Evaluation of Very High- and Very Low-Dose Intravitreal Aflibercept in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

High‑dose aflibercept injection has striking effects on myopic choroidal neovascularization

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 1-year outcomes of a high-dose aflibercept injection [4 mg 2+ pro re nata (PRN) scheme] for individuals with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) through optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-ups. A total of 16 consecutive patients (7 males and 9 females; sixteen eyes) with mCNV were enrolled in this retrospective study. The mean age was 30.5±3.35 years and mean spherical equivalent was -7.31±0.90 D. Subjects received 4 mg aflibercept intravitreal injection on the day of diagnosis and 35 days later. Further injections of aflibercept were required when the following were detected by OCT and fluorescein angiography: i) Decrease in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); ii) aggravation of metamorphopsia; iii) macular oedema; iv) macular haemorrhage; v) increase in retinal thickness; and vi) leakage. Ophthalmic examination and OCT were performed at the baseline, as well as at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months after the initial aflibercept injection. BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) were evaluated at each follow-up. The results showed that the vision of all subjects improved following the aflibercept intravitreal injection. The mean BCVA improved from 0.35±0.15 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) at the baseline to 0.12±0.05 logMAR at final follow-up (P<0.05). A reduction in metamorphopsia was observed and the mean CRT was reduced from 345.38±34.69 µm of pre-treatment levels to 222.75±8.98 µm at the last postoperative visit (P<0.05). The mean number of injections in the present study was 2.13±0.5. Out of all patients, 13 received two injections and 3 subjects received three injections. The mean follow-up was 13.41±1.17 months. Based on the outcomes, it was found that an intravitreal injection of high-dose aflibercept (4 mg 2+PRN scheme) is effective for vision improvement and stabilization. In addition, it also significantly alleviated metamorphopsia and reduced the CRT in patients treated with mCNV. During the follow-up, the eyesight of the patients was stable.

High-Dose Aflibercept for Neovascular AMD and DME in Suboptimal Responders to Standard-Dose Aflibercept

Purpose: To assess the effect of higher dose (HD) aflibercept on visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography outcomes, and injection burden in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME) that responded suboptimally to standard-dose aflibercept. Methods: This retrospective analysis included eyes with clinically significant disease activity on monthly therapy (AMT) (injection interval ≤35 days) or clinically significant increased activity on extension (IAE) (injection interval >36 days) that were switched from aflibercept 2 mg to aflibercept HD (3 mg to 4 mg). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, after injections 1 through 4, and at 6, 9, and 12 months. Results: Overall, 318 eyes of 288 adult patients were analyzed (eyes with nAMD: 59 AMT, 147 IAE; eyes with DME: 50 AMT, 62 IAE). Most of the study cohort received aflibercept HD 3 mg (nAMD: 73% AMT and 58% IAE; DME: 49% AMT and 68% IAE); the remainder received 4 mg. The mean best VA improved significantly with AMT and was maintained with IAE. In all groups, the central subfield thickness decreased significantly and the mean injection intervals increased or remained stable. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: Aflibercept HD might improve outcomes while decreasing treatment burden for eyes that respond suboptimally to standard dosing.

Long-Term Outcomes of High-Dose Conbercept Treatment for Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization and Idiopathic Choroidal Neovascularization

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to report 2-year outcomes of intravitreal injection of high-dose conbercept (1 mg 2 + PRN scheme) for subjects with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) and idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (iCNV) by optical coherence tomography angiography follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 38 subjects (38 eyes) were enrolled in this retrospective study, which were divided into group A (mCNV, 20 subjects, 20 eyes) and group B (iCNV, 18 subjects, 18 eyes). All subjects received 1.0 mg of conbercept intravitreally at diagnosis and again 35 days later. Additional conbercept injection was administered upon findings of decreased best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); metamorphosis aggravation, macular hemorrhage, or edema; increased central retinal thickness (CRT); or leakage observed by fluorescein angiography. The BCVA, CRT, and CNV areas of the two groups were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The BCVA of group A improved from 0.31 ± 0.16 logMAR at baseline to 0.12 ± 0.03 logMAR at the final follow-up (p < 0.001), while in group B the corresponding improvement was from 0.33 ± 0.16 logMAR at baseline to 0.12 ± 0.03 logMAR at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). Visual acuity improved in 17 subjects in group A and 15 in group B, while it remained stable in 3 subjects in each of groups A and B. CRT decreased from 311.83 ± 30.95 μm in group A and 351.17 ± 37.09 μm in group B preoperation to 229.56 ± 5.75 μm and 227.67 ± 4.98 μm at 24-month follow-up, respectively (p < 0.001 in groups A and B). Metamorphopsia was improved in subjects in groups A and B. CNV had disappeared in the two groups at the last postoperative visit. The BCVA, CRT, and CNV areas showed no statistical differences between the two groups at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal injection of conbercept (1 mg 2 + PRN scheme) is effective for treating patients with mCNV or iCNV, which can improve and stabilize vision as well as dramatically alleviate metamorphopsia.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STOPPER POSITION AND INJECTION VOLUME IN RANIBIZUMAB AND AFLIBERCEPT PREFILLED SYRINGES

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship between stopper position and injection volume in aflibercept and ranibizumab prefilled syringes (PFS).

