Long-Term Outcome of Sequential Therapy with Lamivudine Followed by Interferon-β in Nucleoside-Naive, Hepatitis B e-Antigen-Positive Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Genotype C Infection

Combination of Entecavir or Tenofovir with Pegylated Interferon-α for Long-Term Reduction in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Levels: Simultaneous, Sequential, or Add-on Combination Therapy

Seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (“functional cure”) is the optimal endpoint of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Currently available anti-HBV therapy includes nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NAs) and peginterferon-α (Peg-IFNα). Combination of NAs and Peg-IFNα, each with different mechanisms of action, is an attractive approach for treating chronic HBV infection. In earlier studies, compared with monotherapy using IFNα, combination therapy showed greater on-treatment HBV DNA suppression but no difference in the sustained response. However, responses to the combination of non-pegylated IFNα with lamivudine or adefovir were not assessed based on HBsAg quantification but were defined by normal alanine aminotransferase levels, testing negative for hepatitis B e-antigen, and low HBV DNA load over a short term. Here, we reviewed previous reports regarding the effects of combination therapy of entecavir or tenofovir with Peg-IFNα, focusing on long-term reduction in HBsAg levels. Regimens of combination therapy were classified into “simultaneous” combination (“de novo” strategy); “sequential” combination, which involved starting with one therapy followed by the other (“switch-to” strategy); “add-on” combination, which involved adding Peg-IFNα to an ongoing NAs. Some studies have shown promising results, but there is no robust evidence that combination therapy is superior to monotherapy. Large studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapies to increase the rates of HBsAg seroclearance over the long term.

Sequential therapy involving an early switch from entecavir to pegylated interferon-α in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B

AIM

The optimal combination of two currently available agents with different mechanisms of action, a nucleos(t)ide analog and pegylated interferon-α (PegIFNα), must be determined to improve treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

In this study, 24 patients with CHB (14 hepatitis B envelope antigen [HBeAg]-positive patients and 10 HBeAg-negative patients) received entecavir for 36-52 weeks, followed by entecavir plus Peg-IFNα2a for 4 weeks, and finally by PegIFNα-2a alone for 44 weeks.

RESULTS

A sustained biochemical, virologic, and serologic response was obtained in 7/24 (29%) patients at 48 weeks post-treatment (2/14 [14%] in HBeAg-positive vs 5/10 [50%] in HBeAg-negative patients, P = 0.085). At baseline, patients with a sustained response had a significantly lower γ-glutamyl transferase level (P = 0.0023), a lower aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (P = 0.049), and a lower α-fetoprotein level (P = 0.042) than those without a sustained response. The decline in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels during the first 24 weeks of PegIFNα-2a treatment in patients with a sustained response was greater than that in patients without (P = 0.017). Additionally, HBsAg seroclearance was achieved in two patients (8.3%): one HBeAg-positive and one HBeAg-negative patient.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of sequential therapy involving an early switch from entecavir to PegIFNα-2a were unsatisfactory in Japanese patients with CHB. In addition to viral factors, host metabolic characteristics and liver fibrosis/tumor markers can be used for prediction of a sustained response to therapy, but accurate prediction of the therapeutic response is difficult.

Pegylated interferon therapy during early pregnancy for hepatitis B infection: does it prevent vertical transmission?

In general, interferon (IFN) is avoided during pregnancy due to the possibility of fetal side effects. We, herein, reported two child-bearing women with chronic hepatitis B (HB) infection who used pegylated interferon alfa 2b (PEG IFNα 2b) in first trimester unintentionally. We compared HB contracting rates of gestations in which IFN was used and not used. The cases are unique in that they could highlight the importance of IFN use in early gestation for preventing vertical transmission particularly if combined with antiviral therapy for the rest of pregnancy.

Efficacy of interferon for chronic hepatitis B in patients with nucleoside and nucleotide combination therapy failure

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In China, inappropriate therapies with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) have induced hepatitis B virus resistance, combination therapy with nucleoside and nucleotide (ComTNsNt) failure, or multi-drug resistant mutations. However, the efficacy of combination therapy with entecavir plus tenofovir for ComTNsNt failure is limited. In the current study, the regimens of interferon-α (IFN-α) therapy, switching from NAs to IFN-α, and subsequent re-treatment with IFN-α were applied to treat ComTNsNt failure. We further evaluated the efficacy of this therapy.

METHODS

Eleven patients with ComTNsNt failure were enrolled in this study. Nine subjects (9/11) received IFN-α switching therapy. Combination therapy with IFN-α and ComTNsNt was administered in the first 4 weeks. Then, ComTNsNt was discontinued at the end of Week 4, and IFN-α monotherapy was continued for 6 months. Two (2/11) patients discontinued ComTNsNt without receiving IFN-α treatment. All 11 patients received the first re-treatment of IFN-α when they experienced hepatitis relapses after the withdrawal of IFN-α or ComTNsNt. Six (6/11) patients received a second re-treatment of IFN-α. Follow up was conducted after IFN-α therapy in all 11 patients.

RESULTS

Two patients (2/9) receiving IFN-α switching therapy experienced alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare. In contrast, the two patients without IFN-α switching therapy experienced ALT flare. Multiple re-treatments with IFN-α resulted in a sustained response.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-α switching therapy and IFN-α re-treatment might be applied for treatment of ComTNsNt failure. IFN-α switching therapy resulted in safe ComTNsNt cessation, and IFN-α re-treatment induced a sustained response of IFN-α in all patients. This IFN-α treatment is an optional treatment for ComTNsNt failure.

Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B: Combination of nucleoside analogs and interferon

The ideal goal of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment should be suppression of emergence of hepatocellular carcinoma through the disappearance of hepatitis B s antigen (HBsAg) rather than the control of serum hepatitis B virus-DNA level. For this purpose, various types of combination therapies using nucleoside analogs (NAs) and interferon (IFN) have been conducted. The therapeutic effects of combination of two different kinds of agents are better than those of the monotherapy using NAs or IFN alone, probably because different pharmaceutical properties might act in a coordinated manner. Recently, combination therapies with NAs and IFN and sequential therapies with NAs administration followed by IFN therapy have been routinely employed. We previously reported that combination therapy using entecavir (ETV) and pegylated (PEG)-IFN showed antiviral effects in 71% of CHB patients; the effect of this combination was better than that using lamivudine (LAM) and PEG-IFN. This is partially explained by the better antiviral effects of ETV than those of LAM. In our analysis, the cohort of CHB consisted of the patients who showed a flare-up of hepatitis before antiviral therapy, and their baseline HBsAg levels were relatively low. Therefore, in addition to the combination of the agents, the appropriate selection of patients is critical to achieve a good viral response.