Patient Preference-Based Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prostamides for Open-Angle Glaucoma

From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost

BACKGROUND

Bimatoprost has emerged as a significant medication in the field of medicine over the past several decades, with diverse applications in ophthalmology, dermatology, and beyond. Originally developed as an ocular hypotensive agent, it has proven highly effective in treating glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Its ability to reduce intraocular pressure has established it as a first-line treatment option, improving management and preventing vision loss. In dermatology, bimatoprost has shown promising results in the promotion of hair growth, particularly in the treatment of alopecia and hypotrichosis. Its mechanism of action, stimulating the hair cycle and prolonging the growth phase, has led to the development of bimatoprost-containing solutions for enhancing eyelash growth.

AIM

The aim of our review is to provide a brief description, overview, and studies in the current literature regarding the versatile clinical use of bimatoprost in recent years. This can help clinicians determine the most suitable individualized therapy to meet the needs of each patient.

METHODS

Our methods involve a comprehensive review of the latest advancements reported in the literature in bimatoprost formulations, which range from traditional eye drops to sustained-release implants. These innovations offer extended drug delivery, enhance patient compliance, and minimize side effects.

RESULTS

The vast literature published on PubMed has confirmed the clinical usefulness of bimatoprost in lowering intraocular pressure and in managing patients with glaucoma. Numerous studies have shown promising results in dermatology and esthetics in promoting hair growth, particularly in treating alopecia and hypotrichosis. Its mechanism of action involves stimulating the hair cycle and prolonging the growth phase, leading to the development of solutions that enhance eyelash growth. The global use of bimatoprost has expanded significantly, with applications growing beyond its initial indications. Ongoing research is exploring its potential in glaucoma surgery, neuroprotection, and cosmetic procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Bimatoprost has shown immense potential for addressing a wide range of therapeutic needs through various formulations and advancements. Promising future perspectives include the exploration of novel delivery systems such as contact lenses and microneedles to further enhance drug efficacy and patient comfort. Ongoing research and future perspectives continue to shape its role in medicine, promising further advancements and improved patient outcomes.

Systematic methodological review of health state values in glaucoma cost-utility analyses

IMPORTANCE

Describing the characteristics and sources of health state utility values and reporting practice in the literature of cost-utility analyses facilitates an understanding of the level of the transparency, validity, and generalizability of cost-utility analyses. Improving the quality of reporting will support investigators in describing the incremental value of emerging glaucoma interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the state of practice among published glaucoma cost-utility analysis studies, focusing on valuation of health and the quality of reporting.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We searched several databases including Medline, CINHAL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Biosis previews, the Health Economic Evaluations Database, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED). We included full-text, English, published cost-utility analyses of glaucoma interventions with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the primary outcome measure to calculate incremental cost-utility ratios. Excluded studies were non-English language, reviews, editorials, protocols, or other types of economic studies (cost-benefit, cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness). Study characteristics, operational definitions of glaucoma health states and health state utilities were extracted. The original source of the health utility was reviewed to determine the scale of measurement and the source of preference weighting. Items from the Systematic Review of Utilities for Cost-Effectiveness (SpRUCE checklist) were used to assess the reporting and quality of health utilities in glaucoma CUA.

FINDINGS

43 CUAs were included, with 11 unique sources of health utilities. A wide range of health utilities for the same Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson glaucoma health states were reported; ocular hypertension (0.84-0.95), mild (0.68-0.94), moderate (0.57-0.92), advanced (0.58-0.88), severe/blind (0.46-0.76), and bilateral blindness (0.26-0.5). Most studies reported the basis for using health utilities (34, 79%) and any assumptions or adjustments applied to the health utilities (22, 51%). Few studies reported a framework for assessing the relevance of health utilities to a decision context (8, 19%). Even fewer (3, 7%) applied a systematic search strategy to identify health utilities and used a structured assessment of quality for inclusion. Overall, reporting has not improved over time.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This review describes that few CUAs describe important rationale for using health state utility values. Including additional details on the search, appraisal, selection, and inclusion process of health utility values improves transparency, generalizability and supports the assessment of the validity of study conclusions. Future investigations should aim to use health utilities on the same scale of measurement across health states and consider the source and relevance to the decision context/purpose of conducting that cost-utility study.

