 is different from that of IFN-alpha2, suggesting that binding of IFN-alpha8 rather than binding of IFN-alpha2 to IFNAR-2 leads to activation and subsequent antiproliferative activity despite the same antiviral activity in RCC.

Differences in cell kinetic changes among renal cancer cell lines treated with interferon-alpha

BACKGROUND

Interferon (IFN)-alpha shows certain clinical effects on the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. The purpose of the present study was to investigate its direct effects and to compare the responses among different human renal cancer cell lines.

METHODS

Three cell lines, ACHN, RCC10RGB and OS-RC-2, were incubated with IFN-alpha and evaluated using MTT assay for cell proliferation and two-color flow cytometry for cell-cycle-specific cyclin expressions coupled with DNA ploidy analysis.

RESULTS

Interferon-alpha inhibited cell proliferation and caused cell accumulation at S and G2/M phases. However, IFN-alpha induced no significant change in cyclins D1, E, A or B1 expression. Interestingly, cell kinetic changes caused by IFN-alpha were different among cell lines. Cell proliferation was suppressed most in ACHN, then RCC10RGB and least in OS-RC-2. Comparing DNA histograms, ACHN showed distinct increase of G2/M cells associated with elevation of late S cells. RCC10RGB showed a predominant increase of whole S cells accompanied with a slight increase of G2/M. OS-RC-2 showed a modest increase of S cells with a little change of G2/M cells. Chronological observation revealed that S-phase increase and proliferative inhibition appeared on day 1 and day 3, respectively, in ACHN and RCC10RGB, and on day 5 in OS-RC-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha induced substantial cell kinetic interference directly in the tested human renal carcinoma cell lines. The degree of change was different according to the nature of the cell line. It may partly indicate the variety of the efficacy of IFN-alpha treatment against renal cancers.

Identification and characterization of ligands for L-selectin in the kidney. I. Versican, a large chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, is a ligand for L-selectin

Ligands for a leukocyte adhesion molecule, L-selectin, are expressed not only in the specific vascular endothelium in lymph nodes and Peyer's patches but also in the extravascular tissues such as the brain white matter, choroid plexus and the kidney distal straight tubuli. However, the biological significance of these extravascular ligands is currently unknown. We now report the purification and characterization of a novel extravascular ligand for L-selectin in the kidney using a tubule-derived cell line, ACHN. Binding of L-selectin-IgG chimera (LEC-IgG) to the isolated ligand was specifically blocked with either (i) anti-L-selectin mAb, (ii) EDTA, (iii) fucoidan, (iv) chondroitin sulfate (CS) B or CS E, or (v) treatment with chondroitinases. Partial amino acid sequencing, Western blotting and immunoprecipitation analyses showed that a major ligand for L-selectin in ACHN cells is versican of 1600 kDa. Histochemical as well as biochemical analyses verified that a versican subspecies in the kidney was indeed reactive with L-selectin. Studies with cell lines including those derived from the kidney indicated that a certain glycoform and/or splice form of versican is reactive with L-selectin. Under pathological conditions such as those induced by unilateral ureteral obstruction, versican was shed from the distal straight tubuli and became localized in the adjacent vascular bundles around which a substantial leukocyte infiltration was concomitantly observed. Possible involvement of versican in leukocyte trafficking into the kidney under diseased conditions is discussed.

Human cytomegalovirus UL69 protein induces cells to accumulate in G1 phase of the cell cycle

Earlier studies have revealed that human cytomegalovirus rapidly inhibits the growth of fibroblasts, blocking cell cycle progression at multiple points, including the G1-to-S-phase transition. The present study demonstrates that the UL69 protein, a virus-encoded constituent of the virion, is able to arrest cell cycle progression when introduced into uninfected cells. Expression of the UL69 protein causes U2 OS cells and primary human fibroblasts to accumulate within the G1 compartment of the cell cycle, and serum fails to induce the progression of quiescent human fibroblasts into the S phase when the protein is present. Therefore, the UL69 protein is at least partially responsible for the cell cycle block that is instituted after infection of permissive cells with human cytomegalovirus.

Characterization of YB2/0 cell line by counterflow centrifugation elutriation

The non-secreting rat myeloma cell line YB2/0 could be separated into different cell fractions by counterflow centrifugal elutriation. The obtained fractions are analyzed by morphology studies, morphometrics, clonogenic assays and flow cytometry. The methodology is extensively described. A separation of different cell fractions according to cell cycle stages was achieved. This implies further application possibilities for clinical use like the in vitro fractionation of autologous bone marrow prior to transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.

alpha Interferon: the potential drug of adjuvant therapy: past achievements and future challenges

This paper aims to summarize current experience with alpha interferon and provide direction for future study. There are four areas in which alpha interferon has proven or potential activity: antiviral, premalignant, adjuvant and advanced disease settings. The three main viral diseases in which interferon alfa-2b has been shown to have activity are chronic viral hepatitis, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and human papilloma virus infections. In vitro studies suggest that alpha interferon may inhibit transformation of some premalignant conditions into malignant disease; e.g., vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. In the adjuvant setting, it is possible that a biological response modifier, such as alpha interferon, may have a role in helping the immune system to destroy residual tumour cells following tumour bulk reduction with radiation or chemotherapy. A higher response rate has been seen in patients with small tumour bulk compared to those with large tumour bulk (e.g., malignant melanoma, ovarian carcinoma), and in patients with early, rather than late, disease (e.g., chronic myelogenous leukaemia, hairy cell leukaemia, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma). This may be due to efficacy in a small tumour bulk setting or due to an immunoadjuvant role. In advanced disease, the question is how best to exploit the possible synergistic effects between alpha interferon and other therapeutic modalities. The optimum dose, schedule and patient populations for combined treatment have yet to be determined. The major objective of this paper is to determine how best to capitalize upon the current state of knowledge to build for future trials of alpha interferon, and to determine whether the existing data suggest an adjuvant role for interferon after initial tumour regression.