Therapy Rationale for Mineralocorticoid-Receptor Antagonists, Acetazolamide and a Switch of Therapy in Nonresponders in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Clinical predictive factors and imaging biomarkers of treatment response to half dose PDT in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical and imaging biomarkers of the response to half-dose photodynamic therapy (HD-PDT) in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) METHODS: Clinical records and baseline ophthalmic images of 67 chronic CSC patients who underwent HD-PDT were assessed. In addition to demographic data, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images were analyzed for specific biomarkers. The patients were categorized to early responder and late responder based on the time needed for complete resolution of subretinal fluid after PDT (less than 1 month vs. more than 1 month). The baseline clinical and imaging biomarkers were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-three eyes of 67 patients were included in the study. The mean response time to PDT was 1.63 ± 1.48 months with 82.2% (60/73) of eyes categorized as early responder. The mean response time to PDT in delayed-response group was 4.15±1.51 months. In multivariate analysis, delayed response to PDT was associated with lacking history of systemic corticosteroid consumption, lacking history of pretreatment with eplerenone or acetazolamide before PDT and presence of hyperreflective foci in baseline OCT images (all p values < 0.05). There was no association between final visual outcome and late response to PDT.

CONCLUSION

The presence of inflammatory biomarkers such as hyperreflective foci in baseline OCT images might be indicative of resistance to PDT. Moreover, the effect of pretreatment with mineralocorticoid antagonist on the response to PDT in chronic CSC should be explored in future prospective studies.

Efficacy and safety of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant clinical studies published prior to March 2020. The primary outcome was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the secondary outcomes included the subretinal fluid (SRF), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and central macular thickness (CMT).

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four cohort studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 352 eyes. The MRA treatment was not superior to placebo in BCVA at 1 month (WMD = -0.06, 95% CI -0.15-0.02, P = 0.15, I² = 86%), 3 months (WMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.14-0.06, P = 0.44, I² = 77%) and 6 months (WMD = -0, 95% CI -0.05-0.05, P = 0.92, I² = 0%). The MRA treatment resulted in significant reduction than the placebo in the SRF (WMD = -60.64, 95% CI -97.91 to -23.37, P = 0.001, I² = 49%), SFCT (WMD = -39.15, 95% CI -52.58 to -25.72, P < 0.001, I² = 0%), and CMT (WMD = -60.75, 95% CI -97.85 to -23.65, P = 0.01, I² = 53%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis shows that the MRA treatment can improve anatomical structure in CSC patients, but it is not effective for achieving BCVA gain. The applicant of the MRA is safe and have no severe effect.

Efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for central serous chorioretinopathy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) for patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched up to February 2020, to identify the studies comparing the efficacy of MRA with placebo/observation or photodynamic therapy (PDT) for CSCR. The primary outcomes were maximal subretinal fluid height and central macular thickness (CMT). The secondary outcomes included subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Data of interest were extracted and analyzed by R version 3.6.0. The weighted mean difference and their 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the strength of the association.

RESULTS

Ten studies including 284 affected eyes were involved, with 168 undergoing MRA treatment, 60 taking placebo/observation, and 56 receiving PDT. The pooling results showed that MRA was significantly more effective in resolving maximal subretinal fluid height (P < 0.01) and diminishing CMT (P < 0.01) than placebo/observation, while PDT could achieve significantly better CMT reduction than MRA (P = 0.03). For BCVA improvement and SFCT reduction, no statistical difference was detected among the groups of MRA, observation, placebo, or PDT (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MRA is an effective therapy for the management of CSCR, which is only slightly inferior to PDT in terms of CMT reduction. For patients who could not afford PDT, MRA could function as an alternative treatment with acceptable efficacy and safety.