Efficacy of preserved Tafluprost 0.0015% in lowering intraocular pressure

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect of topical preserved tafluprost 0.0015% in a tertiary hospital setting in India.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) attending regular outpatient visits in December 2019 and January 2021, and treated with topical preserved tafluprost 0.0015%. Based on their medication history, patients were divided into two groups, the "treatment naïve" group and the "switched" group, which included patients switched to tafluprost monotherapy after treatment with at least one prior drug.

RESULTS

The mean IOP of the study population reduced significantly from baseline level by 20.6% and 25.5% at 1 month and 3 months after preserved tafluprost 0.0015% treatment (P < 0.001 for both). The mean IOP in patients with only OHT reduced significantly from baseline level by 21% and 26% at 1 month and 3 months after preserved tafluprost 0.0015% treatment (P < 0.001 for both). The mean IOP in patients with POAG reduced significantly from baseline level by 19% and 24% at 1 month and 3 months after preserved tafluprost 0.0015% treatment (P < 0.001 for both). The baseline IOP ± SD in POAG treatment naïve patients was 25.3 ± 0.3 mmHg, which reduced significantly by 24% and 28% at 1 month and 3 months after preserved tafluprost 0.0015% treatment (P < 0.001 for both). The baseline IOP ± SD in POAG switched patients was 24.3 ± 0.1 mmHg, which reduced significantly by 18% and 22% at 1 month and 3 months after preserved tafluprost 0.0015% treatment (P < 0.001 for both). In the POAG switch group, the percent reduction in IOP at 3 months after preserved tafluprost 0.0015% treatment was 23% with timolol as first line, 22% with bimatoprost as first line, 20% with latanoprost as first line, and 19% with travoprost as first line (P < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

We show significant IOP reduction with preserved tafluprost 0.0015% in a real-world setting. As first-line monotherapy in patients with OHT and in POAG-naïve patients, preserved tafluprost 0.0015% significantly reduced IOP at 3 months. Even as second-line therapy in nonresponders (POAG-Switched) to various drugs (same class [PGAs] versus different class), treatment with preserved tafluprost 0.0015% resulted in significant IOP reduction at 3 months.

A Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Open Angle Glaucoma Management

PURPOSE

Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) quantify and compare both costs and measures of efficacy for different interventions. As the costs of glaucoma management to patients, payers, and physicians are increasing, we seek to investigate the role of CEAs in the field of glaucoma and how such studies impact clinical management.

METHODS

We adhered to the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" guidelines for our systematic review structure. Eligible studies included any full-text articles that investigated cost-effectiveness or cost-utility as it relates to the field of open angle glaucoma management in the United States. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the validated Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Economic Evaluations.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in the review. Dates of publication ranged from 1983 to 2021. Most of the studies were published in the 2000s and performed CEAs in the domains of treatment/therapy, screening, and adherence for patients with primary angle open glaucoma. Of the 18 articles included, 14 focused on treatment, 2 on screening, and 2 on adherence. Most of these studies focused on the cost-effectiveness of different topical medical therapies, whereas only a few studies explored laser procedures, surgical interventions, or minimally invasive procedures. Economic models using decision analysis incorporating state-transition Markov cycles or Montecarlo simulations were widely used, however, the methodology among studies was variable, with a wide spectrum of inputs, measures of outcomes, and time horizons used.

CONCLUSION

Overall, we found that cost-effectiveness research in glaucoma in the United States remains relatively unstructured, resulting in unclear and conflicting implications for clinical management.

Cost-analysis of Surgical Intraocular Pressure Management in Glaucoma

PRCIS

The multiplicity of treatment options for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is both a blessing and a challenge. Some attention to cost-analysis might assist in choosing an optimal therapy, especially in a cost-constrained, international setting.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to quantify and to analyze the relative cost of various glaucoma surgical procedures and selective laser trabeculoplasty surgery per mm Hg IOP reduction ($/mm Hg) since standard cost-utility methods are not well suited to the study of glaucoma which characteristically only claims visual acuity in its end stages.

METHODS

Published glaucoma treatment studies were reviewed to quantitate the reduction of mean IOP and glaucoma medications for a given treatment modality. A US perspective was adopted, using Medicare allowable costs were used to calculate a newly introduced parameter-cost per mm Hg IOP reduction-at 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The cost per mm Hg IOP reduction after 1 year of treatment ranged from $190/mm Hg for trabeculectomy to $1376/mm Hg for iStent. For reference, the cost of selective later trabeculoplasty surgery was $121/mm Hg. After the first year, cost/mm Hg ranged from $12 to $61/mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional glaucoma surgeries and selective laser trabeculoplasty surgery were the most cost-efficient surgical methods to lower IOP compared with the various minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries options. They may be more appropriate management when cost is an important issue.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Minimally Invasive Trabecular Meshwork Stents with Phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To investigate the costs and effects of implanting trabecular meshwork bypass stents during cataract surgery from a societal perspective in the United States.

