1
|
Heijltjes MT, van Thiel GJ, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A, Hendriksen G, van Delden JJ. Continuous deep sedation at the end of life: a qualitative interview-study among health care providers on an evolving practice. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:160. [PMID: 37880650 PMCID: PMC10601190 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01289-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous deep sedation (CDS) can be used for patients at the end of life who suffer intolerably from severe symptoms that cannot be relieved otherwise. In the Netherlands, the use of CDS is guided by an national guideline since 2005. The percentage of patients for whom CDS is used increased from 8% of all patients who died in 2005 to 18% in 2015. The aim of this study is to explore potential causes of the rise in the use of CDS in the Netherlands according to health care providers who have been participating in this practice. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted and thematically analysed. Participants were Dutch health care providers (HCPs), working at patients' homes, hospices, elderly care facilities and in hospitals and experienced in providing CDS, who were recruited via purposeful sampling. RESULTS 41 Health care providers participated in an interview. For these HCPs the reason to start CDS is often a combination of symptoms resulting in a refractory state. HCPs indicated that symptoms of non-physical origin are increasingly important in the decision to start CDS. Most HCPs felt that suffering at the end of life is less tolerated by patients, their relatives, and sometimes by HCPs; they report more requests to relieve suffering by using CDS. Some HCPs in our study have experienced increasing pressure to perform CDS. Some HCPs stated that they more often used intermittent sedation, sometimes resulting in CDS. CONCLUSIONS This study provides insight into how participating HCPs perceive that their practice of CDS changed over time. The combination of a broader interpretation of refractory suffering by HCPs and a decreased tolerance of suffering at the end of life by patients, their relatives and HCPs, may have led to a lower threshold to start CDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Research Ethics Committee of University Medical Center Utrecht assessed that the study was exempt from ethical review according to Dutch law (Protocol number 19-435/C).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelon T Heijltjes
- Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
| | - Ghislaine Jmw van Thiel
- Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Judith Ac Rietjens
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes van der Heide
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geeske Hendriksen
- Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Jm van Delden
- Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morita T, Kawahara T, Stone P, Sykes N, Miccinesi G, Klein C, Stiel S, Hui D, Deliens L, Heijltjes MT, Mori M, Heckel M, Robijn L, Krishna L, Rietjens J. Intercountry and intracountry variations in opinions of palliative care specialist physicians in Germany, Italy, Japan and UK about continuous use of sedatives: an international cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060489. [PMID: 35459681 PMCID: PMC9036469 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore intercountry and intracountry differences in physician opinions about continuous use of sedatives (CUS), and factors associated with their approval of CUS. SETTINGS Secondary analysis of a questionnaire study. PARTICIPANTS Palliative care physicians in Germany (N=273), Italy (N=198), Japan (N=334) and the UK (N=111). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Physician approval for CUS in four situations, intention and treatment goal, how to use sedatives and beliefs about CUS. RESULTS There were no significant intercountry or intracountry differences in the degree of agreement with statements that (1) CUS is not necessary as suffering can always be relieved with other measures (mostly disagree); (2) intention of CUS is to alleviate suffering and (3) shortening the dying process is not intended. However, there were significant intercountry differences in agreement with statements that (1) CUS is acceptable for patients with longer survival or psychoexistential suffering; (2) decrease in consciousness is intended and (3) choice of neuroleptics or opioids. Acceptability of CUS for patients with longer survival or psychoexistential suffering and whether decrease in consciousness is intended also showed wide intracountry differences. Also, the proportion of physicians who agreed versus disagreed with the statement that CUS may not alleviate suffering adequately even in unresponsive patients, was approximately equal. Regression analyses revealed that both physician-related and country-related factors were independently associated with physicians' approval of CUS. CONCLUSION Variations in use of sedatives is due to both physician- and country-related factors, but palliative care physicians consistently agree on the value of sedatives to aid symptom control. Future research should focus on (1) whether sedatives should be used in patients with longer survival or with primarily psychoexistential suffering, (2) understanding physicians' intentions and treatment goals, (3) efficacy of different drugs and (4) understanding the actual experiences of patients receiving CUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Morita
- Palliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takuya Kawahara
- Clinical Research Promotion Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Patrick Stone
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nigel Sykes
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Guido Miccinesi
- Department of Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute-ISPRO, Firenze, Italy
| | - Carsten Klein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stiel
- Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Hui
- Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Luc Deliens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Madelon T Heijltjes
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Masanori Mori
- Palliative and Supportive care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Maria Heckel
- Department of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lenzo Robijn
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lalit Krishna
- The Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Center Singapore, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore
| | - Judith Rietjens
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vieille M, Dany L, Coz PL, Avon S, Keraval C, Salas S, Bernard C. Perception, Beliefs, and Attitudes Regarding Sedation Practices among Palliative Care Nurses and Physicians: A Qualitative Study. Palliat Med Rep 2021; 2:160-167. [PMID: 34223516 PMCID: PMC8241398 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Palliative care teams face complex medical situations on a daily basis. These situations require joint reflection and decision making to propose appropriate patient care. Sometimes, sedation is one of the options to be considered. In addition to medical and technical criteria justifying the use of sedation, multiple psychosocial criteria impact the decision making of palliative care teams and guide, give sense to, and legitimize professional practices. Objective: The main goal of this study was to explore perceptions, experiences, and beliefs of palliative care teams about sedation practices in a legislative context (Claeys–Leonetti law, 2016; France), which authorizes continuous deep sedation (CDS) until death. Methods: This is a qualitative study using 28 semistructured interviews with physicians and nurses working in a palliative care team in France (PACA region). All verbal productions produced during interviews were fully transcribed and the contents analyzed. Findings: Content analysis revealed four themes: (1) sedation as a “good death,” (2) emotional experiences of sedations, (3) the practice of CDS, and (4) the ambiguous relationship with the Claeys–Leonetti law. Conclusions: This qualitative study provides evidence of a form of “naturalization” of the practice of sedation. However, the Claeys–Leonetti law exacerbates differences of opinion between palliative caregivers on sedation and questions the interest of this law for society and palliative care practices. clinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04016038.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lionel Dany
- Aix-Marseille Université, LPS, Aix-en-Provence, France.,APHM, Timone, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Marseille, France
| | - Pierre Le Coz
- Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, EFS, ADES, Marseille, France
| | - Sophie Avon
- Aix-Marseille Université, LPS, Aix-en-Provence, France
| | | | - Sébastien Salas
- APHM, Timone, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Université, CRO2, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Veldwijk-Rouwenhorst AE, Smalbrugge M, Zuidema SU, Hanssen SAJ, Koopmans RTCM, Gerritsen DL. Continuous Palliative Sedation in Nursing Home Residents With Dementia and Refractory Neuropsychiatric Symptoms. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 22:305-311.e4. [PMID: 33275905 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Extreme neuropsychiatric symptoms can be a heavy burden for nursing home (NH) residents, relatives, and caregivers. Sometimes, when extreme neuropsychiatric symptoms are considered refractory, continuous palliative sedation is administered. The aim of this study was to explore the trajectory leading to continuous palliative sedation and its administration in NH residents with dementia and refractory neuropsychiatric symptoms. DESIGN A qualitative interview and explorative study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Relatives, elderly care physicians, and other staff members involved with 3 NH residents with dementia and extreme refractory neuropsychiatric symptoms who received continuous palliative sedation were interviewed. These NH residents lived on dementia special care units of 3 NHs in the Netherlands. METHODS Consecutive sampling was used to select participants. Medical files were studied. Semistructured interviews were conducted. Transcriptions were analyzed with thematic analysis, including directed content analysis. RESULTS Nine in-depth interviews with 13 participants were held. Analysis resulted in 6 main themes, with several subthemes reflecting phases of the continuous palliative sedation trajectory: (1) run-up, describing an unbearable struggle of the resident; (2) turning point, at which hope was lost; (3) considering continuous palliative sedation and administration of intermittent sedation; (4) decision to start continuous palliative sedation based on 1 decisive trigger; (5) administration of continuous palliative sedation with stakeholders experiencing relief; and (6) evaluation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The trajectory leading up to continuous palliative sedation in NH residents with dementia and extreme refractory neuropsychiatric symptoms was complex and burdensome, but the initiation led to relief and contentment for all those involved. This study highlights that continuous palliative sedation can be a valuable treatment option among these residents. A recommendation is to include external consultation in the decision process and to administer intermittent sedation as a preceding step when continuous palliative sedation is considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies E Veldwijk-Rouwenhorst
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Martin Smalbrugge
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sytse U Zuidema
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Suzan A J Hanssen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Raymond T C M Koopmans
