Effects of several anti-glaucoma medications on the circadian intraocular pressure fluctuations in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma

The relationship between intraocular pressure and glaucoma: An evolving concept

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important modifiable risk factor for glaucoma and fluctuates considerably within patients over short and long time periods. Our field's understanding of IOP has evolved considerably in recent years, driven by tonometric technologies with increasing accuracy, reproducibility, and temporal resolution that have refined our knowledge regarding the relationship between IOP and glaucoma risk and pathogenesis. The goal of this article is to review the published literature pertinent to the following points: 1) the factors that determine IOP in physiologic and pathologic states; 2) technologies for measuring IOP; 3) scientific and clinical rationale for measuring diverse IOP metrics in patients with glaucoma; 4) the impact and shortcomings of current standard-of-care IOP monitoring approaches; 5) recommendations for approaches to IOP monitoring that could improve patient outcomes; and 6) research questions that must be answered to improve our understanding of how IOP contributes to disease progression. Retrospective and prospective data, including that from landmark clinical trials, document greater IOP fluctuations in glaucomatous than healthy eyes, tendencies for maximal daily IOP to occur outside of office hours, and, in addition to mean and maximal IOP, an association between IOP fluctuation and glaucoma progression that is independent of mean in-office IOP. Ambulatory IOP monitoring, measuring IOP outside of office hours and at different times of day and night, provides clinicians with discrete data that could improve patient outcomes. Eye care clinicians treating glaucoma based on isolated in-office IOP measurements may make treatment decisions without fully capturing the entire IOP profile of an individual. Data linking home blood pressure monitors and home glucose sensors to dramatically improved outcomes for patients with systemic hypertension and diabetes and will be reviewed as they pertain to the question of whether ambulatory tonometry is positioned to do the same for glaucoma management. Prospective randomized controlled studies are warranted to determine whether remote tonometry-based glaucoma management might reduce vision loss and improve patient outcomes.

Reproducibility of consecutive automated telemetric noctodiurnal IOP profiles as determined by an intraocular implant

BACKGROUND

Intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring in glaucoma management is evolving with novel devices. We investigated the reproducibility of 24 hour profiles on two consecutive days and after 30 days of self-measurements via telemetric IOP monitoring.

METHODS

Seven primary patients with open-angle glaucoma previously implanted with a telemetric IOP sensor in one eye underwent automatic measurements throughout 24 hours on two consecutive days ('day 1' and 'day 2'). Patients wore an antenna adjacent to the study eye connected to a reader device to record IOP every 5 min. Also, self-measurements in six of seven patients were collected for a period of 30 days. Analysis included calculation of hourly averages to correlate time-pairs of day 1 versus day 2 and the self-measurements vers day 2.

RESULTS

The number of IOP measurements per patient ranged between 151 and 268 on day 1, 175 and 268 on day 2 and 19 and 1236 during 30 days of self-measurements. IOP time-pairs of automatic measurements on day 1 and day 2 were significantly correlated at the group level (R=0.83, p<0.001) and in four individual patients (1, 2, 6 and 7). IOP time-pairs of self-measurements and day 2 were significantly correlated at the group level (R=0.4, p<0.001) and in four individual patients (2, 5, 6 and 7).

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four hour automatic measurements of IOP are correlated on consecutive days and, though to a lesser degree, with self-measurements. Therefore a virtual 24-hour IOP curve might be constructed from self-measurements. Both options provide an alternative to frequent in-office IOP measurements.

Disruption of 24-Hour Rhythm in Intraocular Pressure Correlates with Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in Glaucoma

Parameters of 24-h rhythm in intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed in patients with stable or advanced primary open-angle glaucoma (S-POAG/A-POAG) and referenced to the phase of “marker” circadian temperature rhythm of each patient. Body temperature and IOP were measured over a 72-h span in 115 participants (65 S-POAG and 50 A-POAG). Retinal Ganglion Cell (RGC) damage was assessed by high-definition optical coherence tomography. The 24-h IOP rhythm in A-POAG patients peaked during the night, opposite to the daytime phase position in S-POAG patients (p < 0.0001). The 24-h IOP phase correlated with RGC loss (p < 0.0001). The internal phase shift between IOP and body temperature gradually increased with POAG progression (p < 0.001). Angiotensin converting enzyme Alu-repeat deletion/insertion (ACE I/D) emerged as a candidate gene polymorphism, which may play a role in the alteration of the circadian IOP variability in advanced glaucoma. To conclude, a reliable estimation of the 24-h rhythm in IOP requires the degree of RGC damage to be assessed. In advanced POAG, the 24-h phase of IOP tended to occur during the night and correlated with RGC loss, being progressively delayed relative to the phase of temperature.

24-h Efficacy of Glaucoma Treatment Options

Current management of glaucoma entails the medical, laser, or surgical reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) to a predetermined level of target IOP, which is commensurate with either stability or delayed progression of visual loss. In the published literature, the hypothesis is often made that IOP control implies a single IOP measurement over time. Although the follow-up of glaucoma patients with single IOP measurements is quick and convenient, such measurements often do not adequately reflect the untreated IOP characteristics, or indeed the quality of treated IOP control during the 24-h cycle. Since glaucoma is a 24-h disease and the damaging effect of elevated IOP is continuous, it is logical that we should aim to understand the efficacy of all treatment options throughout the 24-h period. This article first reviews the concept and value of diurnal and 24-h IOP monitoring. It then critically evaluates selected available evidence on the 24-h efficacy of medical, laser and surgical therapy options. During the past decade several controlled trials have significantly enhanced our understanding on the 24-h efficacy of all glaucoma therapy options. Nevertheless, more long-term evidence is needed to better evaluate the 24-h efficacy of glaucoma therapy and the precise impact of IOP characteristics on glaucomatous progression and visual prognosis.