DESIGN

Cost-utility analysis using Markov models and efficacy/safety data from published pivotal or randomized control trials (RCTs) of devices investigated.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 65 years and older with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma with or without visually significant cataract.

METHODS

With the use of Markov models, glaucoma progression through 4 glaucoma states (mild, moderate, advanced, severe/blind) and death were simulated over 35 years. The cohort with cataract entered the model and received cataract surgery with or without device implantation. We included a medication management only reference group to calculate total costs and outcomes for those without cataract. Intraocular pressure (IOP) reductions from RCTs were converted to glaucoma state transition probabilities using visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) decline rates from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Progressive thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) on OCT imaging related to IOP control warranted further intervention, including adding medication, selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), or incisional glaucoma surgery. We estimated whole costs at Medicare rates and obtained utility values for glaucoma states from previous studies. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained were evaluated at a QALY threshold of $50 000. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis, scenario analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed parameter uncertainty and demonstrated model robustness.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total costs, QALY, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

Over 35 years in the base case, the Hydrus (Ivantis, Inc.) implanted with cataract surgery arm cost $48 026.13 and gained 12.26 QALYs. The iStent inject (Glaukos Corp.) implanted with cataract surgery arm cost $49 599.86 and gained 12.21 QALYs. Cataract surgery alone cost $54 409.25 and gained 12.04 QALYs. Initial nonsurgical management cost $57 931.22 and gained 11.74 QALY. The device arms dominated or were cost-effective compared with cataract surgery alone within 5 years and throughout sensitivity analyses. The iStent inject arm was cost-effective in 94.19% of iterations in probabilistic sensitivity analyses, whereas the Hydrus arm was cost-effective in 94.69% of iterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Implanting the Hydrus Microstent or iStent inject during cataract surgery is cost-effective at a conservative QALY threshold.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Glaucoma Medication Adherence

PURPOSE

The majority of patients with glaucoma do not take their medications as prescribed. Estimates of the cost-utility value of adherence to prescribed glaucoma medication are vital to implement potentially effective interventions.

DESIGN

Cost-utility analysis using Monte Carlo microsimulations incorporating a series of Markov cycles (10 000 iterations per strategy).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with glaucoma aged ≥40 years with a full lifetime horizon (up to 60 years).

METHODS

The analysis estimated glaucomatous progression on the basis of data from the United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study. Participants with glaucoma entered the model at age 40 years with a mean deviation in the better-seeing eye of -1.4±-1.9 decibels (dB) and -4.3±-3.4 dB in the worse-seeing eye. Participants whose glaucoma worsened each year accumulate -0.8 dB loss compared with -0.1 dB loss for those who remained stable. Data from the Glaucoma Laser Trial and the Tube versus Trabeculectomy Studies were used to assign probabilities of worsening disease among treated patients. Claims data estimating rates of glaucoma medication adherence over 4 years were used to assign probability of adherence. Those with poor adherence were modeled as having outcomes similar to the placebo arm of the clinical trials. As patients' mean deviation deteriorated, they transitioned between health states from mild (≥-6 dB), to moderate (<-6 to ≥-12 dB), to severe glaucoma (<-12 to ≥23 dB), to unilateral (<-20 dB) and bilateral blindness. At each health state, patients incurred the costs of treatment and established health utilities; ultimately, societal costs of low vision and blindness were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of glaucoma medication adherence.

RESULTS

Beginning at an initial glaucoma diagnosis at age 40 years, patients proceeded to single-eye blindness as early as 19 years among those who were nonadherent and 23 years for those remaining adherent. Total healthcare costs for adherent patients averaged $62 782 (standard deviation [SD], 34 107), and those for nonadherent patients averaged $52 722 (SD, 38 868). Nonadherent patients had a mean loss of 0.34 QALYs, resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $29 600 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSION

At a conservative willingness to pay of $50 000/QALY, there is room to expand services to improve patient adherence.