METHODS

Empty aflibercept 2.0 mg PFS and ranibizumab 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg PFS were collected and refilled with saline. The stopper was positioned relative to the preprinted mark, and resulting injection volumes were recorded. The position for double the on-label volume was confirmed with repeated testing. The quantitative relationship between position and volume was calculated.

RESULTS

In ranibizumab PFS, doubling the distance increased the volume injected by 2.6 times. Positioning the stopper 4.0, 3.0, 2.0, and 0 mm proximal to and 1.0 mm distal to the mark injected volumes of 0.13, 0.1, 0.08, 0.05, and 0.03 mL, respectively. The relationship between position (x) and volume (y) was y = 0.019x + 0.048. In aflibercept PFS, doubling the distance increased the volume injected by 3.2 times. Positioning the stopper 2.5, 2.0, 1.0, and 0 mm proximal to and 1.0 mm distal to the mark injected volumes of 0.16, 0.14, 0.11, 0.05, and 0.02 mL, respectively. The relationship between position (x) and volume (y) was y = 0.041x + 0.059.

CONCLUSION

Proper positioning of the stopper at the preprinted mark accurately delivers the on-label volume with both the ranibizumab and aflibercept PFS. However, small variations in stopper position appear to have substantial effects on the volume of drug injected.

Treatment patterns in patients with age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: A real-world claims analysis in Dubai

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the pattern of approved anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

METHOD

This was a retrospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort analysis of the Dubai Real-world Claims Database with a 360-day follow-up period. Adult patients diagnosed with nAMD or DME treated with ranibizumab or aflibercept for the first time were included. The primary objective was to evaluate anti-VEGF treatment patterns with respect to the proportion of patients receiving ranibizumab and aflibercept for nAMD and DME separately.

RESULTS

Of the 451 patients included in the final study cohort, 83.6% and 16.4% had a diagnosis of DME (ranibizumab: 48.5%; aflibercept: 51.5%) and nAMD (ranibizumab: 40.5%; aflibercept: 59.5%), respectively, at baseline. Treatment frequency of ranibizumab/aflibercept was similar for nAMD (mean: 2.4/2.9 injections; p = 0.2389) with fewer injections in the ranibizumab cohort for DME (mean: 1.9/2.5 injections; p = 0.0002). Most patients received ≤3 anti-VEGF injections during the 360-day follow-up period. The time between consecutive treatments was large (nAMD: 73.6 days/10.5 weeks; DME: 80.5 days/11.5 weeks). Approximately 10%-13.5% of patients switched their anti-VEGF therapy. Most patients (83.8%) had a diabetes diagnosis during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study provides an initial understanding of anti-VEGF treatment patterns in patients with nAMD and DME in the UAE. Treatment frequency of the 2 anti-VEGF agents assessed was similar in both patient populations. Both treatments were infrequently administered with large dosing intervals.

Cost-effectiveness of treating wet age-related macular degeneration at the Kuopio University Hospital in Finland based on a two-eye Markov transition model

PURPOSE

Wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness worldwide, which can be treated with regular intraocular anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. In this study, we wanted to evaluate whether less frequent injections of aflibercept would make it more cost-effective when compared with ranibizumab and low priced bevacizumab.

METHODS

We used a two-eye model to simulate the progression and the treatment of the disease. We selected an 8-year period, 3-month cycles and five health states based on the visual acuity of the better-seeing eye. The transition probabilities and utilities attached to the health states were gathered from previous studies. We conducted the analysis from the hospital perspective and we used the health care costs obtained from Kuopio University Hospital. The costs of intraocular adverse events were taken into account.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with 3% discount rate (€/QALY) for aflibercept compared with monthly bevacizumab was 1 801 228 and when compared with ranibizumab given as needed, the ICER was minus 3 716 943. The sensitivity analysis showed that a change of 20% of the estimated model parameters or a longer follow-up period did not influence these conclusions.

CONCLUSION

A two-eye Markov transition model was developed to analyse the cost-effectiveness of wet AMD treatment, as quality of life years (QALYs) are largely based on the visual acuity of the better-seeing eye. Monthly injected bevacizumab was the most cost-effective treatment and monthly ranibizumab the least effective.

Management of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Review on Landmark Randomized Controlled Trials

In the last decade, a number of prospective clinical trials with carefully designed study protocols have been conducted for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). These landmark clinical trials such as ANCHOR and MARINA and, more recently, the Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials and VIEW studies have revolutionized the management of neovascular AMD. While AMD continues to remain a leading cause of severe visual loss worldwide, advances in pharmacotherapeutics have led to substantial improvements in the outcome of these patients. The introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents has resulted in improvement of visual outcomes and has had a positive impact on the quality of life among elderly population. While the contemporary management of neovascular AMD has been successful in tremendously reducing the visual morbidity, the financial burden of therapy has increased exponentially. To overcome these challenges, newer pharmacologic agents are evaluated for their efficacy and safety in AMD. Ground-breaking advances in bench to bedside research have led to discovery of new pathways that appear to be viable targets for preventing visual loss in AMD. In this review, study designs and results of landmark clinical trials in AMD from the past decade have been summarized.

