An Order Protocol for Respiratory Distress/Acute Pain Crisis in Pediatric Palliative Care Patients: Medical and Nursing Staff Perceptions

Impact of a Nurse-Driven Opioid Titration Protocol on Quality of Orders at End of Life

At our community teaching hospital, orders for end of life often lacked instructions to titrate opioids based on evidence-based principles and failed to address nonpain symptoms. An order set and a nursing-driven opioid titration protocol were implemented in August 2016 after extensive education. The purpose of this retrospective preintervention and postintervention study was to evaluate the impact of this intervention on the quality of end-of-life orders. We evaluated 69 patients with terminal illness receiving morphine infusions. After implementation, more morphine infusion orders included an as-needed bolus dose with an objective indication and appropriate instructions on when and how to titrate the infusion compared with before the intervention (94.6% vs 18.8%, P < .0001). Morphine infusion orders were also significantly more likely to include a maximum dose (P = .041) and an initial bolus dose (P < .0001). In addition, prescribers were more likely to order additional medications to manage nausea/vomiting, constipation, anxiety, or pain using a nonopioid (P < .05 for all). In this study, implementation of a standardized opioid titration protocol and symptom management order set led to an improvement in the quality of morphine infusion orders for pain management at the end of life and increased the use of medications to manage nonpain symptoms in dying patients.

Pre-emptive prescription of medications for the management of potential, catastrophic events in patients with a terminal illness: A survey of palliative medicine doctors

Background:

Distressing and potentially life-threatening events, such as significant external bleeding, may occur in patients with a known terminal condition. These events are often referred to as catastrophic or crisis events. Pharmacological management varies and there is little evidence to guide practice.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to explore Australasian palliative medicine doctors’ approaches to pre-emptive prescription of medications to manage catastrophic events.

Design:

Anonymous survey data were collected electronically.

Setting/Participants:

Australian and New Zealand palliative medicine fellows and trainees were surveyed.

Results:

Surveys were completed by 121 doctors; 108 (89.2%) who care for adult patients only and 13 (10.8%) who care for paediatric patients or paediatric and adult patients. In all, 74 (61.2%) respondents pre-emptively prescribed medications at least five times per year, and most orders were never administered. Significant visible bleeding and severe, acute airway obstruction were almost universally considered catastrophic events. Many respondents expressed concern about the lack of evidence to guide pre-emptive medication prescription in this setting. Clinicians reported adverse events related to pre-emptive medication orders being available ( n = 30, 24.8%), as well as orders not being available ( n = 61, 50.4%).

Conclusion:

Our study supports the need for guidelines, as well as formal education programmes for medical trainees and nursing staff about this important area of practice.

Clinical Use of an Order Protocol for Distress in Pediatric Palliative Care

Several children receiving palliative care experience dyspnea and pain. An order protocol for distress (OPD) is available at Sainte-Justine Hospital, aimed at alleviating respiratory distress, pain and anxiety in pediatric palliative care patients. This study evaluates the clinical use of the OPD at Sainte-Justine Hospital, through a retrospective chart review of all patients for whom the OPD was prescribed between September 2009 and September 2012. Effectiveness of the OPD was assessed using chart documentation of the patient’s symptoms, or the modified Borg scale. Safety of the OPD was evaluated by measuring the time between administration of the first medication and the patient’s death, and clinical evolution of the patient as recorded in the chart. One hundred and four (104) patients were included in the study. The OPD was administered at least once to 78 (75%) patients. A total of 350 episodes of administration occurred, mainly for respiratory distress (89%). Relief was provided in 90% of cases. The interval between administration of the first protocol and death was 17 h; the interval was longer in children with cancer compared to other illnesses (p = 0.02). Data from this study support the effectiveness and safety of using an OPD for children receiving palliative care.

Research Roundup

Synopses of a selection of recently published research articles of relevance to palliative care.