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; De Waalboog "Joachim en Anna," Center for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Debby L Gerritsen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rietjens JA, Heijltjes MT, van Delden JJ, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Heide A. The Rising Frequency of Continuous Deep Sedation in the Netherlands, a Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey in 2005, 2010, and 2015. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2019; 20:1367-1372. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
6
|
Rodrigues P, Menten J, Gastmans C. Physicians' perceptions of palliative sedation for existential suffering: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019; 10:136-144. [PMID: 31481477 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative sedation for existential suffering (PS-ES) is a controversial clinical intervention. Empirical studies about physicians' perceptions do not converge in a clear position and current clinical practice guidelines do not agree either regarding this kind of intervention. AIM To gain deeper insight into physicians' perceptions of PS-ES, the factors influencing it, the conditions for implementing it and the alternatives to it. DESIGN Systematic review of qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies following the Peer Review Electronic Search Strategies and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses protocols; quality appraisal and thematic synthesis methodology. DATA SOURCES Seven electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES) were exhaustively searched from inception through March 2019. Two reviewers screened paper titles, abstracts and full texts. We included only peer-reviewed journal articles published in English, French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Italian or Portuguese that focused on physicians' perceptions of PS-ES. RESULTS The search yielded 17 publications published between 2002 and 2017. Physicians do not hold clear views or agree if and when PS-ES is appropriate. Case-related and individual-related factors that influenced physicians' perceptions were identified. There is still no consensus regarding criteria to distinguish between necessary and sufficient conditions for invoking PS-ES. Some alternatives to PS-ES were identified. CONCLUSIONS To date, there is still no consensus on physicians' perceptions of PS-ES. Further research is necessary to understand factors that influence physicians' perceptions and philosophical-ethical presuppositions underlying this perceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Rodrigues
- ETHICS 7446 - Centre d'éthique médicale, Université Catholique de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Johan Menten
- Interfaculty Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Gastmans
- Interfaculty Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thurn T, Borasio GD, Chiò A, Galvin M, McDermott CJ, Mora G, Sermeus W, Winkler AS, Anneser J. Physicians' attitudes toward end-of-life decisions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2019; 20:74-81. [PMID: 30789031 DOI: 10.1080/21678421.2018.1536154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims (1) to assess physicians' attitudes toward different palliative end-of-life (EOL) practices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) care, including forgoing artificial nutrition and hydration (FANH), continuous sedation until death (CSD), and withdrawing invasive ventilation (WIV), and toward physician-assisted dying (PAD) including physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia and (2) to explore variables influencing these attitudes. METHODS We used two clinical vignettes depicting ALS patients in different stages of their disease progression to assess the influence of suffering (physical/psycho-existential) on attitudes toward WIV and the influence of suffering and prognosis (short-term/long-term) on attitudes toward FANH, CSD, and PAD. RESULTS 50 physicians from European ALS centers and neurological departments completed our survey. Short-term prognosis had a positive impact on attitudes toward offering FANH (p = 0.014) and CSD (p = 0.048) as well as on attitudes toward performing CSD (p = 0.036) and euthanasia (p = 0.023). Predominantly psycho-existential suffering was associated with a more favorable attitude toward WIV but influenced attitudes toward performing CSD negatively. Regression analysis showed that religiosity was associated with more reluctant attitudes toward palliative EOL practices and PAD, whereas training in palliative care was associated with more favorable attitudes toward palliative EOL practices only. CONCLUSION ALS physicians seem to acknowledge psycho-existential suffering as a highly acceptable motive for WIV but not CSD. Physicians appear to be comfortable with responding to the patient's requests, but more reluctant to assume a proactive role in the decision-making process. Palliative care training may support ALS physicians in these challenging situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Thurn
- a Palliative Care Team, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar , Technical University Munich , Munich , Germany
| | - Gian Domenico Borasio
- b Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) , University of Lausanne , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Adriano Chiò
- c Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini" , University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| | - Miriam Galvin
- d Academic Unit of Neurology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute , Trinity College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland
| | - Christopher J McDermott
- e Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience , University of Sheffield , Sheffield , United Kingdom
| | | | - Walter Sermeus
