Two-Year Outcome of Intravitreal Injections of Ranibizumab for Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization

Real-World Treatment Intensity and Patterns in Patients With Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Common Data Model in Ophthalmology

BACKGROUND

A paucity of data addressing real-world treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs led us to investigate real-world treatment intensity and treatment patterns in patients with mCNV.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model database of treatment-naïve patients with mCNV over the 18-year study period (2003-2020). Outcomes were treatment intensity (time trends of total/average number of prescriptions, mean number of prescriptions in the first year and the second year after initiating treatment, proportion of patients with no treatment in the second year) and treatment patterns (subsequent patterns of treatment according to the initial treatment).

RESULTS

Our final cohort included 94 patients with at-least 1-year observation period. Overall, 96.8% of patients received anti-VEGF drugs as first-line treatment, with most of injections from bevacizumab. The number of anti-VEGF injections in each calendar year showed an increasing trend over time; however, there was a drop in the mean number of injections in the second year compared to the first year from 2.09 to 0.47. About 77% of patients did not receive any treatment in their second year of treatment regardless of drugs. Most of patients (86.2%) followed non-switching monotherapy only and bevacizumab was the most popular choice either in the first-line (68.1%) or in the second-line (53.8%) of treatment. Aflibercept was increasingly used as the first-line treatment for patients with mCNV.

CONCLUSION

Anti-VEGF drugs have become the treatment of choice and second-line treatment for mCNV over the past decade. Anti-VEGF drugs are effective for the treatment of mCNV as the non-switching monotherapy is the main treatment regimen in most cases and the number of treatments decreases significantly in the second year of treatment.

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors for predominantly Caucasian myopic choroidal neovascularization: 2-year treatment outcomes in clinical practice: data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry

Purpose

To report the 24‐month outcomes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in predominantly Caucasian eyes in routine clinical practice.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of treatment‐naïve eyes starting intravitreal injection of VEGF inhibitors of either bevacizumab (1.25 mg) or ranibizumab (0.5 mg) for mCNV from 1 January 2006 to 31 May 2018 that were tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry.

Results

We identified 203 eyes (bevacizumab–85 and ranibizumab–118) of 189 patients. The estimated mean (95% CI) change in VA over 24 months for all eyes using longitudinal models was +8 (5, 11) letters with a median (Q1, Q3) of 3 (2, 5) injections given mostly during the first year. The estimated mean change in VA at 24 months was similar between bevacizumab and ranibizumab [+9 (5, 13) letters for bevacizumab versus +9 (6, 13) letters for ranibizumab; p = 0.37]. Both agents were also similar in the mCNV activity outcomes, treatment frequency and visit frequency.

Conclusions

The 24‐month treatment outcomes of VEGF inhibitors for mCNV were favourable in this largest series yet reported of predominantly Caucasian eyes in routine clinical practice, with approximately two lines of visual gain and a median of three injections given mostly during the first year. These outcomes are similar to those reported for predominantly Asian eyes. Bevacizumab appeared to be as safe and effective as ranibizumab.

Myopic choroidal neovascularization: management issues remain

In the modern world, myopia continues to be one of the most common refractive errors and is considered a socially signifi cant problem, since it is a common cause of decreased vision. In connection with the growth of myopia, the risk of developing complications in the fundus increases, leading to the development of degenerative changes in the retina and an irreversible decrease in visual functions in young and middle-aged people. One of these complications is myopic choroidal neovascularization, which leads to a progressive, irreversible decrease in visual acuity and poor prognosis, and the process is often bilateral in nature. The tactics of managing patients with such complications has been determined: antiangiogenic therapy is used – intravitreal therapy with anti-VEGF drugs, which is currently the fi rst choice therapy for this pathology. But in some cases, antiangiogenic therapy is contraindicated, and the question arises about the tactics of managing such patients. The aim: to study treatment options for myopic choroidal neovascularization in patients with myopia in different situations.Material and methods. The paper presents two clinical observations of patients with mChNV, considers the tactics of their management. The patients underwent standard ophthalmological examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-Angio (OPTOPOL Technology, Poland).Conclusions. Women with myopia planning pregnancy need a thorough examination not only by a clinician, but also by an ophthalmologist, since it is necessary to take into account not only the degree of myopia and choose the optimal delivery method, but also to study the state of the retina for the timely diagnosis of degenerative changes in the fundus.

RANIBIZUMAB VERSUS VERTEPORFIN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY IN ASIAN PATIENTS WITH MYOPIC CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION: BRILLIANCE, a 12-Month, Randomized, Double-Masked Study

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg administered over 12 months was efficacious and well-tolerated in Asian patients with visual impairment due to myopic choroidal neovascularization. Ranibizumab treatment guided by visual acuity stabilization or disease activity criteria resulted in statistically superior efficacy compared with verteporfin photodynamic therapy.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy in Asian patients with visual impairment due to myopic choroidal neovascularization.

