The Prognostic Value of Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Hospice Patients

Predictors of Change in Quality of Life in Patients With End-Stage Disease During Hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are no studies aimed at evaluating the quality of life (QoL) of patients with end-stage disease during hospitalization and the factors that influence it.

AIM

The aim of the research was to identify predictors of change in the QoL of patients hospitalized due to advanced stage of disease.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 140 patients with end-stage disease who were hospitalized on this account. For evaluation of QoL, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Karnofsky Performance Status questionnaires were used for the assessment of mental and functional status. For the evaluation of predictors of negative change in QoL, a logistic regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

During hospitalization, there was a significant deterioration in the scores given for all domains of the functional QLQ-C30 scale, but not the symptomatic scale. Predictors of change in overall QoL detected were marital status, improved functional status, and depression detected on admission to hospital. Gender and age were found to be protective factors against deterioration in overall QoL.

CONCLUSION

Sociodemographic characteristics and mental and functional status may be associated with change in QoL of patients with end-stage disease during hospitalization.

Reporting of "quality of life": a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals

CONTEXT

Palliative care clinical practice depends upon an evidence-based decision-making process which in turn is based upon current research evidence. One of the most important goals in clinical palliative care is to improve patients' quality of life (QoL).

AIM

This study aimed to perform a quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals for reporting characteristics of articles on QoL.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was a systematic review of palliative care journals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve palliative care journals were searched for articles with "QoL" in the title of the articles published from 2006 to 2010. The reporting rates of all journals were compared. The selected articles were categorized into assessment and treatment, and subsequently grouped into original and review articles. The original articles were subgrouped into qualitative and quantitative studies, and the review articles were grouped into narrative and systematic reviews. Each subgroup of original article category was further classified according to study designs.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Descriptive analysis using frequencies and percentiles was done using SPSS for Windows, version 11.5.

RESULTS

The overall reporting rate among all journals was 1.95% (71/3634), and Indian Journal of Palliative Care (IJPC) had the highest reporting rate of 5.08% (3/59), followed by Palliative Medicine (PM) with 3.71% (20/538), and Palliative and Supportive Care (PSC) with 3.64% (9/247) reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall reporting rate for QoL articles in palliative care journals was 1.95% and there were very few randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews found. The study findings indicate further high-quality research to establish an adequate evidence base for QoL.

Home-based palliative care services for underserved populations

BACKGROUND

Kokua Kalihi Valley is one of the first federally qualified community health centers offering home-based palliative care (HBPC). Kokua Kalihi Valley serves low-income, immigrant populations from Asia and the Pacific Islands, whose end-of-life needs are rarely addressed. Our team includes a palliative medicine physician, nurse, case manager, psychologist, interpreter, and volunteers.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this Institutional Review Board-approved study was to measure symptom relief and quality of life, resource utilization, and satisfaction with HBPC.

METHODS

Over 12 months, 91 people including 46 patients with chronic advanced illnesses and 45 corresponding primary caregivers were enrolled. Data were collected prospectively, upon admission, and repeatedly thereafter, using the Missoula-Vitas Quality of Life Index, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, and the Palliative Performance Scale. Utilization of resources was tracked, including case management, hospice, emergency department, and hospital visits.

RESULTS

The median age was 71 years, and more than half had chronic neurodegenerative conditions. Most patients (98%) were minority, including Samoans, Filipinos, Japanese, Micronesians, and Hawaiians. Median stay in HBPC was 7 months, with a median of 3.5 visits. Approximately 25% of patients enrolled in hospice (median stay 67.5 days). There was a decrease in hospitalizations (p = 0.002) after HBPC admission. Discussions and documentation of end-of-life wishes increased from 50% to 90% (p < 0.01). Caregiver satisfaction with HBPC was high.

CONCLUSION

Data on outcomes and quality indicators of HBPC programs are scant, especially among immigrant Asian and Pacific Islanders patients. Our experience demonstrates the effectiveness of palliative care approaches in this population.