- g Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy , KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Andrea S Winkler
- h Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar , Technical University Munich , Munich , Germany.,i Centre for Global Health, Institute of Health and Society , University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway
| | - Johanna Anneser
- a Palliative Care Team, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar , Technical University Munich , Munich , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rietkerk W, Smit MF, Wynia K, Slaets JPJ, Zuidema SU, Gerritsen DL. Explaining experiences of community-dwelling older adults with a pro-active comprehensive geriatric assessment program - a thorough evaluation by interviews. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:12. [PMID: 30642257 PMCID: PMC6332689 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-1025-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pro-active assessment programs are increasingly used to improve care for older adults. These programs include comprehensive geriatric tailored to individual patient preferences. Evidence for the effects of these programs on patient outcomes is nevertheless scarce or ambiguous. Explaining these dissatisfying results is difficult due to the multi-component nature of the programs. The objective of the current study was to explore and explain the experience of older adults participating in a pro-active assessment program, to help to clarify the effects. METHODS Semi-structured in-depth interviews were held with 25 participants of a pro-active assessment program for frail community-dwelling adults aged 65+. This study was part of an evaluation study on the effects of the program. Transcripts were analysed with thematic analysis and cross-case analysis. RESULTS The participants' mean age was 78.5 (SD 6.9) and 56% was female. The majority of the participants were satisfied with the program but based this on communication aspects, since only a few of them expressed real program benefits. Participant experiences could be clustered in six themes: (1) All participants expressed the need for a holistic view which was covered in the program, (2) the scope of the CGA was broader than expected or unclear, (3) the program delivered unexpected but valued help, (4) participants described a very low sense of ownership, (5) timing of the program implementation or the CGA was difficult and(6), participants and care workers had a different view on what to consider as a problem. These experiences could be explained by three program components: the degree of (the lack of) integration of the program within usual care, the pro-active screening method and the broader than expected, but appreciated multi-domain approach. CONCLUSION Older adults' need for a holistic view is covered by this outpatient assessment program. However, their engagement and the correct timing of the program are hampered by the pro-active recruitment and the limited integration of the program within existing care. Furthermore, satisfaction seems an insufficient guiding factor when evaluating CGA programs for older adults because it does not reflect the impact of the program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanda Rietkerk
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Merel F. Smit
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Klaske Wynia
- Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joris P. J. Slaets
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sytse U. Zuidema
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Debby L. Gerritsen
- Department of Primary and Community Care and Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bozzaro C, Schildmann J. "Suffering" in Palliative Sedation: Conceptual Analysis and Implications for Decision Making in Clinical Practice. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 56:288-294. [PMID: 29689298 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Palliative sedation is an increasingly used and, simultaneously, challenging practice at the end of life. Many controversies associated with this therapy are rooted in implicit differences regarding the understanding of "suffering" as a prerequisite for palliative sedation. The aim of this study is to inform the current debates by a conceptual analysis of two different philosophical accounts of suffering-1) the subjective and holistic concept and 2) the objective and gradual concept-and by a clinical-ethical analysis of the implications of each account for decisions about palliative sedation. We will show that although the subjective and holistic account of suffering fits well with the holistic approach of palliative care, there are considerable challenges to justify limits to requests for palliative sedation. By contrast, the objective and gradual account fits well with the need for an objective basis for clinical decisions in the context of palliative sedation but runs the risk of falling short when considering the individual and subjective experience of suffering at the end of life. We will conclude with a plea for the necessity of further combined conceptual and empirical research to develop a sound and feasible understanding of suffering, which can contribute to consistent decision making about palliative sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Bozzaro