The Evaluation of a Two-Year Outcome of Intravitreal Conbercept versus Ranibizumab for Pathological Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the 24-month follow-up results of intravitreal conbercept with ranibizumab in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), secondary to pathological myopia (PM). Methods: Fifty-nine patients' 64 eyes with pathological myopic CNV were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-one eyes underwent conbercept treatment (group C) and 33 eyes underwent ranibizumab treatment (group R), respectively. No patients have received any treatment before. The main outcome of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) uses an international standard visual acuity chart and is converted to the minimum resolution logarithm (LogMAR) visual acuity. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups at the baseline statisticlly. At 24 months, the mean logMAR BCVA of group C increased from 0.95 ± 0.54 to 0.58 ± 0.39 (P < .001) and the mean central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 280.97 ± 62.69 μm to 242.35 ± 90.39 μm (P = .033). The mean logMAR BCVA of group R increased from 0.86 ± 0.40 to 0.54 ± 0.28 (P < .001) and the mean CMT was reduced from 303.58 ± 61.95 μm to 251.82 ± 84.74 μm (P = .005). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA and CMT between the two groups (P = .962, P = .667, respectively). The mean number of injections was 3.94 ± 1.88 in group C and 4.06 ± 1.82 in group R (P = .788). During the follow-up period, no ocular complications and systemic adverse reactions were observed. Conclusion: Similar visual acuity and improved morphology were achieved in both groups. The two drugs were also found to be safe and effective in the treatment of pathological myopic CNV.

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF RANIBIZUMAB TREATMENT OF MYOPIC CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN EAST-ASIAN PATIENTS FROM THE RADIANCE STUDY

A retrospective cohort study of East-Asian patients previously treated with ranibizumab for myopic choroidal neovascularization in the RADIANCE trial. Clinical charts were reviewed to assess long-term efficacy and safety. Visual acuity was sustained for additional 36 months after trial completion with few patients requiring additional treatment and no new safety concerns observed.

Purpose:

To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of ranibizumab for treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in clinical practice.

Methods:

Noninterventional, retrospective cohort study of East-Asian patients previously treated with ranibizumab during the RADIANCE trial. Forty-one patients who completed the RADIANCE trial were followed-up for up to 48 months (post-RADIANCE observation period). Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity changes from baseline (assessed at RADIANCE trial initiation), mCNV recurrences, and ocular adverse events.

Results:

Mean visual gain from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (56.5 ± 12.1 letters) (20/80) was significant at 12 months (+14.3 ± 11.4 letters, n = 40, P < 0.0001), 24 months (+10.4 ± 22.3 letters, n = 31, P = 0.0143), 30 months (+11.0 ± 22.4 letters, n = 29, P = 0.0134), 42 months (+12.9 ± 20.9 letters, n = 25, P = 0.0051), and 48 months (+16.3 ± 18.7, n = 16, P = 0.0034). Of the 16 patients who completed 48 months of follow-up, 63% gained ≥10 letters and 13% lost ≥10 letters. Over the post-RADIANCE observation period, 83% of patients required no further treatment for mCNV, 10% experienced mCNV recurrences, and 12% experienced a nonserious ocular adverse event. Patients who required additional treatment for mCNV received a mean of 5.0 (SD 5.9, range 1.0–18.0) ranibizumab injections.

Conclusion:

Best-corrected visual acuity gained at the end of the RADIANCE trial was sustained over additional 36 months of follow-up. Few patients required further treatment and no new safety concerns were observed.

Real-world data on ranibizumab for myopic choroidal neovascularization due to pathologic myopia: results from a post-marketing surveillance in Japan

Objectives

The aim of this study was to obtain real-world clinical data on the safety and efficacy of ranibizumab treatment for myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to pathologic myopia.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance study in ranibizumab-naive Japanese patients with myopic CNV. Patients who initiated ranibizumab treatment were registered and prospectively observed over 12 months. Safety endpoints were the incidence of ocular and non-ocular adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). The efficacy endpoint included the average change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) units (logMAR BCVA) from baseline to the last observation.

Results

Three hundred and eighteen patients were included in the safety analysis population. Of these 79.9% were female and the mean age was 65.5 years. The incidences of SAEs and ADRs were 0.6 and 0.3%, respectively. A total of 268 patients (84.0%) completed the 12-month study period. The mean (±SD) and median number of ranibizumab injections were 2.0 ± 1.5 and 1.0 during the 12-month study period, respectively. The number of ranibizumab injections received was one in 52.2% of patients and less than or equal to three in 89.2%. The mean change in logMAR BCVA from baseline to month 12 was −0.193, and the mean logMAR BCVA improved from 0.517 to 0.319 between baseline and month 12.

Conclusions

This study showed that ranibizumab is generally well tolerated, and that a minimum number of injections were necessary to produce a therapeutic effect in Japanese myopic CNV patients in a real-world setting.