Oral medications for central serous chorioretinopathy: a literature review

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is characterised by acute or chronic neurosensory detachments of the retina, usually in the posterior pole, with or without associated detachments of retinal pigment epithelium. Although the condition often resolves spontaneously, chronic and recurrent cases can lead to significant visual loss in the working population and it is thus increasingly recognised as an important public health issue. The uncertainty regarding the underlying cause of CSCR has led to a wide range of therapies being tried for this condition including photodynamic therapy, laser photocoagulation, anti-VEGF injections and a multitude of oral agents. This article aims to review the current evidence for oral agents that have been used for treatment of CSCR. A systematic literature search was conducted for articles published between 1980 to July 2018. A total of 73 articles were included. These studied the following oral medications: eplerenone, spironolactone, beta blockers, H. pylori agents, omeprazole, rifampicin, methotrexate, aspirin, acetazolamide, mifepristone, melatonin, finasteride, ketoconazole, antioxidants and curcumin phospholipid. Although none of the studies showed robust evidence of efficacy, the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, particularly eplerenone, appear to demonstrate the highest quality evidence for use in this condition. The review aims to give the reader an overview of the current available evidence for oral medications used in the treatment of CSCR in order to provide an evidence-based discussion with the patient and guide through possible options for treatment.

Pharmacotherapy of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Review of the Current Treatments

BACKGROUND

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is the fourth most frequent retinal disorder in terms of prevalence. It typically occurs in young subjects and affects men more often than women. CSC is characterized by serous retinal detachment (SRD) involving mainly the macular area. The clinical course is usually selflimited, with spontaneous resolution within 3 months. The persistence of SRD or multiple relapse may result in a chronic form of CSC distinguished by permanent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor damage. As the pathogenetic mechanism of CSC primarily involves RPE and choroidal vascularization, the current therapeutic approaches aim to restore the normal functions of RPE and normal choroidal vascular permeability. In this review, the authors aim to summarize the current therapeutic approach to CSC.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted in PubMed by searching for relevant studies on the current therapeutic options for CSC, including simple observation, conventional laser treatment, subthreshold laser treatment (SLT), photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin, treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists and treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs.

RESULTS

Since most cases resolve spontaneously, the most common initial CSC treatment is observation. Current evidence suggests that PDT and SLT are valuable in improving visual acuity, reducing subretinal fluid and maintaining long-term effectiveness. No clear evidence of efficacy has been achieved for anti-VEGF. MR antagonists might be a viable choice for the treatment of chronic CSC.

CONCLUSION

The pathophysiology of CSC remains poorly understood and as a consequence, the gold standard of care for CSC is yet to be defined. To date, PDT and SLT continue to offer good clinical outcomes. Positive preliminary results seem to emerge from the studies of MR antagonists.

Central serous chorioretinopathy: Towards an evidence-based treatment guideline

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a common cause of central vision loss, primarily affecting men 20-60 years of age. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the classification of CSC, and a wide variety of interventions have been proposed, reflecting the controversy associated with treating this disease. The recent publication of appropriately powered randomised controlled trials such as the PLACE trial, as well as large retrospective, non-randomised treatment studies regarding the treatment of CSC suggest the feasibility of a more evidence-based approach when considering treatment options. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current rationale and evidence with respect to the variety of interventions available for treating CSC, including pharmacology, laser treatment, and photodynamic therapy. In addition, we describe the complexity of CSC, the challenges associated with treating CSC, and currently ongoing studies. Many treatment strategies such as photodynamic therapy using verteporfin, oral mineralocorticoid antagonists, and micropulse laser treatment have been reported as being effective. Currently, however, the available evidence suggests that half-dose (or half-fluence) photodynamic therapy should be the treatment of choice in chronic CSC, whereas observation may be the preferred approach in acute CSC. Nevertheless, exceptions can be considered based upon patient-specific characteristics.

Paradoxical response to carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in patients with intraretinal cystoid spaces

Background: Intraretinal cystoid spaces (IRCS) are fluid-filled spaces seen in some retinal dystrophies and often treated with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. The purpose of this study is to report an unexpected bilateral improvement in the IRCS after discontinuation of therapy. Material and Methods: We identified from our records 23 patients with retinal dystrophy and IRCS who had been treated with topical and/or oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. All subjects had regular follow-up with OCT and previous genetic testing. Results: We identified four (17%) patients who experienced a bilateral and symmetrical paradoxical improvement in IRCS size and visual acuity after discontinuation of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Two were mutations in RS1, one in CLN3 and another in NR2E3. All patients were followed for at least three years (range 39-63 months). None had systemic abnormalities. Conclusions: Patients with IRCS may exhibit a paradoxical response after discontinuation of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Although the pathophysiology of these phenomena is unclear, stopping treatment may be an option in patients who cease to improve or get worse on treatment.