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lokker ME, Swart SJ, Rietjens JAC, van Zuylen L, Perez RSGM, van der Heide A. Palliative sedation and moral distress: A qualitative study of nurses. Appl Nurs Res 2018; 40:157-161. [PMID: 29579492 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical nursing practice may involve moral distress, which has been reported to occur frequently when nurses care for dying patients. Palliative sedation is a practice that is used to alleviate unbearable and refractory suffering in the last phase of life and has been linked to distress in nurses. AIM The aim of this study was to explore nurses' reports on the practice of palliative sedation focusing on their experiences with pressure, dilemmas and morally distressing situations. METHODS In-depth interviews with 36 nurses working in hospital, nursing home or primary care. RESULTS Several nurses described situations in which they felt that administration of palliative sedation was in the patient's best interest, but where they were constrained from taking action. Nurses also reported on situations where they experienced pressure to be actively involved in the provision of palliative sedation, while they felt this was not in the patient's best interest. The latter situation related to (1) starting palliative sedation when the nurse felt not all options to relieve suffering had been explored yet; (2) family requesting an increase of the sedation level where the nurse felt that this may involve unjustified hastening of death; (3) a decision by the physician to start palliative sedation where the patient had previously expressed an explicit wish for euthanasia. CONCLUSIONS Nurses experienced moral distress in situations where they were not able to act in what they believed is the patient's best interest. Situations involving moral distress require nurses to be well informed and able to adequately communicate with suffering patients, distressed family and physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Lokker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S J Swart
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J A C Rietjens
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L van Zuylen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R S G M Perez
- Department of Anesthesiology, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A van der Heide
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mitchell GK, Senior HE, Johnson CE, Fallon-Ferguson J, Williams B, Monterosso L, Rhee JJ, McVey P, Grant MP, Aubin M, Nwachukwu HTG, Yates PM. Systematic review of general practice end-of-life symptom control. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2018; 8:411-420. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundEnd of life care (EoLC) is a fundamental role of general practice, which will become more important as the population ages. It is essential that general practice’s role and performance of at the end of life is understood in order to maximise the skills of the entire workforce.ObjectiveTo provide a comprehensive description of the role and performance of general practitioners (GPs) and general practice nurses (GPNs) in EoLC symptom control.MethodSystematic literature review of papers from 2000 to 2017 were sought from Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Joanna Briggs Institute and Cochrane databases.ResultsFrom 6209 journal articles, 46 papers reported GP performance in symptom management. There was no reference to the performance of GPNs in any paper identified. Most GPs expressed confidence in identifying EoLC symptoms. However, they reported lack of confidence in providing EoLC at the beginning of their careers, and improvements with time in practice. They perceived emotional support as being the most important aspect of EoLC that they provide, but there were barriers to its provision. GPs felt most comfortable treating pain, and least confident with dyspnoea and depression. Observed pain management was sometimes not optimal. More formal training, particularly in the use of opioids was considered important to improve management of both pain and dyspnoea.ConclusionsIt is essential that GPs receive regular education and training, and exposure to EoLC from an early stage in their careers to ensure skill and confidence. Research into the role of GPNs in symptom control needs to occur.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kirby J. Morally-Relevant Similarities and Differences Between Assisted Dying Practices in Paradigm and Non-Paradigm Circumstances: Could They Inform Regulatory Decisions? JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2017; 14:475-483. [PMID: 28983787 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9808-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2016] [Accepted: 03/12/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
There has been contentious debate over the years about whether there are morally relevant similarities and differences between the three practices of continuous deep sedation until death, physician-assisted suicide, and voluntary euthanasia. Surprisingly little academic attention has been paid to a comparison of the uses of these practices in the two types of circumstances in which they are typically performed. A comparative domains of ethics analysis methodological approach is used in the paper to compare 1) the use of the three practices in paradigm circumstances, and 2) the use of the practices in paradigm circumstances to their use in non-paradigm circumstances. The analytical outcomes suggest that a bright moral line cannot be demonstrated between any two of the practices in paradigm circumstances, and that there are significant, morally-relevant distinctions between their use in paradigm and non-paradigm circumstances. A thought experiment is employed to illustrate how these outcomes could possibly inform the decisions of hypothetical deliberators who are engaged in the collaborative development of assisted dying regulatory frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Kirby
- Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, C-320, 5849 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4H7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tursunov O, Cherny NI, Ganz FD. Experiences of Family Members of Dying Patients Receiving Palliative Sedation. Oncol Nurs Forum 2016; 43:E226-E232. [PMID: 27768142 DOI: 10.1188/16.onf.e226-e232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To describe the experience of family members of patients receiving palliative sedation at the initiation of treatment and after the patient has died and to compare these experiences over time.