Ranibizumab and aflibercept for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration

INTRODUCTION

Wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a potentially blinding eye disease that causes vision loss among individuals > 50 years old. The main goal in the treatment of wet AMD is to inhibit the choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Currently, ranibizumab and aflibercept are two available anti-VEGF drug for the treatment of wet AMD. Here, we reviewed the clinical outcome of treatment with ranibizumab or aflibercept in patients with wet AMD from recent studies with a special focus on eyes with unusual presentations or treatment resistant and compared these agents with other available wet AMD therapies.

AREAS COVERED

For this review, a literature search from 2011 to present was performed using the following terms (or combination of terms): anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, anti-VEGF, age-related macular degeneration, AMD, aflibercept, and ranibizumab. The studies were limited to studies used ranibizumab, and especially those switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept. Also the clinical trial website (www.clinicaltrials.gov) was searched for recently completed trials of aflibercept or ranibizumab for wet AMD treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Ranibizumab and aflibercept are effective for the treatment of wet AMD including those with retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) and CNV unresponsive to other anti-VEGF agents. Although high-dose ranibizumab has the potential to treat unresponsive CNV, switching to another anti-VEGF agent may be a preferable option in these eyes.

Correlation of platelet activating factor and age-related macular degeneration

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of Platelet Activating Factor (PAF) in the pathogenesis and development of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty six patients with ARMD (24 patients with dry ARMD and 32 patients with wet ARMD) and 25 age-matched control participants underwent ophthalmological examination, including visual acuity measurement and evaluation of the retina. The participants were classified into three groups according to their retinal status, based on indirect fundoscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography and fluorescein angiography findings. In order to evaluate the concentrations of PAF in serum, blood samples were collected from all participants and were analyzed with ELISA technique.

RESULTS

The concentrations of PAF differed significantly according to macular lesions and were found to be lower in patients with ARMD than control participants.

CONCLUSIONS

PAF levels are decreased along with the severity of ARMD. Understanding the role of PAF in pathogenesis of ARMD could be the impetus for the development of new therapies field of treatment of ARMD or even other retinal diseases.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs safety and efficacy in ophthalmic diseases

Macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness in developed countries. In the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has emerged as a key target for therapy. The intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs has been widely employed to reduce the disease progression and improve the visual outcomes of the affected patients. However, each intravitreal inoculation poses a risk of several complications as infection, inflammation, endophthalmitis, intraocular inflammation, increase of intraocular pressure and vitreous hemorrhage. This short review evaluates the efficacy and the incidence of adverse drug reactions related to intravitreal administration of the main anti-VEGF drugs actually available: Bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept.

Aflibercept: newly approved for the treatment of macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data available for aflibercept and compare the drug to other therapeutic options for treatment of macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) to determine its likely role in therapy.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search using the terms aflibercept and VEGF trap-eye was conducted to identify initial literature sources. No timeframe was used for exclusion of older trials. All trials referenced were published between January 1995 and December 2012.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Trials pertaining to oncologic use were excluded, as were studies conducted in animals and those written in a language other than English. Abstracts of the remaining trials were evaluated for determination of relevance to this review. Additional information sources were obtained via Internet and PubMed following a review of references.

DATA SYNTHESIS

While previous Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials for other indications (age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema) have shown intravitreal injections of aflibercept to be safe and well tolerated in many patients, preliminary results from the ongoing COPERNICUS and GALILEO trials proved the efficacy of this medication in treating macular edema secondary to CRVO. Of the combined 358 patients studied in COPERNICUS and GALILEO, 56% and 60%, respectively, of the patients receiving aflibercept 2 mg monthly achieved at least a 15-letter improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline over 6 months compared with just 12% and 22% in the control group (p < 0.01 for both). Additionally, in COPERNICUS and GALILEO, patients achieved a 21.3- and 14.7-letter improvement, respectively, in BCVA compared with placebo (p < 0.01 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

In September 2012, aflibercept became the second vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor approved for treatment of macular edema secondary to CRVO. While efficacy and safety appear similar to other anti-VEGF treatments, the higher potency, binding affinity, and duration of action make aflibercept an appealing new option.

Comparative effectiveness of aflibercept for the treatment of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common reason for vision loss in the United States. Many treatments, such as laser therapy and photodynamic therapies, have been used but their efficacy is limited. Emerging anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies are now considered the standard of care. Anti-VEGF agents inhibit angiogenesis in the eye by suppressing abnormal blood vessel growth, leading to vision improvement. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab are two examples of anti-VEGF drugs that have been approved; both showed promise based on the visual acuity scale. Aflibercept, another new therapy known to trap VEGF and inhibit multiple growth factors, is promising not only because it can be taken bimonthly based on year 1 of the VIEW trials, but it can also be extended, as demonstrated in year 2 of the VIEW trials. Based on a cost–effect analysis, aflibercept is comparable to other leading therapies. This is a review of relevant clinical trials that have proven the non-inferiority and safety of aflibercept compared to the standard of care and its unique role in the current management of wet AMD.