. DESIGN Descriptive comparative study.
. SETTING Oncology ward at Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem, Israel.
. SAMPLE A convenience sample of 34 family members of dying patients receiving palliative sedation.
. METHODS A modified version of a questionnaire describing experiences of family members with palliative sedation was administered during palliative sedation and one to four months after the patient died. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the results of the questionnaire, and appropriate statistical analyses were conducted for comparisons over time.
. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES Experiences of family members and time.
. FINDINGS Most relatives were satisfied with the sedation and staff support. Palliative sedation was experienced as an ethical way to relieve suffering. However, one-third felt that it shortened the patient's life. An explanation of the treatment was given less than half of the time and was usually given on the same day treatment was started. This explanation was given by physicians and nurses. Many felt that they were not ready for changes in the patient's condition and wanted increased opportunities to discuss the treatment with oncology care providers. No statistically significant differences in experiences were found over time.
. CONCLUSIONS Relatives' experiences of palliative sedation were generally positive and stable over time. Important experiences included timing of the initiation of sedation, timing and quality of explanations, and communication.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Nurses should attempt to initiate discussions of the possible role of sedation in the event of refractory symptoms and follow through with continued discussions. The management of refractory symptoms at the end of life, the role of sedation, and communication skills associated with decision making related to palliative sedation should be a part of the core nursing curriculum. Nursing administrators in areas that use palliative sedation should enforce good nursing clinical practice as recommended by international practice guidelines, such as those of the European Association for Palliative Care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Freda DeKeyser Ganz
- Director of the clinical masters program, Henrietta Szold Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Kirby J. Managing Profound Suffering at the End-of-Life: Should expanding access to continuous deep sedation be the priority? BIOÉTHIQUEONLINE 2016. [DOI: 10.7202/1035489ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper argues that in addressing and managing profound suffering at the end-of-life, the priority should not be the legalization of physician-assisted suicide or voluntary active euthanasia in jurisdictions where these practices are not currently available. Rather, concerted efforts should be made by society and the healthcare provider community to expand patient access to proportionate distress-relieving sedation and continuous deep sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Kirby
- Professor, Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Robijn L, Chambaere K, Raus K, Rietjens J, Deliens L. Reasons for continuous sedation until death in cancer patients: a qualitative interview study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015; 26. [PMID: 26515814 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
End-of-life sedation, though increasingly prevalent and widespread, remains a highly debated medical practice in the context of palliative medicine. This qualitative study aims to look more specifically at how health care workers justify their use of continuous sedation until death and which factors they report as playing a part in the decision-making process. In-depth interviews were held with 28 physicians and 22 nurses of 27 cancer patients in Belgium who had received continuous sedation until death in hospitals, palliative care units or at home. Our findings indicate that medical decision-making for continuous sedation is not only based on clinical indications but also related to morally complex issues such as the social context and the personal characteristics and preferences of individual patient and their relatives. The complex role of non-clinical factors in palliative sedation decision-making needs to be further studied to assess which medically or ethically relevant arguments are underlying daily clinical practice. Finally, our findings suggest that in some cases continuous sedation was resorted to as an alternative option at the end of life when euthanasia, a legally regulated option in Belgium, was no longer practically possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Robijn
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Chambaere
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Raus
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - J Rietjens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - L Deliens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bozzaro C. Der Leidensbegriff im medizinischen Kontext: Ein Problemaufriss am Beispiel der tiefen palliativen Sedierung am Lebensende. Ethik Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s00481-015-0339-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
18
|
Palliative Sedation in Nursing Homes: A Good Death? J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014; 15:541-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|